Cory's Corner: NFL will examine pace of play

Your remote controls spoke loud and proud this season.

Whether the NFL TV ratings were down because of the presidential election, poor play or a mixture of the two, commissioner Roger Goodell addressed pace of play at his press conference on Wednesday.

Let’s be honest, with increases in technology, the game is simply better at home than in person. You get the myriad of graphics and stats that each network provides; multiple angles with dozens of replays for every close play and you don’t have fight lines to get food or use the bathroom.

However, the commercial breaks have gotten out-of-hand. Every scoring play is now reviewed — even though it shouldn’t be. So networks usually take that time to take a break. They then come back and show the extra point, followed by another break. Then they return for the kickoff and as soon as the returner gets tackled or takes a knee in the end zone, the networks scurry to take another break. The most popular person on the field these days seems to be the guy in the orange sleeves, who’s telling the refs when the game is going to or coming back from a commercial break.

Back in 2010, The Wall Street Journal found out that the ball is in play only 11 minutes of an NFL game. That’s distressing. At least the NFL doesn’t stop the clock after first downs like the college game, or else we’d be staring at four hours for a regulation game.

Goodell said he expects changes to pace of play. Whether that means the NFL will be more autonomous with how the networks take breaks is yet to be seen. But exactly what can the NFL do? ESPN doesn’t pay $1.9 billion, CBS doesn’t pay $1.5 billion and Fox and NBC don’t shell out $1.1 billion a year to broadcast the NFL, only to have the NFL tell them how to do it.

Maybe the NFL and the networks could work a deal where they could play commercial breaks without leaving action. For example, show the extra point with a small inaudible commercial playing in one of the corners sans the network’s ticker and graphics.

There could even be minor things like the clock only stops when an offensive player goes out-of-bounds in the final five minutes of each quarter. Have a firm time on an instant replay decision. Don’t keep players and fans hostage for 15 minutes trying to determine if a receiver got both of his feet inbounds.

I don’t think the pace of play kept people from initially watching, but it may have had an impact in how many people changed the channel or turned off the TV. If a game is monotonous with no flow whatsoever and especially if you don’t have a rooting interest in the game, what are the odds that you’re going to stay glued to that game?

It also doesn’t help that fans can cheat nowadays. They can watch the RedZone Channel without ever having to sit through an entire game. In a few years you may actually have fans that only watch complete games in the playoffs — because the RedZone goes dark in the postseason.

In this age of everything needs to be done five minutes ago, it’s about time that the NFL cuts the fat from its game. I just don’t want it trimmed too close to the bone.                                                                                                                             

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (2)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Ferrari Driver's picture

February 04, 2017 at 12:25 pm

Cory, I'll give you a thumbs up on the article.

I was going to mention the 11 minutes of actual play study which was done, but you beat me to it.

Considering there is only around 11 minutes of action, it seems outrageous to keep fans at the park 3+ hours.

Also, most of us are paying over $10 a minute to watch linemen push on each other for 4 seconds and then huff and puff.

Yeah, I'm one of the fools who loves and game and pays the outrageous price to watch both in the stadium and more often in front of the TV.

I will also admit that I was one of people that did get sick of the Colin Kaepernick spectacle and it did affect my interest in the games and I skipped a few because of it.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 04, 2017 at 12:44 pm

What's the impetus for the league and owners to change how things are? They're selling loads of ad time (which means TV contracts stay fat) and the longer the game goes, the more likely fans in attendance are to buy beer, soda, foam fingers, etc. Maybe they don't want the games to go longer, but I don't see them getting shorter.

0 points
0
0