The Four Agreements From Week 6

Join me this week as we try to diagnose exactly what the hell happened in Lambeau Field last Sunday. 

The Patriots game was the first sign.  That was Bruce the Shark flashing his face over Sheriff Brody's shoulder as he shoveled chum into the murky ocean water.  The Giants loss was lowering Richard Dreyfuss into the ocean depths in his fancy shark cage.  Last Sunday?  That was Quint getting eaten.  Matt LaFleur and Co. better find a pressurized air tank and a rifle posthaste.  Not our finest showing, Packers fam.  We emerged from the Sunday's red tide bloody and bruised, limping into Week 7 with a 3-3 record, armed with a lot more questions than answers.  I sense your frustration.  I feel your pain.  It's time to slide into your snuggest wet suit, wade on in (the water's fine!) , and let's see if we can find four things to agree upon from this Giants game, and determine whether this Packers season has jumped the shark.

  • Agreement #1--The throwback jerseys looked great!

I figure you have had enough negativity this week, so I thought I would start with a positive from Sunday.  The 1950's throwback jerseys are badass.  No.  Strike that.  Badass isn't strong enough.  Those things are super badass.  Like, Keith Richards wearing a "Who The F Is Mick Jagger?" shirt while smoking a cigarette level of badass.  Did you peep Jaire Alexander rocking his jersey with the yellow longsleeves?  <Insert chef's kiss gif>  It's a shame we dishonored such a beautiful uniform with such a flaccid performance.  Like throwing 20 inch Mickey Thompson's on a dump truck.  Or, snug fitting  LuLuLemon on John Goodman.  Either way, I love the throwbacks and hope the front office continues to trot them out.  10/10.  No notes.  And, that about does it for positive takeaways from the game.  For those of you who are squeamish around gore, it might be best for you to turn back now.  For the rest of you brave souls, flip on your cell phone flashlight to their brightest setting--it's about to get dark in here.

  • Agreement #2--Matt LaFleur Doesn't Seem To Have The Answer

Did anybody catch Matt's post game press conference on Sunday afternoon?  He was asked what he can do to fix Green Bay's recent offensive woes.  His answer?  I don't know.  That's what he said.  I don't know.  I shit you not.  Like George Costanza's doctor inspecting his lip discoloration.  Good night, nurse.  Dude, Matty, I love you man, but holy moly.  Isn't that kind of your job?  Imagine a plumber showing up to your house as your basement tub was flooding, looking at the clog for sixty minutes, throwing his hands up, saying he has no idea how to repair the drain, and then asking if you had any ideas. 

This is truly uncharted territory.  The first three years of the Matt LaFleur Era have been smooth sailing.  The last three weeks?  More like The Perfect Storm.  And, this isn't as simple as shuffling a few offensive linemen around.  And, a splashy wide receiver trade isn't going to cure all ills, either.  Sure, go sign OBJ.  And, trade for DJ Moore while you are at it.  They will look awesome sprinting down the field in green and gold as Rodgers gets sacked for the sixth time.   Green Bay is not fighting a battle on a single heading.  No, sir.  They are fighting four simultaneous battles spread out across four disparate cities. 

First, and foremost, you must fix the offensive line.  Moving Elgton Jenkins back to left guard and Adam Stenavich back into the offensive line room full time would be a great start.  Then, getting in a time machine and traveling back to the spring to resign Dennis Kelly might be an idea.  That's not an option, you say.  Well, kudos to you for being levelheaded.  If the Kelly idea is out, I guess you could try Yosh Nijman at right tackle.  Or possibly Zach Tom.  No guarantee that either works out great, but it honestly can't get worse than what we saw against the New York Jets.  With Jenkins back at left guard, you are free to flip Jon Runyan Jr over to right guard, and then you can transition Royce Newman to the world's most overqualified paperweight.  Just a thought.

Okay, now your line is set (hopefully).  Time to address the receiver position.  Here in lies the problem.  Yes, you could probably pry DJ Moore away from Carolina, but is there any assurance that he is going to gel with Rodgers?  Not really.  And, you have to ask yourself--Is this team good enough to compete for a Super Bowl.  A month ago, the answer was an emphatic yes.  Now, things are a little murkier.  Outside of the Philadelphia Eagles and, ugh, the Minnesota Vikings, the NFC looks pretty wide open.  So, maybe you do splurge and bring in a shiny new wide receiver, and push even more chips that you don't have into the middle of the poker table.  Are we even sure that throwing the ball all over the field is the answer in this modern NFL landscape (more on that later!)? 

And, if you are one of those maniacs who took to the Bird App on Sunday to call for 2 Browz' job, you might want to take an afternoon off and go see a movie.  Or a therapist.  Or a movie about a therapist.  C'mon, Packers Fam.  Do better.  Be better.

LaFleur is in an awkward spot right now.  A spot where great-looking people rarely find themselves.  The scenario where God has to scratch his nose for a minute, and, in doing so, halts giving to you with both hands for the slightest instance.  As a bald and freckled forty-year-old, I am well-versed in how to handle a near-constant barrage of metaphysical punches to the groin.  It will be interesting to see how Matt withstands this first-of-it's-kind supernatural nut shot. 

  • Agreement #3--Is Aaron Jones Still On The Team (That's more of a question, really)

Like it or not, the Two Shell Safety defense has changed how offenses attack defense.  It's the first time in my life that NFL offenses are chasing a defensive game change.  This is not apocryphal either.  Passing yards per game are down this year.  Deep accuracy is plummeting.  The dimensions of the field have changed.  It's time for offensive game plans to acquiesce to this new reality.  Sure, there are certain quarterbacks who are thriving in this new environment.  Brickhouse gunslingers who are mobile, and can take a licking and keep on ticking.  Josh Allen.  Jalen Hurts.  Patrick Mahomes.  Lamar Jackson.  Guys who are as big a threat running the ball as passing.  This new version of NFL football is No Country For Old Men.  This defensive trend appears to be the main culprit for the turtle-on-quaaludes slow start that Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Matt Ryan, and Russell Wilson (to be fair, Wilson might just suck) are currently mired in.  The deep ball that these gentlemen have built their careers on is so 2021.  Running the ball is the new black. 

Which makes it even more vexing that Matt LaFleur continues to de-emphasize Aaron Jones, the Packer's best and most explosive offensive player.  Maybe Matt was so mum on offensive changes in his Monday afternoon presser because he didn't want to tip his hand to Washington on all the creative ways he plans not to use Jones this week.  All of this two high safety stuff that Green Bay has been facing recently chafes big time on Rodgers and LaFleur's preferred system.  Jones is the salve.  Want to force teams to change the way they attack you?  Change the way you attack them.  Seems simple.  Their complete ignorance of Jones lately is bordering on the sublime.  Like that scene from The Simpsons where Homer is joining the Witness Relocation Program and the FBI is helping create his new identity as Homer Thompson.  Aaron Jones is tapping LaFleur on the foot, and Matt is turning to Adam Stenavich and saying "I think he is talking to you".

Just look at the way New England attacked Green Bay three weeks ago.  Belichick may be getting old, but he hasn't lost a step.  Bringing extra offensive tackles in as auxiliary tight ends.  Featuring fullbacks.  Limiting the routes his young QB was throwing.  Adjusting to a more truncated route tree.  Football by way of the late 1980s.  This may be the future if this two safety stuff persists.  Don't take my word for it.  Aaron Rodgers spoke about this several times in one of the 374 podcast interviews he recorded in the pre-season.  It's just too bad he is not heeding his own advice.
 

  • Agreement #4--McCarthyism Will Never Die

Does anybody remember 2018?  The tide pod challenge?  The annoying-ass yodeling Walmart kid?  The Yanny vs Laurel debate?  Simpler times.  Remember Aaron Rodgers turning heel on Mike McCarthy like Hulk Hogan at the 1996 Bash at the Beach?  2018 was the year when Aaron Rodgers finally said enough of this shit, and essentially did everything in his power to push Mike McCarthy out the door.  And, that probably took a lot of pushing because Mike McCarthy is a really big dude.   Long story short--LaFleur was hired 4 months later, Aaron and LaFleur had an awkward feeling out phase in 2019, followed by a romantic comedy-esque meet cute in 2020 over Zoom during the pandemic, and everything has been Kumbaya and roasted marshmallows since.  About that.

By now, you have heard the word "simplify" so much this week that you are ready to call Tommy Lee Jones and Will Smith and have them hit you with the neuralyzer (Will Smith and hit in the same sentence--Freudian slip!).  The phrase "simplify" has been parsed to death over the last 48 hours.  Good news!  I am here to simplify "simplify" for you.  When Rodgers says simplify, he means pivoting harder to the West Coast offense.  You know, Mike McCarthy's offense.  Everybody wants to point to Aaron's distaste for motion.  Sure.  He has mentioned that a few times.  Motion is a huge part of LaFleur's scheme.    Rodgers feels that motion interrupts any rhythm the offense could potentially find (though finding a rhythm with this offensive line is going to be like Navin Johnson finding rhythm in The Jerk--ie, a miracle). 

Rodgers has often ruminated about the beauty and simplicity of the West Coast offense.  He is not exactly wrong.  Bill Walsh, the guy who takes credit for inventing the West Coast offense (that's a long story) pointed to the simplicity of the scheme as his primary reason for adopting it.  Walsh alleged that he could teach his team the scheme in 2 days.  Pretty convincing.  More convincing--The fact that Mike Holmgren taught the scheme to Brett Favre (Brett is no stranger to schemes though, amiright?).  This Frankensteined together offense that Green Bay has been running the past two years is essentially 66% LaFleur, 33% West Coast.  My guess is Rodgers would like to tip those scales a little closer to 50/50.

Having Aaron Rodgers resort back to his comfort blanket of the McCarthy offense is baffling.  The offense stagnated greatly during McCarthy's last two years.  Returning to a bastardized version of Big Mike's West Coast playbook is like one of those gals that Ariel Castro had in his basement getting set free, returning home, taking a nice warm shower, and then heading back to Castro's to watch a movie.  It's illogical.  If Green Bay is going to pull itself out of this tailspin it finds itself currently experiencing, it is not by pivoting to failed systems from the past.  It would behoove the Packers to more fully embrace LaFleur's original system, Rodgers feelings be damned.  Aaron might not like that.  But, as Don Draper once famously said, "that's what the money is for".

  • Catching Strays

Fox replacing Buck and Aikman with Kevin Burkhardt and Greg Olsen is like trying to replace Davante Adams and Marques Valdez Scantling with Sammie Watkins and Christian Watson.

Did Aaron Rodgers get his postgame jacket (shawl?) from Qui Gon Jinn's garage sale?

Why do you think Fox had Erin Andrews (or was that Nanook of the North?) interview Aaron Rodgers and chose to have Tom Rinaldi interview Zach Wilson on Sunday's pre-game show?  Inquiring minds want to know. 

Paying De'Vondre Campbell $7 million dollars for his efforts this season is like paying a hooker $1000 dollars to read a manuscript of how your wife's day at work went.

Quay Walker got a 6 on the Wonderlic test.  I had my daughter take the Wonderlic last week.  She got a 10.  She is eight years old. 

We don't need Newman.  We need a New-man.  Ugh.  I will see myself out. 

GO PACK GO!!!

Tim Preece lives in Utah because he makes poor life decisions.

6 points
 

Comments (23)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

October 19, 2022 at 06:45 pm

I’d leave the wonderlich out of things. That thing is so discredited. Otherwise I’d say that, for the first time, you hit in all 4 this time.

6 points
6
0
PeteK's picture

October 19, 2022 at 07:43 pm

Field like street smarts uses a different measuring tool.

2 points
2
0
Swisch's picture

October 19, 2022 at 09:48 pm

I think it's generally good to leave out references to supposed tests of intelligence. People are smart in different ways.
It seems some so-called experts with a bevy of advanced degrees are telling us some highly questionable things these days regarding biology, the economy, and foreign affairs.
Also, Aaron Rodgers may be highly intelligent, but as far as I can tell, all of his interminable dawdling at the line of scrimmage until (or beyond) the last millisecond of the play clock doesn't seem to usually bring stellar results.

0 points
2
2
Littlejim51's picture

October 19, 2022 at 11:23 pm

I appreciate your cleverness and a resounding thank you for the article. I hope MLF reads it and the rest of the packers (especially after the Jets HC’s recording).

0 points
1
1
LeotisHarris's picture

October 19, 2022 at 07:16 pm

In defense of Quay, I think he scored a 9 on the Wonderlic. His fellow Bulldog, Wyatt, scored an 8.

2 points
2
0
Johnblood27's picture

October 19, 2022 at 07:34 pm

Two brains...

One thimble...

Half full...

0 points
2
2
jurp's picture

October 19, 2022 at 07:23 pm

I loved the article, but have to disagree on the unripe melon throwbacks. I think they'd look better with the white pants GB has occasionally worn, but the all-greens are, well, like the Bear's Orange Non-crush uniforms last week. The only worse unis are Seattle's Neon Horrors.

4 points
4
0
Johnblood27's picture

October 19, 2022 at 07:34 pm

Pittsburghs killer bees are putrid as well, among the worst of the worst.

4 points
4
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

October 19, 2022 at 08:23 pm

Tim, Well done. I liked what you said and the way you said it.

2 points
2
0
Since&#039;61's picture

October 19, 2022 at 08:57 pm

I don't like the Green uniforms. I prefer the Packers uniforms from the 60s. Green, Gold, Champions.

Also, defenses have actually been playing single high Safety and man to man against Rodgers most of the time this season and daring the Packers to throw. They know that our receiving corps can't win their one on one matchups so they put 7 or 8 in the box to stop the run and our receivers can't get separation so Rodgers is left with a check down to either Jones, Dillon or Tonyan or he takes a sack.

The defense knows that Rodgers will read the defense and choose pass with the RPO because his receivers are one on one. Problem is that none of his receivers win their one on ones and with our non-existent OL Rodgers takes a sack because no one is open. Perfect example is the Giants defense going Cover - 0 when the Packers had 3rd and 2 on the Giants 6 and they batted down 2 passes.

The league's defenses knows what Rodgers reads are and how he will respond. Unfortunately MLF, the offensive genius, doesn't have a solution to counter what the defense is doing.

At least MLF should try to fix the OL with left to right; Bak, Jenkins, Myers, Runyon, Nijman. The upcoming game against Washington is the perfect opponent to make some changes. Then come up with some different plays to answer the defensive adjustments and the predictability of our play calls. On defense get aggressive and get after the QB. Stop reacting. dictate to the offense.

I do agree that we should not go back to MMs offense but there are elements of the West coast offense that we can incorporate into our offense. Quick slants, more passes to our RBs to get them in space. Run when the defense expects pass. Anything that suggests that MLF has some answers.

Thanks, Since '61

1 points
3.5
2.5
13TimeChamps's picture

October 19, 2022 at 09:19 pm

"They know that our receiving corps can't win their one on one matchups so they put 7 or 8 in the box to stop the run and our receivers can't get separation so Rodgers is left with a check down to either Jones, Dillon or Tonyan or he takes a sack."

Kind of makes me think we might actually need a super duper WR after all.

1 points
3
2
Since&#039;61's picture

October 19, 2022 at 10:42 pm

A super duper receiver could help but the reality is that MLF needs to come up with solutions for the offense when the defense has figured out what we're doing. Teams are ignoring our play action and dropping LBs into the areas where they know our receivers are going. Our offense has become too predictable.

These are game planning and game adjustment issues. We should be prepared for the defensive adjustments to our offense. But for whatever reason we never see the adjustments.

Next issue is get the OL straightened out. Even a super duper WR won't matter if the defense is getting unblocked free runs at our QB or our RBs in the run game.

Bottom line is that our team needs more than a super duper WR at this point. Thanks, Since '61

4 points
4
0
13TimeChamps's picture

October 20, 2022 at 12:50 pm

Of course this has been multifaceted. I have posted on here repeatedly that until this Oline situation gets figured out, this offense will continue to struggle.

But let's be honest. This WR group is one of the least talented in the league. Even last year, it was Davante and who else? Now there isn't even Davante. I love Lazard, but if he's our No 1 guy, that pretty much sums it up. What other team in the league would Allen Lazard be their No 1 option? The Bears maybe? Other than him, it's two veterans who are constantly injured, and a couple of raw, unproven rookies. And, for some reason, we rarely throw to our most dynamic player on offense.

So, yes, I think a proven veteran that can stretch the field would be a huge help for this team. Who that might be, I'll let the folks who get paid to make those decisions figure that out.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

October 19, 2022 at 11:17 pm

WCO is the basis of the Shanahan and Company zone schemes. When defenses stunt, you have to counter and trap them--basics. I have screamed every year to use a Fullback. Deguara was making plays vs the Giants and they shut him down. McCarthy used a vertical scheme since his NOLA days and never varied the looks. I would be thrilled if they ran any of Walsh's game plans and innovate. Vintage Day at Lambeau.

4 points
4
0
Guam's picture

October 20, 2022 at 09:00 am

There is another chapter to this issue Since '61. There are man-beater concepts available like bunch formations, motion, crossing (pick) routes, etc. etc., but the Packers rarely if ever use them. Rodgers doesn't like them. He prefers static, balanced sets where he gets a better read on the defense (unfortunately they get a much better read on the Packer offense too). Is the problem LaFleur or Rodgers? I suspect it is more Rodgers than LaFleur. LaFleur can't implement changes if Rodgers won't accept them.

I am not a big fan of LaFleur's, but I believe Rodgers' intransigence is the larger problem with this offense.

BTW, I like the "all green" uniforms.

3 points
3
0
egbertsouse's picture

October 19, 2022 at 09:08 pm

I think listening to a dentist’s drill would be an improvement on Joe Buck and Troy Aikman. Even if it was your teeth being drilled.

They both are so sure they are the smartest guys in the room. The only time they have been the smartest guys in the room was in the Mens’ Room at Wrestlemania VII.

I hear they are starring in a new movie. It’s called “Smug and Smugger.”

I read that in a recent popularity poll Buck and Aikman finished just ahead of herpes and right below wood ticks.

5 points
6
1
Swisch's picture

October 19, 2022 at 09:27 pm

Was Mike McCarthy really running the West Coast offense at the end of his days with the Packers?
I admit to signs of losing mental agility as I recently passed 60, but I only remember the Packers running three plays of increasing futility:
(1) A play that Rodgers still likes to try, but which has decreased in dividends over the past several years, is the draw-the-defense-offsides with the hard count, then heave the ball deep knowing that an interception would be nullified by the offside penalty.
There may even be a new rule now that was made to put a halt to this shenanigan.
It was fun for a while, though, until it became irritating.
I'd be glad for Tim to write a funny finish to this line, "That tactic of Rodgers stopped working about the time that . . ." (His reference to "The Simpsons" had me laughing hard.)
(2) Group three receivers out wide, and throw a quick pass to one while the other two block. Problem was, if I recall, the blockers would tend to get penalties for blocking downfield before the pass was thrown. Plus, defenses probably figured out this maneuver after not too long a time, especially if there wasn't much else to figure out in the Packers offense.
(3) Rodgers goes back to pass, doesn't find any open receivers, spins outside the pocket and scrambles around to find time for one of them to finally get open. Ah, the drama of the chase by defensive linemen as Rodgers raced toward the sideline hoping to improvise a completion.
***
Not all that imaginative from McCarthy and Rodgers in those days, although I may be forgetting a lot.
I'm glad for other fans to set me straight if I'm simplifying overly much (even allowing for some hyperbole in my attempt at humor).
Plus, let me know if this was really the West Coast offense. Instead, could it have been, just perhaps, the beginning of Rodgers dismissing the wishes of his head coach and getting carried away with hero ball?

2 points
4
2
Starrbrite's picture

October 19, 2022 at 09:36 pm

Good article—
In a humorous way, points out the many deficiencies facing the Packers.
As for color rush uniforms—NO!!; although I did like the white uniforms. We have the most iconic uniforms of all, no need to wear anything else.
Let’s sign a receiver. I’m still for Brandin Cooks, but I like Moore too.
Thought we should have signed DeSean…and he might/could have returned punts too.
Go Packers!!

2 points
3
1
croatpackfan's picture

October 20, 2022 at 12:49 am

Nothing to add Tim. You said everything what many posters here (and me, too) are lamenting after almost every game this season.

ACR, supported by MLF is prove that this old proverb is correct - you can't teach old dog new tricks. Belichik is prove that proverb fail when old dog wants to learn new tricks.

Again, by the time we see that there was at least 3 major mistake made by Mark Murphy:
1. changing the structure of football operation; 2. hire of MLF just on presumption of MLF's statement about "Illusion of complexity"; 3. producing SC hell by extending ACR, who already spoke of possible retirement, for a fortune.

But, what I wrote now is nothing new. Many posters here said that, As complete list or part of it. "Fish always smell from the head!" Correct? That means that culprits are Murphy, coaches and ACR. They are "heads" of respectively parts of football operation.

And, for rookies, it is hard to be positive when you see everything is falling apart. No because of losing, but because of total mess which is responsible for what.

My advice to ACR, if he thinks he is so brilliant football mind, to retire and become football coach. Than we will be able to see how much he knows and understand about football and relationships.

Note: If there are mistakes in my comment, take notice it is written on mobile phone. Thank you.

1 points
1
0
Cubbygold's picture

October 20, 2022 at 05:19 am

Tim, thanks for the comedy after a sh*tty week. Well done.

1 points
1
0
freddisch's picture

October 20, 2022 at 07:37 am

Great read as usual

1 points
1
0
PearlyBakerBest's picture

October 20, 2022 at 07:54 am

Tim, You’re a great writer but the Ariel Castro analogy was poor form.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 20, 2022 at 11:06 am

Tim you hit the mark, with abundant snark, even mixed in a shark.

Your humor helped silenced my bark, accepting before dawn it is most dark....hoping for sunshine in that Fedex Park.

(I will show myself out)

1 points
1
0