Damarious Randall Arrives

Rookie cornerback Damarious Randall came up big in the clutch. What did he do that was so impressive? Let's take a closer look.

By now, it's safe to say that Green Bay Packers rookie cornerback Damarious Randall is ahead of the curve. He's clearly a major contributor on the defense and is playing like a savvy veteran.

That sort of fortitude and football IQ was no more apparent than it was on the game-ending play when he broke up a pass from Philip Rivers intended for Danny Woodhead on the goal line. When he batted the ball away, the Chargers turned the ball over on downs, preserving the 27-20 score.

In today's NFL, first-round draft choices are expected to contribute right away. With free agent cornerbacks Tramon Williams and Davon House departing for other teams, Ted Thompson selected Randall with the 30th pick in the 2015 draft as a potential replacement.

There's always a learning curve for rookies, but the first-rounders are expected to make the transition quicker, which is why they were selected ahead of others. They are premium picks for a reason.

What makes Randall's emergence even more impressive is he played safety in college. His coaches at Arizona State said he was the best cover guy on the team, and would have played cornerback, but they needed him more at safety.

Those cover skills really came through in the clutch when the game was on the line.

Let's take a closer look at the play that many are already calling a veteran move.

According to Demovsky, Randall tried to bait Rivers into throwing his way. That was pretty veteran if you ask me. 

However, there's more to the play than that. We'll look even closer at the play, using Demovsky's text as the backdrop for my visual description.

Starting with the pre-snap alignment, Randall is already communicating assignments with other defenders. How many times over the years have we heard of the dreaded "communication breakdowns" in the defense?

Too many to mention.

The picture below shows Randall (23, to the right end of the formation on the goal line) communicating with the strong safety (Hyde, 33, on the big "B" in the end zone) and outside linebacker (Matthews, 52 between the big "B" and "A" on the goal line) about who to cover if it's a pass. Here, it appears that Randall is calling the shots, or at least is confirming the assignments.

With the game on the line, the obvious choice to receive the ball is Antonio Gates (85) who is split tight to the right side of the formation. Based on the communication, it appears that Randall was directing Matthews to pick him up on the zone and for Hyde to play over the top in bracket coverage.

The picture above shows at the snap of the ball the defense is unfolding as it was called pre-snap. It's a zone defense, so Randall begins his bait job of Rivers by appearing to favor Gates and forgetting about Woodhead (39) coming out of the flat. When Woodhead breaks for the flat, Randall gave him a 4-yard cushion, which is insane for goal line defense.

As soon as Rivers thinks Woodhead was lost in coverage, he begins his throw to the flat. At this point, the baiting was complete. In the picture below, see how Randall is already breaking towards the ball and driving downhill, which is the hallmark of zone defense.

While the ball is in the air, Randall makes his move to seal the game. The picture below shows how Randall arrived at the exact moment the ball arrives and bats it away.

The baiting was certainly a veteran move, but that wasn't where the greatness of the play ended.

An inexperienced player, especially a rookie, may attempt to catch the ball for a heroic interception. If the ball is juggled or deflected, it's possible that Woodhead could snag it out of the air for a dramatic touchdown.

Or, they may try for a mammoth hit on the receiver to de-cleat them in epic fashion and causing them to drop the ball. In a highlight reel world, many players want to make ESPN's Top 10 with big hits. There's no guarantee the receiver would drop the ball or be stopped short of the goal line. Worse yet, there could be a pass interference or personal foul call.

Not Randall. Not with the game on the line. 

He made the right decision to simply bat the ball away. There's no style points for an incomplete pass and turnover on downs.

Get the win and walk away.

It's not easy to draw praise from QB1, but Randall did. 

But, he didn't let that go to his head. He certainly enjoyed the moment and appreciated its significance.

Soon after, he showed his eagerness to learn more and improve.

I like that hunger. 

The present is good. His future is even brighter.

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (45)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
RCPackerFan's picture

October 21, 2015 at 01:20 pm

I really hate to say it, but Randall has a little bit of Charles Woodson in him.

I am not comparing him to Woodson and am not putting those type of expectations on him, I am just saying that he just has that savvyness to him that Woodson had.

Randall has definitely been a great pick for the Packers. As has Rollins, and Montgomery. I am looking forward to seeing how these guys continue to develop.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 21, 2015 at 01:59 pm

Dude can ball!!
No offense to Tramon or House, but our new secondary is younger and hungrier.
Love the pictorial breakdown.....keep em coming.

0 points
0
0
Idiot Fan's picture

October 21, 2015 at 02:09 pm

I'm a Shields fan, but his guy was wide open.

I'm pumped for our future at CB though.

0 points
0
0
lebowski's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:18 pm

As he was all freaking day

0 points
0
0
Jay Hodgson's picture

October 21, 2015 at 08:06 pm

I noticed that too. Shields plays a lot of out of phase man-to-man and large cushion zone, so it could have been part of the technique to drive down hill and play the man on a throw.

Or, he could have been just playing very poor technique.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

October 21, 2015 at 09:24 pm

It sure looked to me like the defensive philosophy for the game was play soft zones and loose man coverages, give Rivers the small stuff, don't give up the big play, and make the Chargers march down the field and sustain long drives if they want to score. Textbook bend-don't-break. It seemed like they were giving cushions to any routes underneath, close and make the tackle. Don't give up the big play or YAC (or RAC, RAR, YAR, whatever you want to call it, lol).

If they get to red zone, you no longer have to worry about a play leaking deep, now you cover tight in the compressed field of play.

Fans don't like this type of defensive play, but I'm fairly sure that was the call for the week. All week long Packers defenders were talking about the respect they have for Rivers, his command of the offense, his ability to read the defense and adjust the playcall at the line much like Rodgers does, and his ability to make a defense pay the price. They were very concerned about big play, quick strike scoring.

They gave up the receptions to minimize the chance of the big play.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

October 21, 2015 at 11:41 pm

Oppy, if you're right (and probably are) I just don't understand this philosophy in the case of the Packers. I didn't watch the game, so only going by comments and reviews of the game. Here are my critical questions:
1) if GBP Dbacks are top 16 (as we imagine they are), why play soft zone and yield underneath at all? While I get the rationale on surface (don't yield big plays), it seems a horrible intentional strategy! You only begin to allow your opponent to gain momentum, tire your defense, and eventually a defender slips or a WR breaks a tackle. Against a pinpoint quarterback like Rivers, he'll eat that up all day (as he apparently did).
2) if Capers kept sending blitzes while decidedly yielding soft underneath passes, then that is exactly opposite logic. It only gives rivers an easy escape for the blitz. As reviewers said, he had the ball out in 2 seconds.
I would expect the blitzes to be matched by press coverage near LoS to not allow any quick throws, thus forcing Rivers to hold the ball longer and exposing him to sacks.
The only explanations I can imagine are; 1) Capers doesn't yet trust the dbacks to cover press. 2) Capers was hoping to force SD into one-dimension (taking out the run game) by clogging up the lanes.
But a coach who is confident in the coverage would challenge every yard, not sit back and allow his unit to stay out there for 2/3 rds of the game rolling the dice each play. This bend-but-don't break approach sends terrible message to your defense, exposes them, and limits them.
Can anyone help me understand this? I just don't get it despite the comments already posted sort of justifying it. But it's apparent that Capers resorts to this philosophy for whatever reason he supposes it should accomplish.

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 22, 2015 at 12:28 am

The cover 2, or Tampa 2 is based on exactly this philosophy. And it worked very well for a long time. Beating it takes a strong accurate passer, running game and an offense that doesn't make any mistakes (turnovers, penalties etc). Rivers is a hot QB who had an exceptionally hot day against a Good or better Packers pass D. He got the ball out quickly (generally 2 sec or so) and extremely accurately, much like Rodgers does.

The fact that Capers kept blitzing tells you he wasn't intentionally allowing anything. If you blitz it makes no sense to play soft coverage, its an oxymoron. If you blitz a lot your putting your CB in man coverage and on an island, so giving up short passes is giving the offense the easy way to beat the blitz.

I don't believe the Packers played intentionally to allow the short passes all day. But it was SD gameplan and it was executed by a QB who had an exceptional day.

Sometimes you have to give it up to the QB on the opposing team, instead of assuming the Packers intentionally allow something.

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

October 22, 2015 at 05:22 am

Yes Rivers was good, but GB failed to execute by dropping some ints. Also Rivers did fail because he failed to see a wide open receiver more than once on the last goal line stand. Maybe it was the pressure the D was getting late in the game. Also the packers don't seem to bat many balls down at the LOS, maybe its just me, but I don't see it.

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 22, 2015 at 01:41 pm

Yeah the Packers missed an INT or 2, but that has little to do w/ the coverage scheme. More about hands. How many passes does Rodgers have batted down? Very few... That's due to ball placement/accuracy, which is also a strength of Rivers.

The point is, the Packers blitzed a lot and when you blitz your CB can't play soft to allow the short pass. Its has to play tight to try to prevent short completions, which beat the blitz.

Rivers was able to beat the coverage w/ his accuracy and ball placement. It wasn't poor D by the Packers or intentionally allowing the short pass. It was an excellent QB with accuracy and ball placement more than any other factor.

Give it up to Rivers. He's an excellent QB who had an exceptional day. All there is to it.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

October 22, 2015 at 10:35 am

Thanks DS. I guess that was what puzzled me that packers coverage couldn't press more at the line and take away those quick throws and the blitzes then have their impact. Well I didn't see the game, so Rivers must have been on fire rather than indication of GBP quality of the Dback unit. We'll see over time.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 22, 2015 at 09:47 am

Porupack,
I think not having Burnett as our other safety posed a big problem for us. Burnett is usually the QB of the secondary. Well, he hasn't been out there, so keeping everything in from of them and simple seems to make sense. Richardson is out too. Not as impactful as Burnett, but depth and fatigue become a substitution problem. Especially in a possession oriented offense like the chargers.
Can't do everything you want to do when you got Chris Banjo running around as your second safety.
We played it safe.

Our biggest problem was that our offense had so many three and outs. Our secondary was gassed. These guys run more than anyone else on D. A few more first downs would have really helped our D out.

Given these factors, we survived and won the game. I can assure that this D will look much different with a healthy Burnett on the field. That will allow us to take chances and jump routes and let Burnett clean up if we wiff. We're going to need that type of play when we go to Denver.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

October 22, 2015 at 10:39 am

Thanks Bohj and 4th-1. We'll know more in Denver, eh?

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

October 22, 2015 at 11:11 pm

Banjo played well. Not saying that Burnettś return won´t help, but the disparagement of Banjo is unwarranted. I am not seeing any clips of Banjo after big pass plays.

As a note, 5 DBs played 89% of defensive snaps or more. That means we played a ton of 2-4-5 and 1-4-6 schemes.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

October 22, 2015 at 05:14 pm

I don't have the answers to "why", but the D allowed only 20 points to a QB who even one of our own Packers players, Josh Sitton, said put on the best performance by a QB he's ever seen, even better than any he's seen by his own QB, who is 'probably the best to play the game ever', as he put it.

Also, if you are willing to give up the small stuff with soft coverages to ensure you don't let a big one break, sending LB's at the QB makes perfect sense. You WANT to ensure the QB is getting rid of the ball in less than 2 seconds. What you don't want is the QB to have all day in the pocket and find a guy getting open down the field.

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 22, 2015 at 06:19 pm

If you blitz a lot, which the Packers did vs SD, you don't want to give the offense and easy way to beat it. When you blitz a lot its assumed the offense won't have time to go deep, so the CB have to play tight and contest the short passes. Otherwise you waste all the energy your pass rushers are exerting rushing the QB by giving up completions. The point of Defense is to prevent forward progress (and therefore points), not give it up.

Sorry but that wrong.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

October 23, 2015 at 12:11 am

Totally agree. Seems GBP D did not effectively jam SD receivers at the line, and reroute. The free release allowed them to get open on quick passes, negating the effectiveness of the blitz.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

October 23, 2015 at 12:20 am

Oppy,
I hear what you're saying....that Rivers had outstanding night. But the question is why did he? Because he was super-ionized, or did GBP simply yield to SD strength? I get that we won, but yielding 500+ is all the indictment we need. It wasn't excellent football. It wasn't good football. It was poor football responsible for Rivers' excellent night. Maybe half the plays were simply out-of-this- world performance by Rivers. But I'll bet half were lack of press and physicality, and soft scheme. Plenty of teams make Rivers a pedestrian QB. Going into the game, Rivers was the only player that could beat GB....so don't let him have any advantage. This is why I don't yet believe GBP has a playoff caliber D. The potential is there, though.

0 points
0
0
Fejs Buks's picture

October 21, 2015 at 02:14 pm

On 2nd down Woodhead was so open, and Rivers didn't saw him,and throw to Gates incomplete pass.After that play Clay went to Randall and tell him he can’t leave Woodhead open in the flat,and on 4th he executed.He is learning, and will be great corner, but Allen was all over him,until he got hurt.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 22, 2015 at 04:12 am

Very good notice.
Jay, you made "rookie" mistake. It was not Randall who was calling the play, as you said: "Here, it appears that Randall is calling the shots, or at least is confirming the assignments." He was confirming to Clay that he understood him and that he will be on the right spot... Go and watch "What you maight've missed" made by Mike Spofford. It was shown very clearly who was giving instructions to whome...
And, also, regarding penalties, clock was 0:00 at the moment when Randall broke the pass, so any penalty will be with no effect...

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

October 22, 2015 at 05:26 am

Mike Spofford does some really good stuff on "what you might have missed". I check it out every week.

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 22, 2015 at 11:30 pm

Spofford pointed out how Matthews played it differently the 2nd time (4th down) but holding up Gates release. That forced Rivers to throw to the flat and as noted, Matthews corrected Randall's coverage for the 2nd play.

0 points
0
0
Ibleedgreenmore's picture

October 21, 2015 at 02:21 pm

To be compared to Woodson that is great. I see it too and its early, this kid is going to be great.

0 points
0
0
EdsLaces's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:01 pm

I saw a breakdown of all 4 plays. Woodhead was open on same play on 2nd down. Cm3 said hey Randall watch our for that if they run it again. They did and Randall made a great play. Randall made it....Clay made it happen.

0 points
0
0
J0hn Denver's Gavel's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:05 pm

It looks like Davon House lost his starting job down in JAX.
http://jacksonville.com/opinion/blog/513351/vito-stellino/2015-10-21/dav...

TT's move to go younger and cheaper in the secondary sure seems to be paying huge dividends and in retrospect, looks to have been the best move.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:31 pm

JDG: I hope that is not solely based on Hopkins game Sunday. Hopkins certainly achieved super human status again after our last exchange Sunday. Davon was all over him in the first half.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:31 pm

JDG: I hope that is not solely based on Hopkins game Sunday. Hopkins certainly achieved super human status again after our last exchange Sunday. Davon was all over him in the first half.

0 points
0
0
J0hn Denver's Gavel's picture

October 21, 2015 at 04:13 pm

The article I linked implies that it is because of Hopkins, specifically House's coverage of him (or lack, thereof ) in the 4th qtr on Sunday. I'm sure his whole body of work this year went into the decision, that was the breaking point, though

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 22, 2015 at 04:18 am

I'm not surprised. To me Davon looks very average for his hight and speed... Anyhow, I was in the small group who did not panick after TT released Tramon and Davon. I think he correctly evaluate situation...
EDIT: TT as usual..

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

October 22, 2015 at 08:04 am

croat - love your posts! Davon seems to be good person, so I'm rooting for him. He has a blog, very intelligent. In addition, the Jags are kind of a fun team to watch. Bortles, Robinson, Hurns, J. Thomas, and some young guys on defense; on TV they look better than a lot of supposedly established teams.

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 22, 2015 at 01:23 pm

Tramon's best days are behind him. His passer rating against was terrible. He was an easy call when Cleve started to pursue him. May have been worth about 1/2 the contract he got from Cleve, but not 7M worth. I always liked Davon and would have liked to keep him, but he wasn't on the field enough and when he was on the field he was a little inconsistent (which seems to be the issue in Jax as well).

All things considered Thompson made the right call on both guys. Randall and Rollins are more talented and honestly, might be better already than Tramon and House are.

0 points
0
0
PaulRosik's picture

October 22, 2015 at 09:21 am

I watched that game. They left House 1 on 1 the majority of the game against one of the best receivers in the game. House looked good at times but in the end Hopkins torched the Jaguars.

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:18 pm

Many were gripping about the Randall pick immediately after the draft. Not me... I knew he could ball and was great in coverage.

Randall sat on the goalline the entire play. He was baiting a bit, but there waz no point moving forward or back till the throw and break on the ball.

Randall had "arrived" well before this play. He's been playing quality ball all year. Only the casual fan wouldn't have noticed until now.

0 points
0
0
John Galt III's picture

October 21, 2015 at 03:51 pm

Funny - we drafted a safety and a basketball player in the first two rounds to play corner and they both are good.

TT and his scouts get an A plus.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

October 21, 2015 at 04:08 pm

It's a passing league, they are the corners of the future, next years draft focus will be linebacker and tight end , but then again you never know with the Packers.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

October 21, 2015 at 04:29 pm

This kid is taking his lumps at times, but he's shown me enough to be very excited about his future. Kid looks and plays like he's 'wants it'.

0 points
0
0
MarkinMadison's picture

October 21, 2015 at 06:58 pm

Right after the game there seemed to be a consensus at CHTV that this one play was what saved Randall's day. Can you address that a bit Jay? Where do you see Randall's overall performance?

0 points
0
0
Jay Hodgson's picture

October 21, 2015 at 08:03 pm

I haven't watched the whole coaches film yet, so I can't really give a full answer, but he played a lot of bend-but-don't-break like the rest of the defense. Gave up some yards and had some technique breakdowns between the 20s, but tightened up in the red area.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

October 21, 2015 at 09:18 pm

Got 'beat' four times, broke up four plays, up and down all day.

He's a rookie.

0 points
0
0
MarkinMadison's picture

October 21, 2015 at 10:52 pm

Thanks Jay. I have to say I kind of wondered what TT was thinking when he went CB (sorta) twice in the first two rounds. I was really expecting a LB or a TE in the first two rounds. All of that said, Rollins has played consistently well, and I just can't decide about Randall yet.

Oppy, by "beat" you mean someone got behind him?

0 points
0
0
Dan Stodola's picture

October 22, 2015 at 12:13 am

No ones beat Randall over the top or gotten behind him yet. Have to assume beat means giving up a reception. Which isn't getting beat IMO. Even Woodson gave up receptions. Very few, maybe No CB (possibly excepting Deion Sanders or Revis), no matter how good breaks up as many passes and he has completions against him.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

October 21, 2015 at 11:17 pm

Jay, thanks for great use of picks and analysis of the play. It looks like Gates was the first read (if open) and decoy, for Woodhead as second read. Unfortunately for Rivers, he consumed time checking out Gates, before going to Woodhead. Had Rivers already predetermined that the alignment was favoring Woodhead and got the ball out immediately to Woodhead on first read, it would have been an easy score.
Congrats to Randall though, and I'm not trying to diminish his saavy play. Seems he took a calculated risk, and a bit of a risk it was.

0 points
0
0
sheppercheeser's picture

October 22, 2015 at 05:13 am

Randall had a great game, especially the last defensive play, but please people, it's disrespectful to Charles Woodson to compare a rookie to him. Yes, I like what I see in DR's game, but let's let his body of work throughout the season play out, before anointing him an all-star.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

October 22, 2015 at 05:21 pm

Good god.

I think Damarius Randall is a talented DB with a bright future ahead of him, but apparently, if you don't go out of your way to say he's the next coming of deion sanders or that he had an exceptional game, you are frowned upon.

Can't criticize Rodgers, Check.

Must over-exaggerate Randall's performances, compare him to Woodson, Check.

Packer nation is starting to look like homer nation lately. I hate that I have to say that.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

October 22, 2015 at 11:22 pm

Cheesehead is actually pretty okay with some thoughtful criticism. Don´t go near acme packing if you have something that might be perceived as negative unless you have a thick skin.

0 points
0
0