In One Week, Running Back Went from a Question Mark to a Strength for the Packers

What a difference a week can make in the life of an NFL team. For the Green Bay Packers, in less than one week’s time, the running back position went from being a big need to becoming a strength of the team.

One week ago, the Packers were trying to negotiate a reduced cap number with Aaron Jones, their top running back from 2023. If he didn’t reach an agreement with the team,

Second-string RB A.J. Dillon was about to become an unrestricted and was not expected to re-sign with the team.

That left third string running back Emanuel Wilson as the highest player on the depth chart who was almost certain to be back under contract in 2024 as he was an exclusive rights free agent.

All that uncertainty changed in a hurry this past week and it changed in ways nobody expected. Jones and GM Brian Gutekunst never reached an agreement on a reduced cap number for 2024 so the Packers let him go. Ironically, he signed with the Minnesota Vikings.

They quickly signed former Las Vegas Raiders runner Josh Jacobs to a deal to become the new number one back. Jacobs led the NFL in rushing yards in 2022 with 1,653 yards. He also put together back-to-back seasons with 50 or more receptions.

Jacobs is three years younger than Jones at 26. He can also carry a bigger load at 5’10” and 226 pounds, nearly 20 pounds heavier than Jones. Hopefully, he can also stay healthier than Jones who missed significant time last season due to hamstring and knee injuries.

The Packers surprised more people later in the week when they brought back Dillon on a one-year deal. Even after signing Jacobs, Gutekunst indicated he wanted that big back for a change of pace to fill the role that Dillon had played for the Packers over the last four seasons.

Head coach Matt LaFleur appreciated what Dillon brought to the table. “A.J.’s been a great member of our team,” he said at the end of the season. “You’ve got to have multiple backs in this league. You have to. It’s just the pounding these guys take. I think you could really see his value every year towards the end of the season. Shoot, I’d love to have him back here.”

He got his wish.

Dillon will be able to spell Jacobs and give the team a different style of runner that opposing defenses will have to account for. When the weather in Green Bay gets cold and the field is frozen or wet, Dillon can be even more dangerous and tough to bring down.

The one-year, prove-it deal is a win-win for the Packers and the former Boston College star. Dillon can have a bounce back year and set himself up for his next contract whether it’s a new deal in Green Bay or with another team. He always said he loved being a Packer and now he gets to spend another season in Green and Gold.

The Packers now have two very solid running backs at the top of their depth chart with Wilson still available as the third back to give the team some depth. Wilson looked very promising in the preseason last year and earned a roster spot despite not being drafted.

Injuries limited the former Fort Valley State star to just seven regular-season games in 2023 and he carried the football just 14 times in his rookie campaign. Still, Wilson averaged a healthy 6.1-yards per carry and caught four passes on five targets. Now he has another season to develop and prove he can take on a bigger role next season.

Gutekunst may still add a running back in the 2024 NFL Draft. The Packers have five picks in the top 100 and 11 selections overall. It is very likely he uses as least one selection on a running back, but now, the need to upgrade the position is no longer urgent. Instead, the Pack can take a flier on a developmental running back who can help them more a year or two down the road.

Things changed quickly for the Packers at running back. What a difference a week makes.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
6 points
 

Comments (47)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
splitpea1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 12:55 pm

One thing you can count on Gute's approach is that he will never allow his team to be backed into an "urgent" corner prior to the draft. So having Jacobs lined up for a contract and subsequently bringing back Dillon for minimal risk made perfect sense.

Although upgrades on the IOL would be helpful, Dillon still needs to perform better than that 3.4 yards/attempt last season. He averaged only about 2.7 yards after contact and didn't break many tackles, either. A power back built like Dillon should be able to churn through the humanity with much more frequency.

But he was effective in the Chiefs game when we needed him to be, and he currently is the best pass blocker of the trio on the roster. No question Gute will still be looking for running backs come draft time, but this move provides flexibility and the chance to address other positions with (hopefully) at least the first four picks.

2 points
5
3
Leatherhead's picture

March 16, 2024 at 02:10 pm

I have to ask. Which "upgrades on the IOL" would you like to see?

We just lost Runyan, but his planned replacement is a former Day 2 draft choice who's been developing for two years. Whether that's an upgrade over a guy that the Giants think is worth $30M remains to be seen.

At the other guard, we have Jenkins, who is a plus player at LG and the old man of the offense. So I'm not seeing that we're going to get a guy in the draft to "upgrade" him.

It's Myers. You'd like a better center than Myers. And since Myers is in the last year of his contract, it would make a lot of sense to draft his replacement. But don't think this guy is going to come in on Day 1 and start at Center, like Myers did.. If we draft a guy who can eventually replace him as a starter,great, but don't expect it to be Week 1.

As regards Dillon, I'll say what I said before: He's a very good #2 back. He doesn't miss time, he doesn't fumble,he's solid in pass protection, he's a receiver. Over his time with the Packers, he has almost 3200 yards in total offense (about 800 per year, and about 50 per game)

That's our #2 RB. What on Earth do you expect from your #2 guy? That he's actually better than the #1s of other teams?

It looks to me like it's going to be Jacobs and Dillon active on gameday. Wilson possibly the inactive guy but on the 53. It may well be possible to get a very good RB on Day 3, but he's not going to play ahead of Jacobs or Dillon unless they're not health.

-1 points
4
5
Guam's picture

March 16, 2024 at 02:49 pm

I dunno LH, I am not sold on Sean Rhyan yet. Yes, Rhyan is a third round pick, but he has yet to establish himself as a starter two years into his career. I would love to see a high draft pick on the interior line to challenge either Rhyan or Myers. A little competition would be good for everybody and the Packers also need some IOL depth. Right now the Packers only have Newman..........

6 points
6
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 16, 2024 at 03:42 pm

Yep, putting your trust in a guy that couldn't beat out a down year Runyan doesn't make a lot of sense. They also should be looking for some serious competition for Newman. I wouldn't be surprised if they draft three IOL overall, or a guy like Fautanu that can play G and T and two others. But at the very least they need to add two guys.

4 points
5
1
Leatherhead's picture

March 16, 2024 at 05:38 pm

Down Year Runyan = $10M/year interior lineman.

-2 points
3
5
dblbogey's picture

March 16, 2024 at 07:30 pm

So a poorly run team, Giants, overpaid for a free agent.

4 points
4
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 16, 2024 at 10:50 pm

They gave up 85 sacks last year and Runyan is a better pass blocker than run blocker. Desperate overpay about sums it up.

3 points
3
0
Guam's picture

March 17, 2024 at 06:26 pm

Either the Giants or the Packers are very wrong. I suspect it is the Giants......

1 points
1
0
13TimeChamps's picture

March 17, 2024 at 06:43 pm

Like they were with Blake Martinez and Kyler Fackrell.

1 points
1
0
dblbogey's picture

March 16, 2024 at 07:28 pm

They have to upgrade C and RG. There are a lot of quality OT's in the draft who can move inside. I don't see any reason to count on Rhyan being any better than Runyan. Two years in and he's had a horrible 1st year and a below average 2nd year. Any team that has Royce Newman on the 53 man roster desperately needs to add help inside.

4 points
4
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

March 16, 2024 at 03:42 pm

I completely agree that we need a replacement for Myers: he has been mediocre and his contract runs out next year.
Powers-Johnson would be a GREAT pick at 25, but he might well be gone by then.

2 points
3
1
LLCHESTY's picture

March 16, 2024 at 03:45 pm

He didn't run or do the agilities at the combine or his pro day so he could slide with outside zone teams. A team like Pittsburgh makes a lot of sense for him.

1 points
1
0
dblbogey's picture

March 16, 2024 at 07:34 pm

He or Barton would be a big upgrade. or we could trade Myers for Creed Humphrey. The trade part is a joke. Afraid Gute screwed the pooch picking Myers over Creed.

0 points
1
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 16, 2024 at 08:52 pm

You know who's a better C than Myers last season? Myers without injury. I was hard on Myers all season, and hard on coaches for not recognizing his weakness, or not correcting it. But when was he first injured, and to what extent? It became impossible to miss. In fact everyone on the line played through injury except for Nijman, Walker, and Rhyan.

We need depth, at a minimum. Hopefully people who can at least seriously compete for C and RG. We have 4 OTs at 6'6" 6'7" 6'8" and 6'9". If only the smallest of those is going to play and Bakh and Tom are both 6'4", maybe it's time to stop drafting bigger humans. I'd love to see the behemoths play, even if only in specialized and limited roles.

-1 points
1
2
LLCHESTY's picture

March 16, 2024 at 10:52 pm

But they didn't draft the taller ones. UDFAs.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 17, 2024 at 01:10 am

Runyon was injured early, during which time his play was well below his past performance, improving significantly from early in December. Myers not so much. Myers actually was pretty consistent both in terms of his play over the season and in relation to his standard of play in prior seasons. He remains a replacement level player. One that one can make do with but not thrive with.

Let’s not pretend players are good when they simply never attain that height. Myers is going into his last rookie year and we need to make a very serious attempt to be better than he’s ever been if we are serious about winning. Even more so now the guard has changed at running back and with it the style.

Let’s not pretend like some here did with Dean Lowry. Learn from past folly not repeat it. Not awful and reliable prevents us improving to adequate and that and hopefully more has to happen if we want to win things.

3 points
3
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 17, 2024 at 07:29 pm

You know what else affected Myers play - lousy guard play. It took Jenkins half a season to start to roll back into form, and the right side was mostly an unsettled mess. Myers is a pro center, dependable and rock solid. He has absolutely justified his draft slot. He'll be really good again next year.

1 points
1
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:53 pm

They need a center because Myer's contract is up. It's the natural progression. Myers is perfectly good. He's dependable, he makes the calls on the line, and he gets the job done. When they improve the right guard he will look remarkably better (now that Jenkins appears to be recovered from his injuries).

-1 points
1
2
Starrbrite's picture

March 16, 2024 at 02:32 pm

Dillion—hard to bring down—I don’t know about that Gil? Given all the superlatives concerning his monster legs etc, I have very little faith in his short yardage ability. Dillion could use a little Edgar Bennett- wide stride- balancing act.
I don’t dislike Dillion, but I believe we should be more realistic about his performance. As someone else mentioned, he’s not Earl Campbell or Derrick Henry.
Gi Packers!!!

7 points
8
1
dblbogey's picture

March 16, 2024 at 07:40 pm

I'd like to see Dillon drop 5-6 pounds. You can see games where he just doesn't seem to be running 100% and nothing happens. But, when Jones went down late, there were games where he ran like his hair was on fire and was a dominating back. The One year contract might motivate him a bit. I agree, with his size and quads you'd expect people to bounce off him like an Earl Campbell. I'm glad he's back at the discount rate, but wouldn't have paid any more than that.

0 points
1
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 04:40 pm

A LB to sign:

Isaiah Simmons, New York Giants, 26: At this stage of a player’s career, draft grades still matter. Simmons was the eighth overall pick of the 2020 NFL Draft by the Arizona Cardinals. He had 105 tackles and four forced fumbles in 2021 and 99 tackles along with career highs of four sacks and seven passes defensed in 2022. So, his career was on its way, right? Nah. Toward the end of training camp last summer, he was traded to the Giants for a seventh-round pick.

In 17 games with four starts in 2023, he had 54 tackles, one sack and three passes defensed. He played 40-plus percent of the snaps in only two games. According to PFF, he played 166 snaps in the box, 137 on the defensive line and 65 in the slot. In 2022, almost half his snaps came in the slot. In 2021, he played more traditional linebacker.

Simmons is an interesting and talented player. At 6-foot-4 and 238 pounds, he’s got the size to play linebacker. Is there any fit in Green Bay?

1 points
2
1
GregC's picture

March 16, 2024 at 06:00 pm

From eighth overall pick to being traded for a seventh round pick three years later and then playing less than 40% of snaps in all but two games. That's a steep downward career trajectory. I looked him up, and the problem seems to be that he is regarded as not stout enough against the run to be a full-time LB. And yet he was quite productive for the Cardinals in 2021 and 2022. One thing that doesn't show up in the stat sheet is getting blocked out of the play, and maybe that has happened too much with Simmons.

I haven't heard anything about Jeff Hafley wanting a linebacker/safety hybrid type of player, so I wouldn't expect the Packers to be interested in Simmons. I suppose they could take a flyer on him or someone like him, though.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 07:23 pm

Yeah Greg, I also don't understand the seemingly downward trend of Simmons. His first year was below average with 48 tackles. But 2021 and 2022 were both almost 100 tackles each. The Giants listed him as a Safety. He played in all 17 games, but only started 4. And he still had 46 tackles.

He has only missed 1 game in 4 years so he is solid in that dept. 100 tackles per year for 2 years doesn't scream soft against the run and he has also had 5 INTs to boot. I can't believe he goes from being a top ten overall player in 2020 to not being any good now.

If for no other reason GB should sign him as a backup that can play all over the defense. At Clemson he played both LB, CB & Safety spots and was an All American.

I don't want to compare him to Micah Parsons, but they are virtually the same size, speed, and both were LBs in college. So playing a hybrid like Parsons is maybe untapped potential for Simmons. Some lucky team will sign him for nothing and unlock a monster, why not the Packers.

0 points
2
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:06 pm

It's possible he was simply underutilized, put in the wrong situations for what he can do. I see signs that Gutey is working well with Hafley, and hopefully MLF is too? It will be interesting to see what they do ...

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:49 pm

You are probably right SIC. Arizona used him as a LB and @ Safety. The Giants tried last year to use him at Safety. At worst, this guy should easily make our team as a LB for depth if nothing else, and he would be reasonable. He is a better athlete than any LB we have now. We need help at LB for sure, and Hafley says he wants interchangeable parts in his back 7.

If you put Parsons and Simmons side by side, you would swear they were twins with their body measurements. And they both ran high 4.3s coming into the league. Why wouldn't a team at least try Simmons in the same role as Parsons? We have missed out on every other available FA LB, and we will probably miss on Simmons too. I think its worth a flyer.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:39 pm

Anyone who plays a lot of snaps at linebacker is going to have a lot of tackles. It's just like how anyone who plays shortstop is going to have a lot of assists. Even if they are error-prone, they are going to handle virtually all of the routine plays they need to make and most of the harder ones. By the same token, any linebacker will make most of the tackles he needs to make. It's hard to measure the performance of an off-ball linebacker with statistics. There must be some reason for him being devalued. I remember Blake Martinez getting tons of tackles for the Packers, but he was just an average player. Simmons' interceptions suggest that he has some playmaking ability, though.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:57 pm

Blake Martinez was a tackling machine 6-9 yards off the line of scrimmage. He was the prototypical "football player" that guys yearn for on this board. He was tackle sure, but he was average athletically and it showed up where he made his tackles. There's something to be said for exceptional athleticism.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 17, 2024 at 11:37 am

Blake Martinez and Isaiah Simmons are not even in the same galaxy athletically. My fascination with Simmons is fueled by the fact that the Packers have allowed all of the Top 15 FA LBs get signed by other teams. And now we have almost no options. Plus we have a huge need @ LB depth as well as a starter right now.

Simmons hasn't bombed out or played like a bust. He has done enough to get a long look from some NFL team. The Giants and Cardinals misplayed him a lot @ Safety, and even though he ran 4.39 @ the combine, he is too big and not flexable enough to play Safety.
But what he is physically suited to play is a Micah Parsons type of LB/Pass Rusher.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:03 pm

I'm also very interested in Hafley's take on the hybrid position we heard so much about in recent years.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 16, 2024 at 10:56 pm

From what I've read the general consensus is he's ok in coverage against TEs but otherwise a soft player. If his price dropped below $2 million it might be worth trying him as a big nickel but it doesn't sound like you want him on the field on running downs.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 17, 2024 at 11:42 am

He had almost 100 tackles in both 2021 and 2022. He had almost 50 in 2023 while only starting 4 games. He can tackle, but he should not be playing Safety @ 6'4 and 240lbs. He is a LB/Blitzer all day long and I see him in a Micah Parsons role on defense. And he has missed one game in 4 years.

0 points
1
1
10ve 💚's picture

March 16, 2024 at 05:56 pm

To be fair to Dillon, in 2023, he was used quite a bit later in games, with Packers ahead. During that part of the games, his usage was more "run out the clock" than "get the yards". That usually results in less yardage.

However, Dillon is easy to bring down. I always get the feeling that if Dillon happens to collide with a defender, he would be saying apologetically "excuse me, I'm sorry, I hope you're not hurt". Running backs should strike fear into defenders... fear that their chest would be caved in... fear that a stiff-arm would knock their heads back... fear that their shoulders would be dislocated. All that hype about quads is just fun and memes. If he could develop a killer instinct, and somehow generate some rage against any and all defenders, we may see a different Dillon.

1 points
2
1
GregC's picture

March 16, 2024 at 06:28 pm

I remember when Dillon ran roughshod over the Tennessee Titans in that game at Lambeau Field late in his rookie year: 21 carries for 124 yards and 2 TDs. It was exciting. I thought he was going to be a force in the NFL. But he never had another game like that. He has had some good games, but mostly he's been average. It sounds like he has struggled with his technique a lot, maybe getting a little too careful and not being balanced enough when he runs. At this point in his career, I don't hold out hope for him getting much better. If the Packers draft an RB that plays well in training camp, I have to wonder if Dillon could get beaten out for a roster spot. His new contract makes him easy to cut.

Dillon had some bad luck, getting injured late in the season when he should've been at his best. He missed the last several games of the 2023 season. Also, he got knocked out of that close playoff loss to the 49ers in that cold weather playoff game against the 49ers a couple years ago. That's exactly the kind of game they wanted him for.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 17, 2024 at 01:19 am

Dillon seldom plays with fire. He rarely looks like he’s going to send guys flying, he will carry them, be determined, but he doesn’t impact often. When he does he’s like he was that day. He needs someone to wind him up and “unchill” him. A significant amount of winning as a ball carrier is attitude. He needs to find some edge on game days.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:07 pm

Count how many players he knocked out of the game in KC.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:23 pm

10, I really don't get it, but that's not the Dillon I have seen for his time in Green Bay. He isn't Derek Henry and he definitely isn't Earl Campbell. Those 2 are probably in their own category of power running backs along with Jim Brown, Erik Dickerson, and maybe Adrian Peterson. I am probably missing someone, but the point is A J Dillon isn't in the top 100 NFL RBs of all time, let alone this group. He is just an average NFL power back with a little wiggle. He runs hard, he catches the ball really good, and blocks well too. He is a guy that you keep around because he is a good person, he is cheap, and he is usually available.

He is a better RB with an OL that isn't letting him be hit in the backfield. That is true of all RBs but Dillon also isn't Barry Sanders or Aaron Jones, who can avoid first contact. Dillon is better with a little momentum.

That's just one of the reasons I would love Bucky Irving to be a Packer, because of his ability to run through tackles and make people miss.

1 points
1
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 17, 2024 at 04:49 pm

Good post golf. I also agree with CW—seems like he should be more difficult to tackle. A little more fire would be nice.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 16, 2024 at 06:26 pm

Did we get better? I don’t think we got worse and we did extend our horizon at the position. At this point the one thing that’s certain is that our lead running style has changed. In turn that will require some differences of approach on the OL and play calling. Can we deliver in terms of personnel and offensive coaching adjustment?

4 points
4
0
GregC's picture

March 16, 2024 at 06:59 pm

After all of the hand-wringing about Aaron Jones' departure, this article paints a picture that is maybe a little TOO rosy. I'm in the middle and am interested to see what happens. I am cautiously optimistic. I like what Pete Dougherty wrote: If you had one game to play, you would take Aaron Jones over Josh Jacobs. But for a whole season, the choice would be Jacobs, hands-down.

4 points
4
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 16, 2024 at 08:37 pm

The 17 game elimination marathon to get to that one game is important., and I wouldn’t have a lot of confidence in Jones being able to always available. I wish he had taken the pay cut and stayed with the team. But he didn’t, so two have Jacobs now.
What is interesting to me is that with all these RBs in the draft, we got Jacobs and Dillon signed instead. We need not spend premium picks on RBs .

2 points
3
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:28 pm

Yeah LH, but Dillon is only on a one-year contract. We are going to get another good RB in the draft as there are plenty to choose from if we take one before the 4th round.

2 points
2
0
joejetson's picture

March 16, 2024 at 08:12 pm

Glad to see Dillon back. The knock on him was that he had a sub-par year in 2023. Statistically that is true, but during the part of the season he was the #1 back (early to mid-season when Jones was injured, the offensive line was underperforming badly. The whole offense was struggling because of o-line problems.

It seemed like every time they gave Dillon the ball, there was no place for him to run. Love was struggling as well while under constant pressure.

As the season progressed, the line played better, created some running lanes and pass protected better.

By then, Jones was back in the lineup and Dillon didn't get as many opportunities.

I think Dillon is most effective if he gets a hole and builds up a good head of steam. That's when he delivers the blow to the unfortunate defender and pushes the pile back for extra yards after contact.

I'd love to see GB add some young road-graders to the o-line and then unleash Dillon and Jacobs on them.

You'll see some very tired, hurting run defenses by the 3rd and 4th quarters.

Like Lombardi said, "I like the run game. It makes you hard-nosed".

It would be fun to see some "hard-nosed" Packer football again.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:12 pm

Hard nosed, as in Dillon as FB, lead blocking for Jacobs, or whoever they wind up passing to include Jacobs and Kraft in the short game.

Could prove to be unstoppable? But definitely needs some road grading from the O line ...

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 16, 2024 at 08:38 pm

Great article, Gil! I'm going to add a little to it, starting with a 14 minute interview with Jacobs that I've linked before:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uwDfseXINLQ

My impression: great guy, GREAT attitude, and best of all he's long time friends with the hungriest player on the team, #25. If he can match that intensity?!? LOOK OUT, this will be a GREAT season!

Further, I hope to see Dillon used in the Kyle Juscyk role. Yes, I know other people are in line for that. I tell you what, if I had the choice of having to try to stop either Jusczyk or Dillon - and no disrespect to Jusczyk, (sp?) but I'm picking him EVERY TIME. Pity the fool that tries to bring down Dillon, and doubly so as a FB. How many players did he send out of the game in KC for being stupid enough to try to tackle him? And I say that as someone who at 16 who was inch for inch built about like Emmit Smith; a little more weight in the upper body, but still - legs that are crazy strong. I don't want to get in Dillon's way, if he's pissed and has a full head of steam, He's an incredibly nice guy, but he's proven to me that he can bring the nasty when it counts, and I see that in Jacobs in this interview. Plus, Dillon dropped ONE pass in this "disappointing season," and 0 fumbles. MLF's offense is too much like Shanahan's not to have a GREAT lead blocker, and I can't imagine someone better for it than Dillon. Let him plow the field, let Jacobs do what he does. And of course Dillon is still a weapon, as is Juczyk.

I say welcome to Green Bay, Mister Jacobs!! Yes I'm disappointed we don't get #33 back, of course. I wish him the best, as long as he gets stripped every time he tries to carry the ball against the Packers :) Pick him up, carry him backwards for 15 yards while three other players attack like a pack of hyenas to get the ball. His listed weight is 208?!? He's more like #173, dripping wet. Dillon is substantially heavier than his listed #247. I have no idea what Jacobs is even listed at, but his #405 bench many years ago indeed translates into a wicked stiff arm that I do not want to be on the receiving end of, and his lifts have increased substantially since then.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:16 pm

A week ago the pressing needs were DB, OL, LB and RB. The order seemed about right.

This week they seem to be OL, LB and DB. That order seems about right. And RB isn't on it...so yes, the Pack has improved its RB room for 2024.

The draft is loaded with OL talent...some day one starters, some who will challenge to start during the season and a bunch of future starters/quality depth players.

I hope LB is one of the top 2 selections...and could see 3 OL taken with the first 6.

This is a nice draft to invest in talent to protect Love and plow the road for years to come.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 17, 2024 at 12:01 pm

RB was never a Top 3 need Lambeau. GB really solidified that fact by moving so quickly on Jacobs. I wish they would have moved as fast on a FA LB.

If we had coveted Benson as the RB we had to have, we would have had to pick him @ #58 at the latest. Wright might have boosted himself to that position too. Just like this draft is set up really good for the Packers to take a Top 10 OL with our first pick, and then a Top 3 Safeties should start off the board around #41. The majority of the RBs we should be interested in, should still be available @ #88 or #91. We can get a RB there that could take RB1 from Jacobs in 3 or 4 years.

Depending on if we want Allen or Estime, they could fall to the 4th or 5th.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 16, 2024 at 09:32 pm

There are not many RBs that gain yardage late in games when teams are trying to run clock, and the defense knows it. I always feel bad for the players because they are getting hit 2 yards deep in the backfield. Even good running offensive lines struggle in those situations.

0 points
0
0