How Big of a Need is OT for the Packers this Offseason?

How big of a need is offensive tackle for the Green Bay Packers this offseason? Depending on how you view the position, the level of need could vary quite a bit.

When it comes to positions of need that the Green Bay Packers should address this offseason, offensive tackle is an interesting one. 
 
Now, I'll start by saying that there is no such thing as too much depth at offensive tackle, so really adding to it -- whether through free agency or the draft -- should always be on the to-do list. However, the sense of urgency that Brian Gutekunst should have when it comes to addressing this position this offseason could vary wildly. 
 
On the one hand, depending on which light you shine on this position, it could appear to be in pretty good shape. David Bakhtiari will be back at left tackle, and as far as the future of the right tackle position with Billy Turner no longer on the team, that player is likely already on the roster and the Packers have some depth as well.
 
Yosh Nijman had shown that he can be a capable starter, along with some help, and he should continue to improve. To our knowledge, he has worked out strictly as a left tackle, but if he can make the switch to right tackle, where he took 639 snaps during his final season at Virginia Tech, then the Packers have a capable backup at both tackle positions.
 
On top of that, at some point, Elgton Jenkins will return from injury as well. We know Jenkins can play either tackle position and play either very well. Prior to suffering the ACL injury, Jenkins was PFF's 11th highest-graded tackle last season as he filled in for Bakhtiari. 
 
So as I said, if this is the group of offensive tackles that the Green Bay Packers have to lean on, they are set up very well on both the right and left sides.
 
However, let's now swing the pendulum in the other direction, where the need becomes much greater. 
 
With Turner being cut, the overall depth of the position takes a hit even with two potential replacements already on the roster. The prudent move on the Packers' part would be bolstering the depth of a key position and addressing tackle in the draft.
 
When it comes to Nijman, we don't know how much work in practice he has had at right tackle or if the Packers have plans on moving him to the right side. But even if they do, as Turner has told reporters in the past, just because left tackle and right tackle are the same position, the transition from the one side to the other is not an easy one to make.
 
"This is something that I heard Packers legend Josh Sitton say a few years ago in Miami, and that is, 'It's like wiping your (butt) with your opposite hand.' And if you've ever tried that, I'm sure you know," Turner said via Packers.com. "So, being able to, in the middle of a game, go from one side to the other, it's not necessarily the physical part. You know you're capable of physically doing those actions, those techniques that you've practiced for so long.
 
"It's really just the mental aspect to tell yourself, 'OK, instead of pushing with this leg I have to push with the opposite. Instead of throwing this hand first, I have to use this hand.' It's the weight distribution and the mentality when you're in sync during a game, you kind of get in the zone and you just get in this mood of doing everything in the right way. And it's just kind of a flow. It's hard to explain."
 
As far as Jenkins goes, for one, we do not know when he will return from his injury. And perhaps Green Bay is most comfortable keeping him inside at guard where he has been named to a Pro Bowl, and has already cemented himself as one of the best interior players in football. 
 
As you can see, if this scenario were to play out -- or at least something close to it -- tackle becomes a much bigger need this offseason, particularly on the right side. 
 
I tend to think that Green Bay is closer to the first scenario that was described and have to feel pretty good about where they stand at one of the game's most important positions. I do believe the Packers veiw Jenkins as a tackle and for an offensive line where versatility is key, I believe Matt LaFleur and Co. won't have any qualms moving Nijman to right tackle if needed. 
 
With that said, I also expect Gutey to address tackle in the draft; and do so somewhat early on. Since taking over as GM, the Packers have drafted at least one offensive lineman each year, and while ideally, we hope that Green Bay can find some immediate contributors, ultimately, the draft is about planning ahead. As we look ahead to 2023 and beyond, the uncertainty at offensive tackle will only continue to grow. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Born and raised in Green Bay, WI and I still call it home. After my family, watching the Packers, sharing my opinions on the team through my writing and interacting with other fans is my greatest passion. You can find me on Twitter at @Paul_Bretl. 
 

NFL Categories: 
2 points
 

Comments (32)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:04 am

It just got bigger when we released our starter.

You've got Bakhtiari, but I don't know how much you can rely on him at this point. Nijman looks like a capable backup, but if he starts at RT, as some have suggested, then he's not available at LT. Jenkins can play either tackle spot, but he's not going to be available when the season starts.

So I don't see a start RT on the roster right now, or a backup.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:08 am

I suggest that we have bigger problems that might impact this. Releases have started and it looks like they are going to be clearing much more cap than hoped for. I’d wait for prioritizing until after the dust settles.

7 points
8
1
stockholder's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:12 am

Runyan is a starter. They like him. . Several good tackles later in the draft

2 points
6
4
PeteK's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:41 am

As I said in another article Van Lanen is listed as a RT backup and could play if the emergency arrises. In my opinion, Douglas, Campbell signings more important issues right now.

4 points
4
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:57 am

Looks like they will move on one by the third pick. Talent is in the first two rounds and the Turner job can go between Nijman and Newman. Probably draft two O linemen through the fourth picks. Jenkins will not be back until Nov-Dec.

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 14, 2022 at 11:33 am

Nijman is the odds on starter at RT now that Turner is gone.

Yosh earned it with his play last year. And he also has played many snaps there in college so he has already learned how to "use his other hand" as Sitton once said to Turner. Not only does Yosh have great size, strength and agility...he is very intelligent and is a sponge absorbing coaching according to Steno.

I am still shaking my head why Matt and his O coaches thought it a good move to move Turner to LT (he did not play well at all) and the lumbering Kelly at RT where he was destroyed by the 49er speed rush. Those two moves greatly contributed to the loss as the did the QB play and STs of course.

A starting line up of Baht, Runyon, Meyers, Newman, and Yosh looks good to me. And when Jenks comes back move Runyon to RT and Newman to the bench.

I now think a T on draft day 1 or 2 is highly likely...and also a G on day 2 or 3 as it sadly appears Patrick will be released.

5 points
6
1
HawkPacker's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:18 pm

'A starting line up of Baht, Runyon, Meyers, Newman, and Yosh looks good to me. And when Jenks comes back move Runyon to RT and Newman to the bench.'

Respectfully do not entirely agree LambeauPlain. Move Jenkins to RT and Yosh can hopefully be the swing tackle. First round I would like to see an edge rusher or defense tackle or WR and second round as well. I do think we will draft a tackle at somepoint.

1 points
3
2
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:20 pm

Jenkins may be back later in the season, but not an option to start out at any position.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

March 14, 2022 at 03:35 pm

I think at this stage, with a full off-season for three young players (Runyan, Myers, Newman) plus others (van Lanen), it's hard to say what the dynamic will look like in the fall on the OL.

No idea what the severity of Jenkins' injury turned out to be...the Packers know better than anyone else. Big guys are usually slower to recover, but it's all about the degree of damage he sustained.

For years, the Packers tended to spend heavy on the OL. With the departures of Bulaga and Linsley, they were suddenly riding lighter on cap there, and even with Bakhtiari--and with Turner gone--they're now paying on the cheap end on OL.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:00 pm

So if Bakh rolls his ankle, who do you put in?

Nothing is more important than keeping your QB protected. IF Nijman is backing up Bakh, that's good.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:03 pm

I think that will be the case: unless they sign another credible RT, Nijman looks first in line for the right side and he's your top backup on the left side, too.

4 points
4
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:06 pm

How can he be both? If he's starting, he can't backup. Jenkins won't be available. We essentially will not have a backup at either tackle, unless you think some UDFA/Day 3 guy is going to protect the franchise.

Leave Nijman at LT because it's a more valuable position and we don't know about Bakhtiari at this point. He's on the bad side of 30 and coming back from a bad injury. We'll need to find another solution for RT.

-2 points
1
3
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:09 pm

Yes he can. Jenkins has done exactly that. Just means you need a back up RT, which are usually easier to obtain.

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 14, 2022 at 01:09 pm

Of course. If Jenkins can do it, anybody can.

-2 points
0
2
dobber's picture

March 14, 2022 at 03:25 pm

He's already shown he's a capable starter on the left side, but he's not going to play ahead of $23M Bakhtiari. So he's first in line on the right side.

Whatever the case, you've got two capable LT on your roster--hopefully one returns to elite form.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 14, 2022 at 01:57 pm

You start your best 5 Offensive linemen. Who are the best five? We don't know yet. Right now, I'd say the Packers best available 5 would be Bakht, Runyon, Meyers, Newman, Nijman. When Jenks returns, he would join the starters, with Newman to the bench.

And who knows...a yet to be named rookie or FA may emerge as a starter.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 14, 2022 at 03:26 pm

I think they'll draft at least two OL to add to the mix. If you've got your full complement of picks, I'd argue you should draft at least 1 OL every year, if not two.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:32 pm

This is one more reason we should have taken the Denver package and parted with AR12. He's worthless on his back or on the IR list, so build talent and depth on the line and a lesser QB can have equal success if running the offense as designed. Sorry, I thought I was over it. GPG!

4 points
4
0
ImaPayne's picture

March 14, 2022 at 02:18 pm

That horse has left the barn. Seattle got the deal of the century. I still say Denver was never interested in AR. Told old, too pushy about wanting to make decisions on players and not a decent playoff record.
No Denver got their man and the person they were going after from day one.

0 points
2
2
ImaPayne's picture

March 14, 2022 at 02:15 pm

I hope Bakh is okay but I still remember Beluga and how he never came back. It was one small injury after another and finally we had to cut him loose.
Bakh's injury was much much worse, over a year to heal. I got the feeling were going to see a lot of bench time for him and we just made the mistake of paying him big bucks instead of a trade and drafting a healthy replacement.

5 points
5
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:44 pm

Yeah, Bulaga actually was a quick healer. His MCL was just a couple of game. His ACL was 9 months. Another IIRC was longer and if I recall correctly, none of his injuries were non-contact but rather he got rolled up a few times (don't quote me on that plus my memory stinks).

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:08 pm

They are going to draft a lineman. Really goes without saying. I'd be surprised if they draft one in the 1st round. Even 2nd round seems high with the other needs they have. That said, few names I think they could get in the first three rounds.

1st/2nd (bottom/top-middle) - T/G Bernhard Raimann - Most athletic of these names. But shorter arms, which is why some see him as a G, and needs to put on more weight. I'd pass as I think this is too high at #28.

2nd (top-middle) - T/G Darian Kinnard - Big hands, long arms. But slow and not quick. However, he did have good production and played both positions. Versatility Packers like. I'd be surprised if he lasts until #59, but if he does, I'd think he would be in conversation. 2nd still too high for this position?

3rd (top-middle) - T Abraham Lucas - Also big hands and long arms. Also very athletic. Only allowed 4 sacks in 3000 snaps. But not much experience in run game as the team was mostly passing team. I'd also be surprised if he makes to #92 in the 3rd, but if he fell this far, this would be where I'd take him.

4 points
4
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:48 pm

I agree, though if some stud OT is there at 28 (unlikely most years), then never pass on a stud even if you don't need him at present.

GB is probably thinner at OLB, ILB, DB, and potentially wide receiver depending on how that shakes out with Adams, MVS (and I suppose Lazard but I expect a tender and then a quick restructure).

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

March 14, 2022 at 12:47 pm

I see them drafting a tackle though only in the mid-to-late rounds. They don't seem real high on Cole Van Lanen. The Packers released their starting right tackle in Turner.(Someone please explain why Turner played at left tackle in the playoffs?)

With Preston Smith back, plus R. Gary, they have edge rushers. The urgency there has diminished. They will need help at middle linebacker after Campbell leaves. I'm not sure the D. Adams impasse will be solved so they need a solid receiver.

Packers draft needs in order:
1) Wide receiver(might need 2)
2) Linebacker
3) Tight end(could be swapped with wide receiver)
4) Edge rusher
5) Tackle-offense
6) Tackle-defense

1 points
4
3
ImaPayne's picture

March 14, 2022 at 02:12 pm

That would be a smart move but then Gutt aint the brightest bulb on the string. I agree, draft the best wide receiver available, and possible two and put the ball in Adams court. They are praying the pack dont do this but it really says to Adams, your not getting that huge contract you want, we may just trade you away we got your replacement.
Oh and Rodgers, thanks for inking your deal, sorry your not getting Adams and breaking our bank.

3 points
4
1
PatrickGB's picture

March 14, 2022 at 01:10 pm

After breaking my arm and having a cast up to my shoulder, I learned how to wipe with no problems. In fact I use my other arm more often now for everything. I know, TMI. In any case, it certainly can be done and linemen know how to do it just fine. It comes with practice. Yet if a good one drops I can see this team doing it again and maybe moving him to guard until the time he may be needed. We kept Yosh for years and slowly developed him.

2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:51 pm

TMI, no obvious change in the subject and then you talk about a good one dropping. Eww. 😝

[I don't know the names of these emojis, so sooner or later I am going to use one that is inappropriate - I just pick one that looks like it might be correct.]

1 points
1
0
crayzpackfan's picture

March 14, 2022 at 01:33 pm

GB has always seemed pretty adept at draft and developing the OL position. For that reason I’m not overly concerned. However, with age and serious injury concerns, along with Turner being cut, depth may be an issue. Obviously we have more pressing needs to address with earlier round picks, but let me pose the question anyway. Let’s say Trevor Penning from UNI or the center from Iowa drops to 28, do we draft either or?

0 points
0
0
ImaPayne's picture

March 14, 2022 at 02:08 pm

Its much easier thinking what doesnt this team need. QB, RB, punter.
We need ILB, OLB, OL, DL, Safety, Kicker, return specialist.
Again this year like always there is a ton of holes to fill because of the way the pack structure contracts. Our developmentals are developed so other teams can have them once we can no longer pay them veteran wages and those cheapo deals run out.
We must have 10 X packers doing quite well of playoff teams. Sad all the talent we let go out the door and got nothing for them.
I'm with Zimmer, you draft to win now not in three years.

-1 points
1
2
13TimeChamps's picture

March 14, 2022 at 02:49 pm

By all means, let's follow the Speilman/Zimmer player acquisition model

Arguably, the two most overpaid/underperforming QB's in NFL history would be Sam Bradford and Kirk Cousins. Between the two of them they have played a total of 6 years with Minnesota...and counting...and have produced a grand total of ONE playoff win. That would also be their total even including other teams they have collectively played for.

Those are the kind of moves that get coaches/GMs fired. Oh wait.....

4 points
4
0
Lphill's picture

March 14, 2022 at 02:47 pm

Campbell back !

1 points
1
0
HankScorpio's picture

March 14, 2022 at 06:25 pm

They should go dumpster diving after someone like Dennis Kelly, perhaps even Kelly again if the price is right. And draft o-line, at least 1, every single year. With a target group of 9 on the roster, there is always room for another o-line. Having said that, you need to find two guys to play outside between Bahk, Jenkins, Nijman. I've seen someone suggest Newman might be able to slide outside. Given everything else, that's a gamble I'm comfortable taking.

Bigger fish to fry with premium picks, WR, TE, Edge and CB are bigger needs in my eyes as things sit on March 14. Normally, on the sheer value of the position, I would not include TE in that group. But the way ML likes to use them means they better get some more and make them count. If they can re-sign Douglas or Sullivan, that might bump CB down a bit. Jaire and Stokes are a top-notch pair but you need 3 in 2022 NFL.

1 points
1
0