Can the Packers repeat their 2019 free agent success in 2024?

GM Brian Gutekunst won't be able to spend as much money as he did in 2019, but can he find similar type of value and impact?

Ever since general manager Ron Wolf took over at the helm in the early 1990s, the Green Bay Packers have, by and large, been a draft-and-develop team, rarely dipping into the free agency pool to improve the roster. The fact that the franchise has relied on the draft so heavily over the last three decades should not be seen as an indictment. However, this offseason could be a deviation from the norm for general manager Brian Gutekunst, just like it was in 2019. 

“I do feel that whatever opportunities are out there to improve our team in free agency, we’ll be able to do that,” Gutekunst said during his end-of-season press conference. “I don’t think we’ll shy away from adding impact players if we have to push things down the road [in terms of salary cap]. We’d prefer not to do that, but at the same time, this is about winning and trying to win a championship. So if that’s something that makes sense, we’ll do it.” 

Packersnews.com noted the Packers could have at most $39 million in “effective” cap space after restructures and cuts. 

There have been countless teams over the years that have handed out expensive multi-year contracts like Halloween candy during the initial wave of free agency and banked on those players to make an immediate impact. In the short term, the lavish spending seems to have a positive ROI. The team that spent the most guaranteed money in free agency from 2016 until 2020 increased their win total that season by an average of 5.4 wins, according to ESPN. It is a different story, however, in the following season. The team that spent the most guaranteed money from 2016 to 2019 saw their win total decrease by 5.5 wins in Year 2, according to ESPN. 

The New England Patriots dolled out more than $160 million in guaranteed money in 2021, an NFL record at the time. The Patriots improved from 7-9 in 2020 to 10-7 in 2021 and made the playoffs, only to fall back below .500 in 2022 with an 8-9 record. The Jacksonville Jaguars broke the Patriots’ record in 2022, which – yep, you guessed it – worked in the short term. Jacksonville, after going 3-14, won the division with a 9-8 record in 2022 but finished with the same record in 2023. 

Gutekunst & Co. went on a spending spree by necessity in 2019 as the organization’s prior drafts were mostly clunkers, to put it lightly, in terms of results. He signed Za’Darius Smith to a four-year, $66-million deal; Preston Smith to a four-year, $52-million deal; Adrian Amos to a four-year, $36-million deal; and Billy Turner to a four-year, $28-million deal. All four signings, believe it or not, worked out quite well. 

The Packers were 6-9-1 in 2018 and improved to 13-3 in 2019, and did not experience a dropoff in 2020 or 2021, winning 13 games in each of those two seasons as well. The MVP play of quarterback Aaron Rodgers was a leading reason why the Packers won 13 games in three consecutive seasons, but the four aforementioned free agents played a major role as well. 

Za’Darius had 26 sacks over his first two seasons and was a second-team All-Pro honoree in 2020, although he missed all but one game of the 2021 season and was released in March 2022. 

Preston produced 12 sacks in his first year in the Green and Gold and has had at least eight sacks in each of the last three seasons. He is one of 10 players to record at least eight sacks over the last three seasons, according to Bill Huber. Above all, Preston’s best ability has been availability – he has only missed one game in his 146-game career. 

Amos started every single game during his four-year tenure and was a tackling machine. He was third on the team in tackles in 2019, first in 2020, and second in 2021 and 2022. However, he struggled in coverage in 2022, allowing six touchdown passes according to Pro Football Focus. 

Turner started 43 games over three seasons for Green Bay and possessed the positional versatility that every offensive line coach craves, starting games at both tackle and guard positions throughout his tenure. 

If there was a position that could use an impact player in 2024 and beyond, it would be safety. Rudy Ford, Darnell Savage, and Jonathan Owens are all free agents, and the free agent class as of now is headlined by Antoine Winfield Jr., Kyle Dugger, Kamren Curl, and Xavier McKinney. (I fully expect the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to apply the franchise tag on Winfield.)

Gutekunst will not spend at the clip that he did in 2019. He simply does not have the same amount of money at his disposal to do so. But if he can find value and an impact player on the free agent market, similar to 2019, that could be the difference in the team making a legitimate Super Bowl run in 2024. 
 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Rex is a lifelong Packers fan but was sick of the cold, so he moved to the heart of Cowboys country. Follow him on Twitter (@Sheild92) and Instagram (@rex.sheild). 

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
8 points
 

Comments (37)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Leatherhead's picture

February 19, 2024 at 01:27 pm

IMO, we should sign some of our own FAs to some inexpensive deals and get them on the 90 man roster.

Savage would be the most costly, but I'm not really seeing a replacement FA who is better than Savage and cheaper. Ford and Owens, too. That would be 3 of the 5 safeties we need. Add Johnson. Now we only have one spot left going into the draft.

Runyan loves playing here and would be cheap. He's usually healthy to practice and play, and he's started quite a few games at multiple positions.

That's where I'd spend the FA cash first. I think they'd all be near the vet minimum except Savage, who won't be very expensive.

-3 points
6
9
LLCHESTY's picture

February 19, 2024 at 01:29 pm

Savage's void years tolled yesterday. He won't be back. Thankfully.

https://twitter.com/KenIngalls/status/1759391564202160184?t=1zh-fmFJEX0C...

10 points
10
0
egbertsouse's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:06 pm

Great! I’ve heard this argument that we should re-sign Savage, even though he stinks, because he is cheaper than some good players. I don’t get it, he can’t cover or tackle and he gets injured a lot but let’s sign him up and give him $5 mil to run around and mimic HHCD.

7 points
7
0
stockholder's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:24 pm

Based on Need-
Gute could draft 3 Safeties off the start.
And he would win this draft

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 19, 2024 at 01:44 pm

I was looking at the FA safety class.

Cam Curl is going to cost us over $14 million/year. Savage is a $5.5M cap hit. When you look at the FAs out there, I don't think there's anybody better than him who is less expensive.

But, probably a moot point. The Packers have signaled they are moving on.

3 points
4
1
PeteK's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:04 pm

I could live with Rhyan in a battle with a second round G, but I think we need a solid vet (Savage) to go with the rookie safeties. It all depends on how many/much.

-6 points
0
6
egbertsouse's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:10 pm

Savage is not a “solid vet.” He is a vet but he is far from “solid.” Unless by “solid” you mean, “underachieving stiff.”

3 points
5
2
LLCHESTY's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:14 pm

Why do you think Curl will get $14 million a year? OTC has his 2023 valuation at $5 million. The only safeties getting over $10 million in FA will be Winfield if the Bucs don't franchise him and Xavier McKinney.

Savage doesn't have a good fit in the new system. He hasn't been good deep and his tackling is too poor to be a good box safety. His best spot might be as a slot defender but let some other team overpay him to find out. I'd much rather see them give Julian Blackmon $7 million a year than Savage $5 million. He fits what they are going to run and his missed tackle rate was ⅓ of Savage's.

5 points
5
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 19, 2024 at 03:02 pm

I would pursue Kendall Fuller as a CB, then focus on safety in this draft. Maybe they bring Runyan back on easy money?

2 points
2
0
golfpacker1's picture

February 19, 2024 at 07:05 pm

Why in the world would we want to spend valuable FA dollars on players we know are below average?
Nope, I am out on that one. GB doesn't need to fill holes with substandard players just because they were on last years team.

How about we sign some new young talent that can tackle. Hafley needs to be in on potential choices. I do like Blackman almost as much as I like Jeremy Chinn. Chinn would be less expensive and open more FA dollars. Which is one reason I also would pursue Bobby Wagner right away and give him a choice. He is also still very good and would turn our poor run defense to good immediately. He made $4 mill last year and led the NFL in tackles.

Curl looks good but I saw him over $10 million per year too. I have recently read that the Jets Safety they just cut would be a great fit in Hafley's secondary.

5 points
5
0
LLCHESTY's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:25 pm

The Packers will still be shifting contracts to clear cap space this year so going crazy in FA would be foolish. I'm hoping the only spot they add in FA is a mid level starting SS.

They are only two years away from having to make decisions on Watson, Doubs and Tom and possibly Wyatt and Walker. Slowly backing away from pushing all the money down the road via restructures and void years is the path to take at this point.

9 points
9
0
x24's picture

February 19, 2024 at 02:59 pm

I too think having enough cap space to pay serious contributors in '25 is more realistic. We are still paying off the '19 spending spree

5 points
5
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 19, 2024 at 04:00 pm

I don't think slowly backing away is the answer, I think slamming on those brakes with a hard stop on mortgaging the future is. It will be interesting to see who GB can sign ...

1 points
1
0
cdoemel's picture

February 19, 2024 at 09:05 pm

Mostly draft!

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

February 19, 2024 at 11:46 pm

Other than that I would spend it on a FS and draft a SS, I am
in complete agreement with you Chesty.

The only reason we should look to FA at all this year is because we’ve got no experience at S worthy of starting. I’d bring back Ford cheap or Moore and draft to fill in behind but we need a genuine starter deep. Box type players, as the SS is in these schemes, are present in this draft in more numbers and typically are up to speed much faster than their deep cover counterparts.

I can’t see how we keep Jones without more void years in his deal. Enough is enough, keep it at that this year and for massaging Love’s cap hit. Absolutely don’t want to be losing starters in 2 years because we are hamstrung by still paying in cap terms for multiple players no longer on this roster.

1 points
2
1
golfpacker1's picture

February 20, 2024 at 09:13 am

Nubin and Kinchens would be perfect for us to draft. Both are ballhawks and tackle well.
We need one of them @ #41. Again, Saftey @ #41, nothing else because they won't be there @ #58.

As far as Ford or Moore re signing. Is it because they are familiar, and does that make a difference with a new DC?

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

February 20, 2024 at 10:00 am

Injuries happen. Adequate veteran depth that knows what their role is, helps in STs helps. Both players are likely cheap (or I’d not do it) and open to short term deals. If the draft picks out play them then let them go after preseason. We aren’t going to find 4 rookie safeties we want playing immediately and we are going to need adequate depth.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

February 20, 2024 at 10:09 am

Misplaced and moved

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

February 20, 2024 at 09:35 am

I just think what they will be looking for in a FS would be too expensive. I guess Jordan Whitehead has played a lot of single high and has been really good in coverage the last two years but has a missed tackle rate higher than Savage. According to OTC the Jets took a $3.3 million cap charge on him for 2024 so it doesn't look like they want him back. Had $7.9 million average for them.

I think a FA SS would be cheaper and then coach up a rookie with plus athleticism that has played a lot of single high.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

February 20, 2024 at 10:25 am

SS type box safeties are cheaper but also more common in the draft and tend to take a lot less time to get up to speed in the NFL.

My thinking is that, historically, relying on even a high pick to click adequately in single high as a rookie would be very brave. It can but very rarely happens.

Draft potential behind an established, competent FS. That player probably gets on the field in 2 high anyway, and we will see some of those looks just as Boston College did. Draft for competition at the box/SS and bring back Ford (unless we think Johnson Jr can provide FS depth effectively).

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

February 20, 2024 at 02:36 pm

Nubin is a senior with 2400 college snaps, and Kinchen a Junior with 1900 snaps.
Either should adjust quickly and they both tackle well. Lets get one @ #41.

1 points
1
0
PhantomII's picture

February 19, 2024 at 03:06 pm

I want Gute to repeat the 2023 NFL draft where he hit on 100% as far as I can see. We need a pro bowl level Safety thru FA on trade, either way. That would be a HUGE plus starting this next season. If our new DC thinks he can make Savage a pro bowl level Safety, then re-sign him, otherwise don't. We need a big improvement in the Secondary and pressure up front for things to work out as well as stopping the run. Our OL getting to be Elite is where we need to go after the Safety improvement.

-2 points
0
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

February 19, 2024 at 04:02 pm

OL is the #1 priority, but both S & LB need help too ...
plus a RB

0 points
3
3
PhantomII's picture

February 19, 2024 at 06:10 pm

I did not mention the OL first because it should be fixed thru the first 3 draft picks and a Vet Safety could help the secondary a bunch. We don't have a lot of money but we need the -S- spot addressed with no guesswork how that's gonna go. A Safety thru the draft and resign a couple cheaper contracts. I'm always ready to burn a #1-#2 future draft pick as our offensive players are many right now. Suppose to be poor LB and RB 1sr round talent?? I want the real #1- C and 2-IOL studs in the run game.....Hopefully our current OL members stay in the Gym this offseason and come back ready to impose their will in the run game also. Either way we need to get bigger/ Stronger and Meaner at the LOS. Gute can continue to churn to improve what else we need to get better at. Suppose to be a lot of WR talent...but we are flush there. May need a few next season to spread out player contracts.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

February 20, 2024 at 08:11 am

OL should be the #1 draft priority mostly because:

1. Packers G/C needing upgrades & quality depth
2. T needs more quality depth
3. The draft is solid with both quality and depth at T...solid depth at G/C
4. The strength of the team is the QB and the receivers...bolstering the OL can make the passing (& run) O elite

While the need at S is more glaring, the draft is very weak. I could see a trade up for a DB they feel can be Hafley's deep FS (DeJean?). I could see an outright trade for another team's backup S with a player or pick. Or maybe a FA signing.

1 points
1
0
cdoemel's picture

February 19, 2024 at 09:06 pm

Exactly!! That’ll be three strong drafts in a row.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Fan's picture

February 19, 2024 at 05:05 pm

Safety is the best place to spend free agent money. Getting a guy that stabilizes the defense would be a big improvement. But I don't think that spending big money on OL would be worthwhile. And I believe that guys like Savage, Nixon and Owens could be depth pieces at the right price. And for these guys, I just don't think that Barry was a good enough DC to use players to the best of their ability. My thoughts.

4 points
4
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 19, 2024 at 05:52 pm

I agree with your reasoning on Safety. If there's a position where you pay for experience, it'd be Safety. I can't believe we'd go into next season with a bunch of newbies/UDFAs/Day3 guys as projected starters

I also agree that we don't need to s pend big money on the Oline. We should resign Runyan on a cheap deal, and we should spend two of our Top #91 picks on OL, and they'll be on rookie contracts. Only Jenkins will be on his second deal with us.

2 points
2
0
lou's picture

February 19, 2024 at 06:22 pm

Unfortunately Runyan will get a nice contract elsewhere, what a great 6th round pick he was, check out where he landed on the Athletic's top 150 Free Agents List, number 19. Other Packers on the list Nixon (67) Savage (107), Nijman (109);

Age: 27 Height: 6-4 Weight: 307

Runyan plays with excellent initial quickness, and his reactions and instincts are really good. He combo-blocks to linebackers effectively and plays with timing and very good awareness. It helps that he can also play with bend and a solid punch. He's developing into one of the better guards in the NFC. The Packers have already paid left guard Elgton Jenkins, so Runyan will likely hit the market. — Mueller

2 points
2
0
LLCHESTY's picture

February 19, 2024 at 09:07 pm

PFF has Runyan at 92 on their top 200 FAs. That seems a lot closer to correct than 19.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

February 19, 2024 at 11:57 pm

Runyon is a good but not great starter, or was but for the first three quarters of this season, over his rookie contract. Some team will give him a chance to start. It wouldn’t shock me to see him in Chicago. Im not sure we are in that market or should be.

1 points
1
0
CanPackFan's picture

February 19, 2024 at 06:19 pm

Where is the money coming from to sign a lot/expensive FAs like in 2019? Given the cap, this doesn't make sense at all.

How about the Love extension? That's going to be big, big bucks.

Let's get all the non-performing contracts fixed up as much as we can this season. Don't keep pushing dollars forward...

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

February 19, 2024 at 09:08 pm

S, LB, OL, RB, CB with the first five. In any order.

2 points
2
0
golfpacker1's picture

February 20, 2024 at 09:31 am

I disagree CD. That first pick really 100% has to be CB or O-line. Or trade back, because it doesn't hurt us either way. If we can find a trade partner.

#41 is perfectly placed at where 1 of the 2 best Safeties will still be available.

# 58 still gets us either a great O-lineman or CB depending on what happened with 25 & 41.

#88 or #91 should be perfectly placed to get us a Top 6 RB and a Top 4 LB.

1 points
1
0
BA4Pack's picture

February 19, 2024 at 09:51 pm

Xavier McKinney and a mid tier RB would do well.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

February 20, 2024 at 02:41 pm

South Dakota State has a mid to later round OG named McCormick who looks like a Packer. 3 year starter and worked out @ Center at the Senior bowl and was impressive. Very strong run blocker too.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

February 22, 2024 at 10:15 am

I had forgotten just how much money we spent that year. And the speed with which we moved on those guys was impressive. We saw our targets and went after them. 3 of them were really great signings and provided super upgrades at those positions. The Billy Turner signing was ok and filled the swing Tackle role. Thats why Njiman will probably get that kind of money and more being younger and injury free.

It should not be hard to sign 3 reasonable upgrade FAs this years for what we paid for Preston Smith alone that year. And hit home runs with all 3. Add in a strong draft and 2024 should be a good year, and in 2025 we should be a pre-season favorite to contend for the big prize.

1 points
1
0