Packers vs. Seahawks: 5 Things to Watch and a Prediction (NFC Championship Game)

Five things to watch and a prediction for the Packers' NFC Championship Game matchup with the Seahawks. 

Eddie Lacy looks to avoid a tackle by Cliff Avril—Joe Nicholson, USA TODAY Sports.

Eddie Lacy looks to avoid a tackle by Cliff Avril—Joe Nicholson, USA TODAY Sports.

A trip to Super Bowl XLIX is on the line when the Green Bay Packers (13-4) travel to Seattle to take on the defending champion Seahawks (13-4) in the NFC Championship Game at CenturyLink Field.

Here’s five things to watch and a prediction: 

 

1. Avoiding Rich 

Did the Packers intentionally avoid Richard Sherman back in Week 1? Depends on your interpretation of avoid. There was an obvious attempt to move Jordy Nelson around and away from Sherman, while most passing downs sacrificed a receiver such as Jarrett Boykin’s to Sherman’s preferred side. No offense should ever cut the field in half, but the bigger issue in the opener was Green Bay’s inability to create open receivers. Sherman wasn’t targeted because his receiver wasn’t open. Nelson and Randall Cobb struggled to create separation. No receiver averaged more than 10 yards per catch, and the Packers only created one passing play over 20 yards. The Packers now have a broader range of receiving targets, with rookies Davante Adams and Richard Rodgers developing into legitimate pass-catchers over the last 16 games. Given Aaron Rodgers’ likely inability to buy time outside the pocket, it will be vitally important for the Packers receivers to provide more passing windows this time around. There’s no reason to avoid any player or either side of the field. 

 

2. New Wrinkles

The Packers defense gave up 34 points and 207 rushing yards the first go-around in Seattle, but two new wrinkles—and the absence of a few others—might help now. Green Bay has dumped the “quad” defense, replaced A.J. Hawk and Brad Jones as regular players and introduced the NASCAR pressure package and Clay Matthews at inside linebacker. The quad was a disaster and Hawk and Jones were outmatched physically inside, missing five tackles. Meanwhile, the NASCAR look has been successful, especially on third down, and could be used in a greater capacity Sunday to help contain Russell Wilson and his scrambling abilities. Four athletic rushers and a spy behind them is an attractive option to help neutralize Wilson’s unpredictability. Matthews’ repositioning from the edge to the inside started a drastic turnaround for the run defense. The Packers can’t give up 200-plus rushing yards and expect to win. Having Matthews and the physical Sam Barrington inside gives Green Bay a much better chance to force the Seahawks to grind for yards on the ground. Then again, nothing scheme-wise will matter if the Packers miss 18 tackles again. 

 

3. Red Hot Julius Peppers

Veteran Julius Peppers has that veteran craving for a Super Bowl, much like Charles Woodson back in 2010. He’ll speak to the team before Sunday, but he’ll make his loudest contribution between the white lines. The Packers have limited his snaps and he’s been better off for it, with splash plays in each of the last three games. Peppers can help his new team get back to the Super Bowl with more Sunday, especially considering Seattle’s shaky situation at right tackle. Rookie starter Justin Britt is questionable with a knee injury, and if he doesn’t play, 2013 undrafted free agent Alvin Bailey will start. Either way, the opportunity is a great one for Peppers. It would be another notch on Ted Thompson’s already impressive belt if Peppers was a difference maker in back-to-back games on another improbable run to the Super Bowl.  

 

4. Confidence Builder?

A game four months and 16 games ago probably doesn’t mean much to Mike McCarthy, but if there’s anything the Packers can take away from the opener, it’s that a highly competitive game through the first three quarters or so turned on its head due to self-inflicted wounds. An interception on the first play of the second half. A rushed fourth down play near midfield. A blown protection from a backup right tackle resulting in a safety. Two killer penalties on Seattle’s dagger drive. Make those kind of mistakes against the defending champs and a 20-point loss was predictable. But the Packers shouldn’t feel like going into Seattle is an impossible task. The Panthers were only down a touchdown going into the fourth quarter last week, and it took an interception for a score in the red zone to finally put the game away. Winning in Seattle won’t be easy, but the Packers will be in position to win the game if some of the egregious mistakes from the opener are cleaned up. Bank on it. 

 

5. In Lacy’s Hands

The Packers are bringing a gimpy quarterback into a tough atmosphere to face a historically good defense with potentially wet and windy conditions in the forecast. The best counter to those obstacles is having a fresh, (mostly) healthy and talented running back and an offensive line that has molded into one of the game’s best this season. This will always be Rodgers’ team, and Mike McCarthy will always side with putting the biggest games on his quarterback’s shoulders. But why wouldn’t this be on Lacy to power a win? The Seahawks are a top-2 defense in rushing yards and yards per carry, but Seattle has lost this season when opponents have run the football—with games against Kansas City and Dallas sticking out as obvious examples. Nothing about the task will be easy, but success in the run game will keep the Packers on schedule on offense while also keeping the Green Bay defense off the field. Lacy has rushed for 97 or more yards in six of the last seven games, and he’s currently on a 10-game run with 100 or more yards from scrimmage. He needs to be productive for Green Bay to get to the Super Bowl. 

 

Prediction: Seahawks 27, Packers 23 (12-5)

The Packers weren’t 20 points worse than Seattle back in September, and many of Green Bay’s internal improvements—running the ball, stopping the run and broadening the receiving pool—match up nicely with areas the Seahawks exploited in Week 1. I’d like the Packers by three points if Aaron Rodgers was closer to 100 percent. But I think the calf injury and the immobility it has caused is worth a touchdown against Seattle’s defense, and those lost points will be enough to send Seattle back to the Super Bowl for a second straight season. 

 

Zach Kruse contributes to Cheesehead TV. He is also the Lead Writer for the NFC North at Bleacher Report. You can reach him on Twitter @zachkruse2 or by email at [email protected].

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (33)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
4thand1's picture

January 16, 2015 at 10:13 pm

I predict you'll be 12-6 after Sunday.

0 points
0
0
NewNikeShoes's picture

January 16, 2015 at 10:49 pm

I admire your swag.
Can't wait for this game!

0 points
0
0
NashvilleCheesehead's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:03 am

I predict you'll be 12-7 at end of season! You seem to underestimate this team in big games.

0 points
0
0
Zach Kruse's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:48 am

I haven't predicted a playoff game wrong since I came to CheeseheadTV :)

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

January 17, 2015 at 10:19 am

Nobody's perfect, you're way overdue.

0 points
0
0
packsmack's picture

January 16, 2015 at 11:11 pm

28-13 Packers. Defense is gonna go crazy.

0 points
0
0
lucky953's picture

January 17, 2015 at 12:10 am

I guess picking against the Packers means you're being "objective" and a national media writer. I generally like your analysis. Hey, a guy's gotta pursue a career. I'll bet a dozen donuts you wouldn't make that prediction sitting with a bunch of Packers fans in Green Bay. Sorry, you lose! Green Bay 24 Seattle 17

0 points
0
0
Zach Kruse's picture

January 17, 2015 at 12:53 am

Just being honest with how I see it, like always.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:04 am

smh...

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:39 pm

Of course Zach would make the same prediction sitting with Packers fans - because real Packers fans would respect his opinion.

0 points
0
0
aj's picture

January 17, 2015 at 12:11 am

Dang Kruse... you're jumping ship for this game? I was hoping our own guys at chtv would have faith, but it seems like it's just the fans for this one. It's alright, I hope you pick them to lose in two weeks as well.

0 points
0
0
jh9's picture

January 17, 2015 at 06:03 am

Just about every football analyst and national media pundit are picking the Seahawks. If I were Mike McCarthy I would use this situation to my advantage and make sure the Packers knew how everyone is disrespecting them. From the way all these so-called experts are looking at this match-up, you'd think the Seahawks are playing against a college team!

Personally, I can be as objective as the next guy, but I'm now sick of all this "piling on." On Sunday I'll be rooting as hard as ever for the Packers to win but with the added motivation of wanting to stick it to every doubting expert. If AR and the Packers can pull out this victory it will be one of the best most satisfying wins in Packers history!

Go Pack Go!

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

January 17, 2015 at 07:59 am

For the second week in a row all we hear about is the OTHER teams running game. Last week it was all about the Cowboys running game, the Cowboys OL, and this week it's been all about Lynch. I'm sure McCarthy has pointed this out to his OL and Lacy. How the media continues to ignore the Packers OL and running game is beyond me but they have. Punch them in the mouth for 60 minutes Mike, don't get to cute, and put this crap that the Packers can't beat a physical team to rest!

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:06 am

I'm done talking about this game. I'm ready for some action. I'm going to ALWAYS expect a win from my Packers. Go! Pack! Go!

0 points
0
0
Doug_In_Sandpoint's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:56 am

Yeah, what you said. Except the last part. Our D steps up big and scores once. Pack 30, Hawks 20.

0 points
0
0
Tommyboy's picture

January 17, 2015 at 11:45 am

I don't know gentlemen, it's great to be a homer and all, but it will take a Herculean effort to win this game. No one is saying the Packers can't do it, but it'll take some special play to get it done. I'm with Zach on this. And yes, I hope beyond hope we're wrong.

By the way, I've literally seen NO one pick the Packers in the media. Anyone???

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 17, 2015 at 11:48 am

"By the way, I've literally seen NO one pick the Packers in the media. Anyone???"

What does that mean?

0 points
0
0
LASVEGAS-TOM's picture

January 17, 2015 at 01:24 pm

Usually that means a Sure GB Cover. Jason Wilbe is the only Media person I've seen pick GB. The line has moved 1/2 Pt. Seems to me, with everyone seemingly on Seattle in this game, I would have thought the line would have moved up?? Las Vegas has the $$$$ going to the side it wants it to go, which ever side that is? It really doesn't make sense? Usually when all the $$$$ is one way, it loses. I can't ever remember GB getting 7 1/2 Pt's & winning outright. The Line tells me one thing, all the Smack talk tells me another. I believe we're going to The Big Dance!! LVT

0 points
0
0
Tommyboy's picture

January 17, 2015 at 01:40 pm

I mean I haven't seen anyone in the media pick the Packers to win. I've seen plenty of fans, but haven't seen anyone from any network or news outlet pick the Packers. I'm wondering if anyone has seen somebody pick the Packers in this game. It sounds like Wilde has. I love Wilde, but he's obviously a GB guy.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 17, 2015 at 02:53 pm

I hear the people talking Seahwks this and Seahawks that, but all of these websites have the Pack on display. You'll see the Pack before you see the Seahawks. NFL.com, Bleacherreport.com, CBSsports.com. They know we're a serious threat.

0 points
0
0
Matt Mills's picture

January 18, 2015 at 01:15 am

Dave Dameshek at NFL.com picked the Packers. So there is one, anyway...

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

January 17, 2015 at 12:45 pm

It looks like i will be watching our Packers beat the Seahawks from the first row, with one Corey Behnke.

I plan on storming the field naked, sooo... keep an eye out.

27-24 Pack

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 17, 2015 at 01:00 pm

Plan on going and blending in or are you going Packer'd out?

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

January 17, 2015 at 01:27 pm

What kind of a question is that!?!?

I'll have my gear on.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 17, 2015 at 02:46 pm

I read someone's post that they would be uncomfortable with not many Pack fans nearby in the stadium.

I'd rock my sh*t too. I was just asking!

0 points
0
0
packsmack's picture

January 17, 2015 at 03:27 pm

You'll have a blast with Behnke, that's really awesome.

0 points
0
0
Doug_In_Sandpoint's picture

January 17, 2015 at 06:07 pm

That's my seat! Corey???

0 points
0
0
Doug_In_Sandpoint's picture

January 17, 2015 at 06:08 pm

Congrats though. I'll be at home. Alone.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

January 19, 2015 at 08:36 pm

I was really glad to be there... for 56 minutes.

It was a long ride home.

0 points
0
0
Norm's picture

January 17, 2015 at 08:43 pm

Zach, why would you say "another improbable run to the Super Bowl?" What's so improbable about the Packers winning one home game as the favorite? If this were the Lions then sure, but this is the Green Bay Packers and we have Aaron Fucking Rodgers as our quarterback!

Feel free to use that phrase after they upset the Seahawks tomorrow though.

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

January 17, 2015 at 09:18 pm

Wickersham and Ditka picked the Packers to win. 2 of the experts on ESPN panel. I'm picking the Pack too, make that 3 experts.

0 points
0
0
TommyG's picture

January 18, 2015 at 12:18 am

Picking against the pack is the easy and lazy pick, that's why so any "experts" are taking it. To be wrong about an underdog winning makes you a homer, to be wrong about a favorite makes you part of the herd. The media loves being part of the herd. That way they can all be right or wrong together; and we as fans ignore their faux pas.

0 points
0
0
sheppercheeser's picture

January 18, 2015 at 06:49 am

I think if the 'Hawks played the Packers 10 games, the 'Hawks would win 6-7 of them. That being said, if the Packers can play mistake free i.e. no blown coverages, no killer penalties and no turnovers (tall order!), they will be in it at the end. Throw in a 'Hawks turnover or two and the Packers win. Today the Pack have to play smart!

0 points
0
0