Joseph's Gems: Air Force's Taylor could have Packers' Safety Room Flying High

The Best Defensive Back isn't who you think it is.

 

We are just 3 weeks away from the 2024 NFL Draft, and I'm all but done with the Big Board. It's been a tough class and guys are rising and falling just about every couple of days. I'd make some adjustments myself if I could but Al and Nags promised to beat me up if I did, so here we are. Joseph's Gems for 2024 continues.

Part III highlights the Air Force Academy's Trey Taylor.

 

Trey Taylor is from Frisco, TX, and played for Lone Star High School, he was a 3-Star prospect for 24/7 and a 2-Star for Rivals.com. Before committing to the Air Force, he received offers from a robust 22 schools, including the entire Ivy League, Liberty, Army, New Mexico State, and North Texas. While at Lone Star, he was named All-State his Junior and Senior seasons while claiming the record for most interceptions in a season with seven. If the Lone Star sounds familiar, Chiefs LB and Super Bowl Champion Nick Bolton and Broncos WR Marvin Mims are part of their recent claim to fame. Speaking of fame, Taylor is the cousin of Hall of Fame Safety Ed Reed.

 

Taylor aligned at both safety spots for the Falcons and even manned the slot, starting 30+ games in three years. A former RB in high school, Taylor understands angles of pursuit very well, which leaps off the tape as he's a terror when aligned in the box. His RB experience also explains his natural ball skills after having back-to-back seasons of multiple interceptions and pass breakups. Taylor was the "Star" of the Air Force defense, as he was consistently asked to guard or shade toward the offense's best weapon, and he performed admirably, allowing a 47.0 passer rating when targeted and an 87.2 rating in coverage this past season(per PFF). For his exploits, Taylor was named the 2023 Jim Thorpe Award winner, given to the Nation's Best Defensive Back (Take that Booper DillyJean!!!!). Taylor didn't stop there, as he was awarded the Defender of the Year Award, given to the Most Outstanding Player from the Service Academies, and the Pat Tillman Award for standing out at the 2024 Shrine Bowl.

Where does Taylor fall in this year's safety class? Welp, it depends on who you ask. There's a guy...who shall not be named, who is absolutely the best in this year's class. Unfortunately, some people....well, a lot of you actually, keep mistaking this person for a cornerback. Listen, folks, I don't care who you vote for this fall, but make sure they promise free comprehensive eye exams for all Americans. You all need help. Anyways...the disappointing Combine/Pro Day performances of Tyler Nubin and Kamren Kinchens have sent the league reeling. There are a couple of guys left who I MIGHT label premium (but you won't ever hear those words come out my mouth), but they have limitations as well to their game. So Trey Taylor, who does have some occasional lapses with run discipline and concerns with play strength himself, might yet still find himself somewhere between Top 5 and Top 10 for this year's class. If I had to put an exact range on it, I'd probably say between the #4 and #6 safety in this year's class. What works for Trey in his favor is that he can play the free or the strong safety spot. But what exponentially raises his value is his ability to play the nickel. There are MAYBE only about two, maybe three other safeties who can do that very well in this year's class: USC's Calen Bullock, WSU's Jaden Hicks, and UGA's Javon Bullard. In short, Trey Taylor is the perfect candidate for a 4-2-5 scheme where you may ask your secondary to do a variety of different things depending on down and distance plus personnel; which is what new Defensive Coordinator Jeff Hafley will be asking of this defense in 2024.

 

So with that being said, is Trey Taylor a Gem? We're going to find out, but in case some of you guys are first-time readers, let's go over "What's a Gem"?

Size - Adequate height and weight for the position (Within my parameters but with historical precedents, more on that later)

RAS - Must be able to compete at the NFL Level

Production - Gotta be a stat sheet stuffer. 

Competition - Power 5 vs Group of 5 vs FCS and below, it matters. 

Gems have to check at least 3 out of 4 of those boxes. If a player checks all 4, consider him SOLID GOLD as Certified by your favorite "GM-ologist" (Get it?)

 

 

SIZE

At the Air Force's Pro Day, Taylor checked in at 6'0 and 213 lbs, an increase from his previous weight of 205. He measured at 9 1/2 in hands and 31 3/4 in arms, just a tad bit short but not too much. The arm length might explain his inability to shed blocks. He still is solidly in the mold of an NFL Defensive Back. Check.

RAS

At the Air Force Pro Day, Taylor confessed that he felt he should have run faster. I agree with that. Based on the tape, Taylor's sideline-to-sideline range suggests 4.46-4.48 speed. If we take that estimation he's probably be roughly around a 9.86 RAS than the 9.71 he posted. We're arguing semantics, as the agility grade confirms he can line up in the slot where twitchier receivers might be and the vertical verifies he can challenge tight ends. He should have no issue covering in the NFL. While there are concerns from the tape about his play strength, had he done 22 reps on the bench at the Combine it would have been best amongst all DBs. Perhaps that explains the jump from 205 to 213; which might also explain the slower 40, 20, and 10. If he can regain that speed and explosion, Taylor will be an entire problem. His pro comp? Adrian Amos. Double Check.

Production

As a Fifth-Year Senior across three years, Taylor has 6 interceptions, 4 sacks, 3 forced fumbles, and over 150 tackles. He was respected in the Mountain West and wasn't routinely tested. Triple Check.

Competition 

This is where Taylor will get knocked on, the Mountain West, which has its fair share of NFL prospects here and there, will likely never be considered a premium field for NFL talent. Air Force going against Army and Navy every year with their Triple-Option offenses doesn't lend much work for a safety either. Until Boise State gets itself back together, or perhaps Colorado State sees a resurgence with renewed interest in the CU-CSU rivalry, Air Force will run away with the MWC almost every year. No Check.

 

Certification

Size? Check

RAS? Check

Production? Check

Level of Competiton? Nah

 

Based on my findings, I certify Air Force's Trey Taylor as a GEM who should be a priority selection in the 4th Round!!!!

 

Would the Packers be interested?

Trey Taylor spoke with 31 teams during the week of the Shrine Bowl. There were 7 teams that he especially said took a deep dive with him: the Bears, Commanders, Panthers, Saints, Raiders, Buccaneers, and the Packers. So it's relatively safe to say that General Manager Brian Gutekunst has Taylor on his board and will be looking to make the selection based on how the draft unfurls. Given that all but one team met with Taylor, it could also be considered safe to say he might get "over-drafted". I'm sticking to my valuation of him as a 4th Rounder, but I would not be surprised if he got selected on the back end of Day 2, simply because a team didn't want to risk him getting snatched up early on Day 3. Once again, the ability to play BOTH safety spots AND the nickel cannot be overstated. Plus being named the Nation's Top DB (over some dude in a cornfield) speaks volumes too.

 

Plenty of guys to pick over still. Gems will be right back with another prospect in this 2024 series.

#GPG

 

 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Joseph has been an avid fan of the Green Bay Packers since 1997, citing an affinity for dairy products during his childhood and his favorite color, green. Born in Jacksonville, FL, Joseph currently is an Active Duty servicemember in the U.S. Armed Forces. Joseph considers himself a lifelong fan of the game of football, competing since his youth well into adulthood. When it comes to the Pack, Joseph is particularly impassioned about the NFL Draft and collegiate scouting process, and will contribute regularly on CHTV.com leading to that year's upcoming Draft. You can follow him on Twitter at @joeyreyallday.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
10 points
 

Comments (41)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
LambeauPlain's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:18 pm

Enjoy Joseph's analysis and how he frames it. And named Taylor too. Can never have too many "Taylor's" on the Pack.

He looks like a football player. What is his service obligation for the AF? How does that play into availability?

Would be a competitor in the S room and instant contributor on STs.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:49 pm

I have read comments (but no official confirmation) that he is eligible to be drafted due to the rules applicable when he committed and that he is not subject to the current 5 year obligation.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 05:00 pm

To confirm: He is eligible now. One of the last from the Forces academies to have that ability. The bill revoking the practice established under Trump allowing deferment was amended before passage as follows:

"… shall only apply with respect to a cadet or midshipman who first enrolls in the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, or the United States Air Force Academy on or after June 1, 2021."

Taylor enrolled prior to that. As a miscellaneous piece of additional trivia, he appears to be a distant cousin of Ed Reed

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 09, 2024 at 11:58 am

Thanks, CW!

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 08, 2024 at 03:18 pm

Two year duty before signing the Pro Contract. He is the Jim Thorpe winner because of his smarts and reading a QB fast. He would be worth the investment in the fourth-fifth round and come onboard as a strong safety in 2026.

2 points
3
1
GregC's picture

April 08, 2024 at 05:18 pm

This is incorrect. He can play right away.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 09, 2024 at 10:08 am

10-4, now I see the loophole.

1 points
1
0
HawkPacker's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:24 pm

I'll take that dude in the cornfield any day Joseph!!

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:57 pm

You don't have to worry about DeJean anymore. He had a good pro day and will be gone by 25.

2 points
3
1
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 02:39 pm

Probably. I always saw him more as a slot/FS candidate anyway. Were the Packers really going to take that in the first round?

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 08, 2024 at 03:19 pm

Yes, he is a Harrison Smith type of player.

3 points
3
0
MainePackFan's picture

April 08, 2024 at 06:56 pm

" (Take that Booper DillyJean!!!!)"

I agree with you jb, but apparently Joseph doesn't share our assessment. ; )

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:24 pm

Like him a lot, but he’s probably more a slot than a SS though. I’d be very happy with him late on.

If I’m being critical, he struggles to shed blocks. He doesn’t read the field well, needs to be in the box. Even then has a tendency to overrun plays. 5th/6th round project with great upside. Does tend to hit not tackle.

He’s a robber type, he actually reminds me of Savage in enough ways to have some caution as a true SS. I’d see Nixon at SS and him in the slot as a better proposition than the other way around. Not a FS prospect. He would contribute on STs immediately.

1 points
1
0
splitpea1's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:29 pm

Most have him going in the sixth or seventh round, possibly due to the level of competition and challenges with zone coverage. But the fact that he's probably very intelligent, a great teammate, and has those Ed Reed genes has a lot of teams interested. He would make good competition or reserve for Nixon.

3 points
3
0
mnbadger's picture

April 08, 2024 at 12:45 pm

Joseph, I appreciate your analysis of these lesser known players.
Typically, these are the types of players that get drafted and fill out about 2/3 of our roster.
I will never disagree with a take like yours.
You've done your due diligence. I've had a beer and a sandwich.
Can't wait for the draft.
GPG!

6 points
6
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 08, 2024 at 03:26 pm

He was named the Nation's top DB during the 2023 season as per the Thorpe Award and the Pat Tillman honors given by the Shrine Bowl committee. He is well known and a highly regarded safety.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 08, 2024 at 01:15 pm

I think that he'll be better closer to the line of scrimmage - as I question if his Mountain West coverage grade will translate into a FS against NFL talent. Also I prefer a tackler vs. a hitter (see Mckinney). Sure as a late round pick - as a potential upgrade to Benny Sapp or Zane Anderson? If so, then his immediate contribution probably on Special Teams.

1 points
1
0
Starrbrite's picture

April 08, 2024 at 01:23 pm

Okay—you convinced me; I want him too.
Go Packers!!!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 02:52 pm

Another possible slot type who will go late or UDFA is Decamerion Richardson, Mississippi State. Late developer. Very athletic: 4.34-second 40-yard dash and 10-foot-8 broad jump. Needs to play in the box, not with his back to the QB and much more suited to press than zone. Very willing tackler. Not of a build to be a SS, 6’2”, 188.

For a similar DB who could be a SS, look at Ryan Watts, Texas. Tackles really hard, 4.53 40 but very good agility and burst. Again, later developing. Needs to play in the box and play press not off predominantly. There are some unheralded late options that could help.

1 points
1
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

April 08, 2024 at 03:56 pm

It seems that a good Safety can be found anywhere in the Draft. Perhaps as much as - or more so - than any other position.

Richardson is interesting. However he may be a little light (listed at 188 lbs.) - as it appears that Gutekunst likes a Safety around 200+ lbs.

First time in my draft perusals that anyone has referenced Ryan Watts. Having triggered my curiosity with by some research - I could understand Watts being drafted before Taylor and Richardson.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 04:40 pm

Richardson would have to be a slot I think.

0 points
0
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

April 08, 2024 at 03:25 pm

Trey Taylor is a student at the Air Force Academy. I don't know how that works, but I wonder if he can play in the NFL immediately if he is drafted. I do know that Roger Staubach graduated from the Naval academy and then became a Naval officer and went to Vietnam before playing over a decade with the Dallas Cowboys.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 08, 2024 at 05:04 pm

As I posted above, he is eligible now as a result of a grandfathering clause in the current statute.

0 points
0
0
skydancer506's picture

April 08, 2024 at 06:00 pm

This is from a longer article from the Federal News Network:

"A 2019 memo from then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper, at the direction of President Donald Trump, allowed academy athletes to defer service or repay their tuition if they opted to play professional sports. Since then, several top football players went pro after academy graduation." and "The loophole that allowed a direct route from service academies to professional football will close this year. The 2023 Defense Authorization Act bill will only allow service academy graduates to accept professional sports contracts two years after graduation."

In essence, the loophole will close but will affect only those who entered the academy after June 1, 2021. Those who were already at the Academies will still have the loophole in effect for them. Trey Taylor entered the Air Force Academy in 2019, his red-shirt year, he sat out 2020 for COVID, and didn't start for the team until 2021. However, because he was already in the system since 2019, he'll be eligible to play right away.

2 points
2
0
Starrbrite's picture

April 09, 2024 at 08:32 am

Thanks Sky—-well done.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

April 08, 2024 at 03:43 pm

Good players can be found each round but I do have to point out that level of competition also weighs in as to whether a player is ready to start in the NFL. The Packers need someone who can start.

Here are the teams that Air Force played last fall...Robert Morris and Sam Houston...Utah State and San Jose State...San Diego State and Wyoming...Navy and Colorado State...Army, Hawaii and UNLV...and Boise State.

One legit team in Utah State. The rest were...well, not the SEC or Big 14(18).

I would think he would be someone to look at in rounds 4-6, but not round 1.

1 points
1
0
skydancer506's picture

April 08, 2024 at 06:02 pm

Nobody in comments or the original article ever stated that he was someone to look at in round 1. Whatever gave you that idea? Everybody here seems to be of the opinion that he'll fall somewhere between Late 3 and UDFA - probably around 4 or 5.

3 points
3
0
HarryHodag's picture

April 09, 2024 at 07:01 am

Quote from article: "Where does Taylor fall in this year's safety class? Welp, it depends on who you ask. There's a guy...who shall not be named, who is absolutely the best in this year's class."
---
Sounds like the author is pretty high on this guy, yes? "Everybody" doesn't matter on draft day, either. I also AGREE that he's a round 4-6 guy.
Have a nice day.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 09, 2024 at 07:33 am

I read that too. As I said in my earlier post, I like him a lot as a late pick and have mentioned him a number of times, but recognize there are weaknesses that I pointed out to add perspective.

In my view he’s a much better projection as a slot than a SS as well. There I think he provides depth immediately. Context is everything. He isn’t DeJean ready, but he could be very good with a little time if put in a role that plays to his strengths. In a Hafley system, slot might well be just that. I think he’s perhaps a tad under projected generally, but by no means that much.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

April 08, 2024 at 04:33 pm

I wonder who will be our other starting safety? I know of one free agent Safety that is 6'0 213 lbs, great hands and runs a blazing 4.34. Maybe we should make him an offer. His name is Rudy Ford.

1 points
2
1
stockholder's picture

April 08, 2024 at 05:07 pm

Joseph- now your on the track.
Nice write up.

2 points
3
1
Leatherhead's picture

April 08, 2024 at 05:16 pm

I have to recuse myself because of a strong pro-Academy bias, the result of having both of my sons graduate from there. Through them, I've had the opportunity to meet hundreds of cadets and IMO, these are exceptional people and they'll be an asset to any endeavour they're part of . If we can get this guy, we should target him and make it happen. Consensus has him as a 7th round/undrafted FA. Draftek also sees him after 200. So does CBS.

We're just hoping for a guy who can make our practice squad at that point. If he does better than that? Bonus!!

That Conference they play in, the Mountain West? They send good players to the pros, too. Not like the SEC, of course, but pretty good. Mike Pennell played at Colorado State. Darryn Colledge played at Boise. Didn't Love come from Utah State? And that's off the top of my head....I'm sure there are more examples.

1 points
1
0
skydancer506's picture

April 08, 2024 at 06:11 pm

Pro Football Focus has him ranked 226th with a season grade of 83.9.

NFL Draft Buzz has him ranked 263rd and an UDFA designation.

NFL Mock Draft Database lists him as 266th.

However, it seems that all of these sites are biased against the Mountain West conference. Granted that it's not the hotbed of scouting activity, but there are some good MW players out there. It seems that if you go to a MW Conference team, you'll get overlooked by everybody. It's a shame, too. The MW does have a handful of solid players that get drafted each year.

0 points
0
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

April 09, 2024 at 11:19 am

No need to recuse yourself because of that. You have to be a proud dad.

Many of us hold soldiers in the highest esteem. The Ferrari Owners Club that I belong to in California sponsors an annual event where we drive the cars to a base called Vandenberg and we display the cars for the soldiers, letting them sit inside and take photos and we also have a dinner at their officers club where each of us sponsors two young soldiers where we provide a fancy dinner and give them a nice gift. It's a wonderful event and my favorite. The soldiers seem to love it and I think our members enjoy it as much or more. They do a wonderful job of keeping us and our country safe and secure. They are fine young men and ladies.

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 08, 2024 at 08:10 pm

Great.
Now there are 46 players I’d like GB to draft.

5 points
5
0
Starrbrite's picture

April 09, 2024 at 08:36 am

10-4 TK—I was laughing at myself yesterday because I like everybody—every write up I say, that’s my guy.

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 09, 2024 at 08:43 pm

Ha! Same page, amigo!

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

April 09, 2024 at 05:21 am

Joseph knows his stuff. I'd be fine with Taylor in round 4. He seems like a very nice fit for the Packers and you know how highly they value a players flexibility to play several positions well. He's no Cooper DeJean, but how many are..........and he didn't cost pick #25 overall, either.

0 points
1
1
T7Steve's picture

April 09, 2024 at 07:45 am

Joseph, please explain "allowing a 47.0 passer rating when targeted and an 87.2 rating in coverage" does PFF give a coverage grade when the ball isn't thrown at them? I guess if you're really good they won't throw to the guy you're covering, but a 47 passer rating sounds like his grades should be better in coverage, shouldn't they?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 09, 2024 at 08:14 am

The coverage rating is a formula designed to put the play in context of the role he is being asked to perform. The QB success rate is just a metric that ignores difficulty (or the adequacy of the QBs/WRs faced, which shouldn’t be forgotten in small school contexts).

PFF explains the idea behind its coverage rating thus:

“Successful coverage rate can be skewed by players with easy play-call assignments or difficult matchups. Cornerbacks who play the deep third in Cover 3 are often left on islands while the flat defender stays in the flats, and the deep cornerbacks have to try to avoid getting beat. This is a tougher assignment than that of cornerbacks who sit in a deep quarter in Cover 4, as they have more help over the top and underneath from safeties.”

His rating suggests he achieved what he did taking on tough assignments. It doesn’t reflect opponent ability/accuracy either, of course.

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

April 09, 2024 at 10:44 am

Thanks, CW.

I'll take PFF for what it's worth, I guess. I guess it helps with very good or very bad and leaves the middle up for interpretation.

0 points
0
0