What to Expect With Josh Jacobs

How could the new feature back in town fit into the Packers' offense?

As I was getting myself ready for work early on Monday morning, I remembered that legal tampering began in about five hours and thought, “Will the Packers do anything? Or will I feel like the kid getting picked last on the playground watching everyone else sign Free Agents as the Packers seem to be on vacation?” My one free agency wish for the Packers was to sign Safety Xavier McKinney. If they did that, and only that, I would’ve been happy. Well, Brian Gutekunst granted my wish to not be picked last at recess when he landed McKinney and also decided to throw in one of the top available running backs in former Raider, Josh Jacobs. Wow, incredible, more than we could ask for, right?

The Power Runner We Want

No disrespect to AJ Dillon at all as he still had a decent career in a Packers uniform, but Josh Jacobs is the power runner we all hoped AJ Dillon would become. He's the type of running back that defenders have zero desire to encounter in the open field because he will make them pay for attempting to take him down. Jacobs also boasts a nasty stiff arm that's helped him elude defenders in the open field for many long carries. 

When it comes to speed, I would place Josh Jacobs maybe a little above average for his size and running style. He's not going to put you in a cloud of dust from the moment he takes a hand-off, but he does have the breakaway speed that has helped him take off on 63 and 86-yard touchdown runs the last two years. He has the wheels to get away from the more average-speed defensive backs. 

Looking at receiving, Jacobs isn't going to line up in the slot like Aaron Jones did occasionally, but he's still a threat in the passing game. In the last three seasons, he's averaged about 348 yards through the air. For a little perspective, Aaron Jones averaged about 339 in the last three seasons. Sure, Jones missed two more games than Jacobs in the three years, but that would only average 10 yards or so more than Jacobs in the long run, which isn't bad at all. The one noticeable stat for Josh Jacobs though when it comes to catching the ball, is he has yet to record a receiving touchdown. I think that will have to change once he steps foot on the field for the Packers. 

How He'll Fit

With Josh Jacobs' experience, I believe he will slide right into that feature-back role taking the majority of the carries from the start. In Matt LaFleur's offense where he likes to get the running backs involved in everything, I think we will surely see Josh Jacobs' production in the passing game increase. But I don't think he will see the amount of carries he saw with the Raiders. Jacobs saw 340 carries in 2022 through 17 games. Aaron Jones only saw 213 in the same span. The Packers like to keep their running backs fresh and I'd expect the same for Josh Jacobs. 

With Jacobs' style being mainly power, I'm anticipating the Packers to go after a more elusive running back in the NFL draft. One that displays patience to find a lane before hitting the hole and has the agility to slip away from tackle attempts rather than power through them. That will provide the Packers with a nice change of pace back to spell Jacobs when needed. Emanuel Wilson could also help fit the mold to be a nice change of pace to Josh Jacobs if he takes the next steps in his development for 2024.

Josh Jacobs also provides leadership to a young locker room. At 26 years old he was a captain in the Raiders' locker room and was considered the heartbeat of the Raiders' offense. Jacobs is a player this team can rally around and hopefully, he will turn into that in a Packers uniform.

Players come and go every year. Whenever the Packers let a favorite player go, it stings. But I always try to remind myself that another player will come. I was very high on Eddie Lacy during his Packers tenure and despite his production drop-off I was still gutted to see him leave the Packers in 2017. But guess who we drafted to replace Lacy in 2017? Aaron Jones. The Packers have preached "next man up" for years when it comes to replacing a player who goes down to injury. Well, when it comes to fan favorites, there's always going to be that next man up as well. We got a good one in Josh Jacobs and hopefully, time will prove this to have been a great move.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.

__________________________

16 points
 

Comments (88)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:04 pm

He's the volume back who will get the majority of touches. The rookie we draft will compete with Wilson to see who gets the rest.

Jacobs, at 26, is the old man among the skill position players, including Love. In fact, I think that he'll be the old man in the huddle except for Jenkins. This group, this offense, has a wonderful window of opportunity before people get too old and expensive. I really hope we take advantage of this.

15 points
15
0
dblbogey's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:36 pm

Though my first choice would be Cooper DeJean, it's a deep OT class, some who could play inside. I'd love a good one early and at least one more a bit later. We have a QB and plenty of weapons, and if we upgrade the play at center and RG this could be an amazing offense.

5 points
5
0
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:05 am

#buildthetrenches!!!!

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:30 am

The OL makes the offense.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:17 am

LH, do you know what the lasting ramifications of a quad injury are? Is that one of those things that can recur or nag?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:16 am

It’s usually referring to a muscle tear or contusion and therefore wouldn’t ordinarily suggest long term issues.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:26 am

Steve, I don't think muscle injuries are that problematic. Bones, yes. Ligaments and tendons, yes, But muscles? You heat them up, you stretch them out, you do some massage, you take some anti-inflammatories, you ice bath.

I'm not worried about Jacobs at all. He'll almost certainly play more snaps than Jones will this year.

2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:53 am

Play more snaps, gain more yards, play in the playoffs, and gain more first downs.

Bank it.

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

March 14, 2024 at 11:12 am

And hold onto the football at all times.

Wonder how many he's been credited with?

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

March 14, 2024 at 11:12 am

Thanks, you guys.

0 points
0
0
pete-nado's picture

March 14, 2024 at 06:15 pm

Christian Watson should be reading this...warm it, stretch it, rub it and get back out there Christian. With that said, I generally agree with Leatherhead's comments. Jacobs hasn't had the sort of recurring muscle injuries Watson has had, so doesn't seem much of a concern.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:11 pm

nicely written Greg, great summary and review plus a positive preview.
GPG!

12 points
12
0
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:17 pm

It will take him a while to learn.
Unlike Jones.

-17 points
3
20
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:00 pm

Jones first NFL carry was week 15 of his rookie year.

1 points
5
4
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:09 pm

"Jones first NFL carry was week 15 of his rookie year."

Matt, you type that as if facts would mean anything to stockholder...

4 points
8
4
Tundraboy's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:21 pm

Lmao. Good one!

-1 points
2
3
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:18 pm

Stock—you’re taking too many sleeping pills again. Open the curtains and let the sunshine in. Jacobs is a stud.

1 points
4
3
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:29 pm

Never said he wasn't.
I 've said I like the signing.
But the truth is; Jones knew
where to be and when.

2 points
5
3
jannes bjornson's picture

March 14, 2024 at 12:05 pm

#30 Jordan Morgan LT Arizona
#54 Edge Cooper LB A&M
#58 Devontez Walker WR N Carolina
#86 Bucky Irving RB Oregon
#88 Jaden Hicks S WASU
#91 Mc. Jackson DT A&M
#126 Coleman OG TCU
#156 Guerendo RB Badgers
#169 Elijah Jones CB B.C.
#202 Sione Vaki S Utah
#219 Kimani DVidal RB Troy
#245 Jordan McGee LB Temple
#251 Ike Williams WR Illinois
#255 Nelson Ceasar Edge Houston

-1 points
0
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:31 pm

They all run the SAME plays. The change-up RB should be from RD Two,or Three. Do not get caught with just one guy who can move the chains. Play to Win. A.Jones was never the bell cow guy. Get his clone.

0 points
4
4
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 05:09 pm

jannesbjornson,
" A.Jones was never the bell cow guy. Get his clone".
Problem with cloning Showtime is the fucked up way he was shown the door, I doubt he'd offer up any DNA!

0 points
1
1
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:21 pm

I'm hoping the mourning period for the loss of Aaron Jones ends quickly so we can talk about what this offense might look like with Josh Jacobs as the primary RB. Jones had a Marshall Faulk type of role--forcing the defense to spread out with his lateral movement. Jacobs is a more traditional straight-ahead type of runner, but I think he has the speed and receiving ability to threaten the perimeter and give defenses fits. It will be very interesting, hopefully in a good way, to see how this turns out.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:39 pm

#33 and Jacobs are incomparable. Jacobs benched #405 years ago and yes that translates into an effective stiff arm that 33 just isn't strong enough to do. Jacobs can do a lot including getting around the corner, just not in the way that 33 does. Jacobs ran a 4.64 but not content with that, the next day he was timed at 4.53 and 4.52, what Dillon was timed at in the combine. Unlike Dillon, Jacobs brings that speed onto the field. He can also cut in the backfield without slowing down so much that it insures he gets stopped. Jacobs has turned short gains into TDs more than Dillon, but I don't really know how that compares to 33 over his career.

Dillon has 20+ more pounds to make would be tacklers regret attempting it, yet Jacobs sometimes runs straight into secondary defenders which I find odd and hope they break him of that. He breaks through TO the secondary more often than either Dillon or 33, and from there it's just a question of if he takes it to the house or gets caught from behind. Either way that's already a 10+ yard gain.

Give him someone in the Kyle Juscyk role and an O line that's dominant all the way across, and he could have a HUGE season! If the whole league knows GB can't run behind the C or RG again this season? That probably won't happen.

GPG!

5 points
5
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:56 pm

Great stuff Sic, thanks! I'll be interested to hear what others say. The switch from Runyan to Rhyan should help the running game, and I wonder if they might draft a better run blocker to potentially replace Josh Myers at center either this year or next. Not that I want the offense to get too run-oriented, but wouldn't it be great if they could both run and pass well!

5 points
5
0
SinceLombardi's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:45 am

It was over the minute he landed in Minnesota

2 points
2
0
4thand1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:30 pm

I haven't checked, but how is he as a blocker and pass catcher.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:43 pm

He doesn't seem to be used much in pass pro. Is that because he sux, isn't willing, or hasn't been taught? Certainly #33 punched WAY above his weight in this area, and is only one reason it hurts to see him go.

As a receiver he gets yards, but not from the kind of route tree 33 has. More typical check down RB stuff, but explodes from there. Broken tackles and dragging multiple defenders downfield, he excels at.

2 points
2
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:03 pm

Agreed SST. As Greg said in his column, Jacobs is more the AJ Dillon type, but more of a horse. He will not be doing #33 things. That's not his game. I suspect the Packers will add a back that's more in the skillset of Jones, most likely through the draft. The new Thunder and Lightning : )

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:31 am

If you watch his film, he has very quick feet and is more agile than Dillon. He’s much better at juking defenders or just running through them. He breaks tackles at a far higher rate and also runs with great lean at the line. His change of pace is noticeable. None of those things can be said of Dillon.

If I recall he bench pressed some 400 pounds. He’s got one of the best stiff arms I’ve seen in years certainly, but that power is visible in his game. He also regularly breaks very long runs. He may not be a track star but he’s beaten enough DBs often enough to show he had more than Dillon (not Jone’s forte either).

He’s not Jones, few are as extremely sudden, agile and elusive in short areas. Jones finds creases very few others could see, let alone wriggle through. He’s not very similar to Dillon either though. If anything I’d say a little more towards Jones.

Passing game wise, I’ve not really seen him asked to do much non traditional for a RB. He does have good hands. Get him in space though and he’s a handful.

Could he do more? I think that’s something LaFleur will find out, but I don’t see him ever being used more imaginatively by the Raiders. That’s why he has 50 catch seasons and no TDs. If LaFleur can unlock that a bit then his upside increases dramatically. I see no reason why it can’t be in this O.

1 points
1
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 14, 2024 at 07:09 pm

He is similar to Dillon in that he is a bigger back that can't create without a O-line opening holes to have success. He has more twitch than Dillon but that isn't saying much. Jacobs ran a 4.69 at his combine. Dillon in the 4.5 range. Neither is going take a short pass over the middle and turn it into a 60 yd TD ala Jones.

My point isn't that Jacobs is a bad signing. He's an excellent RB and he can do things that Aaron Jones can't. I'm happy we have him. That being said, as I pointed out in my post you responded to, the Packers need an Aaron Jones style back to compliment Jacobs (and now Dillon). I believe they will find that player in the draft.

-1 points
0
1
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:33 pm

I also find lack of information in that area concerning. It came up as a potential negative in his initial prospect and scouting reports, but I did find a video from him in college absolutely stoning a pass rusher. It looks like he has the strength and willingness, but maybe lacks finesse.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:34 am

Raiders fans tell me he’s just really not been asked to do that, probably due to the huge other workload meaning not out there on passing downs as often, but has stoned guys when he is. He’s strong and physical, so not shy of contact. May need some polishing perhaps.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:03 pm

You pretty much nailed it SST.
Jacobs is the perfect replacement, for Dillon!

-2 points
0
2
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:13 am

I think he isn’t the same as either. Jacob’s has some of each in him. That’s why he is a bell cow RB, one that can get to the edge as well as run up the middle. He’s a true 4 down back. That said, I agree they will be looking to get a bit more speed to get to the edge quicker and can run faster routes out of the backfield or line up outside.

2 points
2
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:19 pm

He’s got good hands and run the screen pass exceptionally well.

1 points
1
0
Cheezehead72's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:50 pm

As mentioned he is an adequate pass catcher. It will be nice seeing him catch the ball out in the flat and then having a DB try to tackle him alone. Might make teams stick with their base defense.

If he is not good in pass protection he needs to learn. MLF agrees with me that you want to keep the same back out there for 3 downs. If you substitute that allows the defense to match personnel. It is better to keep the defense from substituting.

2 points
2
0
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:18 pm

Cheezehead72,
Good to hear that MLF agrees with you.
I didn't know the two of you were that tight.
Can we count on you for some inside track, behind closed doors info?
Congrats :)

0 points
1
1
Cheezehead72's picture

March 14, 2024 at 05:58 am

Just because he agrees with me does not mean we are close. You can agree with someone you never met.

2 points
2
0
Houndog's picture

March 14, 2024 at 06:43 am

Cheezehead
I was just kidding with you man, I'd hoped you knew.

-1 points
0
1
dobber's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:34 am

He has two 50+ catch seasons under his belt, so I'd move from "adequate" to at least "accomplished".

2 points
2
0
hhsbaseball's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:40 pm

He has more receptions than Jones did in 2 of the last 3 seasons but somehow has 0 TD catches. The year he did finish behind him he had 53 grabs so not bad.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

March 13, 2024 at 05:28 pm

Thank you. These are very important parts of the Packers offense. Jacobs doesn't seem to be afraid of contact, which is important. But whether he has good blocking technique is something that should be addressed. Then again, if the Packers signed him, they know he can handle that area at least adequately. Good post.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:42 pm

Cmon Stockholder, lets not Debbie Downer this exciting new toy we have. Players get older and more injury prone. Younger ones take over. The salary cap works in the NFL. While a lot of Packer fans were more than ready to move on from Rodgers because he was such a big tool, it's completely the opposite with Jones. Everyone agrees it was the right business move to make releasing him, but he was so well liked that it feels like he died.

Anyway, we got a younger, healthier, talented new Packer RB, and it sound like we got a good deal financially too. And he is kind of a combo back to boot. A lot of us fans were eager to see Jacobs and Jones in the same backfield, well that pairing won't happen. But there are a bunch of AJ clones in this draft that will work too.

I am guessing we pick one @ #88 or #91 because there should still be a large group to pick from. Jaylon Wright, Marshawn Lloyd, Bucky Irving, Ray Davis, and even Jonathon Brooks should be there still. Any of them would be a great change of pace back, and like Jones, they all are really good catching and running the ball.

On a different note, FA prognosticators are saying GB could double down and sign another free agent Safety like Fuller. That would really change our needs in our first five picks as we wouldn't need a Safety anymore. I would be fine with that, but FA LB is a more pressing need, and the market is thin. If we want one it might have to be Devin White or Bobby Wagner. I am fine with either because either would be an upgrade and White's upside is thru the roof. Maybe 3 years @ $6 million each for White or same salary for Wagner for 2 years.

4 points
4
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:52 pm

#31 Wilson has almost identical body type to Jacobs. MLF hasn't been great at utilizing both #33 and 28. The whole "change of pace RB" idea should be scrapped as a failed experiment in GB, IMHO. MLF has enough difficulty using 1 RB intelligently. Let him learn to do that with Jacobs, keep #31 as depth behind him in case of injury, although Jacobs does have a history of playing through injury, and for most of the season. Dude is a football player!

I'd like to see this signing move the draft priority for RB down, substantially. Do they look for someone light and quick? That was Goodson. Develop Wilson and somebody else behind Jacobs, but with the idea that he's RB1 and bellcow. Instead of using 2 RBs on the field, use multiple TEs, and get somebody doing the Kyle Juscyk role.

I think that's the winning strategy, because you're paying for it and Jacobs can do it.

0 points
2
2
Tundraboy's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:33 pm

You are on the right track my friend. Time to finish the OL as well.

2 points
2
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:21 pm

Exactly Golf—we are younger, healthier, and better.
We ALL miss Jones—but we just got better.

2 points
2
0
SinceLombardi's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:48 am

I would add that Rodgers was an all time great at qb. The most important position. While Jones ( yes , less polarizing ) is a really good running back. A position that abounds with just as, if not more talented players.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:43 pm

26 isn't a young RB and his ypc dropped last year significantly. I fully expect them to get another in the draft as well. Jacobs has had a lot of wear on his tread going back to college. How much longer can he be the feature back?

0 points
1
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:54 pm

None of that has anything to do with his production last season, the Raiders were a mess. That said, he needs a dominant run blocking O line as well as somebody in the Kyle Juscyk role. Without those, I don't think he breaks out.

-1 points
0
1
LLCHESTY's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:53 pm

Zamir White had 397 yards and 4.7 yards a carry in the last four games after Jacobs went down, including a big 145 yard day against the Chiefs. I guess we blame the OL for that one too?

2 points
3
1
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:30 pm

OK, SST,
If you're right, and Jacobs needs a dominant run blocking o-line what does that say?
The knock on GB's line for a good part of last season was their run blocking and they were reasonably good in Pass-pro.
When Showtime came back healthy that whole thing changed, so where do we really stand?

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:17 am

Nobody knows for sure why his production went down and it’s reasonable to consider his workload over his career as being a contributing factor.

This isn’t a risk free signing, and they spent quite a bit of money to bring him in that may or may not have been better spent elsewhere. If he turns back to the 2022 player it’s a huge win, but if he is more like 2023 and even digresses more it’s a big loss. The reason it is a big loss if he produces like last year is because you can get that production from a draft pick or kept Jones and developed another for way less money.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:09 pm

Bucky, I was looking up Jacob's career carries in college and pros. He only had 250 carries @ Alabama. Jones had more in college, they both have about the same total now even though Jones has more years. Jacobs has more pro carries.

We definitely should get another in the draft. I really like Guerendo-Louisville. 6'0 220 lbs but runs in the 4.3s. Maybe he takes over in 3 years. Wright, Irving, Brooks, Lloyd, or Davis would work too.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:42 pm

Two from that group.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:21 am

Thanks for the info golf. I really don’t want another 220lb back regardless of 40 time. I’d prefer more of a scat back lower to the ground, with quickness, someone built like Jones, 5’10 and 200lb. Quickness and explosiveness over speed is what I’d love to see. What I mean is the one who is faster in the first 5 yards is most important.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:50 pm

He didn't get all that much tread wear at Alabama.

He carried the ball 85 times as a Freshman, 46 carries as a sophomore (after that season it was revealed he played most of the season on a broken ankle!), and 120 times as a Junior...then he declared for the draft.

His intangibles are solid too. Great leader and work ethic. Kid can lift a semi.

His production last year was in direct correlation to the overall struggling Raider O operation under McDaniel (Peter Principle in action). The O line, QB play was lousy and he had to run into loaded boxes most of the time. Adams' YPC were also the second lowest of his career last year for the Raiders.

I think he can be the feature back for a lot longer than Jones will ever be.

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 13, 2024 at 05:44 pm

More than likely longer than a 29 year old Aaron Jones who tends to miss multiple games each season.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:22 am

Jacob’s and Jones have missed the same amount of games over their career.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:42 pm

Hopefully two years. He's really damn expensive if he can't.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:24 am

Fortunately, he could be cut after year one if he doesn’t perform. And, if that happens the other option is for Jacob’s to take a big pay cut to stay. They have to take one or two RB’s in the draft this year. Hopefully, a scat back type.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:16 pm

I know exactly what to expect—He’s a stud.
He’s a first down back and can move the chains. He runs the screen as well as any back in the NFL and he’s huge asset on the goaline. I can wait to see what he’s gonna do with the green and gol—bam!!
Go Packers!!!

3 points
3
0
Turophile's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:42 pm

To go with Jacobs, draft any of Jonathon Brooks, Jaylen Wright, Blake Corum, Marshawn Lloyd, or even Dylan Laube, who is elusive, a great pass catcher and under-rated runner. Brooks is recovering from an ACL but should be ready for camp and is the best all round RB in the draft. He should have time to get eased into the rotation as Jacobs will take most of the load early on.

I'd leave out Trey Benson (for injury history), Bucky Irving (too light), Will Shipley (too light for his height), Audric Estime (4.7 40 is too slow).

I left Corum in there despite him being 5'8", 205, he runs hard, is elusive, runs low, churns his legs on contact and is strong. He would be a nice complement to Jacobs as he does most things well. Lloyd (5'9", 220, 4.45) might be the most likely choice for the Packers, with the build to thrive in a cold weather outdoor stadium, lives in the weight room and has a low pad level and fast feet. Wright might be the most fun as he is fast (clocked at 23.6mph in practice) and the 44" vert tells you he has power in his legs and he has the make-you-miss ability, which is very dangerous when you can run sub 4.40.

3 points
5
2
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:22 pm

Corum looked slower after his injury repair.
The cuts weren't as fast.
I'd take Wright.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:25 pm

It was only an MCL and meniscus tear, not an ACL or PCL, so confidence is high for him to be fully recovered in time.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 14, 2024 at 12:08 pm

Wright, Benson, and Guerendo helped their draft position the most @ the combine. Wright and Benson might be the only 2 RBs picked in round 2. Guerendo would be a great get @ #88 or #91. So would Lloyd, but Bucky Irving makes the most guys miss. His highlights are the best. I thought I read he is a decent blocker too, but that's not what he would be picked for.

Maybe Jacobs is considered the AJ clone and we draft a bigger back like Guerendo, Braelon Allen, or Audric Estime. Estime hurt himself @ the combine but I would just say the tape doesn't lie. He plays fast and I would argue he is somewhat like Jacobs because Josh didn't run a super-fast 40 either. He might fall to the 5th round.

2 points
2
0
murf7777's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:33 am

Brooks coming off an ACL is more risk than Benson coming off his own ACL. Benson has had 2 injury free productive years since the ACL/ML injury. That said, I’d prefer quickness and explosiveness over 40 timed speed. I want one who gets to the edge quickly and a very good route running with soft hands, so he compliments Jacob’s.

1 points
1
0
Vachio's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:46 pm

Everybody saying he's an AJ Dillion clone and/or strictly a power back...have you not watched the man play?

His game speed looks about the same as Jones (his 40 time at his pro day was actually fasters than what Jones put up) and he consistently displays more power on the field than Dillon did at any point. He's a threat to break off a 10+ yard run any time he touches the ball and he's great at making the first guy miss.

With defenses unable to key on him for fear of what Love and our 8 headed monster of pass catchers might do, he could have a career year.

7 points
7
0
Turophile's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:07 pm

If he can intimidate people like RB Isiah Pacheco (KC Chiefs) I am going to enjoy watching him very much.

4 points
4
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:41 pm

Exactly Right —the Dillon comparison doesn’t hold water.

3 points
3
0
pantz_bURp's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:27 pm

What to expect from Josh Jacobs?

*just win baby!*

2 points
2
0
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 05:17 pm

In case you haven't heard, Al Davis died in 2011.
And the Raiders are 39-44 since Jacobs got there.

-2 points
0
2
LLCHESTY's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:55 pm

More carries, less efficiency is what to expect from Jacobs if he stays healthy.

-9 points
1
10
Starrbrite's picture

March 14, 2024 at 01:41 pm

LL—I’m always energized by your posts—-what happened?

0 points
0
0
BA4Pack's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:00 pm

Call me crazy but Josh Jacobs reminds me
more of Mashawn Lynch than Eddie Lacy.
You won’t need to limit his carries like Jones.
Get him a dominant IOL in the one of the first 3 draft picks and let him do his thing.

9 points
9
0
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 05:45 pm

Good idea BA4Pack, then we'll see
But Jones has 400 more yards on 130 less career carries with that shitty offensive line you want upgraded.

-4 points
1
5
10ve 💚's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:18 pm

Houndog: Could Jones' more yards be because most of his career he played alongside Rodgers?
Defenses had to respect that pass more than the run.

GPG!

2 points
2
0
Houndog's picture

March 14, 2024 at 07:08 am

10ve,
Yeah, it could be what you suggest, which I guess then the last 5 games of this past season would be accredited to Love's presence, right? Or, was Showtime the difference in those last 5 games. Its a "Who makes Who look good" question.
But then, wouldn't you also need to consider that Jacobs 'good' years came during Derrick Carr's good years. Things went a bit South once Carr was gone, another "Who makes Who" question maybe.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 14, 2024 at 12:13 pm

If we get 4 good years out of Jacobs, that would the obvious best case scenario. He would be 30 years old. It's probably more likely 3 good years and someone else will take over. Whichever RB we draft earliest will be that guy. There will be a big group to choose from if we are taking one in the 3rd round.

1 points
1
0
Houndog's picture

March 13, 2024 at 05:29 pm

Being a Packer fan living in the SF Bay area, a 49er hater, and my refusal to renew my Sunday Ticket subscription at the new NFL rip-off price of nearly $800, I saw almost all of the Raiders games last season on local TV.
The Raiders did not let Jacobs walk, and the Packers did not write an 'easy-out' contract because they were both convinced he could return to his 2022 form. Both parties had their reasons.
Let me know how you feel in December, my money's on Jones!

-3 points
0
3
Starrbrite's picture

March 14, 2024 at 01:44 pm

Hounddog—out on Yuit blue suede shoes and celebrate—it’s gonna be good.
But agree with you on the NFL ticket—what a scam.

0 points
0
0
BA4Pack's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:07 pm

Can’t say I disagree with your logic Houndog but I’m a hopeless Packer optimist.
It’s easier for me that way.

2 points
2
0
Houndog's picture

March 14, 2024 at 07:25 am

BA4Pack,
I don't disagree with you either, and I'm a dyed in the wool Packer fan too. But as I got older some of the optimism changed to reality, like from 1969 through 1991. Lots of lean years there despite the new Bumper Stickers annually, "The Pack, Devine" was one of them, "The Pack is Wright" was another.
Devine, my ass! And Randy Wright statically is the worst QB ever in the NFL.
Damn, I hope I'm wrong. But The Raiders letting Jacobs walk and Gutey's easy-out contract say something. Could it be "where there's smoke, there's fire"?
I hope not!

0 points
0
0
BA4Pack's picture

March 14, 2024 at 08:07 am

Zeke Bratkowski, Dan Devine, Forest Greg, even Bart Starr…some pretty bleak decades. I remember Forest Gregg’s intense stare, hairy eyebrows and hatred of Da Bears.
Whatever happens it’ll be alright.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 14, 2024 at 12:21 pm

It's a lot easier to let him walk than tie up $12 million per year Houndog. Especially with the RB position devalued like it is. I am sure GB would rather have a good RB for $5 million per year, than paying what we hope is a really good RB $12 million.

The Packers are taking a shot at Jacobs and paying more with the idea the RB production stays the same or gets slightly better. Jacobs contract favors the Packers, Jones contract and his age did not.

The NFL salary cap works, Oakland decided to spend the money elsewhere. That's why we have a Free Agent Frenzy.

1 points
1
0
gsd3's picture

March 14, 2024 at 04:02 am

Hate to see Jones go but am cautiously optimistic. I would like to see Brooks or Wright added in the draft to pair with Jacobs.

-1 points
0
1
Ron750's picture

March 14, 2024 at 04:12 am

I haven’t seen any mention of how well he pass protects. That’s an important part of being a Packer’s RB.

-1 points
0
1
SinceLombardi's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:44 am

I like the move.Sorry to see Jones leave, but it’s the modern NFL. I also think that Emanuel Wilson could have a role as a change of pace, reliable back up.

-1 points
0
1
WD's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:10 am

One of the best articles I have seen yet on Cheesehead. Nailed it Greg.

0 points
0
0