Packers’ Future is Riddled With Question Marks and Holes

The bright future we want is still a long way off without major moves


 

Wouldn't it be funny if the Packers decided to mess with the Bears by tanking against Carolina on Sunday?

It would at least be a bit of a smile after the putrid mess the Packers have shown themselves to be the past couple of weeks, and for too many games this season. Not to mention Matt LaFleur’s stubbornness about keeping Joe Barry. A slightly better draft position never hurts, either, so let’s do this!

I’m only half joking. Heading into next season there are two ways to look this team:

The first is what we all hope for. … Jordan Love is the guy, he just needs some footwork adjustments and more experience to be consistent. The promising talent on the receiving corps is real and fulfills its potential. David Bakhtiari has one more good year left, and Aaron Jones a couple. Rashan Gary and Lukas Van Ness become a monster rushing duo for years to come. Surprising youngsters like Isaiah McDuffie blossom. Joe Barry finds employment far, far away and, free of Rodgers’ dead money, the front office makes some smart free-agent signings to plug holes. 

But it’s simply too easy to assume the best, much as that feels good. This team has a lot of question marks and major holes heading into next season. They need to be addressed by management, because even in the best case, this team is currently not built to compete with the league's top five teams. Let’s start with the defense, beyond the obvious need to jettison Barry, because if that doesn’t happen nothing else will matter. (Here’s hoping the Jets fire Robert Saleh and he joins his best friend, MLF, as assistant head coach/DC.)

— De’Vondre Campbell looks cooked. He says he’s been playing hurt, and there is no reason to doubt that, but even when healthy he’s an average linebacker at this stage, with limited coverage ability. Meanwhile, top draft choice Quay Walker is up and down, turning in too many performances that don’t justify his draft spot. It’s still early for a definitive evaluation of players from the 2022 draft class, but right now the arrow is pointing sideways on Walker.

This means that the linebacker position is shaky at best, with 220th overall pick McDuffie from the same class as the brightest light. It’s a classic opportunity for a solid free-agent signing to get some help. Patrick Queen, anyone?

— Kenny Clark is still a top tier interior lineman, but his PFF grades have steadily declined. Clark is only 28, but he came into the league at 20, so the tread could be wearing thin. Devonte Wyatt, chosen a few first-round slots after Walker, is slowly improving and will likely always be a good rotational player, but nothing so far indicates he’s a significant difference-maker in Clark’s mold. TJ Slaton looks to be the better player. 

With 31-year-old Preston Smith a candidate for release to save some cap over time, the D-line needs shoring up even with edge looking like a lasting strength with Gary and Van Ness. 

— I remain a Jaire fan and believer, but it is increasingly hard to be sold on Eric Stokes, who even when healthy is proving to be yet another corner with middling tackling skills and average coverage instincts. If your best trait is your recovery speed you’ll occasionally flash a highlight-worthy play, but for the most part it means you are putting your team in a lot of bad situations to begin with. The cupboard is empty of experienced cornerbacks after that; Carrington Valentine is too green to know what to expect long term. Some quality depth is sorely needed.

— Finally, it seems time to give up on Darnell Savage. He can’t stay healthy, and regressed after a solid first couple of years. Safety has been a known issue for some time, with Savage and a bunch of b-players. I still cannot believe the Packers passed on Brian Branch,  and worse trading with the Lions to let them have him. The Giants’ Xavier McKinney, a tackling machine and an upcoming free agent, would look good in Packers colors. 

The picture is a little better on offense. Not all the young receivers will make it, but Wicks, Reed, Doubs and Kraft look like solid additions with significant upside. Watson is a question mark, given his propensity for injury. Luke Musgrave got a lot of attention before his injury, and his size/speed combination is impressive *if* he can stay on the field. Injuries were an issue in college, and his tall, spindly lower frame is ill-suited to staying healthy in the NFL.

The offensive line is in serious need of more talent. The Josh Myers pick was disastrous coming right before Creed Humphrey, now regarded as among the best centers in the game. Runyan is so-so, and left tackle is a big question mark. It’s hard to see Rasheed Walker as the long-term answer. Jenkins and Tom are solid anchors, but drafting a first round left tackle seems likely and logical.

As for quarterback, Love has some good stats, impressive throws and an ability to read defenses and command the offense. But his mechanics are inconsistent, which leads to accuracy issues. Some quarterbacks figure it out, others don’t and become career backups. There is deservedly more optimism about Love than pessimism, which I share. But he needs to show consistent progress over the last three games on the schedule.

Finally, this is a team in need of a coaching overhaul. LaFleur has earned the right to continue, but not if he holds tight to weak assistants. He needs to make some moves, on defense and special teams in particular.  Bring in some dynamic, creative pros even if they aren’t your buddies. And have them be coaches who understand the necessity for in-game adjustments. 

The outcome of the Panthers game is meaningless. Let’s see the Packers rise above and dominate weaker competition, or be rightfully lumped in with bad teams. And if they do revert to the team we saw against Detroit and Kansas City, let’s see them do it again against Minnesota and Chicago to end the year on a high note. GPG and happy holidays to all. 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________
Jonathan Krim grew up in New York but got hooked on the Packers — and on hating the Cowboys — watching the Ice Bowl as a young child.  He blames bouts of unhappiness in his late teens on Dan Devine. A journalist for several decades who now lives in California, he enjoys trafficking in obscure cultural references, lame dad jokes and occasionally preposterous takes. Jonathan is a Packers shareholder, and insists on kraut with his brats. You can follow Jonathan on twitter at @Jkrim.

__________________________

12 points
 

Comments (79)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

December 22, 2023 at 06:14 am

Every team has holes. That’s the nature of the NFL. My concerns about the subjects of some of your takes is that I really don’t have enough faith in the coaching and use of players on D and the OL to know wether regression or non development is primarily due to ability.

Too much regression, too many players seemingly used against strengths or in ways that seem to not put them individually or as a group in a position to succeed. Until we clear out the coaching I don’t see this getting clearer or better.

12 points
15
3
Guam's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:38 am

Perfect summary of my feelings ColdWorld. Too many talented young players have either regressed or not developed during the three years Barry has helmed the defense. The musical chairs on the O-line has also hindered talent development there. I lack confidence that anything will change if the coaching staff doesn't.

4 points
7
3
LambeauPlain's picture

December 22, 2023 at 08:53 am

Spot on, CW. As I was reading the article the same thoughts ran through my head...good players can become great with accomplished coaches who are adept teachers and effective communicators. Coaches who recognize individual strengths to coach up into overall positional power...then 11 men working together creating team synergies opponents cannot defeat.

Conversely good players can regress under undisciplined, uninspired, incompetent or indecisive coaching. I see this on the Defense, on STs, and on the OL.

On Offense it seems Vrable, Clements and Dunn have developed their rooms at WR, QB and TE respectively. On Defense Rebrovich is making gains with the pass rushers, the D strength. That's about it. STs under Rich have regressed this year. Penalties = lack of discipline. That's coaching. And the kicking game is "meh".

Better coaching would greatly improve the Packers. There is talent on this team and too much is being unused or misused.

It starts with the HC, and after 5 years, what is the Packer's identity? What is their brand? What does the overall TEAM do well? I don't know...and that tells me MLF does not have a clear strategic vision. He seems to float with the currents and is more of a responder, not an initiator of events as great leaders are.

2 points
4
2
Packers2020's picture

December 22, 2023 at 01:31 pm

I agree with what all of you are saying but we do need improvement in these areas:

C, LT, RG, Safety, CB, ILB, DT, and back-up QB.

The article is not wrong at all. We do not have enough talent or depth in these areas to be a contender. Having said that, the right coaching always gets the most out of your players as well as put your players in the right positions to succeed. Which I do not believe is happening either.

Alot of work to do at 1065 Lombardi Ave.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 23, 2023 at 09:56 pm

I agree with that, except #8 is a GREAT backup QB for this team, and Mr Magoo is fine for #3.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:08 am

It may be that some of these high draft picks are just inadequate as professional football players.

3 points
5
2
Since'75's picture

December 22, 2023 at 12:15 pm

Ohh noooo!!

Cuz umm der ummm Gutsey don't errr ummm duh draft no ummm duds der hey!!

Carry The G!!!!!!
*************
Just being a bit facetious Jannesbjornson, i agree with you 😉

-1 points
1
2
PackerBackerAZ's picture

December 22, 2023 at 02:32 pm

You are right about the defensive draft picks. While Gutekunst has done a very good job on offensive picks, he is sorely lacking in ability to pick defensive players. Even Gary doesn't seem to have the aggressive tenacity to be a great edge rusher, and that's far and away his best defensive pick. The safeties, corner backs, linebackers and defensive linemen don't seem to be very good, much less great, NFL players. I'd like to see him delegate defensive picks to somebody that can hit more than miss.

0 points
1
1
SinceLombardi's picture

December 22, 2023 at 06:32 am

I can’t end the season on a positive note. The season ended against the NYG, with four games left. Obviously not mathematically, but for all intents and purposes. It’s the earliest we have had a season end since McCarthy’s final season.
MLF, his players and staff reiterated their commitment to ending the season the following week.
And if you cling to the mathematical aspect of the season not being over….MLF made sure that didn’t matter when he decided his friend Joe Barry mattered more than the Packers final season standing.
Although you would also be right if you said LeFleur made that decision in July.

10 points
11
1
Razer's picture

December 22, 2023 at 06:40 am

When you list the holes like this, the Packers have a big hill to climb. And, a redo on our RBs is probably needed. So while coaching remains the hot topic, talent gaps are perhaps the biggest concern for growth. I am not a fan of Gutekunst's draft style but I do like our pro scouting department. We are not strong in either trench and that will set the ceiling for this team going forward.

11 points
11
0
Rossonero's picture

December 22, 2023 at 06:51 am

Holes are one thing, coaching is another. Look at Minnesota's defense.

Lots of holes and was porous last year. So what do they do? Hire Brian Flores (who I wanted) - and Flores is doing a lot more with a lot less talent. So the point is, coaching matters. Leadership matters. Some of these guys like Stokes, Walker, etc. absolutely need a new defensive coordinator. LaFleur missed a chance to fire Barry.

The saying in coaching circles goes, “that which will be done eventually, must be done immediately.”

It will be interesting to see how well Bryce Young does against this broken scheme.

9 points
11
2
NickPerry's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:47 am

"It will be interesting to see how well Bryce Harper does against this broken scheme."

Can you say Baker Mayfield?

4 points
5
1
HawkPacker's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:01 am

Another point is: by retaining Barry for the current year, we lose another year. And what is bothersome to me is the players we have now on defense. We all have our opinions on each individual talent but could we be wrong about that? If we did have Flores, is it possible that Darnell Savage reverts to his talent the first year he was a packer? And who else is in that same boat with Barry's coaching and our possible tainted opinions on each one's talent.

So let's say we dump some of these players and find out, after they were picked up by some other team, just how good they really were when they played for us.

That to me is very bothersome. Do we have enough faith in these coaches to make the proper analysis on each of these players? I am not sure at this point.

5 points
5
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

December 22, 2023 at 03:07 pm

It seems that the players aren't able to consistently operate correctly in the Joe Barry scheme(s). That's a reflection on the quality of the players. It also points to the fact that Joe Barry hasn't changed enough of the scheme(s) to allow these players to run it right. I believe that the coaching staff has done as much tinkering as they can and still have a viable NFL scheme. Maybe the players don't have the mental capacity to grasp an NFL scheme good enough to operate on game day. Maybe they don't spend enough time studying film and seeking the counsel of their position coaches on their own. Since I'm not privy to game planning and practice, I take what players and coaches are quoted as saying to be true. The players believe that not all eleven players are on the same page when the defensive breakdowns occur. That the defense would be fine if everyone did their job within the scheme. MLF says there are too many instances of players not being where they're supposed to be when the defense gets gashed. Those statements tell me that the defense is being coached in a manner that can have success if run correctly by all eleven players. That's all anyone should expect from a defensive coordinator.

0 points
1
1
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:45 am

Carolina is actually well-aligned to attack the Packers as Tampa did...Thielen is old, but he works well underneath and on crossers, and can still have a big game given the opportunity. Mingo is a big, physical WR who can block and has been effective when used. Hubbard and Sanders are capable runners. Young really is the iffy part. Thielen struggles against man coverage, though. Play man and attack with the front 7. Force Young to make hot reads.

3 points
3
0
NickPerry's picture

December 22, 2023 at 06:57 am

"Wouldn't it be funny if the Packers decided to mess with the Bears by tanking against Carolina on Sunday?"

Wouldn't it be funny if the Packers lost to Carolina Sunday, Bryce Young looked like Joe Montana, and Chubba Hubbard and company ran for 200 yards?

Funny? Ummm, Hell no.
Possible? Absolutely!
Surprising? Not in the least.

IF Carolina beats the Packers Sunday and Barry's defense PLAYS like it has the last two weeks, can we please switch the attention to WHY Matt LaFleur SHOULD be fired instead of Joe Barry? Hell, I can make an argument now for it but some STILL think he deserves to be back.

10 points
12
2
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:20 am

I think we'll see a shift in snaps this week (or a couple healthy scratches) to reflect some internal adjustments. With the injury list as long as it is, it will be hard to tell what's due to health, what's due to performance, and what's due to "philosophical differences".

How this teams responds to this week's mess--with LaF essentially throwing his players under the bus and attaching himself to his coaches--will tell us a lot about the future of LaF in GB. If they come out flat (and continue to play that way over the last couple weeks), I think it would signal that LaF has lost his team and that a clean sweep of the coaching staff is necessary. Here's hoping they respond well and play well. Either way, Barry's lot is cast and he's a poison pill: there's no way LaF can retain him post 2023.

2 points
3
1
T7Steve's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:12 am

If they don't fix the "holes" in the trenches or can't figure out how to do it, the biggest "hole" is coaching.

Trying to tweak skill positions is a "hole too far and doesn't matter if the lines aren't fixed.

Please quit being bullied. Winning by cleverness and trickery is not sustainable in the NFL. Toughness, strength and depth are the only thing that is sustainable.

9 points
9
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:14 am

If Zach Tom is their best tackle, why not put him on the left side? Or if center is truly his best position, put him there. Either way, they need OL help. RB’s can come from anywhere.
I’ll not comment on the D at this juncture.

4 points
8
4
NickPerry's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:56 am

This is EXACTLY what I've been thinking TK...

As important as RT is the Packers have ALWAYS had strong, excellent Centers on the O-Line. Maybe Walker would be better at RT? That might be one move that could be made.

At the start of the season we all thought we had Yosh Nijman as a plug-in for Bakhtiari. I don't know if we'll EVER know what really happened but Buckus and Steno saw nto Nijman's demise in GB.

I like the idea of Tom moving to Center and we still don't know enough about Ryhan. But we KNOW about Runyan, Newman, and Meyers. We KNOW those 3 have NO BUSINESS
being a starte5r in the NFL. A fill-in from time to time, okay maybe Runyan. But Meyers and Newman have go to go.

Like most of the things in GB we're a bit in the dark on some of these players. I mean when your OC thinks Josh Meyers was playing some of the BEST football of his career earlier this season, how we possibly know how good these guys really are with THAT kind of coaching?

4 points
7
3
T7Steve's picture

December 22, 2023 at 08:14 am

Do you want to make a side bet Nick?

Which NFC North team will Nijman be starting for next season?

2 points
3
1
NickPerry's picture

December 22, 2023 at 11:11 am

The Bears!!! I have NO DOUBT!

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

December 22, 2023 at 05:41 pm

Maybe he goes to the jets

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:57 am

"I like the idea of Tom moving to Center and we still don't know enough about Ryhan"

I like the idea of adding a couple more capable NFL linemen to the mix and making the best alignment of those guys..

4 points
4
0
NickPerry's picture

December 22, 2023 at 11:12 am

That works too dobber. I'm with you. I think with the extra 2nd and 3rd the Packers NEED to draft at LEAST two O-Linemen in the first 3 rounds of this draft including a LT in Round 1.

But that's me....

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 23, 2023 at 10:05 pm

3.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 22, 2023 at 01:27 pm

Dobber, the problem with that is that I don’t think Butkus’s could pick the best permutation this year, so why will
He be able to next? If anything I’d bet that that’s the least likely outcome based on the last two years.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

December 23, 2023 at 09:55 am

You stock the cupboard.

If the coaches are so damn shitty, then they fall away and the next coaches inherit decent personnel.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 23, 2023 at 10:06 pm

Butkus has to go. He should be the first one out the door.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

December 22, 2023 at 11:35 am

"I’ll not comment on the D at this juncture."

Agreed. Wouldn't be prudent, not-gonna-do-it.

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 22, 2023 at 12:59 pm

Dana Carvey’s GHW Bush!!

3 points
3
0
Since'61's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:55 am

For me this discussion should wait until the season is over. Yes, we can claim that for all intents and purposes this season is already over but the NFL is a week to week league. Defeating the chiefs one week and losing to the Giants the next proves that point.

What we know about this Packers team is not likely to change significantly over the next three weeks but you never know. In any case the Packers have plenty of work to do in the off season as the transition from the post-Rodgers era continues.

I'm not confident that much will happen until the Packers fundamental philosophy as an organization changes. That will require bringing in solid NFL personnel and returning to a traditional let the GM run the entire football operation with the cap guru and HC reporting to the GM while the GM reports to the organization's President.

The Packers began to go off the track when Murphy went off to build Titletoen while TTs health was declining. Then in an over reaction to that situation Murphy reorganized the FO with the GM, Cap guru and HC all reporting to him as equals. That decision has hurt the team. The Packers need a President who allows the GM to run the entire football operation and who is 100% focused on the football operation rather than someone who is focused on several non-football operations in addition to the team. Hire professionals and let them do their jobs. Murphy's decisions to restructure the FO and then to hire MLF after one 2 hour meeting were bad decisions. His third strike was his "we're not idiots" decision to give Rodgers a huge salary cap eating contract rather than moving on from Rodgers after 2021.

Those 3 decisions plus a few others have brought the Packers to their current situation. I'm afraid that we have no choice but to wait until 2025 and Murphy's replacement before we will see significant changes in the Packers organization for the better. The current FO has no sense of urgency to change their approach until then. Thanks, Since '61

11 points
11
0
HawkPacker's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:07 am

I agree Since. Murphy has no reason to make any significant changes when he will be gone in a year.

I don't understand why the Board does not get involved and make the necessary changes.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:56 am

If things significantly degrade, I don't think Murphy will want his legacy to be a team swirling the drain and in disarray.

1 points
1
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:39 am

Plus the day he walks out is the day he no longer has significant control of the narrative. There's a huge contingent of Packer fans who will run with the 2 SB wins in 30 years of HOF QB play and Murphy is the closest and likeliest target since they at least made it to a 2nd SB with Favre.

1 points
1
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

December 22, 2023 at 03:31 pm

You're so right. They at least made it to a second super bowl with Favre. Because of Holmgren and the defense, not Favre. With his interception record and "BIG" game losses due to interception, I have never believed that Favre belongs in the HoF. My thoughts on Rodgers are that he might be worthy. His interception record, unlike Favre's, is a positive. Many of his losses were due to the defense giving up the winning score after he got Green Bay into the lead. I believe his super bowl win was the result of his play coupled with a good defense.

0 points
1
1
CheesedDeadHead's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:45 am

"I don't understand why the Board does not get involved and make the necessary changes."

Because they are on their 5th Doodle poll to schedule a EB holiday zoom and can't get a time when they are all available. Making a decision on fast tracking a Murphy replacement is like calculus to an algebra teacher.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

December 23, 2023 at 09:47 am

@hawkpacker
I can tell you why the BOD's don't get involved, it's because they can't.
Robert Harlan took that power away from the BOD's and gave it to the GM in 1991.

In turn, Mark Murphy took that power away from the GM, and gave it to himself in 2018.

IF....you are insinuating the BOD's remove Murphy, There is zero percent chance the BOD's would ever do that, i'll go one further, it most likely hasn't even entered their minds.

What i don't understand is why i have to keep explaining this to people since it happened.

I'd like to think as Packer fans, people would know this stuff.
It's really fairly basic.

-1 points
0
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 23, 2023 at 10:11 pm

Executive board.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

December 24, 2023 at 09:28 am

Yea, thanks Sic....🙄
It's called the Executive Committee
************
Not many know much about either the Board, or the Exec Comm., so i try not to confuse the issue.

Although i will say the 7 member Executive 'Committee' should NOT include the President of the Packers, as it can easily create a conflict of interest. I feel it should be independent of the President.

Then there is the 43 member BOD's who Murphy is also Chairman of.
This Board in my opinion is nothing much more than a status symbol in Green Bay.
Or...an exclusive private club.

But then again, i'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Thanks again for your help Sic.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:26 am

@Since '61 and the rest of you filthy animals.....

Well, i have to agree, it's a week to week league, i vaguely remember that being brought up occasionally.

I also agree about Murphy's handling (or non handling) of Thompson (while the team regressed) AND then the restructuring of power implemented by Murphy in 2018.
Interestingly enough, it was Murphy who told the media when asked, that the new GM would have full authority, then about a week later, Gutekunst was hired and outfitted with training wheels, which was a direct result of Murphy changing the Packer by-laws in 2018, which put full football operations under his power alone.

Almost exactly contrary to what Bob Harlan did in changing the by-laws to accommodate Ron Wolf when Wolf insisted on full authority over football operations in 1991.

So in 1991, how did putting football operation authority in the hands of the GM work out over the years for the Packers and Packer Nation after the 1970's and 80's?

Well, if memory serves me well, it resulted in 3 SB appearances with 2 victory's.

But apparently Mark Murphy thought better of that power structure, and changed it!!
Murphy will tell you that, he did it because he found 'silo's' in the building while doing the GM search in 2018.
Here is what he isn't telling you......
Mark Murphy was President of the Packers for 11 years before this 'discovery'.
Meaning ...he didn't know anything about it for the past 11 years?
Really?
I guess he was too busy with the slide, the ice rink, and the hot chocolate stand to pay attention what was happening with the people under him.

Here's the rub...Mark Murphy put himself in power of having full football operations.
But....he had absolutely no NFL football operational experience whatsoever, or even college for that matter.

As Packer fans i've always expressed how spoiled Packer fans were with having Favre and Rodgers for 3 decades.
I think it goes even further than that, into the top offices at 1265 Lombardi Ave.

I think because of the success over that time, the Packers have gotten arrogant, pompous and basically feel superior over the NFL.

For the record...i blasted Murphy each year after the Seattle NFCCG for not dealing with Thompson (removing him)
Until finally..the BOD's made him do it.
Murphy use to answer reporters saying....."Ted will let me know when he wants to retire"
Are you flipping kidding me?.....that isn't how your job works Mark Murphy!!!!

I also condemned the Packers taking so long to remove Capers way back when.
I'd get condemned for that.

It's funny how years and years later the masses then come around and agree with me.
******
As far as present day, i've been waiting for Murphy's removal, and i too hope they bring in football people, change the by-laws back.
I worry they promote from within and keep status quo.

I'd also like to see us going back to a real 4-3 defense, i'm sick and freeking tired of watching this 12 year rerun of a fake and ineffective 3-4 defense.

I could write about the Packers for days.
Sorry for the long novel 🤷‍♂️

2 points
3
1
CanPackFan's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:10 pm

Amen 61! You've nailed it from the top down!

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

December 23, 2023 at 09:41 am

That's 75!!

Honest mistake, i'll get over it 😉😲

0 points
0
0
Boneman's picture

December 22, 2023 at 08:11 am

I believe that this season has been of huge importance in the development of Jordan Love AND MLF. I think MLF has really grown and blossomed as an offensive coordinator, sans the training wheels of ARod as his QB 1, he really has been very good developing his young offensive talent and generally calls a pretty good game. He has failed as a head coach however. A HC is the CEO of the football team, in charge of offense, defense, ST, culture, attitude and direction. Coaches like Belichek, Harbaugh, Tomlin, Shannahan and Reid are tremendous CEO's and their teams all have a consistent and steady culture that easily survives coordinator changes. The Packers haven't had this type of coach since Holmgren and opted this time for the exact same formula they used with McCarthy and are getting the same results. Unless MLF can mature and grow into that executive role we all can just hope lightning can strike again like it did in 2010.

6 points
7
1
CheesedDeadHead's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:26 am

"I think MLF has really grown and blossomed as an offensive coordinator, sans the training wheels of ARod as his QB 1, he really has been very good developing his young offensive talent and generally calls a pretty good game."

I beg to differ. He doesn't gameplan for his opponents defense. He doesn't change his gameplan when the opponents do what a good OC knows they will do. He loves to come up with formations. He should be a QC for offense for some team where he can draw up plays and the OC can pick the ones that make sense for the defense he will see or throws them out as not helpful. Right now we have a formation guru with little appreciation of how those nifty plays fit into a gameplan to attack a specific opponent.

And as a Head Coach, I agree with most of your assessment, to me he's a dumpster fire HC.

5 points
6
1
Art's picture

December 22, 2023 at 08:20 am

Since MLF refuses to fire Barry and Barry refuses to change his play calling I suggest that if they insist on keeping Barrry on the payroll for the net 3 games then have someone else on the defensive staff actually call the schemes. They don't need coordinator experience Barry has almost 5 yrs DC expeeience, so experience is no guarantee of success for the next 3 games. Turn the players into an aggressive defense, what do we have to lose?
Insanity doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results but thats what Barry wants to do and has expressed that he won't change. Total arrogance and incompetence!

6 points
6
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:31 am

" Barry has almost 5 yrs DC expeeience, so experience is no guarantee of success for the next 3 games."

Barry is completing his 7th year as a DC (2 with lions, 2 with Redskins/WFT/Commanders, 3 with Packers).

4 points
4
0
Guam's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:00 am

I like many of the author's points, but thought he was a bit harsh on Jordan Love. Love has exceeded expectations this year and is evolving into a good starting quarterback. Yes, he has some mechanical issues, but even as talented a thrower of the football as Aaron Rodgers was working on his mechanics late into his career. I think Love deserved a bit more positive review for his development this season.

9 points
11
2
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:31 am

Based on this one-year sample, he's definitely growing into the role. Still, it can't be a one-year flash and I think that's the tonehere. Given the Packers will likely need to invest in him before the start of the 2024 season, keeping Love moving forward and avoiding regression has to be priority 1.

4 points
4
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:35 am

Yep, it's not even a qualitative issue. Look up his stats compared to AR or Favre.

What is a gray area is the team around them. Clearly JL doesn't have the same experience at WR/TE that AR had plus the OL for JL is a mess, while AR had a much better OL.

Add that together and there's no reason we can't hope for continued improvement/maturity from JL.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:26 am

"With 31-year-old Preston Smith a candidate for release to save some cap over time,"

The Packers can make out about as well cap-wise by getting Smith to take a pay cut and an adjustment on his 2024 roster bonus. He's not going to command very much on the open market, so it might be to his advantage to accept the pay cut. He's still playing well and has been a good citizen and locker-room leader. Enagbare, Cox, and Van Ness are still cost-controlled, young options. I could see them going either way.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:32 am

Washington wouldn't pay either of their Edge guys and settled for a #2 & #3 to make believe a guy from this draft can replace Montez Sweat. P. Smith on a pay cut offer makes sense.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:26 am

The Old Labrador woke me up at 3:00 AM, couldn't get back to sleep, so I ran the first draft simulation '24: PFN version. All top OTs off the board by #10. Rome Udunze gone at #8. Comp picks unknown. Trades likely.
#11 Cooper DeJean Safety/CB Iowa
#38 Quinyon Mitchell CB Toledo
#42 Jordan Morgan LT Arizona
#76 Edge Cooper ILB Texas A&M
# 82 Bucky Irving RB Oregon
#107 Delmar Glaze OT Maryland
#172 Dillon Johnson RB Washington
#203 Xavier Watts S Notre Dame

Let loose the Mockery...

1 points
2
1
LeotisHarris's picture

December 22, 2023 at 11:32 am

Too soon, buddy, but a thumbs up for your Lab and his efforts to keep you from a life of laziness.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 22, 2023 at 12:27 pm

Barry drove me to Mock....

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

December 22, 2023 at 02:40 pm

11. Dallas Turner. LB AL
38. Tyler Nubin S Minn
42. Kingsley Suamaala OT BYU
76. Cedric Gray. LB. NC
82. Johnny Wilson. WR FSU
107. Donte Corleone. DT Cinn.

-2 points
1
3
EnemyTerritory's picture

December 22, 2023 at 04:21 pm

No RB?

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:19 pm

Later - Unless it's Benson instead of Wilson.
I changed the LBs on purpose.
Because if they get a new DC-
The 4-3-4 puts Gary and Van Ess back on the DL.
Where I believe they can outplay anyone there.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 23, 2023 at 09:01 am

Where does Walker play?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 23, 2023 at 09:54 am

WLB in an even front.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 23, 2023 at 10:20 pm

What O linemen better than your #42 pick should be available at #12?

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

December 23, 2023 at 10:32 pm

All could make rd. 1. 1/2 are RTs. Morgan has past knee damage.
Mine is on the freak list. 42 maybe too low.
I say Paul will be a starter.
Alt from Notre Dame is the most ready.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:47 am

In the spirit of the holidays, may we all remember that you don't purchase a drill because you need a drill, you purchase a drill because you need holes.

A year from now this will all look very different.

9 points
10
1
dobber's picture

December 22, 2023 at 09:52 am

Well stated, LeotisHarris.

2 points
2
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:42 am

I thought you bought drill bits to make holes. Now I'm all confused.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 22, 2023 at 01:05 pm

I used to work for a guy who rated the drill bits as class A, B, or C. So, class A bits make class A…?

1 points
1
0
NFLfan's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:25 am

I have started to lose interest as the dysfunction continues. Multi-billion corporations should not be running in this fashion. And, waiting till 2025 is out of the question for me. If I see positive movement such as the selection of a good DC (@ least), I will remain invested but if LaF is retaining Barry, I won't stick around as it's not good for my blood pressure and general wellbeing.
I've dropped a dysfunctional team before after 15 years of poor play.They are now the best team in the NFL but I only have a passing interest in them. I guess it's like falling out of love.

0 points
2
2
Packers0808's picture

December 22, 2023 at 10:54 am

Amazing that the lack of pride in the piss poor job Barry has done he himself doesn't recognize the train wreck he made he doesn't just resign and the embarrassment of being fired. He is in hole deep enough already, who will again hire him for anything football related of importance!

2 points
3
1
J-Rome's picture

December 22, 2023 at 11:00 am

For players like Savage and Stokes, I think you have to wonder if Barry isn't putting them in bad positions and that has caused some of the decline. Campbell though, just looks hesitant to tackle and is slow getting to the ball carrier. Injury or not, it been that way since he signed his contract. I'm not too concerned about Wyatt yet as its typical for a Defensive Lineman to take 3 years to really acclimate to the NFL. The team and DC are built to play with a lead, not shut anyone down. More than anything, I think the culture of the defense needs to change.

1 points
3
2
barutanseijin's picture

December 22, 2023 at 01:58 pm

You mean Barry ruined Stokes & Savage kinda like how Nagy “ruined” Trubisky?

1 points
1
0
EnemyTerritory's picture

December 22, 2023 at 04:24 pm

“Built to play with a lead”. So we of course defer on the kickoff and rely on Barry’s crew in the first drive. Now I understand…

2 points
2
0
splitpea1's picture

December 22, 2023 at 12:19 pm

What is especially concerning is that at the beginning of the season we thought we had a lot of the defensive questions on personnel answered; it was the offense where we really weren't sure what to expect. Walker and Stokes have regressed from their somewhat promising rookie seasons and Savage has been in regression for a while. These are all first round picks and we cannot afford this either now or any more in the future.

So while we all hope and pray we go in a new direction with the defense moving forward, big turnarounds usually involve adding at least a couple of new starters. One of the biggest turnarounds in history occurred in 1981 with San Francisco as they fielded four new starters. I do like a couple of the suggestions noted here, but we all know how Gute feels about his draft picks, so we'll see.

Like many other fans, I thought it prudent that the offensive line be addressed early in the upcoming draft, and it's still a good idea. But the fact that there are still so many holes on this team muddies the waters a little bit, leaving us largely in BPA territory again.

1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

December 22, 2023 at 12:20 pm

Looks like i have a problem on my hands.

My thumbs up are catching up to my thumbs down.

That is starting to make me feel very uncomfortable, like i'm 'conforming' or something.

For my New Years resolution i'm going to try refraining from being so damn charming and adorable.

1 points
3
2
stockholder's picture

December 22, 2023 at 03:29 pm

Campbell isn’t cooked unless he wants to leave.
And I wouldn’t spend one dime anywhere, unless it’s RB.
Patrick Queen = LOL- everyone here said he sucked. I didn’t.
Quay Walker is a thumbs up. But I ‘d draft this position.
Because how many stokes do you want? Most run 4.5.
And he isn’t going to let Valintine beat him out.

Kenny Clark should be the NT every time there in a Blitz.
Slaton doesn’t have a sack. Raji did until they moved him.
I get the grave digger stuff. But Clark and Wyatt aren’t turtles.

P. Smith is slowing. Try counting his counts like Peppers.

Jaire isn't going anywhere but back on the IR.
He’s small and he can’t keep tackling without hurting his shoulder.
And if you look at the height of the draft class.
(You Keep your fingers crossed.)

To much value on the Ol this draft.
Jenkins was a 2nd rd. Bahk 3rd. It’s that deep again.

Coaching Overhaul-
MLF and Love are a Combo.
Barry can go if you change the front.
But after 3 Dcs with the 3-4-4.??
Go ahead and make it 4.
I’ll say Told you So!!!

2 points
3
1
barutanseijin's picture

December 22, 2023 at 04:31 pm

Some of this seems to be negative for negativity’s sake. For example, Walker was terrible the first few games but now is second to Trent Williams in pass block win rate. I assume the motivation behind these unrealistically negative assessments is to stir the pot.

2 points
3
1
jannes bjornson's picture

December 22, 2023 at 06:36 pm

One comment was correct in suggesting Walker play the RT, his position at Penn State.

1 points
1
0
CanPackFan's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:05 pm

A coaching overhaul is a must for this team. LaFleur- if he is truly a HC - needs to find an OC he can hand the reins over to - and not to an Olineman. A new DC cannot be in doubt! But please, no more Fangio followers. Even Fangio's current defense in Miami is ranked only 13th best while all the rest of his disciples rank in the bottom third. It doesn't say much for LaFleur that he still wants a Fangio style defense? As much as I've complained that Barry is a dinosaur when it comes to change, I'm beginning to think he and his pal LaFleur are birds of a feather?

2 points
2
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

December 22, 2023 at 07:43 pm

Nothing about losing to the Bears would make me smile.

3 points
3
0
rob44rml's picture

December 23, 2023 at 04:51 am

I think it's time to enlarge the scope of the problem...actually, taking away AR & Davante from those season's results, LaFleur hasn't really demonstrated his ability of a supposed excellent HC; admittedly poor play calls, conservative schemes(playing not to lose, instead of to win), poor communication, DC choices(both Pettine & Barry), loss of the locker room !, and a non-command of his position...
It's time to consider at change at BOTH DC & HC; maybe even GM-but I've been a Packer fan since '58, so I've seen the lack of direction in the front office over all these decades-55 years since SBII and only 2 SBs with 2 great QBs...do the math!! Sweep clean the front office top to bottom and start with football-winning people..it is called TITLETOWN USA !!....Lombardi wouldn't have stood for this !

1 points
1
0