Cory's Corner: Joe Barry Is Under Microscope

The Packers defensive coordinator has plenty to live up to this year. 

Now that the trade is over and the NFL Draft is completed, it’s time to look at expectations. 

The easy answer is Jordan Love. I mean, he was just signed to a new deal with virtually no pro experience and he is also replacing a future first ballot Hall of Famer that also replaced a first ballot Hall of Famer. 

But if you said Love, you’d be wrong. 

The correct answer is defensive coordinator Joe Barry. And I’m not just saying that because I wasn’t a huge fan of his for much of last season. Granted, I will never understand why corners were seven yards off a receiver on third-and-3, but I digress. 

The Packers have made it clear what their philosophy is — use high draft capital on defensive talent. For the third straight year, the Packers picked a defensive player in the first round after taking Iowa’s Lukas Van Ness 13th overall last week. 

The Packers have eight first round picks on defense. Think about that for a second. When you say the Green Bay Packers, what’s the first thing that pops in your head? A back shoulder throw? A Lambeau Leap? A play-action deep pass?

Defense isn’t what I think of when I say Packers. Maybe I would if Matt LaFleur was in charge of that side of the ball, but alas, he’s not. It’s because of the amazing offense that the Packers have remained relevant for so long and thanks to amazing quarterback play. 

Now the Packers are trying to change the narrative. Despite having a basket full of picks, they still managed to stay on the defensive. The Packers went from 13th in defensive points in 2020 to 17th in 2022. But at what point is that the result of the talent and not the leader?

There are probably plenty of you that are wondering what the Packers offense is going to look like. I am too actually. Is this the year that the Packers will finally lean on a running game? The Packers have the perfect fire and ice and combo at running back and now we might be able to see it.

The moment that Barry was coming back, I was beyond shocked. Now that the Packers have invested another first round pick on defense, it just means that the Packers believe in Barry. 

This defense hasn’t really looked very good at all in the past couple years. It bends about as much as a rainbow, just waiting for the eventual moment when it will break. 

That’s why this is Barry’s prove it year. Either this defense proves that he belongs or it proves that Green Bay made a mistake in bringing him back.  

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
7 points
 

Comments (105)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 06:53 am

I wasn't crazy about the Barry hire when the Packers announced it back in 2021 but I decided to give him a chance. He's had 2 seasons and his defense has not impressed. Going from 13th to18th in points allowed is not a very positive trend and not the trend that I was expecting with the Packers annual investment in1st round defensive selections. The defense is not any better than when Pettine or Capers were the DCs. The Packers defense hasn't been very effective since the 2010 SB season. I enjoy tough, physical solid defensive play. Aggressive play with sure tackling and rallying to the football. For several years now I find myself going back to my DVDs of the Lombardi era and the Holmgren era to watch serious and legit NFL defensive play. That's along way off but it's where we're at.

This is Barry's 3rd season and IMO he is down to his last strike. 3 seasons or 3 strikes and you're out if he can't get it done this season. With Love in his first season as a starter and a receiving corps that is fresh out of the box and raw the Packers will need their defense to keep the games close.

In 2023 the strength of the Packers offense will be their RBs and even they will only go as far as a questionable OL takes them. Opposing DCs will know this and prepare accordingly. After last season and with Gary and Stokes coming back from injuries I'm not sure what will be the strength of the Packers defense in 2023.

The defense needs to play more physically, win the LOS and they need to tackle better. These are minimums characteristics that I will be looking for early in the season. Next they need to throw away the soft zone BS and play closer to the LOS and utilize the man to man strengths of their CBs. Again they should get physical with the receivers at the LOS. They need to be better on 3rd and long and obviously they need to be better at stopping the run.

The Packers defense is long overdue in stopping opponent when it matters, in getting off the field on 3rd downs and in protecting leads. They have been fortunate to have been playing with an offense that has been very effective in ball security particularly interceptions. That could change in Love's first 1-2 seasons.

Bottom line is that if Barry can't get it done again then the Packers need to find someone who can and who will. Thanks, Since '61

22 points
23.5
1.5
jvole's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:49 am

If the safety play is weak, there might be even more cushion given to receivers by the DBs. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm afraid that it is going to be tough to watch.

0 points
1
1
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:17 am

Agree, I'm also concerned about the safety play. I'm waiting to watch Tavarious Moore play. At least he has some experience at the position and I have read some positive comments about him. Until the regular season begins everything is just hype, propaganda and speculation. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:08 am

I'll put money on the rookie , Johnson. Bill Walsh didn't worry about veterans Experience when he started Three rookies in his defensive backfield and won the SB.

5 points
5
0
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:19 am

TBH I think Anthony Johnson has a real shot at securing a starting safety spot. Savage is on a downward trajectory and Moore has mostly been a backup/STer.

5 points
7
2
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:53 am

I hope that you are correct about Johnson PackyCheese. I'm looking forward to watching him play.
Thanks, Since '61

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:20 am

You’re not kidding on D, Since’61. Man, I miss both of our Super Bowl winning defenses. Heroic defensive feats by legendary Packers players in both wins.

2022’s DL ranked #32 at Football Outsiders. Our OL ranked #2 overall in the NFL.

I believe our O is going to roll, especially with the infusion of skill talents two years in a row.

The D has been one gigantic question mark for two years. I can only assume they’re trying to build something bigger and better, something that will help us win another Super Bowl.

If not, what the hell are we doing here?

Looking forward, like yourself, Since, to seeing a real ROI.

0 points
3
3
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 09:06 am

gg, I'm not surprised about the #32 DL ranking. Except for Clark they get pushed all over the field. They only showed up for the 2nd Viking game. The Packers need their young DLs to step up big time in 2023.
Thanks, Since '61

7 points
7
0
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:36 am

What bothers me most about this D last year or at least the secondary, which was operated differently than the year before, is the performance of every S who played in it. All had moments, but all came up short and regressed where there was a past benchmark to compare against.

Amos isn’t old, he’s just turned 30 now. He’s been the epitome of solid his entire career. I do not buy the argument that he suddenly got slower. It possible, but easy but dubiously probable explanations should always be scrutinized thoroughly before being accepted.

Savage went backwards, Ford had moments and then less good ones. All looked lost at times, all looked hesitant at times, all seemed to be being asked to play against strengths regularly. Dissimilar players being asked to interchange roles, with CBs too in the course of a game.

This could just be talent, but I honestly don’t think that’s the root answer. When regression is the norm not merely individual that’s a big, bright red flag that the expectations are an issue: here that the system requires the unrealistic of whomever is at S. The more I look, the more I think that’s the. case here (without saying that talent couldn’t improve too).

Barry’s system of last year seems calculated to bring all safeties down except a guy who can do everything like Woodson. There are precious few of those in any era. That means that the system has a fundamental flaw. Either Barry changes it, or the problems at S continue I fear, regardless of who is in the line up, that only affects the degree.

9 points
10
1
SensualInfluence's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:40 am

Sweet novel. Your comment is almost as long as the article

-8 points
1
9
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:27 am

To be fair, Barry isnt the one out there blowing assignments and missing tackles. And injuries like Rashan Gary and Eric Stokes arent easy to overcome. Im no Barry apologist, as he has flaws to be sure, but the hate is just over the top. The players need to be better too. This point seems to be completely ignored because hating Barry is in right now. Yeah the off coverage on short yardage is frustrating. But what about games like vs the Eagles when guys were in the right position all night but couldnt tackle to save their lives. Thats not Barry's fault. They cant even drill tackling in the NFL anymore. Again, the players have to be better too.

-3 points
4
7
LambeauPlain's picture

May 06, 2023 at 02:54 pm

I do not ascribe "hate" to pointing out facts about Barry as a failed DC...facts are stubborn things and the trend of DC failure has become his brand.

How many seasons has Barry failed as a DC? 6?

And his second verse of his previous 3 team stints as DC were worst than the first.

He just is not good running all the phases of an NFL Defense. In fact, he is incompetent doing it.

MLF retaining him is of deep concern. Concern about the HC's decision making ability.

2 points
2
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:37 pm

I wasnt taking shots at anyone specifically. Especially not you. Just speaking in a general sense. Anytime Barry comes up, its seems its only negative. In reality, the defense peaked at the right time last year and nearly carried this team and its punchless offense to the playoffs. I guess all I'm really trying to say is we should be fair and point out his successes as well as failures. We should also temper putting all the blame on him when guys like Jaire gave up big plays at the worst times, Kenny Clark disappeared for 2/3 of the season, Quay Walker gets kicked out of 2 big games and also had a couple of horrendous game, Devondrae Campbell regresses after an all-pro 2021, etc. Thats not all on Barry, nor do I think a "better" DC would have magically prevented that all from happening. But as I mentioned, despite all that, this defense still peaked at the right time and had the offense been even decent theyre a playoff team looking to do damage. As for his other previous DC jobs, Bill Belichick couldnt have made lemonade out of that 0-16 Lions feces pile. And the Washington defense he coached only had nominally more talent than the Lions team. Perspective is key.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:30 am

"What the hell is going on out there? Everybody's hitting, nobody's tackling."

Talent on the field was changed away from what works. That's coaching. DC is a fink.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:35 am

You're more tolerant than I am. I saw plenty last season that told me DC was a bust and should be fired as soon as the season was over.

What I'm unsure about is the idea that the team is "soft" because MLF's personality is soft and that's contagious. Maybe he's only good when everything works? That's not quite the same as players doing everything and "carrying" the HC, but we saw him fail to adjust. I think keeping Joe Barry is the same mistake.

Replacing him now at the start of the rebuild makes the most sense, have one year when nobody expects success; don't spread that over 2.

3 points
3
0
BFK's picture

May 07, 2023 at 08:11 am

Joe Barry is a lost cause and needs to go! With the offense undergoing so many big changes the defense is going to have to rise to the occasion in 2023. I do not have the confidence in Joe Barry. As we all know by now, with the addition of
Lukas Van Ness the Packers, have eight, count them, EIGHT ! first round draft picks on defense. The return on the Packers investment has been very POOR! If the defense DOES NOT SHOW major improvement Barry needs to be given his walking papers. Remember, he was the DC of one of the few teams to go winless in an NFL season; that does not give Packer fans confidence he can get the job done. If he does not get the job done Coach Matt will need to make a change, whether Barry is his friend or not.Otherwise he might be the next one on the hot seat!!!

1 points
1
0
egbertsouse's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:01 am

This is the point where Gute or Murphy or whoever is in charge should step in and tell MLF that they need quality coaches and not just drinking and poker buddies. I know it can happen because after the Mennenga and Drayton debacle, somebody finally forced MLF to get a real ST coach.

14 points
16
2
mrtundra's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:07 am

Retaining Barry had to be one of the most maddening moments I had, regarding this Packers' team. Not using players at their best positions, playing defenders, off the line, on short yardage plays, are things everyone saw, that had to change. Then, MLF says Barry stays. Gut punch time. This has to be Barry's last stand. Will he circle the wagons or will we see the same old, same old? At any rate, this Defense has to perform better, this season. That is all on Barry.

20 points
21
1
Turophile's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:43 am

"Will he circle the wagons, or will we see the same old, same old?"

These two are different things ??

0 points
0
0
Renllaw's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:09 am

This is an evaluation and growth year for the young offense. Little to no playoff expectations. Could they be keeping Barry for one more year because they know this? And also know he will cost them 3-4 close games? Meaning our expected 11 2024 draft picks are more valuable? I don't know. What I do know is that the guy has NEVER had a successful, or even top 50% defense in the NFL. I just cant see any reason outside this. EVERYONE, including the broadcasters every week, wonder what the hell that dude is thinking. I have a hard time believing that MLF and Gute don't recognize this. So there has to be a plan right? Please, as a packer fan tell me there is a reason for Barry.

12 points
12
0
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:14 am

I'm thinking that the reason for Barry is either the price is right or that he is someone's good buddy in the Packer organization or possibly both. Also, like many industries/corporations, the NFL has always been a take care of one of their own in carrying dead weight long past their expiration date and in passing around guys from team to team until they reach retirement. Thanks, Since '61

10 points
10
0
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:03 am

Or perhaps he’s a good soldier for men who can’t handle dissent or lead. Weak leaders tend to like weak characters around them. Barry no doubt knew he was at the last chance saloon when he was hired (and not as a first choice).

4 points
4
0
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:03 am

Excellent point Coldworld. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:39 am

I can’t buy this line. LaFleur made some bad choices, yes.

But, were they made under a quasi mind F level of duress at the hands of AR?

Also, yes.

Let’s just let the dust settle. See how LaFleur coaches his team unencumbered with that same level of insubordination from the most important position on any team that helped bring McCarthy’s demise.

I think we’ll see a different LaFleur. Let’s at least give the man that chance, without LaChooching it all over the place.

He was one of the NFL’s youngest HCs, who tried his best to lead a control stealing & totally self absorbed prick.

No? Too soon?

I appreciated the hell out of the AR we knew prior to Jordy’s leaving. Not after. Not at all.

I’m grateful for this new era, free from his cap constraints, and all the ridiculous drama he brought us. That was an embarrassment to me, as a lifelong Packer fan.

Let’s give LaFleur & his staff a fair chance.

GPG!!!

-3 points
3
6
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 02:01 pm

There are many things that I can at least see a plausible basis for claims that Rodgers might have interfered or influenced. Perhaps that even extended beyond Clements into offensive coaching choices. I find it a stretch too far to think Barry or Drayton were a result of his actions. That and most coaching hires other than Bissacia and Clements and retention rests solely on LaFleur in my mind.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 06, 2023 at 03:02 pm

MLF also selected Menninga and retained him after he showed he was over his head. But to then hire his assistant Mo to replace him was a jaw dropper.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 04:03 pm

Sorry. I was mainly focused on MLF’s real-time game decisions possibly being adversely affected by having a malcontent wrecking entire game plans.

I mean, there just is zero excuse acceptable regarding AR throwing to Davante exclusively more than 3 Quarters of a playoff game.

How much more insubordination can a HC take?

And, Mennenga, Drayton…? Sign LaFleur’s first choice, Rizzi, and it’s a non-issue. Same with saddling the man with Pettine.

That’s pretty messed up. That’s also 100% on Mark Murphy.

LaFleur picked Barry to run what LaFleur envisioned. No? Well, that was going to require a personnel change over. Unable to use trade or FA, it was going to take a few drafts to get scheme specific players.

Fans unwilling to acknowledge that in favor of piling on LaFleur/Barry is kind of disappointing. I’m thinking it might be missing the mark. That unbridled derision. As a fan base, I know we’re better than that.

As Packer fans, we can give them more of a chance to prove themselves, no?

-2 points
1
3
jannes bjornson's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:40 am

They could have snagged a master, like Vic Fangio, or an up and coming, inspiring guy like Ejiro Evero, but they walked around with lead shoes and stayed stuck in the mud. Eight one picks on this side of the ball, one of them should have gone to an OT.

9 points
9
0
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:21 am

I have a hard time thinking MLF will be the HC of the Packers any longer if we endure another losing season with a leaky Barry defense…

10 points
10
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 06, 2023 at 03:05 pm

Or uber talented Brian Flores who the vikings sadly hired to face MLF's O at least 2x/year.

2 points
2
0
gpt999's picture

May 06, 2023 at 02:07 pm

Just because this might be an evaluation year for a young offense, why would GB want to saddle even more pressure on a young QB (taking over from a HOFer QB) by having a less than optimal defense backstopping him? It means he would be throwing more and running less. If he's throwing more because they're always behind, he's going to have more incompletes and interceptions which will ruin his confidence.

Even though this may be an evaluation year for the offense, it doesn't mean that the defense should be less than optimal...

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:41 am

The defense has definitely been a disappointment overall under Barry.
Why did Rasul, DeVondre, and Darnell regress so drastically last year?
Is it possible that the 8 first rounders were over-drafted? Or is it the way they were used? Infuriating to see Hyde and Hayward go elsewhere and excel.
OTOH, how often are coaches’ accomplishments underestimated because they had great players? Even Belichick is subjected to the “he had Brady” argument.
I am hoping that Barry was retained because he DID seem to adjust somewhat last year; less passive zone coverage, letting 23 cover 18 in the second MN game.
Bottom line is he’s under a microscope because he deserves it.

16 points
16
0
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:21 am

Belechick is subjected to the "he had Brady" argument because he has done nothing before or since Brady has played for him. Thanks, Since '61

6 points
6
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:32 am

True.
But would you agree he’s highly regarded as a coach?

To some extent, I think ALL coaches get this. Mac and MLF had 12, Carroll (who I greatly dislike) had the Legion of Boom, the recently fired Bud had Giannis, Phil Jackson had Jordan…maybe this applies more to basketball. Fewer players involved. One superstar is more able to carry a team.

Years ago, Bum Phillips was extolling the virtues of Tom Landry when he said something to the effect of “He can take his team and beat yours, or he can take your team and beat his.”
Now THAT would be a great way to evaluate coaches!

3 points
3
0
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:15 am

I would agree that he is a highly regarded coach especially on the defensive side of the ball. His early SB champions were excellent defensive teams. Each of Bellichick's SB wins were one score games except against the Rams which was 13-3. They should have lost to the Seahawks and to the Falcons but both of those teams beat themselves with stupid plays in the second half. The Seahawks with a dumb play call on the goal line at the end of the game and the Falcons with poor decisions and bad defense in the second half of their loss to the Pats.

His teams are usually well prepared and play hard but Brady was the difference maker for the Pats.
Thanks, Since '61

2 points
2
0
barutanseijin's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:14 pm

Belichick was a champion in those years because he had his team play smarter and with fewer mistakes. Had the Falcons or Seahorks played smarter they would have been champs.

1 points
1
0
murf7777's picture

May 06, 2023 at 03:50 pm

He also is great at making game time adjustments. Brady doesn’t win all those championships without him. It was a great partnership.

0 points
0
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:12 pm

I think that quote was originally said about Bear Bryant.

Even if Bum Phillips said that concerning Tom Landry, I do believe that I think that Jerry Jones would disagree with that sentiment! LOL!

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:25 pm

Yeah, that might be it!
But the idea expressed is really accurate. Or inaccurate, based on how you look at it.

0 points
0
0
Mark King's picture

May 07, 2023 at 08:07 am

Thanks for the Bum Phillips quote ! I love ALL his quotes !! Humor mixed with Wisdom !!

0 points
0
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:45 pm

Give Belichick that 2020 Bucs team and an above average qb instead of Brady and he still wins that super bowl. If you want to call out his prowess as a gm, thats one thing. But as a coach, he is unparalleled. After winning 8 rings as a head coach and dc in this league, I cant believe were still even having this converation. Was Lombardi only good cuz he had Starr? Was Walsh only good cuz he had Montana? How about Noll/Bradshaw? Landry/Staubach? Or can we all agree that it takes two to tango?

1 points
2
1
Paul Konieczny's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:11 pm

Not an accurate statement.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:47 am

Personally I believe in the talent on the Packers Defense. I think there's a TON of it and just about all of it is very young and of course athletic as hell. You have 1st rounder or rounders on the DL, ILB, OLB, CB, and Safety position because well, you HAVE to count Savage as a 1st round talent...Hey maybe Savage surprises this year but I have a feeling he'll break out next year, with a different team, NOT coached by retreads like Pettine and now Barry.

The keeping Barry as DC gives me that same feeling I had when MLF kept Mo Drayton in 2021. We all know how that turned out. But even in Drayton, who I never thought should have been hired in the first place, hadn't failed, TWICE, as a previous Coordinator like Joe Barry did before coming to Green Bay.

The Packers did play a little better down the stretch last season and the game in against the Vikings at home was a good example of what could be. Walker needs to mature a bit but I like him. I still think Wyatt breaks out this year, and for the love of God Joe Barry let your CB's like Alexander and Stokes get in the FACE of the WR's! If I see a CB lined up 7 yards off in 3rd and 3 or 10 yards off on 3rd and 7 I think I'll lose it.

I was a huge supporter of MLF until that 2021 season when by support began to waver a bit. Keeping Drayton when EVERYTHING pointed to making a change before a huge blunder happened when it mattered (Playoffs). Hiring Joe Barry in the first place and then keeping him is a close second.

Barry's leash must be short. BIG changes need to happen on the defensive side of the ball IMO this year. I just don't know if that old dog can learn enough new tricks fast enough.

13 points
15
2
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:58 am

Nick,

Everybody wants to hear that short leash stuff, but the reality is Pettine was forced upon LaFleur, didn’t work, resulting in a two years long mistake to recover from.

LaFleur clearly stated what he wanted his D to be when Barry was hired, one that offered his O scheme’s “Illusion of Complexity,” but on D.

That requires different players who are multiple in positional offerings. Takes time not only to acquire, especially with limited FA $, but time to train. I think they want to morph with players proficient in multiple roles to create substitution mismatches.

Why has Barry never once been called out on the carpet by either of LaFleur or Gutekunst? Because he’s got a very long leash.

I bet the clock only starts about now, given he should have all the players he needs to run that, if that’s what they’re actually doing.

Otherwise? Yeah, jettison him out. But, my guess is they’re probably thinking they’re right on course.

It’s been painful to watch as fans, but without the pain of years of talent acquisition, hard work & dedicated training, there’s no glory.

-6 points
1
7
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:01 am

What would allow Gutekunst to have such a conversation with Barry? He isn’t Barry’s superior in any direct sense. That’s LaFleur and Murphy.

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:07 am

I wouldn’t doubt it was as simple as “Matt, what do you want for your defense and who do you want to run it?”

I could easily see Murphy signing off on that, and Gutekunst relishing the opportunity to acquire the talent for it.

He’s been at it for a while. King. Jones. Burks. Martin. Summers. Keke. Scott. None of his picks there worked out.

I bet he relished the opportunity to load this D, if that’s how the scenario is playing out.

We’ll see. I’m spitballing. There’s gotta be more to this, don’t you think?

Barry drastically changed their D style last 5-6 games. Was it to see who could readily switch press-man to zone? Who could pressure without blitzing? Etc.

Maybe.

Look at every DB rostered since. They all are really great zone players with press-man abilities. Big Safeties who can morph LB in Carpenter/Moore. Multi positional, quick, strong DL. Van Ness introduced to an LB coach Day 1… Etc.

Lastly, every single defender added has run stop in his resume/tape.

-6 points
0
6
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:06 am

Down the stretch we played predominantly weak offenses.

5 points
6
1
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:06 am

Duplicate

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:14 am

''''' If I see a CB lined up 7 yards off in 3rd and 3 or 10 yards off on 3rd and 7 I think I'll lose it.'''''

Will you lose it if they line up tight and get beaten deep?

-1 points
3
4
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:37 am

Bingo. We’re so used to press-man coverage. Zone? What’s that?

-3 points
1
4
jannes bjornson's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:38 pm

Why would you spend number One picks on guys to play off-coverage?

6 points
6
0
NickPerry's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:27 pm

I'll take my chances with Alexander and Stokes running step for step with just about anyone. How many 18 play drives do you NEED TO SEE?

Death by 100 cuts (or 18) or one. Same result at the end of the day. 18 cuts gets PAINFUL at times when they make it so easy on the offense.

Obviously neither is ideal...

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 02:10 pm

If you have players that can do something really really well and you do not take advantage of that, then the benefits from the reason you are not have to be strikingly apparent or you are getting less out of more. I think that is what Barry achieved last year.

1 points
1
0
gpt999's picture

May 06, 2023 at 02:16 pm

I agree that Barry should be on the SHORTEST of leashes! My concern is that GB - or more specifically MLF - will not fire Barry during the season even if he should be argueing that a change during the season would be more trouble than its worth? We've seen that MLF has been scared in the past to replace obviously weak coaches during the season (Mennenga, Drayton). But maybe if MLFs job is on the line, he will have more "urgency" to replace poor coaches sooner than later? We can always hope...

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:46 am

I agree, the talent is THERE.

DC should have been fired at the end of the season at the latest.

1 points
1
0
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:53 am

The only good thing about having Barry as DC another year is that it may make MLF’s decision to retain him look so bad that it might get them both fired next year.

17 points
18
1
Bitternotsour's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:27 am

don't get the focus on Barry. a fish rots from the head, as they say. this speaks to MLF, not Barry. Also, the offense fell off big time last year (Rodgers play too) and guess what, there was a new coordinator.

the fish rots from the head.

1 points
3
2
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:42 pm

I don’t know if fish would be my food comparison for MLF. I think MLF seems more like toast…

1 points
3
2
packerbackerjim's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:57 am

For me, MLF is on secret double probation. Lack of in-game adjustments, and now a lack of adjustment by not jettisoning Barry, has tested my confidence in the organization.

20 points
21
1
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:07 am

Agree about MLF. I trust Gutey and Bissacia, especially after this off-season.

5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 09:05 am

The problem is that Gute has no authority over the coaches. LaFleur reports directly to Murphy. I do think it’s indicative that LaFleur was trying to keep Drayton—he wouldn’t immediately sack him after the season at least. It seems the collective leadership stepped in and found Bissacia.

However, LaFleur has shown an unwillingness to fire anyone. He reportedly tried to keep our former DB coach despite a seeing disconnect with Barry. That made no sense either. He also appoints almost exclusively from within except at the bottom. Taken together, that suggests a man not able to separate performance from loyalty, good judgement from personal ties.

We saw that with his reaction to Amari and Watkins being cut too. It extends to players. It probably plays into his unwillingness to change out underperformed to reward those who do. He seems to be massively over personally invested in his people. It could also explain his willingness to work with Rodgers even if Rodgers was usurping his authority or at least impeding his ability to do what he thought best, as some claim That’s not a survivable mentality as a leader. It’s just not.

He’s going to have to start looking and acting less like a buddy mentor and more like a Head Coach whose job is to win and the object of loyalty is a winning record and the team, not individuals. A Head Coach can’t be everyone’s friend. He can be friendly, but ultimately he’s going to have to make tough and unpopular decisions regularly. With leadership, command, there has to be a mental and emotional distance and acceptance that one can’t truly be one of the boys. I don’t think LaFleur has that in him. This may be his last chance to prove he does.

9 points
9
0
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:11 am

Small correction packerbackerjim it's "double secret probation". Thanks, Since '61

6 points
6
0
packerbackerjim's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:39 am

Good grief; Not enough coffee.

3 points
3
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:18 pm

You've really done it this time...

You're not walking out on this one...

I really hate those guys...

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:32 pm

Style points awarded.

“Eat Me!”

0 points
1
1
fthisJack's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:35 am

It really wasn't MLF's O last year. That belonged to our departed QB. This will be the year that we see what HIS offense is really like.

-3 points
2
5
TarynsEyes's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:10 pm

A leader who relinquishes command, and it fails, is still the reason for its failure.

8 points
9
1
ricky's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:14 am

Vic Fangio was available. The Packers stuck with Barry. My theory is still, the team just doesn't want to pay coaches big money, and therefore hire second or third rate talent, and hope that it all works out in the end. It took the total collapse of the Packers offense, and the special teams giving up points against SF in a playoff game IN LAMBEAU to finally wake them up enough to hire a respected ST's coach. The players don't seem to play hard for Barry There also seemed to be a lot of communication problems, especially noteworthy in the secondary, the first half of the season last year. When they brought him back, and LaFleur said that because the defense showed improvement during the season, he would stick with Barry. But the improvements were put in place under extreme duress, with a lot of pundits and fans calling for Barry's firing. Will he learn from his mistakes? Or will he be stubborn, believe he knows best, and repeat the pattern of last year?

11 points
11
0
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:22 am

Agreed. Why did we not get Fangio or Evero? Leonhard is still available in 2024, though.

1 points
2
1
vin0770's picture

May 07, 2023 at 09:05 am

So was James Swartz and he knows defense too.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 06, 2023 at 09:55 am

smh.......

'''''' The Packers went from 13th in defensive points in 2020 to 17th in 2022.'''''

They gave up 371 points both years. If you deduct the 14 points we gave Minnesota in garbage time of blowout win, we would have been at 357 last year, despite missing a starting corner for the season and our best defensive player for half a season.

3rd in fewest completions.
6th in passing yards allowed
2nd in fewest Yard After Catch
8th in Pressure %
4th in Interceptions
2nd in Interception %

Put that under your microscope. And remember, in the losses that ended our last two seasons, the defense played plenty well enough to win, but the offense was screwing the pooch.

Defense in the NFL is passing defense. Passes go farther than runs. Passes result in more big plays than runs. Passes account for more TDs than runs. And on that final drive at the end of the game, it's usually going to involve mostly passes. The Packers have one of the very best pass defenses in the league....I wonder if anybody should get any credit for that.

-1 points
6
7
egbertsouse's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:14 am

You can cherry pick all the stats you want, if you have eyes you know they are not good. I notice you didn’t have any stats about rushing defense or yards per play or yards per game or points per game or 3rd down efficiency. I wonder why? Go peddle your snake oil to someone else, I’m not buying.

5 points
9
4
Slim11's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:49 am

Leatherhead has a valid point here.

His point about the offense needs a little more. Last season, the offense went three-and-out too many times. At some point, a defense...any defense...gets worn out and their effectiveness diminishes. Going into the late third and fourth quarters last season, the Packers defense, especially the d-line wore down rapidly. If that defense spends more time on the sidelines, the chances of a third down stop improve and the defense can get off the field.

This season, I expect a Rodgers-less offense to be more run oriented and time killing. This will keep opposing offenses and our defense on the sideline. In 2022, I saw a notable difference in the defense when our offense made long drives. I expect Jordan Love to play more within the offense than Rodgers did in 2022.

1 points
2
1
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:43 pm

It does not help when Barry is forcing our press corners to play deep zone

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:15 am

The middle of the road defensive performance is at odds with the supposed talent level. Either the talent is not real or that D underperformed. From watching the number of regressions, seeming lack if coordination, tactical and personnel usage questions, I find the coaching explanation to be far more plausible.

That doesn’t invalidate your point that a good O could have overcome that. Yes, our O was insipid, unimaginative. Predictable and ineffective over the season. Both sides contributed, but the D was probably the furthest below reasonable expectations.

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:55 am

What happens when you own DBs Coach goes rogue against your wishes?

Maybe Barry & LaFleur wanted to see something with playoffs pretty much out of the picture. Different coverages. Zero blitzing on 3rd down… (we were one of the NFL’s best at it through 10 weeks or so…), different players rotated in for looks.

We did see all of that, but got pissed off by it, rather than maybe allow them evaluate time with live bullets to assess their needs a bit more completely.

-4 points
0
4
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:45 am

You’re right, Leatherhead.

There’s been so little transparency regarding LaFleur & Barry’s intentions, and that’s fine with me as a fan.

All I want it for them to bring it, and I think they have done their best, without some key pieces.

Lose your starting CB opposite Jaire? Lose your top pass rusher in Gary? Have Father Time knock the wheels off your SS in Amos?

While talent acquisition hindered by the big cap constraints? I think Joe Barry’s D can turn the corner with this talent infusion. I’d rather support him until I know the whole story, or he’s proven otherwise inept.

Gutekunst & LaFleur are bright guys. They didn’t choose Joe Barry for nothing. Quite the opposite if you ask me.

-6 points
1
7
Leatherhead's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:31 pm

Thank you, Greengold.

I totally believe THE PLAN is to encourage teams to run instead of pass, and for good reasons which I've stated plenty of times. I think Barry is doing what he's being asked to do, which is limit big plays, create pressure, and get takeaways. We were 8th in the league in 3rd down conversions, gave up the 6th fewest yards, and finished 5th in interceptions.

Some people, and I'm not going to mention their name, get all riled up when a team has a nice run and is still on their own end of the field. "Pathetic!!!" Or a couple of early scores, like Miami had, blinds them to what happened the rest of the game.

If you're holding teams to 24 or less, you're doing a pretty good job on defense.

-2 points
2
4
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:00 pm

Absolutely, LH.

It’s easy to throw your hands in the air and scream THIS SUCKS! FIRE BARRY!

I think taking a closer look at what they’re doing, what they’ve said about it (guardedly, which is understandable), or not said *bing* - and the types of players added & deleted from the roster points to a very conscious rebuild of our Packers D, one that was going to take time.

Walker, despite his youthful errors, was a wrecking ball. We haven’t even seen Wyatt, really. A consensus #1 3T from 2022’s R1. Clark, Slaton & Reed did some good things.

People should maybe take a good look at Enagbare’s contributions after Gary went down Week 10. Commendable. Preston Smith too.

Jerry Gray went off the grid. Why? I’ll wait for the book to come out on that, but, this Packers D had some positives that have been readily overlooked.

Maybe LaFleur, Barry & Gutekunst made an executive decision and tried some unusual things simply to Scout their own players’ capabilities with an eye towards 2023? Possible.

Maybe, just maybe, when we were 4-8 last year those 3 just said, “fuck it.” Deciding instead to move all-in on player evaluations the last 5 games. Trying those things that everyone now is up in arms over. After Gary went down???

Entirely plausible.

I’m very encouraged with the D-side additions. Pass rush. Run stop. Zone & man coverage abilities on the back end. Dynamic players all of them.

On Van Ness, Wooden, Brooks, and Cox Jr. additions, I’m reminded of the words in deciding drafting for those positions, “always trust productivity.” I believe Andy Herman shared that earlier this week.

All those dudes brought humongous productivity numbers to our Packers table!

I find a lot to be encouraged about, after having thought about it, and learned the capabilities of many 2023 additions on D.

More people should quit bitchin’ and look & see what we’re brining into this coming season.

Watch the film on Anthony Johnson Jr, Brenton Cox Jr, Carrington Valentine, Tarvarius Moore, Colby Wooden, Karl Brooks, Lucas Van Ness, and some of those ST players that will be a part of our secondary.

I’m going to give this my support until I’m convinced otherwise. To this point, I don’t think we know the whole story enough.

-4 points
0
4
Since'61's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:41 am

The problem with that line of thinking is that it enables and accepts an on going level of mediocrity season after season. All of the stats in your post are irrelevant versus the only stat that matters which is points allowed. Your approach tells the team that we're doing fine and that it's OK to go on as we have in the past even though in reality it's just not getting the job done.

We are going on 3 decades (mid 1990s' - to mid 2020s) since the phrases "Packer defense" and "carry the team" have been used in the same sentence. We can spray all the perfume we want on this pig but it has been and still looks like a pig.

Yes it is a passing league but if the defense can't stop the run, can't win the LOS and tackles poorly teams are going to run against the defense until they can show they can stop it. And then they get beat by play action and still get beat with the pass enough to allow points.

The Packers defense gets beat physically at the LOS, they don't play aggressively and they don't tackle very well. That's been the story for the Packers defense for a long time. Barry is under the microscope and he should be, just as Pettine was and Capers was finally let go when after he had been allowed to remain as DC far beyond his expiration date.

This should be Barry's prove it season. 8 first round draft picks and no excuses. I don't see why we need to have any loyalty to this guy. The Packers want to build a new, young team they should have sent the message that "good enough" is not good enough. We expect excellence and we're starting over with a real NFL DC. That is the message that I would have sent this team as far as Barry is concerned. Thanks, Since '61

4 points
5
1
barutanseijin's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:42 pm

You guys are harping about the defense because the offense sucked last season. They were third in the division in points scored, but gave up the fewest points in the North. They didn’t get to the playoffs because the offense couldn’t score on one of the weakest Ds in the league. They obviously needed better QB play and some more playmakers and those are exactly the areas they’ve addressed in this offseason

-2 points
1
3
Johnblood27's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:21 pm

LH, I give the credit for the passing defense to Jerry Gray. His voice of dissent and prodding of the DB's to play to their strengths despite the Barry scheme was the difference.

What do you have to say about that?

8 points
8
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 06, 2023 at 03:50 pm

I think I should get the credit for that.

1 points
1
0
GregC's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:19 am

Trying to look on the bright side....

1. The defense under Barry has looked well-coached at times, including toward the end of last season. As Leatherhead noted, the defense played well in the last two season-ending losses. So I do have some hope that Barry has figured some things out, although he still needs to prove that he can coach a defense that is good for an entire season.

2. The soft coverage, as maddening as it is, is something that I see over and over when I watch other NFL games. I'm not saying it's okay, and it does seem like Barry calls those coverages more than most other DC's, but for whatever reason, it is very common in the NFL. I suspect it's because of a fear of giving up the big play. Remember that the rules are skewed toward the offense. So I try to keep some perspective on this.

3. Although there was some grumbling among the defensive players early last season, they did not quit on Barry. They actually played better toward the end of the season.

-2 points
2
4
harleycops's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:23 am

This is it, Barry! No more waiting, no more what ifs, no more excuses. Either do it this season or get out of the way. Perhaps this will be the beginning of the end that leads the Pack to:

JIM LEONHARD - JIM LEONHARD - JIM LEONHARD!

4 points
5
1
TarynsEyes's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:36 am

It's a constant statement, 'There are 8 first round selections on Defense', yet, the Defense cannot play to the level boasted of their draft selections. There has to be a reason(s) for this.

The problem for me rests with the half full/half empty analogy. The glass is always missing half of something. It never seems 2/3 full of player consistency, HC game planning, Defensive scheme,

The fan glass is always over-flowing with 'hope', and that may be the issue with the Defense of 8 1st round selections. It's based on 'hope' with a scheme built by a lengthening list of false schemers.

A half a glass of anything will always be a half a glass of nothing.

Winners never have a half full glass of nothing.

8 points
8
0
PhantomII's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:46 am

The poorer the offense plays and more 3 N outs you have the more tired your D will get. Last season we had a lot of flux on the OL with injured players coming back and some grand experiment on the OL that none of us agreed with. AR lost 2 WR's got paid mega bucks.....did not do the team a favor and come in early to build timing with young WR's. The offense was very poor last season. We may have some #1 picks on defense that don't play up to it also. This season we have a new QB...who IS MOTIVATED. We drafted a bunch of pocket pressers in the Z. Smith skill set to play outside or inside and we may just get that dominant DL....Finally. I'm not a Barry fan. This season with JL's new weapons so abundant, hopefully our defense getting 3 N outs should be a priority to put up points on the board. Maybe we don't have so many possession turnovers without points on the board. GPG

3 points
4
1
Slim11's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:55 am

An additional take on the Joe Barry argument...

During this offseason, Bissacia was named assistant HC...and Barry wasn't! I hope this gives Bissacia the leeway to go after Barry and lighting a fire under his lower back side.

Barry is a friend of LaFleur and has been in Green Bay longer. Yet he wasn't named an assistant HC. It does make me wonder why...

9 points
9
0
Coldworld's picture

May 06, 2023 at 02:23 pm

No one was trying to recruit Barry as a head coach or assistant Head Coach?

I don’t know how well publicized it was, but Bissacia actually led the first day of rookie camp with LaFleur absent yesterday. Bissacia is clearly more than just a STC now.

5 points
5
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

May 07, 2023 at 04:01 am

Very interesting!

0 points
0
0
beerandbrats's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:21 am

I was so excited about the defense going into last year. Talk about a letdown! It becomes even more important now that Jordan Love is starting. A strong defense would take some of the pressure off of our young offense. I believe we have the talent to do that but we don't have the coaching.

8 points
9
1
EnemyTerritory's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:43 am

The good news is that with Barry as DC the new QB1 Jordan Love is gonna get lots of attempts to put points on the board. His offensive development will be hastened by an offensive defensive performance

3 points
3
0
Packers0808's picture

May 06, 2023 at 11:46 am

My faith in Barry is simple, ZERO. Have not in any world can figure this guy with the same job again here or anywhere else!

4 points
6
2
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 06, 2023 at 12:14 pm

For fans of patterns, trends and probabilities - please note:

* Barry has 3X been a DC (Detroit, Washington, GB). Each time his 2nd year was worse than the first.
* Barry has never made it to the third year as a DC - until now.
* Prior to Barry - GB had fired it's 3 previous DCs (Pettine, Capers, Sanders).

So as the team commences its renewal / renovation - it does so with a DC who is in unfamiliar waters as a DC. All things considered - there is a higher probability that the team will end up with a worse record than last year - which increases the likelihood that Barry will be the fourth DC in a row to be fired by the FO. If so, this merely confirms how Murphy manages - always one year too late and cheaply (regarding coaches).

6 points
6
0
greengold's picture

May 06, 2023 at 06:21 pm

Totally appreciate this, Alberta, but I feel strongly this team far out does the 2022 Packers, and wins this division.

None of those previous teams had the talent acquisition Gutekunst provides regularly.

I think they’re so young, they won’t know any better, and they’ll just go out and have fun playing the game. Both sides of the ball.

Tested, seasoned OL. Dynamic, powerful, eager RB ready to light it up. Our 2nd year skill players already have had their own private workouts.

With a defense maybe on the threshold of making it? What if it is? Gary & Stokes maybe return mid season? Huge talent infusions both sides of the ball.

I’ll take these Packers all day.

-2 points
2
4
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:11 pm

I think we get 2nd or 3rd in the division. Talent wise, I think we have the potential to be pretty on par with the lions, but Dan Campbell and Aaron Glenn are FAR better than MLF and Joe Barry. Campbell is a real leader; MLF is a sissy. Lions will win the division because they have leaders and not sissies. If Bissacia (a leader) was our HC then I think we’d have a good shot.

When he was HC of the Raiders, all the players loved him, and he would not hesitate to call people out if they played poorly. He would call out Carr if he played badly. Also, with two of their players being arrested, their HC being fired, and to have the crappy roster they did in 2021 (without Davante or Chandler Jones), it is a MASSIVE achievement for Bissacia to have led that team to the playoffs. Also, if not for a bad refereeing call, they would have beaten the AFC Champion Bengals in 2021. Bissacia is special.

0 points
1
1
gpt999's picture

May 06, 2023 at 01:51 pm

As a fan, I am not impressed that Barry was not replaced at the end of last season. Frankly, its shows a lack of toughness in MLFs management style which has been evident from the start of his employment with GB. This is NOT a good look for a HC. Before, MLF had Rodgers, Adams and Hackett to give him a gawdy Won-Loss record. Now they're all gone and its on his shoulders now.

I also so hate to think that the strange GB management structure has a lot to do with keeping Barry? I bet if Gutes had authority on this decision, good old Joe would have been shown the door long ago!

I think the "double secret probation" line should apply to MLF this year in respect to Barry. If Barry is "the hill that MLF wants to die on, so be it!"

7 points
7
0
jhtobias's picture

May 06, 2023 at 04:46 pm

Not only is Berry under a microscope so is lafluer. Remember lafluer kept this bone head as Dc and hired him.

If the defense is not top 8 by any metrics you choose berry and lafluer have to gon inexcusible hiring and retaining this is on lafkuer.

Anyhow rich b is twice the coach than berry and lafluer put together .. That is a head coach that would bring the fight out in this team of youngsterd win or lose.

Clown 1 and Clown 2 are soft safe spacers

4 points
4
0
PackyCheese500's picture

May 06, 2023 at 07:17 pm

Exactly! We have already seen how he captained a team in mid season that had their HC fired and two players arrested to a playoff spot despite having an even crappier roster than the 2022 Raiders. They almost beat the Bengals that year, and would have if not for a terrible referee. Bissacia is special!

If you read about what he’s done, the players all loved him, but he would not be afraid to call out people after a bad performance (like Carr if he had a bad day). If he was HC Barry would have been gone mid season.

2 points
2
0
Dragon5's picture

May 06, 2023 at 06:07 pm

Joe Barry, born July 5th, 1970, in a DOG year, will enter his enemy year, the year of the DRAGON, February 10th, 2024. High odds Barry's outcome is already predetermined.

If the defense had eleven starting 1st round picks, it still wouldn't matter. Youth begets mistakes...this excuse will buy Barry time this year, but with the noose already around his neck, MLF, aka "LaFlake," will have little choice but to release the gallows trap door. What will be interesting to see is, if Gute, by title only (as Murphy hired MLF), holds MLF accountable by asking him to fall on a sword too. MLF is NOT a leader of men. Period. Recall the org oppositional energy structure...Murphy & MLF are GOATs while Gute is an OX...enemy signs.

OT: Bucks coach Mike Budenholzer, a ROOSTER, just lost his brother AND his job in his enemy year of the CAT. Michael Jordan, a CAT, lost his Father during his enemy year, the ROOSTER, in '93.

0 points
2
2
Ferrari-Driver's picture

May 06, 2023 at 08:48 pm

I really wanted to make a few points on this topic, but you guys covered everything, probably better than I could, like the corner backs, the lack of strong, enthusiastic play by the defense, and Joe Barry simply not getting the defensive results that we should be getting for all the draft capital that has been spent on the defensive side of the ball.

What I do know is our defensive coordinator simply is not getting the job done with the players he has been given. Joe Barry's fault or poor drafting by Gute? Perhaps I'm not correct, but my finger is pointing at Joe Barry. Like more than a few coaches have said over the years "it's better to get rid of a player a year early than to keep him a year late". I somehow feel that fit's Joe Barry.

4 points
4
0
Boneman's picture

May 07, 2023 at 07:17 am

Please name one DC we haven't wanted fired in like...forever! I'm so sick of hearing how much "talent" we supposedly have on Defense. I haven't witnessed much of that talent. Football isn't really as complicated as we try and make it out to be. Be competitive and give all out effort on every play. Show that and I'll take the results.

2 points
2
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

May 07, 2023 at 11:14 am

Fritz Shurmur

0 points
0
0
Paul Konieczny's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:04 pm

After seeing what’s going on with our defense and our country, I have no confidence in anyone named Joe.

-1 points
0
1
Paul Konieczny's picture

May 07, 2023 at 03:32 pm

Who won the SB? I think Reid needs a new DC.

0 points
0
0