Breaking down the latest Packers cap moves

The Packers inched closer to complying with the salary cap but still have work to do.

 

The Packers released Billy Turner and ZaDarius Smith.  Turner's release saves $3.359 million, but a net of $2.65 million because his removal promotes a player making $705K into the top 51 highest paid Packers.  Releasing ZaDarius Smith saves $15.281 million, or a net of $14.576 million. 

ZaDarius Smith's release was widely expected although there were reports that Smith was offered the option to return to the team to play for the cash he was scheduled to earn - but probably with voids to reduce his cap number.  ZaDarius if healthy is much better off declining that offer and entering free agency one year younger and free of the risk of injury or that the quality of his play might decline in 2022 while playing for the Packers.

Turner's release was somewhat surprising.  The Packers tackle situation looked pretty good going into 2022.  Assuming Bakhtiari will be healthy and with Turner available, the Packers were set at left and right tackle with Nijman being the primary backup.  That is a trio many teams might envy.  The Packers would have gained even more flexibility when Jenkins returned as he is capable at both spots. 

Now the team will enter the season without a proven swing tackle.  Many will suggest bringing in a proven veteran (or drafting a tackle), but that cost is not significantly different than the amount gained by releasing Turner.  His contract could have been left untouched.  If the Packers did not believe his services were needed, they possibly could have flipped him for a draft pick or released him in June to gain extra cap relief. 

It is possible that Turner did not cooperate with the Packers by agreeing to add an extra void year.  It also might be that the Packers needed Turner's permission to convert his base salary into a signing bonus and he refused.  Entering his age 31 season and coming off one of his best seasons, I would think that Turner is better off trying to secure one last long-term contract in free agency now rather than next year.

PACKERS EXTEND PRESTON SMITH:

The Packers added four years to Preston Smith's contract, keeping him under contract through the 2026 season and gaining $8.26 million in 2022 salary cap savings.  He received 4 new years and $52 million ($13M AAV) and a $12.2 million signing bonus.  Here are the details per Overthecap:

 

YR Base SB Roster GA WO Cap Dead Save
'22 1.15M 9.69M   .5M .15M 11.46M 19.45M (7.99M)
'23 2.0M 2.44M 7.5M .6M .5M 13.04M 9.76M 3.28M
'24 5.7M 2.44M 5.4M  .8M .5M 14.84M 7.32M 7.52M
'25 12.0M 2.44M   .9M .5M 15.84M 4.88M 10.96M
'26 12.6M 2.44M   1M .5M 16.54M 2.44M 14.10M

This looks like a giant win for the Packers to my eyes.  His AAV is unchanged and thus is a lower percentage of the salary cap than it was when he signed in 2019.  He can earn $14M in cash for 2022 (just $1.5M more than he was scheduled to earn under his old contract) and thus has a one-year out of $14M with $9.76M dead and cap savings of $3.28M.  Should the Packers need to generate cap space in 2023, there is a nice, fat $7.5M roster bonus available.  There is a two-year out for $24.6M with $7.32M dead and cap savings of $7.52M.

The Packers needed to generate sizeable savings from Preston Smith, which they achieved.  That being the case, I worried that Preston Smith would have all the leverage and bargain hard for a lucractive contract.  I misgivings were misplaced.

So far, the Packers have restructured the contracts of Kenny Clark, Aaron Jones, and David Bakhtiari, extended Preston Smith and released ZaDarius Smith and Billy Turner.  Here is a tracker:

Player Total Saved My Est. 2023  
Bakhtiari 8.78M 6.33M 3.86M  
A. Jones 3.05M 3.05M 763K Likely all $3.05M hits 2023 cap
K. Clark 10.892M 10.0M 2.723M  
Z. Smith 15.28M 15.28M N/A  
Turner 3.36M 3.91M N/A  
P. Smith 8.26M 8.00M N/A  
TOTAL 49.62M 46.57M $7.346M  

Overthecap has the Packers $18.335M over the cap still, not including the 2022 salary cap number for DeVondre Campbell, who has reportedly re-signed, and not including Rasul Douglas, Chandon Sullivan, Robert Tonyan, Allen Lazard, Marquez Valdes-Scantling, Corey Bojorquez, Whitney Mercilus and several other possibilities.  Fans are still waiting to see the details on Aaron Rodgers' contract.  Other players who could generate cap savings include Randall Cobb ($6M?), Adrian Amos ($4.7M?), Dean Lowry ($3.6M?), Marcedes Lewis ($1.7M?), Mason Crosby ($2.39M) and Davante Adams ($8M to $10M?) if the two sides can reach an agreement on his value.  That seems like it might take some time as Adams has publicly indicated that he will not play on the franchise tag.  While not encouraging, players threatening to sit out due to being tagged is not terribly uncommon either.

Buckle up since more moves should happen soon.  

 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
9 points
 

Comments (43)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:11 pm

LOL - Jersey Al changed the title in roughly 6 minutes and before the first comment! He hates my titles, not that I blame him.

Very happy with the Preston contract. Surprised they released Turner and wonder if they will draft someone (still have to read that article), sign someone, or cross-train an existing player. Z was expected - back surgeries scare me.

$18M and change to go, but remember that does not include $2.6M for draft picks due in May or so, $3.5M for the PS, and $5M for a piggy bank. That is about $11M. It looks like GB had $7.9M in space the day before the first game and almost $11M right after the initial cutdown, but ended up with $2.9M. A $5M piggy bank is not too much. And it doesn't include money for Campbell and anyone they sign, tender, or re-sign.

Adams threw out a little bomb saying he wouldn't play on the tag. He knows GB needs the cap space. I think GB loses this battle of wills, but some compromise will be included if they can reach an agreement. Maybe incentives.

Edit: I should run a contest: guess what TGR's crappy title initially was for this article!

6 points
7
1
dobber's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:32 pm

That Preston Smith deal really is pretty team friendly. He had his contract downsized last season, but bounced back and was a key piece. Good player. Good guy. Always available.

"guess what TGR's crappy title initially was for this article!"

Packers Cut the Cheese

5 points
6
1
MainePackFan's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:39 pm

As the world TurnZ

5 points
5
0
pantz_bURp's picture

March 14, 2022 at 07:31 pm

HandiCAPped

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 15, 2022 at 09:00 am

TGR: Was the original title "Most Key Packers Playing Gutey-Ball...A Few Don't."?

Appreciate the update. It does show Gutey and Ball make a good personnel/financial team.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 15, 2022 at 10:04 am

Rodgers is officially back on a three year, $150 million dollar deal with a first year cap hit of $28.5 million (or savings of $19 million for 2022). That puts the Packers under the cap for the start of the business year. They still need $11 million for 2022 operations plus they need to find the money for Davante's contract. Lots of work still ahead.

I did hear an ESPN talking head state that the league expects the cap to go up 20% in 2023 and another 20% in 2024 due to the new television contracts. Have no idea if that assertion is true, but if so, will certainly give the Packers some cap room to work with beyond 2022.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

March 15, 2022 at 10:38 am

cheese wiz---other entries are hilarious.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:15 pm

Thank you TGR, for keeping up to date and explaining it so quickly. Now I am wondering what the original title was!

2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:28 pm

Now better titles are occurring to me. I think my last ones were more sprightly: here comes the ugly and a something like a couple of homely restructures for Clark and Jones. I suppose I could have written something like here comes the risky extensions, but I was very pleased overall with Preston's numbers. I really thought he might play hardball and get a premium. Maybe those numbers are simply his market: legal tampering started at 11 am today, so these numbers were out maybe 4 (?) hours later.

Tom Silverstein is reporting that Campbell's first year cap hit will be around $5M. Sounds like a pretty nice cash flow for him in this deal. Well, GB has to use signing bonuses.

2 points
2
0
Duneslick's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:30 pm

Big change they just signed campbell to 10 plus million a year. Davante wants 30. Where is this money coming from

1 points
1
0
Johnblood27's picture

March 15, 2022 at 08:00 am

your pocket, dude!

everything you buy that is advertised on an nfl telecast pays the freight.

if you actually attend the games, you certainly know where the money comes from since it literally flies out of your pocket into the NFL coffers.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:32 pm

Silverstein also reporting that Turner was released with a failed physical designation, but that the knee injury is minor and he should be healthy for 2022. Packers would have to reveal that in the release, so it may or not have been causative in GB's decision to release Turner: Silverstein thinks it was not the cause.

6 points
6
0
jhtobias's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:33 pm

I'm not sure why anyone is suprised davonte will not play on the tag. He shouldn't he wants to be paid properly foe his services like anyone in this world.

Problem is I'm not sure rodgers will play in green bay without him.

Personally, from a business standpoint I would trade him, but packers don't have that luxury with rodgers demands when it comes to devante.

Packers have a choice to make keep both rodgers happy which means pay davante or most likely lose both.

-1 points
1
2
MainePackFan's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:58 pm

Rodgers is playing for the Pack in 2022. Adams I'm not sure. C Kirk signing for stupid money today didn't help the Packers case.

As I said in an earlier post, let him get his best offer. If you aren't willing to pay it, take the 2 first round picks or work out a trade with the team that is willing to pay it.

I hope Tae is back, but if he insists on being the highest paid WR (which he deserves) he needs to understand that being the highest paid player at a position is short lived accomplishment. Ask Bahk :)

6 points
6
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:59 pm

It is not legal to trade Adams unless he signs his tender. So trading him is not an option unless GB gets his consent. In some ways that is a formality because any team trying to acquire him would want to reach contract terms with him.

6 points
6
0
dblbogey's picture

March 14, 2022 at 09:52 pm

"he wants to be paid properly for his services like anyone in this world."

If I was Davante I'd be happy adding another 21 million to the many millions he already has and play catch with Aaron Rodgers. If you're happy where you are, if you are already filthy rich, just play. Actually, I'd love for some team to give us two #1's for him though.

2 points
3
1
jeremyjjbrown's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:01 pm

Breath man. It's no surprise to the Packers that Adams isn't playing on the tag.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 15, 2022 at 09:10 am

No, it isn't. He and the Packers have until July to work out a long term deal. Signing the $20 M tag now reduces his negotiating leverage with the Pack. And he can only negotiate with the Packers (IE exclusive rights tag) now, right?

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 16, 2022 at 02:51 am

No, Adams is on the non-exclusive tag (the exclusive tag is almost never used: last time it was on Dak Prescott). The non-exclusive tag does allow Adams to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet, but the price is two first round picks if GB declines to match. That won't happen unless Bill O'Brien returns or Jacksonville really wants him, given how they are throwing money around. Now, someone might have made an offer for Dak and given up two firsts given what QBs command.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:42 pm

Fortunately, our #4 WR didnt get cut, cuz he’ll help us a lot more than a starting tackle. There has to be something I’m not seeing in this Turner release.

1 points
2
1
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 07:07 pm

Age - 31
injury - missed 2 and 4 games in '20 and '21.
contract - uncooperative? that's speculation.

Watching Bulaga play 10 and just one game after leaving GB?

I don't know the answer and was surprised they didn't just let him play on his current contract, or try to flip him later. At worse, a release after June 1 (or by designation) saved quite a bit, to nearly $6M saved in 2022 instead of the 3.3M they got.

I also hope they are just saving AR's deal to see how much they need. I would just take the max and not spend it if Gute can't find the right player to spend it on but have it if an opportunity presents itself.

But that's just me: I wouldn't spend it, I don't even like spending other people's money.

7 points
7
0
BirdDogUni's picture

March 14, 2022 at 07:20 pm

I wonder if AR's deal is in direct relationship to getting the "Band" back-together? I don't have any idea what that would look like, but it would be new and different for sure...

2 points
2
0
MarkinMadison's picture

March 14, 2022 at 10:00 pm

I was wondering the same thing. Maybe we haven't seen Rodgers' deal yet because he knows he may have to trim some fat to keep Davante around.

1 points
1
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:02 pm

I was no surprised Turner was cut. But I was surprised he was cut now.

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 15, 2022 at 05:22 am

I wonder if Bulaga would return for a Wagner/Kelly type deal. Or maybe he hangs it up, he did get paid pretty well the last two years.

Any word on whether Preston's roster bonuses are guaranteed? Seems like the last bridge for Ball to cross.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 15, 2022 at 05:25 am

No. Nothing seems to indicate that any money in Preston's deal is guaranteed other than the signing bonus.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

March 14, 2022 at 08:00 pm

I think it's terrific what the packers have done so far. Getting Rodgers back; seems to have open the doors to these big contracts. And I believe Z. Smith would still be a packer, if it wasn't for his back operation. The biggest surprise was Turner. But after so many guys coming and going at RT. Just No job appreciation there. Devante Adams is a Need. The packers made that case when they tagged him. But up to now; I Thought it was because Rodgers blackmailed them. So what the Hell is his problem? Obviously Money. Even if you pay him. His attitude during these negotiations, have tarnished his image. I don't care if he plays for the packers or not. When a player only sees money. They don't care about anyone but themselves. And we don't need him to win.

5 points
5
0
MarkinMadison's picture

March 14, 2022 at 10:01 pm

I think they are probably just looking at Nijman and seeing a potential upgrade at RT. That is my thought.

5 points
5
0
stockholder's picture

March 14, 2022 at 08:28 pm

Next poll: Should Alexander be the highest paid Packer?

-2 points
1
3
PhantomII's picture

March 14, 2022 at 09:28 pm

JA has 1 ALL PRO year and a couple good ones. Hurt for an excessively long time on a botched tackle of a big RB.
I know he is a candidate for a big contract but would feel a lot better with a playing time / escalators for pro bowl/ all pro / PD's / INT's / QBR . I would say top 5 money with escalators or top 3 at most. He's hyped a bit too much for 1 special year. If it were back to back I would have no issue. He's dropped quite a few INT's. Douglas had 5 INT's , 2 of which were pick sixes.....something I would think should be on a top paid CB resume....just sayin'.

4 points
4
0
Rossonero's picture

March 14, 2022 at 09:21 pm

I, too, was most surprised about Turner being shown the door. It's not like it was massive savings at $3M+. Perhaps the Packers have the following in mind:

1. Move Yosh Nijman to RT (I think he's only ever played LT, but you never know)
2. Re-sign Dennis Kelly for peanuts (assuming no one else snaps him up of course)
3. Move Jenkins to RT since he's versatile enough and Guards are easier to find
4. Draft a RT....or a Guard if #3 happens

I still can't believe Campbell is back, that's so awesome. We haven't had a great ILB in eons, and with him in the middle, the defense just feels like it's on a different level.

For Tuesday, I'd like Rodgers to get his deal figured out. I still want to see Douglas back in that secondary.

3 points
3
0
MarkinMadison's picture

March 14, 2022 at 10:03 pm

Nijman was moved to RT his senior year of college after recovering from injury. I don't know why he couldn't adjust over an off-season.

Love Campbell.

5 points
5
0
Rossonero's picture

March 15, 2022 at 09:19 am

didn't know that -- thanks Mark!

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:11 pm

Was expecting Turner to be released due to non-spectacular play, age, and cap savings.

Packers likely need to draft OT in 3rd or 4th round. Save #1 and # 2 obviously for BPA, but hopefully a DL and WR (unless Adam's traded for a WR). My preference is trade Adam's for a #1 or high #2 this year and trade up to get Jameson William's at WR who I think has talent in the likes of Chase, and Jefferson.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 15, 2022 at 05:43 am

I suppose, but it was only three million. Might not be able to replace him for that except in the draft. The option to just keep him on his current deal for the final year was a pretty good one. He was not overpaid in terms of cash or cap if he is the starting RT. Not overpaid as the starting RG. It is a lot if GB thinks he is the backup.

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 15, 2022 at 09:38 am

PFF has Turner as just below average for NFL RTs...posting a pass block rating of 69 the last two years. Yes, he has experience at G (2019), but also gave up a whopping 53 pressures that year.

I think the Packers see the need to upgrade at RT and Nijman would be that guy. If they now view Turner as the 2nd best RT, you are right, TGR. He would be too expensive as a back up.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2022 at 02:31 am

With Tom Brady now coming back, AR may decide after all to retire. If some of his requests would not be meet.

It is interesting how many of you now comments Davante wish to be top payed WR, while that was OK when AR wanted that kind of deal.

If that is OK for any other player, why that want be OK regarding Davante? I know that WR are dime & dozen, but he still do not ask top QB level of salary. After all he is not guilty for the salary cap situation Packets found themselves in.

Maybe Davante knows something about AR which gives him the idea there will not be SB with Packers in near future (1 to 2 years in future).

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 15, 2022 at 05:32 am

I don't think too many feel that GB shouldn't make Adams the highest paid WR. There are some. I think the highest paid receiver at present is Julio Jones at $22M. I don't think it is DeAndre Hopkins at supposedly $27.5M, although that is the normal number that an agent would use.

So if Adams wants $25M or even $26M (seeing Kirk just robbed Jacksonville for $20M AAV), I'd be fine with that on a fairly decent structure (GB can't afford a decent structure - it will be heavy on cash in the beginning and light on cap).

I think Adams telling GB he won't play on the tag is fairly standard procedure. It might mean there is ill-will between the parties, but such statements are not too unusual. GB needs the cap room so it will be interesting to see which party blinks.

2 points
2
0
Johnblood27's picture

March 15, 2022 at 08:14 am

I am really sick of every item in the CBA that favors players being sacred for both sides to respect while terms that favor the team are negotiable.

The franchise tag was put in to protect the integrity of a teams roster and their ability to compete at a similar level year to year.

Players getting all pissy about being tagged is just a bunch of whiney beeatches whining. I lose all respect for any player that gets tagged and then cries. Have you looked at the amount of money getting tagged means for that player? It is astronomical! For Christs sake, stop all the crying and negotiate if you want to, but also realize the windfall you receive playing for the tag, it is a minimum of a 20% raise!!!

BTW, Gute clearly stated - publicly - that Rodgers and Adams are completely separate issues. He wouldn't say that if Rodgers was pressuring him to have he and Adams together as a fait accompli, Guteys statement would be a throwing down of the gauntlet to AR if their retentions were tied together.

Maybe that is why we have not seen an AR contract? More behind the scenes whining?

I am truly beginning to hate the characters on this team. I want my Packers back! Unfortunately that will take a pair of cajones to be imported into 1265 because there are obviously none left there now. No need for urinals, just toilets.

-4 points
0
4
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 15, 2022 at 10:01 am

Well, we just got resolution here. Looks like Rodgers finally signed - still $50MM AAV but for three years vs. the four originally reported. Clears about $19MM in space.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2022 at 10:37 am

TGR I agree with you. I also do not think it will be wise to give Davante Adams contract with the top money AAV among WR. Partly because of his age, partly because he would be slower and more prone to injuries, on which he was not immune in the past.

I just do not understand why lot of people shows anger/displeasure with level of contract he demand. He has all rights to demand that and it is probably contract he can sign somewhere else. I'm team player and I strongly believe that in team sport (not only in the sport) team is more important than single person. On the other hand, when his career is done, he will not be part of the team and that is why he need to secure himself and another team he is part of (his family!). On that premise I understand his demand and have no problem with it.

At the moment Packers can not sign him to be highest paid player in NFL, so, with no ill between team and Davante, they should split. What I believe that Packers are in problems because we do not know if AR is in backside and demands signing of Davante Adams to play for Packers.

That was the meaning behind my post!

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

March 15, 2022 at 11:09 am

We need to get rid of Cobb and get Douglas, good CB are very difficult to find.

1 points
1
0
PatrickGB's picture

March 15, 2022 at 02:05 pm

I expect that the tag on Adams is holding things up. If we just traded him now it would fix that.

0 points
0
0