Cory's Corner: Better instant replay starts with the refs

There is such an obsession to get every call right that every frame is combed to a fault. It has happened so much that the line between clarity and confusion has become nearly translucent.  

Of all the major pro sports, the NFL translates the best to television.

And now with the advent of numerous camera setups, technology has taken over the game.

There is such an obsession to get every call right that every frame is combed to a fault. It has happened so much that the line between clarity and confusion has become nearly translucent.

The premise of instant replay is good. Heck, if it wasn’t for the famed “Instant Replay Game” on Nov. 5, 1989, the Packers don’t beat the Bears 14-13 forcing Chicago coach Mike Ditka to look down in shame with his ugly flat cap.

But there is a line. I have heard plenty of people say that the strike zone in baseball should be decided by robots. I couldn’t disagree more. Human umpires are a fabric of the game. Is it perfect? No. But that is a part of the game.

What needs to happen, is people need to accept that sports aren’t going to be perfect. Just because we don’t see every blade of grass on a sideline toe-tap catch by Antonio Brown doesn’t mean he didn’t catch it. Or just because the ball might have changed its location after two frames of video, doesn’t mean that Rob Gronkowski didn’t catch it.

I like the fact that instant replay is in the NFL’s back pocket. The biggest fear for the NFL brass is that the Super Bowl gets decided by a call that could’ve been corrected. And now I think the biggest fear among fans are multiple calls that may or may not be right that bog the game down tremendously.

It’s time to pare instant replay back. First of all, eliminate the replay for every scoring play, because that is just a waste of time. Secondly, only let coaches throw the red flag once during a game. And even if you get your challenge right, you don’t get any more challenges.

From 1986-1991, only had 12.6 percent of calls were reversed. However, from 1999-2016, 37 percent were reversed. That tells me that modern refs have become lazy. They are relying on instant replay as another official, and that shouldn’t be the case. Watch an NFL game today and you’ll see many referees out of place, mainly because they know they will be bailed out by technology.

This isn’t an instant replay issue at all. It’s a referee issue. Just because the game has been digitized down to each frame doesn’t mean the refs can’t make a difference.

The referees keep the game flowing and make it watchable. If there are too many penalties, the flow is awful and it becomes unwatchable. Spend too much time waiting for an instant replay answer, the flow is lost and fans start to grumble.

As a society we have become too reliant on technology. I can’t remember the last time I’ve walked down the street and didn’t see someone poking around on their phone.

It’s time for the NFL to get out from the technology albatross. Have the guts to actually make a call on your own. It’s time for the NFL referee to take the game back. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (17)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Hematite's picture

December 23, 2017 at 06:51 am

I'm in favor of getting rid of replays.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 23, 2017 at 07:00 am

“I only want replays that benefit my team,” said the majority of fans of all sports.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 23, 2017 at 08:44 am

...and tax breaks for the wealthy.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 23, 2017 at 09:27 am

Ouch!

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

December 23, 2017 at 10:22 am

Hey, rich guys are gonna use that money to give you a raise! Don't you believe them?

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 23, 2017 at 11:11 am

LOL

(but yes, of course)

0 points
0
0
Hematite's picture

December 23, 2017 at 05:40 pm

In a word, no.
Historically it's never happened.

0 points
0
0
Curt's picture

December 23, 2017 at 07:42 am

The premise of replay - reverse only the obvious errors - seemed good. The current did the ball move a 1/4 inch or did his left cheek hit before the right cheek thinking is just plain absurd and a waste of time.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 23, 2017 at 08:47 am

"That tells me that modern refs have become lazy. "

Why do we assume that if calls are overturned the officials must be 'lazy'? Aren't they told to err in particular ways if the calls are close? In essence, they're being told to allow replay to fix things if it turns out they're borderline. IMO, that's part of what's happening here.

Besides, the definition of a catch seems to be redefined every week, so what hope do they have?

0 points
0
0
Alvo's picture

December 23, 2017 at 09:07 am

"From 1986-1991, only had 12.6 percent of calls were reversed. However, from 1999-2016, 37 percent were reversed. That tells me that modern refs have become lazy."

This has more to do with technology. Ultra-slow high-def cameras can pick up plays that would always be ruled as "indisputable evidence." Coaches also have access to these replays before challenging, so success rates increasing seems obvious.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

December 23, 2017 at 11:25 am

Well stated. Excellent!

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

December 23, 2017 at 02:38 pm

Thumbs up. Happy Holidays.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

December 23, 2017 at 12:23 pm

How about full time refs?

You know professionals who dedicate 40 hours a week to honing their craft? I thought the weekend refs where pretty good in my Softbal League so obviously that's good enough for the NFL right?

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

December 23, 2017 at 04:43 pm

If you worry about referees laziness, there is very easy and safe system to cure that - lets referees pay fee for every overturn call... Lets say 1 K? 2 K?

It is ridiculess how people blame technology for their own imperfections.

I respect your argunment, but what is wrong in making correct judgements? In deciding if the ball pass the line or not?

I think it is not problem in reviews, problem is in unclear rules. Make rules simplier and you'll not have problems with reviews,,,

0 points
0
0
billybobton's picture

December 26, 2017 at 02:51 pm

It is always shocking when packer reporters don't know what they are talking about. The super bowl has already been decided by bad calls and blown reviews.

Jerry Rice and the refs determined this so many years ago and without that Owens would never have been a hero and Sharper a goat one less time in his incredibly blown life

0 points
0
0
Doug Niemczynski's picture

December 30, 2017 at 04:10 am

I don't see anything wrong with the deal I am just so glad they got it done before the end of the season instead of Jagging around like they usually do

0 points
0
0
Karuzzo's picture

March 14, 2021 at 11:28 am

Hi, it is very important now that technologies are changing every day. The same WordPress constantly introduces new updates. By the way, if you want to know about the latest trends in WordPress, then I recommend reading this article https://wpnewsify.com/plugins/convert-wordpress-site-into-mobile-app-plu... and which plugins are better to use for mobile devices.

0 points
0
0