Bringing Back TE Marcedes Lewis for One More Season Makes Sense for the Packers

The Green Bay Packers have big needs at tight end this offseason. As of now, the only two experienced players still on the roster are Josiah Deguara and Tyler Davis.

But there is another veteran option available if GM Brian Gutekunst is willing to spend a little bit of money this offseason and that player knows the team’s offense well. It’s veteran tight end Marcedes Lewis.

Yes, Lewis will turn 39 in May and he is nearing the end of a long and productive NFL career. The former UCLA star has spent the last five seasons in Green Bay and has started all 17 games for the club in each of the last two seasons.

Lewis is not much of a threat as a receiver anymore. He lacks the speed to be a downfield threat like he was in his prime. Last season, Lewis caught only six passes for 66 yards and two touchdowns. He still has good hands even if he is more of a safety-valve at this stage of his career. His catch percentage in 2021 was 82.1 percent and in last season, it was 85.7 percent so he still has good hands.

Lewis is also still one of the better blocking tight ends in the league both blocking for the run and in pass protection. If you watch film of the Packers offense in 2022, you’ll see how important Lewis’ blocking was on so many of the team’s longer runs and how he helped protect Aaron Rodgers by chipping an edge rusher before going out in a short pattern or just staying in to pick up a blitzing defender.

Despite his advanced age, Lewis is still effective, and he has announced that he wants to play one more season which would be his 18th in the league and set a record for NFL tight ends.

We all know 2023 will be a year of transition for the Packers offense. Jordan Love is taking over as the starting quarterback after 15 seasons of Rodgers being the starter. The Packers have not gone into a season with a new and unproven starter since 2008.

Lewis is considered one of the better leaders on the Packers roster and having him around to give the team leadership and continuity during a year of change. It would certainly help give Love some assistance in his first year as the starter. Lewis has seen all there is to see in pro football and that could benefit Love and the entire offense.

Lewis’ coaches and teammates acknowledge what Lewis brings to the table. “They don’t make too many like Marcedes and I mean that in the highest regard,” head coach Matt LaFleur said late in the 2021 season. “Just as a person, as a player, as a leader, he excels at everything we ask him to. He’s a pro’s-pro and I can’t even articulate what he means to this football team and our success here as an organization.”

While Lewis is not a rah-rah guy, he leads by example, doing all the little things the right way. He may not speak often but when he does speak out, his teammates certainly listen.

“Whenever he speaks, it’s a big deal,” added backup tight end Tyler Davis. “He grabbed us during one of the meetings and was, like, ‘Listen, the standards of this room are at this level. We’ve got to own that every day. Not just the games, but practice.’”

If the Packers select a tight end early in this draft as expected, having Lewis around for his rookie season would also be a big benefit for that young player. Tight ends usually take some time to have an impact in the league and learning from Lewis how to play the game and be a professional could really speed up that player’s development.

Of course, Lewis would have to accept a team-friendly deal. Assuming he signs a one-year contract, the rate would have to be reasonable as the Packers don’t have a lot of cap space because of the way the team structured Rodgers’ contract a year ago.

Keeping Lewis for one more year could really help smooth the team’s transition to Jordan Love and help develop their new rookie tight ends. He is still able to contribute as a blocker and knows the offense as well as any returning player. The question is, will the Packers take this approach, or will they look elsewhere if they choose to add a veteran tight end or just go with rookies at the position.  

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
4 points
 

Comments (163)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:08 pm

"But there is another veteran option available if GM Brian Gutekunst is willing to spend a little bit of money this offseason and that player knows the team’s offense well. It’s veteran tight end Marcedes Lewis."

You are absolutely correct Gil.

It is interesting how people here parrot the propaganda and "talking points" Packer Management feeds to them and read to them.

Rebuilding, cap hell, blah blah blah.

Like a bewildered heard of lemmings and an angry mob they drink it down.

How about doing your own independent research and making some comparisons with other teams.

The Sky is not Falling.

The Packers actually have the 4th most cap space in the NFL,

And that is including the playing $31.6 cap hit of Aaron Rodgers - one year removed from leading all 32 teams' starting QBS in passer rating, a composite of completion %, interception %, touchdowns per pass attempt, and yards per pass attempt, not once but 2 years in a row and one year removed from 2 consecutive MVPs as well!!

And the Packers have the 4th most cap space in the NFL not only in terms of first 51 players, which is all that matters until September 2023:

Bears $38.3
Panthers $27.2
Lions $24.0
Packers $22.2 (adjusted $360K for the net effect of signing Dallin Leavitt for $1.4M and cutting Vernon Scott for a savings of $1.040M)
Texan $22.5

Least Cap Space:
Vikings $1.1

and also 4th most cap space in the NFL in terms of total players:

Bears $27.7 (64 players signed)
Panthers $19.0M (62 players signed)
Rams $13.4M (45 players signed)
Packers $12.3M (64 players signed)
Lions $8.7M (70 players signed)

Least Cap Space
Commanders -17.2 (75 players signed)

Google 2023 salary cap by team.

Try Over the Cap or Spotrac.

The Packers are 12 months removed from 13-3, 13-3, and 13-4 seasons.

They are also the 9th youngest team in the entire NFL.

Team age:

Rams 25.91
Titans 26.15
Browns 26.25
Giants 26.24
Colts 26.24
Chiefs 26.24
Bears 26.25
Bengals 26.27
Packers 26.29

Oldest Team:

Patriots 27.59

Rebuilding, cap hell, blah blah blah.

A LOWERING OF EXPECTATIONS AND AN EXCUSE AND COVER FOR BRIAN GUTEKUNST.

PROPAGANDA PUT OUT BY PACKER MANAGEMENT FOR THE UNCRITICAL NON QUESTIONING PARROTS TO REPEAT.

The Packers are currently $22.2 million under the salary cap per "Spotrac" - or $21.3 million under the cap if you prefer "Over the Cap"- on their first 51 players, which is all the Packers need to account for until September 2023 under NFL salary cap provisions before even considering the approximate $15.8 million more ($31.6 cap hit if Rodgers plays for the Packers in 2023 minus $15.8 cap hit) cap accounting dollars the Packers would save with a trade of Rodgers after June 1, 2023.

Nonetheless, the Packers have blown their chance to use some of that $22.2 million (Spotrac) - or $21.3 million (Over the Cap) if you prefer - to sign their own free agents - Tonyan (Bears 2023 cap hit $2.6 million) , Lazard (Jets 2023 cap hit $3.2 million), and Jarran Reed (Seahawks $3 million) or Cobb and Lewis who are both still unsigned and will each probably sign one year deals in the $2 to $2.5 million range.

And the Jets, who just signed Lazard two weeks ago have $9.8 in cap space for their first 51 players compared to the Packers $22.2 million for their first 51 players.

All these re Bears, Jets, Seahawks, etc. signings of Packer veterans Tonyan, Lazard, Reed, Cobb and Lewis will prove to have been more valuable contributors to winning than whomever Brian now searches and finds to replace them.

These Packer veterans positive effect on team morale and chemistry - intangibles - and obvious on field performance relative to the current "veteran" Packer wide receivers and current tight ends as a group and defensive linemen – won’t be so easy to find and replace.

Whatever management comes up with as replacements be at the same or similar salary cap dollars as the Jets and Bears paid to Lazard and Tonyan and Seahawks paid for Reed or a million or 2 million cheaper at the league minimum $750,000 for a first year player, league minimum $875,00 2nd year player or league minimum $940,000 3rd year player.

And the miserly Brian is saving these dollars for what reason?

“THE FUTURE IS NOW” as Redskin Coach George Allen once said as he formed the “Over the Hill Gang” and turned the Redskins into winners for the first time in their history.

Current Packer management just seems to know the cost of everything and the value of nothing - including intangibles.

The Packer 2023-24 team should be a 13-4 playoff team again - as it was a year ago at this time - if player personnel were managed prudently by the General Manager.

Anyone can be a Packer Front Office Bean Counter, the value comes with thinking and recognizing value, both intangible and tangible.

Hopefully the trade falls through and Rodgers is the backup to Jordan when the season starts and we see what Jordan does - which is most likely a flop by the end of 6 games. At that point, Rodgers can right the ship.

Hopefully Brain acts sensibly and signs Cobb and Lewis and Crosby.

Hopefully, Darnell Washington, JSN or Robinson are there at the 15th pick. - I would be happy with any of the 3.

Mercedes Lewis could help Darnell Washington along.

And Randall Cobb could help JSN along or any other wide receiver drafted.

Exercise Aaron's $58.3M option for 2025 before the September deadline, and let Jordan play as the starter this season.

In all probability, based on Jordan's leading all of college football in interceptions his last year of college and his few poor NFL appearances, Jordan will prove NOT to be the Packers future starter.

Meanwhile with Aaron as the 2023-24 backup, 2023-24 may still be able to be salvaged.

The Packers, come the May 1, 2023 deadline, certainly should not exercise their 5th year option on Jordan for $20 M and $20M of cap space hit for 2024.

THE GIANTS DID NOT EXERCISE THEIR 5TH YEAR OPTION ON DANIEL JONES LAST MAY AND JONES HAD 36 MORE STARTS THAN JORDAN LOVE AND JONES DID NOT LEAD ALL OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL IN NTERCEPTIONS THROWN IN ANY OF HIS 3 YEARS AS DUKE'S STARTER!!!

-22 points
6
28
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:41 pm

To quote "My Cousin Vinnie"

"Everything that guy said is BS..."

Enough already.

16 points
19
3
dblbogey's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:09 pm

I got bored halfway through and stopped.

7 points
7
0
murf7777's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:59 am

That’s farther than I could make it.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:41 pm

PLEASE STOP SPAMMING THE SAME MATERIAL MULTIPLE TIMES EVERY THREAD.

It’s suffocating this site and persuading no one at this point.

19 points
22
3
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:06 pm

Coldworld,

Everyone here knows you are PAID BY PACKER MANAGEMENT to post Packer Management PROPAGANDA here in order to LOWER EXPECTATIONS and PROTECT Packer Management's positions of power.

Everything I post is FACT and can be EASILY CONFIRMED by TRUE Packer fans.

Obviously Mercedes Lewis should be resigned and so should have Cobb, Lazard, Tonyan and Reed.

Rebuilding, cap hell, blah blah blah.

Coldworld, ALL FACTS:

1) The Packers are currently $22.2 million under the salary cap per "Spotrac" - or $21.3 million under the cap if you prefer "Over the Cap"- on their first 51 players, which is all the Packers need to account for until September 2023 under NFL salary cap provisions before even considering the approximate $15.8 million more ($31.6 cap hit if Rodgers plays for the Packers in 2023 minus $15.8 cap hit) cap accounting dollars the Packers would save with a trade of Rodgers after June 1, 2023.

2) Nonetheless, the Packers have blown their chance to use some of that $22.2 million (Spotrac) - or $21.3 million (Over the Cap) if you prefer - to sign their own free agents - Tonyan (Bears 2023 cap hit $2.6 million) , Lazard (Jets 2023 cap hit $3.2 million), and Jarran Reed (Seahawks $3 million) or Cobb and Lewis who are both still unsigned and will each probably sign one year deals in the $2 to $2.5 million range.

3) And the Jets, who just signed Lazard two weeks ago have $9.8 in cap space for their first 51 players compared to the Packers $22.2 million for their first 51 players.

4) All these Bears, Jets, Seahawks, etc. signings of Packer veterans Tonyan, Lazard, Reed, Cobb and Lewis will prove to have been more valuable contributors to winning than whomever Brian now searches and finds to replace them.

5) These Packer veterans positive effect on team morale and chemistry - intangibles - and obvious on field performance relative to the current "veteran" Packer wide receivers and current tight ends as a group and defensive linemen – won’t be so easy to find and replace.

6) Whatever management comes up with as replacements be at the same or similar salary cap dollars as the Jets and Bears paid to Lazard and Tonyan and Seahawks paid for Reed or a million or 2 million cheaper at the league minimum $750,000 for a first year player, league minimum $875,00 2nd year player or league minimum $940,000 3rd year player.

7) And the miserly Brian is saving these dollars for what reason?

8) "THE FUTURE IS NOW” as Redskin Coach George Allen once said as he formed the “Over the Hill Gang” and turned the Redskins into winners for the first time in their history.

9) Current Packer management just seems to know the cost of everything and the value of nothing - including intangibles.

10) The Packer 2023-24 team should be a 13-4 playoff team again - as it was a year ago at this time - if player personnel were managed prudently by the General Manager.

Anyone can be a Packer Front Office Bean Counter, the value comes with thinking and recognizing value, both intangible and tangible.

Hopefully the trade falls through and Rodgers is the backup to Jordan when the season starts and we see what Jordan does - which is most likely a flop by the end of 6 games. At that point, Rodgers can right the ship.

Hopefully Brain acts sensibly and signs Cobb and Lewis and Crosby.

Hopefully, Darnell Washington, JSN or Robinson are there at the 15th pick. - I would be happy with any of the 3.

Mercedes Lewis could help Darnell Washington along.

And Randall Cobb could help JSN along or any other wide receiver drafted.

Exercise Aaron's $58.3M option for 2025 before the September deadline, and let Jordan play as the starter this season.

In all probability, based on Jordan's leading all of college football in interceptions his last year of college and his few poor NFL appearances, Jordan will prove NOT to be the Packers future starter.

Meanwhile with Aaron as the 2023-24 backup, 2023-24 may still be able to be salvaged.

The Packers, come the May 1, 2023 deadline, certainly should not exercise their 5th year option on Jordan for $20 M and $20M of cap space hit for 2024.

THE GIANTS DID NOT EXERCISE THEIR 5TH YEAR OPTION ON DANIEL JONES LAST MAY AND JONES HAD 36 MORE STARTS THAN JORDAN LOVE AND JONES DID NOT LEAD ALL OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL IN NTERCEPTIONS THROWN IN ANY OF HIS 3 YEARS AS DUKE'S STARTER!!!

-18 points
2
20
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:18 pm

If you read TGR's articles you will see that the 22m cap space number is deceptive.

9 points
10
1
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 04:27 pm

"If you read TGR's articles you will see that the 22m cap space number is deceptive."

I have read all of TGR's articles and also corrected TGR's mistakes which he thanked me for.

There is nothing "deceptive" in these salary cap numbers which show the Packers to have the 4th most Salary Cap Space in the NFL , but PACKER MANAGEMENT of course uses the "lack of salary cap space" as COVER for the fact that Brian - and Mark - have ALIENATED the Packer players to the point that the Packers now cannot even resign players Brian and Mark wanted to sign.

PURE PACKER MANAGEMENT PROPAGANDA and Paid staff to post this PROPAGANDA out there to lower Packer Fan EXPECTATIONS as Packer Management continues to fail after living like Parasites off the talents of Rodgers for the last 15 years.

-7 points
2
9
Coldworld's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:36 am

“I have read all of TGR's articles and also corrected TGR's mistakes.”

That says it all really. Clueless with hubris in spades.

2 points
3
1
Coldworld's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:47 pm

Paltering.

“The active disclosure of true but misleading information: paltering enables would-be deceivers to actively influence a target's beliefs.”

https://scholar.harvard.edu

That’s you in a word.

5 points
5
0
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 04:29 pm

Coldworld,

Keep collecting your check from Packer Management as you attempt to deceive Packer fans.

-10 points
2
12
dblbogey's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:12 pm

This site needs a block button for people like you.

10 points
10
0
greengold's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:48 am

Fuck off with that BS.

0 points
1
1
mnbadger's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:07 am

Automatic down vote if the word count for a comment exceeds the author's article.
I suspect if the insight is that valuable, somebody would be paying you for it.
GPG!

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:18 pm

He's just looking for attention.

Ignore him and he'll eventually get bored and go away.

10 points
14
4
LLCHESTY's picture

April 15, 2023 at 09:25 pm

It's always sad when someone starts to believe their own BS.

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:57 am

"Our opinions become fixed at the point where we stop thinking." - Ernest Renan

0 points
1
1
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:51 pm

Personally, I think it would be funny if Bill B and the Pats intervened at the last minute and agreed to trade for Rodgers in exchange for pick 46 and a '24 1st. I know his vengeance against the Jets is personal (dating back to when they fired him), and if he wants to break the all-time wins record, the trade could make sense. It would help him do that quicker while also screwing the Jets.

7 points
8
1
Heyward's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:01 pm

The Jets never fired Belichick.

3 points
3
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:05 pm

My bad. He resigned. But i know he doesn't like them

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:55 pm

Mangini.

1 points
2
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:33 pm

Listen, mister:
Who you calling an angry mob?
And FYI, I HAVE “heard of lemmings”, (they’re not that rare an animal), but I have NEVER drank one down. Now, if someone else chooses to do that, it’s none of my affair. But to have you throw out these blanket insults is crass, disorderly, and inaccurate.
Good day to you, sir.

7 points
7
0
LeotisHarris's picture

April 15, 2023 at 04:11 pm

::fistbump::

Know what I hurd, TK? Lemmings are basically solitary creatures. When they gather in groups, it's referred to as a slice of lemmings.

6 points
6
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 04:18 pm

Thanks, good buddy!
NOW we’re getting some edge you cation around here!

4 points
4
0
BA4Packers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 08:46 pm

I sorta kinda get not bringing back Lazard of Tonyan. No need to take snaps from the sophomores. I don’t get Reed. Vet min. Cobb and also Lewis I could live with.

-3 points
0
3
Coldworld's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:38 am

Reed didn’t get a minimum contract, he signed a 2 year, $9,000,000 contract with the Seattle Seahawks, including a $3,000,000 signing bonus, $4,190,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $4,500,000. Not huge, but probably more than we could offer.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 15, 2023 at 10:38 pm

Wow Starr, that is a new record for ruining a thread right away by you posting the same info for the 500th time. By the way, I blew past it like everyone does. Try posting something new with no stats or conspiracy theories for a change.

8 points
9
1
justjan's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:54 am

R-E-L-A-X

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:38 am

Yawn. The Jets are looking for fans.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:37 pm

At this point it depends on what they really think of Austin Allen in part and mostly on the draft. If we take TEs then they need to play and grow alongside the other young players. Let’s see how the draft falls.

4 points
8
4
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:48 pm

Allen I think could be interesting particularly as a red zone option (with his 6'8 height) and if he can improve in blocking. He does not have much YAC ability (coming from a Huskers fan), and doesn't really break tackles

3 points
4
1
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 11:37 pm

I think Richard Rodgers actually broke 1 tackle his whole Packer career, so we're used to that... SMH

4 points
4
0
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 05:53 am

Bubba Franks was a catch and fall down guy too... just sayin'...

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:38 am

The majority of TEs are.

2 points
2
0
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:42 am

c'mon Dobbs, you don't disrespect the TE positions athleticism that much do you?

Let's 'hope' for a body that can make a block AND catch a ball AND break the occasional tackle.

It just cannot be THAT hard...

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:35 pm

We throw to a TE 6 times/game, and we get about 4 completions. DeGuara, and Allen, and a Day 3 draft pick can probably handle that. IF all else fails or somebody gets injured, I have no objection to using Lewis for another year. Use those early picks on a WR and an OL

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I'm reading some really disturbing ideas about the offensive line. Some people say we're "good enough", on the offensive line. Others say that we shouldn't improve our blocking because it will diminish our opportunity to add a "playmaker" with that pick. In the mock drafts here, I repeatedly see OL being Day 3 guys, for the most part, and yet when the season starts, and we get an injury or two, and we've got Hanson and Newman out there, the same people are going to be going "what is HE doing out there?", apparently unaware that the answer is "he's the best available guy right now."

We are fortunate, right now, to have six legitimate starters. If we can make it to Opening Day with only one guy missing from an injury, we still have 5 starters. After that, it gets a whole lot shakier. After our Top 6, we're looking at Newman, Hanson, Rhyan, Walker, Jones at this point, and we only dress 9. IMO, this is not a bench that I'd want to go into a 17 game schedule and playoffs with.

IMO, if we bring in a starting caliber OT that could push Tom and Nijman to the bench, and if even ONE of the guys from last year (Rhyan,Walker,Jones) has improved, that would give us 8 solid offensive linemen heading into training camp, and that's not including Hanson or Newman. I thought Newman regressed last year, but he did start quite a few games as a rookie and held his own most of the time. He's still under contract, he's cheap, and if he has improved, I'd be willing to keep him as the #9 offensive lineman. Last year, he was the #5 guy. That's called improving the line.

Additionally, since our TE is a 6th offensive lineman on most plays, if we get a guy there who can get his man blocked, that's ANOTHER upgrade on the offensive line.

Bakthiari should be better this year than he was last year.
Jenkins should be better
Myers should be better

All three of those guys were recovering from bad injuries last season. They're healthier now.

Tom should be better, being a 2nd year guy.

We have a chance to have a real good offensive line this year. Who had the best offensive line in the NFC last year? Did somebody say "the Eagles"?

3 points
5
2
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:53 pm

Yes, BUT! If they had a Kittle clone, would they utilize him differently?

6 points
6
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:09 pm

Well, if a frog had wings, would it hop differently?

I understand your point. Let me ask you this: You have a way you've done things for a long time, but you get the opportunity to hire a person who is so exceptional that you're going to change your organization.

I'm concerned that if we do that, bad things can happen. He could get hurt and now you've made these changes and the guy you made them for isn't available. I'm also wondering, "if the TE is going to get the ball more, who is going to get it less?" Fewer throws to Watson? Fewer opportunities for the RBs?

At some point....hopefully early in the process....you have to decide what kind of team you're going to try to put on the field, and right now our offense is 50% RBs, 15% Watson, 25% all other WRs, and 10% TEs. That translates out, on the average, of 32 RB plays, 10 Watson plays, 15 plays to the other WRs, and 6 throws to the TE.

This is the Packer offense. I don't think there's anybody in this draft that would be worth changing it. I do think we should add some guys to the WR room to compete for some of those 15 targets.

0 points
3
3
Guam's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:46 pm

"This is the Packer offense."

It was Rodgers' offense. I am not sure it will be Love's offense. I think that is one of the key questions for next season. What will the offense look like with Rodgers gone? Rodgers' offense looked a great deal like McCarthy's old offense and nothing like anything from the Shanahan tree. I think whether the Packers draft a TE high or not will provide us with some insight into what the offense will look like next season under Love.

7 points
7
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:40 pm

I was told if a frog had wings, it wouldn’t bump its rump with every jump.
I think the GB offense next season is the land of opportunity.
If they could add a big, juicy, soft handed target in the middle of the field, it would force the defense to adjust. And then GB could readjust and on and on it goes.
When KC had Tyreek Hill and Jason Kelce, did they limit each other or did they create opportunities for each other? I’m not pretending to have all the answers, but these are good questions!

8 points
8
0
PhantomII's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:55 pm

Bigger, stronger OL imposing their will on a defense, run it down their throats. When they change the DL to stop it throw the ball with a mismatched defense to a WR/RB/TE. Why do we never use a RB pass to a TE/WR...ever. Getting the defense thinking and mixing things up a little should be the standard to always being in the best position to move the chains.

0 points
2
2
golfpacker1's picture

April 15, 2023 at 10:48 pm

Leather, how is it bad to use and make the TE position an offensive weapon that defenses have to account for. I think it is incredibly bad coaching to just trot a TE out there that the defense can just ignore because they know er won't use them the way every other team does. Thats a pretty arrogant way to coach and we are not good enough at other things to play that way. Thats why I say a big no to bringing back a TE that we only throw to 6 times a year. What a waste of money that we can't afford.

2 points
2
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 16, 2023 at 04:36 pm

Most teams don't have 5 good starters on their OL and you want 7? Diminishing returns to be hoping 2 starter worthy players are sitting on the bench. Smart teams can cover for having one bad O lineman in the lineup.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:07 pm

Re: Tight Ends

Is the reason the Packers only throw to TEs about six times a game because of LaFleur's design or Rodgers' preferences? LaFleur comes from Shanahan's coaching tree and that offense certainly uses TE's extensively. I suspect we may see much different usage of the TE position next season with Jordan Love at QB running LaFleur's preferred offense.

If that is true, then the Packers need to draft a TE. Deguara, Allen and even Lewis are not sufficient.

9 points
9
0
Swisch's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:04 pm

It would be great to keep Marcedes.
If it's thought he still has the skills and the desire, and if he comes at an affordable price, bring him back as a beast of a blocker and a mentor for Darnell Washington (or whomever we draft at TE).
For that matter, use him a little more in the passing game, as well, especially if our offense next season has more of an emphasis on tight ends.

1 points
3
2
dobber's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:37 am

Maybe because that's all the more those guys were getting open...and even then, maybe not so much.

1 points
1
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:32 pm

I agree with your point about the OL, However, draft-wise, I think next year is the best year to do it. The Tackle and Guard classes are very thin, and many draft experts think that a lot of tackles will be pushed into higher draft range than when they would normally go because of high demand and low supply, Combine that with the fact that next years OL class looks to be great, and I would say wait a year to spend a day 1 or 2 pick.

Instead, in 2023, we should focus on the strengths of the draft that coincide with our main needs, namely TE and edge rusher. We have a good OL that will probably be top 10 in the league (Jenkins was returning from injury, Myers should show improvement after last year [which was basically his rookie seson], Tom should be even better once he bulks up, and [a healthy] Nijman and Runyan will settle more into their new positions).

I say draft an edge in the first round, as there are some exceptional talents this year and we want to maximize that. Then either trade up with our second and third for Washington or stay put in the second and take LaPorta or Kraft.

2 points
3
1
Racingdad's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:07 pm

If we draft a tackle in first rd and he a capable starter we could move d Bach or yosh in season and maybe recoup some draft capitol . Bach is most likely gone next yr ( 40 mil cost on contract that expires end of 24 ) dead cap if gone 19 mil cost to stay in 24 add 21 mil that’s 40 mil for a LT as far as yosh he’s a fa after this season and expected to sign for 17-20 mil yr so my point is draft Darnell Wright now try to move one of yosh or Bach in season than either zack Tom takes other tackle job or draft another next year . Build the best line you can while reducing cost at the same time. Edge te etc can be had 2nd rd or later but their are only a few top tackles ready to start now

1 points
1
0
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 06:01 am

there is an opportunity cost to drafting an OT in round 1 this year and having him start and drive a quality player to the bench or have him sit and not contribute.

Another position, such as Edge would get a lot of snaps this season and not drive a good player to the bench since GB is thin at Edge.

Same at Safety, but I don't see a lot of quality at the position in the draft this year, also Safety is simply not a high value position, it can wait.

Last year was the time to draft both a TE and a S. Preferably with the picks that we received for AR... WAIT!! The stoopid FO failed to capitalize on a fantastic opportunity and let the future slip away from them! Oh well...

0 points
2
2
dobber's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:43 am

"there is an opportunity cost to drafting an OT in round 1 this year and having him start and drive a quality player to the bench"

True, but there's also longer-term (beyond 2023) planning to consider, and where holes will be opening -- either as players move on or are let go. You allude to this in your S/TE comments.

The best teams stockpile talent and find ways to keep young, quality guys on cheap deals. I come back to the fact that the Packers have two high-paid OL (Bakh and Jenkins), and two guys who they'll have to make decisions on after the season (Runyan and Nijman). How many of those guys can you afford to pay?

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:03 am

Plug and Protect the Right Flank, but the top guys will be going fast. Maybe Anton Harrison is there on a trade down? Otherwise, target the Edge. Let Nijman walk. Tom needed helper bees on the corners so he should compete for the Center spot. Myers may be a better guard.

-1 points
0
1
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:40 am

If GB has drafted 9 OL in the past 3 drafts (they have), the stockpiling has been done and the tipping point to move to back fill other positions has come.

If GB needs 3 more OL this year, the past drafting has been crap-ola and there is no hope that any draft strategy will yield positive results.

Sink or swim for the young OL, I would use a maximum of ONE late (6 or 7) round pick on an OL.

There are plenty of needs elsewhere on this roster and the Easter Bunny didn't leave any players in baskets at the doors of 1265, likewise the stork hasn't delivered any new players to Lambeau and Santa Claus did not leave any players under the tree at the sledding hill, oh yeah, and the tooth fairy didn't leave any players under Murphys pillow, even though he deserves to have his teeth knocked out.

3 points
3
0
dblbogey's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:24 pm

I'd love if one of the top 3 Offensive Tackles fell to 15. Otherwise, maybe Zach Tom at RT, because he outperformed Yosh last year and has a higher ceiling. Yosh is a good back up LT. If Myers doesn't improve, that's a weak spot. But I'd also like to grab one the the TE's in the 2nd round.

1 points
2
1
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:41 pm

Yeah, it makes no sense to bring Big Dog back until Training Camp anyway, no matter how the draft plays out. Our young TEs need to concentrate on the playbook. Big Dog's guidance would surely benefit them, but they won't really need him until TC or even later. He may impart wisdom on being a Pro and longevity, but that will progress as does the season...

Austin Allen could very well be a viable #2 or #3 TE. We won't know until probably the conclusion of TC. He's not the fastest TE, but he does have skills and should make a viable Red Zone target at the very least. Adding a #1 TE in this draft would greatly enhance our offensive capabilities. Imagine if we could add Brock Bowers next year in the draft. That may seem greedy, but a viable possibility nonetheless.

0 points
4
4
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:35 pm

Idk why you are receiving the dislikes, this all makes good sense to me. Another backup TE candidate (a rookie this year) is Wake Forests Blake Whiteheart.

3 points
3
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 11:40 pm

I have a legion of fans from APC to dislike every comment. I could say the Packers are 13 Time World Champions and Go Pack Go and get 2 dislikes guaranteed. Lol

% Em...

1 points
2
1
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 06:05 am

woof woof

arf arf

bark worse than bite, let 'em howl!

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:30 pm

Lolz. Just gave you a dislike for that!

Giggling.

Too funny BDU!!! I get it. Just sharing the Love…

0 points
1
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:00 pm

Just say no to Lewis. He's not even a retread any longer, just thread bare. Bring in Two TEs minimum from this draft and get More athletic. Get a receiving/all-purpose guy and an Inline guy like Schoonmaker later on. They can bag blocking sled TEs in rds 5-7. Move Forward. Yesterday is dead and gone. Maybe use an Offensive play design which incorporates the TE usage from the New offenses being played around the League and innovative college schemes.

1 points
2
1
dobber's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:46 am

Lewis is backward-looking. As you say, they can find what Lewis brings in the later rounds (or in UDFAs).

Thanks for what he did, but he's not a forward-looking acquisition and doesn't represent growth.

3 points
3
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 17, 2023 at 02:47 am

OTOH, he helps allow for a fair evaluation of Jordan Love. I am not quite as sold on the offensive line as others are, and I also think about trading Bakh at the trade deadline in week 8.

That said, I don't want to pay Lewis $2.5M. It seems like the Packers (and perhaps other teams) are waiting to see what the draft brings before looking at Lewis with serious intent. I am unsure of Lewis' market.

1 points
1
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 12:47 pm

I can see the sense of bringing back Lewis. It would need to be on a team-friendly deal.

Also, it may just be me, but I am excited to see what Josiah Deguara will bring to the offense in an expanded role. I think his pass-catching upside is untapped, particularly his YAC ability. His blocking has only gotten better over time.

3 points
3
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:48 pm

"His blocking has only gotten better over time."

There was no place to go but up. I remember his first attempt at blocking was the most awkward attempt I'd ever seen. He almost knocked himself out attempting to come across the formation and block the edge, only to be waylaid.

-2 points
1
3
HawkPacker's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:18 pm

I also remember him blocking two guys from the Viqueens. Totally took them out of the play.

4 points
4
0
HawkPacker's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:18 pm

.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 15, 2023 at 10:51 pm

That was Lazard.

-1 points
1
2
golfpacker1's picture

April 15, 2023 at 10:51 pm

That was Lazard.

-1 points
0
1
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 11:41 pm

That was Lazard and it was three...

1
2
3

-1 points
0
1
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 06:07 am

Deguare laid out 2 queens with one block in the game he wrecked his knee.

Lazard laid out 3 J-E-T-S with one block last season.

4 points
4
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:04 pm

QBs hit the wall at age 39-40, but TEs do not ?

1 points
2
1
TarynsEyes's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:19 pm

Convincing oneself to bring back a 39-year-old TE speaks to a larger issue than needing a veteran on the roster.

The drafting and developing of TE's is an issue.
The coaching of the TE's is an issue.
The FA signings of TE's has been an issue, save for the limited service of Lewis.

Whether Lewis is a Packer or not, he is not the answer to the issues.

How can Lewis be looked at as a 39-year-old beneficial need, and a 39-year-old Rodgers be an encumbrance?

If it's time to move on from the far better player, retaining a nearer to unusable player is absurd and opens questions to the FO and many a fan's legitimacy of thinking.

Many are suffering from the Donald Driver Syndrome, afraid to let go of what is now taking up a roster spot, or simply put, space.

Move on, draft a top TE in the 1st rd, if possible, Love will thank the FO, and so will many fans.

1 points
6
5
Heyward's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:41 pm

Well said!

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:00 pm

Up until the the TE; in rd. 1

0 points
3
3
jannes bjornson's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:13 pm

Round two and four/five. Get Two.

3 points
4
1
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 06:08 am

2 or 3 depending, then 6 or 7 depending...

lets not get too draft capital spendy...

-1 points
1
2
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:00 pm

I was on the road with my fellow long time die Packer fans and attended the Packers Dolphins game in Miami on Christmas Day.

We had front row seats and watched Mercedes beat the Dolphins secondary deep for 31 yards to the Dolphins 7.

Showed great speed and made a great catch.

That play by Lewis early in the 3rd quarter - along with Jarran Reed's strip of Tua near the end of the 2nd quarter turned the momentum in the Packers favor and led to their victory and a Christmas present for all of us.

Mercedes was underused as a receiver - especially in the red zone.

That was the problem.

If you have a subscription to NFL Plus, watch the game again with Coaches Film/All 22 and you will see what I am talking about.

Packers have trouble with Josh Myers and Runyan's run blocking, especially in the Red Zone and Matt's play calling in the red zone and this will become apparent when theh plays are slowed down and scrutinized with All 22/Coaches Film.

Lews is not the problem. and should be signed along with Cobb, now that Brian has driven away Tonyan, Reed, and Lazard and screwed up with Davante and Rodgers.

This is what happens when you have young insecure GMs with fragile egos that are only in place because their predecessor was terminally ill and the President did not do the work necessary to evaluate the person.

-13 points
1
14
Leatherhead's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:22 pm

"""How can Lewis be looked at as a 39-year-old beneficial need, and a 39-year-old Rodgers be an encumbrance?"""

Taryn, we both know that you know the differences, like cost and role in the offense, are more significant than a common age.

And of course, I'm skeptical about your entire premise that we have trouble developing, coaching, etc. TEs, because when I start looking back, I see three different seasons where our TE was catching over 50 balls in a season under Gutekunst/Lafleur. I saw a free agent TE catch 11 TDs in one season, and we led the league in offense that year.

You are correct that we should be moving on. He can still play, he's a good force in the locker room and the huddle, so if we have to keep him one more year it isn't the end of the world, but I really think that Deguara, Allen, and a Day 3 pick can do the job we need the TE to do.

3 points
5
2
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 11:50 pm

I was on the road with my fellow long time die Packer fans and attended the Packers Dolphins game in Miami on Christmas Day.

We had front row seats and watched Mercedes beat the Dolphins secondary deep for 31 yards to the Dolphins 7.

Showed great speed and made a great catch.

That play by Lewis early in the 3rd quarter - along with Jarran Reed's strip of Tua near the end of the 2nd quarter turned the momentum in the Packers favor and led to their victory and a Christmas present for all of us.

Mercedes was underused as a receiver - especially in the red zone.

That was the problem.

If you have a subscription to NFL Plus, watch the game again with Coaches Film/All 22 and you will see what I am talking about.

Packers have trouble with Josh Myers and Runyan's run blocking, especially in the Red Zone and Matt's play calling in the red zone and this will become apparent when theh plays are slowed down and scrutinized with All 22/Coaches Film.

Lews is not the problem. and should be signed along with Cobb, now that Brian has driven away Tonyan, Reed, and Lazard and screwed up with Davante and Rodgers.

This is what happens when you have young insecure GMs with fragile egos that are only in place because their predecessor was terminally ill and the President did not do the work necessary to evaluate the person.

-5 points
1
6
stockholder's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:30 pm

I would bring him back and Rodgers too.
But that apparently won't happen.
I've tried to mock Kincaid.
Even if he does have a back problem.
And just about all 5 of the top TEs.
But it just doesn't work for the DL and S.
The Packers are in trouble.
The Bears spent money.
The Lions have Jones number.
And the vikings want revenge.
Ok sign him. If you can.

-4 points
3
7
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:40 pm

Stockholder,

I notice that when I click on your name in the section where the latest posts by commenters are shown and listed, I am NOT taken to your post as occurs when I click on other commenters latest posts.

Ae you aware of this and why this is occurring?

-7 points
1
8
BirdDogUni's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:51 pm

It works just fine, you're just doing it wrong, like your comments.

14 points
15
1
stockholder's picture

April 15, 2023 at 01:53 pm

Yes. - Only my comments.
Maybe because I've been here a long time.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:18 pm

Not as long as others

4 points
4
0
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 06:11 am

do you have original stock?

long shelf time, gettin' a lil moldy?

-1 points
1
2
jannes bjornson's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:15 pm

Kraft.

2 points
3
1
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:23 pm

Agreed

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:00 pm

IMO Talk of Lewis means No TE early -
My updated draft - No trades.

15. Myles Murphy. Edge Clemson
45. Adetomiwa Adebawore DL/Ed NW
78. Rashee. Rice. WR SMU
116. Jamie Robinson. S FL
149. Karl Brooks DL B.Green
170c. Zach Kuntz. TE O. Dominion
232. Ronnie Hickman. S. Ohio St
235. Hunter Luepke FB ND state
242. Josh Whyle. TE. Cinn
256c. Mohamed Ibrahim. RB. Minn.

-3 points
1
4
jannes bjornson's picture

April 15, 2023 at 06:32 pm

Gonzalez, Murphy, Paris, B.Jones Skoronski, Levis ,Smith- Nygba off the Board by #15.
Trade to Buffalo for #27/59/#2 (2024). Nobody wants Rodgers in this siml. Darnell Wright gone @ #26.

#27 Uzomah Edge
#45/#3 (2024) to NOLA for #40
#40 Tillman WR #2
#59 Kraft TE
#78/ #5 (2024) for #73
#73 Benton 3 Tech
#116 Z. Harrison Edge
#149 Cory Trice CB/S
# 170 Schoonmakr TE
#242/#6 (2024) to Jags for #208
#208 Max Duggan QB
#232 Anfernee Orji LB
#235 Evan Hull RB
#256 Jake Moody K

-1 points
1
2
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 07:30 pm

The latest mock:
15: DE/OLB Lukas Van Ness, Iowa
42 (via NYJ): WR Cedric Tillman, Tennessee
45: TE Tucker Kraft, South Dakota St.
78: S Jordan Battle, Alabama
116: DT Brodric Martin, Western Kentucky
149: IOL Alex Forsyth, Oregon
170: QB Sean Clifford, Penn St.
232: TE Blake Whiteheart, Wake Forest
235: K Andre Szmyt, Syracuse - only if Moody isn't available
242: WR Jared Wayne, Pittsburgh
256: S John Torchio, Wisconsin

0 points
2
2
stockholder's picture

April 16, 2023 at 04:47 pm

Let me give you some thoughts here.
While I like the trade down.
You don't take edge past 15. Which means Nolan. smith /BR /
But I sided with Acme for Murphy.
UZomah is dropping after his 4.7 forty - Great tape .
#45 I backed off WRs- Tillman has climbed.
But I'm a pass because Reed DL went back to seatle.
Which Means DL. Adetomiwa Adebawore DL/Ed NW
Has been brought in and matched Donalds (Rams)
He will be picked over Uzomah. If the Jets don't grab him.
But thats the difference DL over edge in rd. 2.
You must replace Amos. - @ 149 not happening.
Thanks

1 points
3
2
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:35 pm

Uzomah of K State, Nolan Smith, and Murphy are all EDGE prospects I like a lot. Van Ness is my favorite of them all though

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 17, 2023 at 10:35 am

Uzomah did not run a 40 At Combo olympics, or his Pro Day. He is in the 4.6 range, long reach and leverage the OTs. More technically sound, chop and swim moves, not just a speed rusher. Adebawore may be 6'-1 @ 280Lbs, but the 4.5 40 puts him as Edge. His vertical was impressive. Three to six tech. How is his run stop? I'll grab Benton at 6'-4", 310. Uzomah will go end of first round. If they whiff, think of watching another guy like King filling the Gutedkunst evaluation. They took Wyatt with the #29 as the DT infill. They can get five tech or DTs in rds 3-6. Best to bring in bigger CBs who can flex to safety spots. Nobody on this defense tackles to begin with, especially their ILBs.

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

April 17, 2023 at 10:51 am

Benton is more of a NT. - Listed as a D1
Adebawore - Listed as a D5 by draft tek
I love Dexter - As you know - Listed as a D3

DL1 Smith 3, Benton 4,IKA 3,Coburn2,Clark 4.
DL3 Carter3 , Breeze5, Dexter6,Roy3, Brooks4 Pickens4
DL5-VanEss5,Kancey1,White5, Adebawore2.Tuipulotu2.Wooden

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 17, 2023 at 10:58 am

Benton is a 1-3 tech, watch the Badger games. Fast first step. I watched Adebawore for the Wildcats cause trouble the last couple seasons. I have not reviewed his tape vs the OSU/ Big Ten OTs, yet. The question mark is Barry. They should move to four down linemen with flexible DE/Edge. GAry will not be back until Trick r' Treat ,earliest. I want sacks.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 15, 2023 at 10:55 pm

Ibrahims body is as old as lewis's. nope. How about Evan Hull?

3 points
3
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:04 pm

15: R1 P15 RB Bijan Robinson - Texas
45: R2 P14 TE Darnell Washington - Georgia
78: R3 P15 EDGE Byron Young - Tennessee
116: R4 P14 S Sydney Brown - Illinois
149: R5 P14 WR Bryce Ford-Wheaton - West Virginia
170: R5 P35 TE Zack Kuntz - Old Dominion
232: R7 P15 WR Elijah Higgins - Stanford
235: R7 P18 OT Ryan Swoboda - Central Florida
242: R7 P25 EDGE Tavius Robinson - Ole Miss
256: R7 P39 FB Hunter Luepke - North Dakota State

1 points
2
1
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:36 pm

Byron Young (from Tennessee) is too small. Sydney Brown won't fall that far. I absolutely love the Ford-Wheaton pick, as his combine (and upside) are electric. I don't really like the Kuntz pick, as he is just a big WR, not a true TE.

And you probably know what I am going to say about taking a RB in the first round...NO NO NO!

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 17, 2023 at 11:29 am

If, Bijan is there at 15, he'll be the BPA. If nobody wants to trade up for him, I'd draft him. Passing on Barry Sanders again would just suck. Dillon on the last year of his contract, so why not take the BPA, give your young developing QB a RB to grow with.

Passing on BPA to go for a need or want is how you become the Cardinals or Falcons. Drafting a Bijan Robinson when you have two good veteran RBs to learn from is how you stay competitive.

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:38 pm

15: R1 P15 EDGE Lukas Van Ness - Iowa
45: R2 P14 TE Darnell Washington - Georgia
78: R3 P15 EDGE Andre Carter II - Army
116: R4 P14 WR Jonathan Mingo - Ole Miss
149: R5 P14 RB Roschon Johnson - Texas
170: R5 P35 TE Zack Kuntz - Old Dominion
232: R7 P15 WR Bryce Ford-Wheaton - West Virginia
235: R7 P18 S Rashad Torrence II - Florida
242: R7 P25 S Jason Taylor II - Oklahoma State
256: R7 P39 DL Kobie Turner - Wake Forest

1 points
1
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:37 pm

IMO I personally think that a 2nd or 3rd place finish this year in the North is likely. The Lions will likely win the division, the Bears have improved, and I have no idea what the Vikings are doing (but they are going to suck badly this year).

0 points
3
3
freddisch's picture

April 16, 2023 at 12:09 pm

Rogers Too????

0 points
0
0
Matt's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:08 pm

I'd take him back regerdless of who we draft. I think young TEs have much to learn from Lewis and there's no better way to learn while being on the same field. I am not a tactic specialist but from what I saw on tape, his blocks were very important. Blocking and receiving are both important but blocking is not as flashy. If he was as good receiver as he is blocker we all would cry for him to stay ;)

5 points
7
2
Since'75's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:37 am

I'm not sure what Sternberger and Dequara learned from Lewis, but it clearly wasn't enough.

1 points
3
2
LambeauPlain's picture

April 15, 2023 at 02:31 pm

Big Dog in the TE room ... containing 2 rookies, Deguara and Davis... on one year deal makes sense to me. His reputation as a mentor is added value to his blocking, which he still does very well.

But not until after the draft depending on the cap situation. Obviously no one is signing him to a multi-year deal as 2023 is his exit as a player and possible entrance into the coaching ranks...hopefully in Green Bay. I expect the FO has told him they want him back...close to vets minimum/incentive laden deal could be a win win.

2 points
4
2
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 04:20 pm

“Big Dog in TE room”; is that anything like “fat guy in a little coat”?

3 points
4
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:01 pm

I'd say pass on resigning Big Dog, but if we do I'd like to see Big Dog with Darnell Washington. Big Dog can mentor Darnell, but can you see the two TE offense with those two on either end of the line? Can you say running game? Yowser!

-3 points
0
3
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:13 pm

" I'd like to see Big Dog with Darnell Washington. Big Dog can mentor Darnell, but can you see the two TE offense with those two on either end of the line? Can you say running game? Yowser!"

KTS,

I agree - and the Red Zone scoring in the passing game as well, especially if Myers can be replaced and Lafleur can do better with his thinking and play calls.

KTS, you seem like an intelligent person, can you answer these 2 questions:

1) Less than 6 months ago, why were the Packers players on the field able to work together to go 13-3, 13-3, 13-4 and 3-1 - generating more wins and less losses over this 53 game period than any of the other 31 NFL teams - until Rodgers broke his thumb?

2) Specifically which players on the field were most important in sustaining this long period of on the field excellence generating more wins and less losses over this 53 game period than any of the other 31 NFL teams - until Rodgers broke his thumb?

-7 points
0
7
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:28 pm

STR,
At this point in time #1 and #2 no longer matter! Water over the dam. I am not going to speculate on how & why things evolved to where we currently find the Packer team.

Time waits for no one and it is a young man's game. There are many things that go on behind the scenes that unfortunately is never shared with the public, but the organization will usually end up taking the blame. There doesn't seem to be any compromise between the Packers and AR. The Packer organization is moving forward with the Rodgers trade. I appreciate the years AR committed to the GBP's, but now my only concern & interest is in the Packers obtaining the best trade & capital they can in exchange for AR, and possibly David Bachtiari. Take all the trade capital and build a young team with potential and let's see where this young talent can take us.

7 points
7
0
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 06:21 pm

KTS,

Less than 6 months ago IS CURRENT. What do you think:

1) Less than 6 months ago, why were the Packers players on the field able to work together to go 13-3, 13-3, 13-4 and 3-1 - generating more wins and less losses over this 53 game period than any of the other 31 NFL teams - until Rodgers broke his thumb?

2) Specifically which players on the field were most important in sustaining this long period of on the field excellence generating more wins and less losses over this 53 game period than any of the other 31 NFL teams - until Rodgers broke his thumb?

-7 points
1
8
Johnblood27's picture

April 16, 2023 at 06:17 am

big dog and washington on ends of the line...

why not just put your 6 and 7 OL out there.

save the roster spots for players with unique skills at their position.

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 03:49 pm

Analytics, baby!!!
6 catches, 2 TD’s.
60 catches, 20 TD’s.
BOOYAH!!
Problem solved.
Because of math and stuff.

6 points
6
0
Racingdad's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:15 pm

Btw I used to think s h was kinda of flakey , but he’s been totally overshadowed by that starrtoRodgers guy he’s totally a Rodgers plant that seems to hate everything packers do if I was that negative to my team I’d either find a new team to cheer for( jets) or just stop watching altogether just posting mindless dribble that no one reads anymore !!! What a waste of space !!

5 points
5
0
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 15, 2023 at 06:11 pm

Racingdad,

What do you think of what Aaron Jones had to say about Aaron Rodgers - see below:
Aaron Jones on Aaron Rodgers March 8, 2023:

"I'm salty," Jones said. "I don't want him to go to Vegas so I would say he could come here (New York). But he's my quarterback. It would be good to see him reunite with (Nathaniel) Hackett (former Packers offensive coordinator and new Jets OC), somebody he knows. But like I said, Aaron Rodgers, please don't go anywhere.

On Wednesday, Jones upped his game.

"I'm on national TV making my case," Jones said. "Other guys are on social media, I'm on national TV. Come back to the Packers, we got everything we need. We're right there, we didn't start off the way we wanted to last year, but we picked it up. You're a huge part of that. Our leader. We got it going. We lost the last game to get into the playoffs. We got everything we need. Let's bring one back to Green Bay."

And then in a segment where the panelists were asked to describe the New York movie they'd use to describe Rodgers becoming a Jet, Jones wrote “Do The Right Thing!”
"You know where home is," Jones said. "You’ve been there for so long. You’re a leader of our team. We’d love to have you back. Just do the right thing and come home."

-6 points
0
6
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:48 pm

The Packers, as we all know, have a large need at TE. IMO, there is one TE draft crush of mine who I think possesses the upside to be the best TE in the draft, and who I think would be the best fit for the Packers: TE Tucker Kraft of South Dakota St.

This guy has a legitimate NFL frame at 6'5, 255 lbs and has a great raw athletic score of 9.58.
I think his skill set will transfer well to the NFL because of this. I also believe that his best football is in front of him; I think his athleticism will enable him to improve in many areas of the game as he becomes a pro.

He is a monster in YAC situations. He can break tackles and can even make people miss too; a great mover in space. He had over 400 yards after the catch in 2021, and 200 of those were yards after contact. A former high school RB, this may be his best trait.

He can really block, too. The SDSU offense is very run-oriented, so he has lots of experience in that area.

His frame is a great asset for when he is in contested-catch situations. He had a '34 vertical at the combine and a '36 vertical at his pro day. He also ran a 4.67 at the combine and a 4.6 at his pro day, but IMO his play speed is faster than that - more in the 4.55 range

The main knock on Kraft is that his route-running is underdeveloped. However, I believe with NFL coaching, he has the skill set to improve. I also think that NFL coaching will help him expand his bag of tricks after the catch as well. If you watch his tape and look at his combine, I believe he possesses the athletic traits necessary to improve in this area, and, as I said before, his best football is in front of him.

I think he would be a great pick at #45 and as the Packers' TE1 of the future. From what I have heard, he is a hard worker who will always strive to get better. He just feels like a Packer to me, and I hope that is the result come draft day.

If we miss out on Kraft I also like Sam LaPorta of Iowa (as long as he can improve his blocking)

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:20 am

Agree on Kraft. He’s one of the most complete players at TE in this draft.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

April 16, 2023 at 12:59 pm

There’s an element of development required with Kraft. One if the things I do like about him is that he isn’t an ex receiver, but a RB. He can run and break tackles and has the frame for it. He also knows how to run block. Therefore he brings the opportunity to run very different plays out of personnel groups with a RB.

The downside is he’s not a good route runner. He doesn’t look sharp even in a limited route tree and his genuine burst doesn’t show up as much as it should. That prevents him getting separation as often as his athleticism suggests that he should. He has a tendency to body catch. As a in-line blocker he’s going to need work and perhaps arm strength.

I like Kraft’s upside and potential. I think it will take a year or so for him to be ready to fully unleash it though. I would not rely on him as an in-line blocker yet. Pick him and treat him as a developmental move and work on expanding his route repertoire and skill and pass blocking. A good later option if we don’t get a move earlier, and one that might eventually be better or at least more versatile, than some of those.

3 points
3
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:40 pm

CW,
I agree that there is development needed, although I absolutely believe that Kraft has the athleticism and ability to do whatever is required of the TE position (better route-running, blocking, etc).

I like his upside too.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:42 am

Packy I really like Kraft too. I want the Packers to try to trade back for extra ammo in the 2nd and 3rd as it will help fill our needs, while the best talent is available. Late first would be a perfect spot to start the draft for GB picking the best TE. And for us that is one of Washington, Mayer, or Kraft.

Back to Kraft. He reminds me of an Iowa TE. I also think he might be the best fit for GB. As you state he is very athletic and talented, but an overlooked reason is that he has played football in the winter. In probably worse conditions than GB. Kraft and Mayers both have played in the cold. 2 years ago Kraft had an awesome season with 60 some catches. He is a weapon that his school got a glimpse of and then decided to put him back in the box in 2022. We could unleash him again.

I will give Notre Dame credit because they use their TEs as a weapon and that's exactly what GB should do. The idea of TEs main role in GB is blocking is a bad coaching philosophy. It should be 50/50 receiving and blocking. Even a great blocking TE should be catching 20 to 30 balls just to keep the defense honest. Otherwise, why even have a TE? Jordan Love would sure appreciate good TEs.

Earlier in the draft process Kinkaid was my clear choice for GB pick of TE because he catches so well. That idea has changed for me because all of these TEs catch really well. Also, Kinkaid has back issues and those can last forever so we can eliminate the worry by picking someone else and not skip a beat.

If we got LaPorta I would be thrilled. Unless you guys are Iowa fans you have no idea how good LaPorta's numbers really are. Charlie Jones caught 21 passes for Iowa in 2021.He caught 100 passes in 2022! The Iowa QB was terrible and was last in NCAA passing stats for 2 years in a row. Kirk Ferentz is hardheaded and his only offensive strategy is to let the defense win the game. Very frustrating and as long as he is in charge the Hawks will never recruit good WRs and they will ruin good QBs. LaPorta reminds me of another great Iowa TE in Dallas Clark. Thats what we could be getting with Sam.

3 points
3
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:46 am

I also agree that I believe he is the best fit. He would be my first choice of TE the Packers can draft. The cold weather is an astute observation.

However, Washington and LaPorta are not far behind. LaPorta is amazing, and as long as he can bulk up and improve his blocking, I would be ecstatic. Washington has amazing upside and has been blocking first round edge rushers. I would love him too.

Mayer I believe is a safe pick, but I don’t think he has a lot of upside. I think he would be solid. I would be happy for him, as he would probably provide stability for Love early on. High floor, low ceiling. Who knows? Maybe he does turn out to be good. I have him a level below Washington and LaPorta.

Kincaid and Musgrave are the ones I would avoid. Both have had injury problems, Musgrave especially. Musgrave also has no YAC ability, which is important for TEs, and almost always goes down upon contact. He is way too much of a gamble for me. Kincaid IMO is not a true TE. He is a big WR. I don’t know how well his style of play will transfer to the pros, but I would not be surprised either way. That is not very important though. He puts his head down when he blocks, and I don’t think he has the strength to block in the pros. If he wanted to bulk up, it would probably limit his speed and perhaps his elusiveness. I guess he would be fine if we wanted to use him exclusively as a WR, but he is not at all true TE, and we should not pretend that he can be.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 17, 2023 at 07:38 am

Hey Packy,
A couple deep bombs to Mayer, along with a handful of solid blocks and a few chain moving 1Ds when we need them and about 3-5 TDs might change your mind on his upside. Quickly.

I’m a huge Darnell Washington fan, and can easily see either of Mayer and/or Washington have this level of impact early as our inline TE.

Can you imagine having both to run some funky 12 personnel with a big front?

Can you imagine running out of that?

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

April 15, 2023 at 05:57 pm

You have a new QB, needs protection by all accounts, Lewis should be a no brainer!

2 points
5
3
dobber's picture

April 15, 2023 at 06:34 pm

There are plenty of non-brainers getting posted around here recently....

3 points
6
3
TKWorldWide's picture

April 15, 2023 at 07:34 pm

Bazinga!

1 points
2
1
Packers0808's picture

April 15, 2023 at 11:19 pm

You fit right with that group?

-2 points
0
2
dobber's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:47 am

I'm the leader of the band!...and happy to own it! ;)

BTW: my pvs. comment was't a poke on you, I just love an opportunity for word-play!

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 16, 2023 at 03:31 pm

You’re not the only one, amigo!

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:31 am

Here's a thought Packers....How about our O line and backs handle the pass protection job, and the tight end gives Jordan Love another option?

Especially with the lack of pass catching targets we have.

Just thinking out loud.

-1 points
1
2
dobber's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:48 am

A guy who can block AND run?

PREPOSTEROUS!!!

2 points
3
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 16, 2023 at 05:10 pm

Inconceivable!

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:24 am

That particular idea would put the Pack's offense into the realm of the 21st Century. A real Mind-bender for some folks...

2 points
2
0
ko40489's picture

April 15, 2023 at 06:34 pm

If Gutey really believed his own rhetoric about Deguara and Davis being so great, there wouldn't be all the talk about drafting a TE in the early rounds this year. Davis shouldn't have made the roster last year--and he had a total of 4 catches all season. Cut him and re-sign Lewis. The running game will need all the help it can get this year. With an unproven QB and young WR's, defenses are going to load the box unless and until they start getting burned in the passing game. If the Pack can't establish a running game and end up facing a lot of 3rd and long situations, the offense will be in real trouble.

-3 points
0
3
dobber's picture

April 15, 2023 at 06:37 pm

"Davis shouldn't have made the roster last year--and he had a total of 4 catches all season. Cut him and re-sign Lewis."

The bottom 2 TE on the depth chart are going to mostly play STs: Davis 81% of ST snaps, Deguara 47%.

6 points
6
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:16 am

What rhetoric?
Did he go on record singing their praises?

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

April 16, 2023 at 01:19 pm

LaFleur was the one raving about Deguara after the pick, saying that he brought the skill set needed to do a lot of things that the 49ers were doing.

Davis was a dud on O. I saw no sign of consistency as a blocker despite the odd good one there were many bad ones. He also vanished as a pass threat. As a minimum contract type though, I have to admit that he earned that just buy his ST play.

At this point that’s what Davis is until he shows otherwise. Now we need to go find some true TEs who can help on O and decide whether we actually want to use the H-back role and Deguara. The two issues are not the same.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:30 am

Davis actually held point as the season progressed. He can sneak out on the Dbl. TE sets for a key 1st down, or a backdoor play for yardage just as well as Lewis.

0 points
0
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 15, 2023 at 07:10 pm

The latest mock:
15: DE/OLB Lukas Van Ness, Iowa
42 (via NYJ): WR Cedric Tillman, Tennessee
45: TE Tucker Kraft, South Dakota St.
78: S Jordan Battle, Alabama
116: DT Brodric Martin, Western Kentucky
149: IOL Alex Forsyth, Oregon
170: QB Sean Clifford, Penn St.
232: TE Blake Whiteheart, Wake Forest
235: K Andre Szmyt, Syracuse
242: WR Jared Wayne, Pittsburgh
256: S John Torchio, Wisconsin

-2 points
1
3
WD's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:32 am

I would be happy to see the Packers draft Van Ness but he is likely to be gone by #15. On the other hand YA Ya Diaby (Edge) would likely be there in the third round. I see you are assuming we are getting two picks in the second round. Hope you are right.

1 points
1
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 12:30 pm

I have seen some drafts where LVN is gone at pick #8 and some where he goes at pick #28. We will see...personally I believe he will be available at pick #15, but if the board doesn't look like it is falling right I would not hesitate to trade up and grab him. Many draft experts has said this guy has a ceiling of J.J. Watt!!

Look at it this way: here is how I see the draft playing out:
1. CAR: CJ Stroud. Josh McCown, the Panthers QB coach, said to Stroud that he'd see him in Carolina.
2. HOU: Bryce Young. The other top QB.
3. ARI: Will Anderson Jr: I could see the Cardinals trading this pick, but I don't know who else in the top 10 would want it, and plus they would get Anderson if they stay put.
4. Colts: Anthony Richardson. My guess is Steichen will want a guy with a similar skill set to Jalen Hurts.
5. Seahawks: Tyree Wilson: They have not addressed OLB in free agency, and with Jalen Carter's character problems my guess is they go Wilson here.
6. Eagles (via trade with Lions): Jalen Carter, Georgia: I do not think Howie will hesitate to pay whatever price for the guy he wants, and despite the character issues, Carter is believed by many to be the most talented player in the draft. He possesses the versatility to be a DT and DE. The Eagles' D-Line was at its best with heavy rotation, and Carter would go a long way to replace Javon Hargrave.
7. Raiders: Christian Gonzalez: The Raiders literally have no one at CB, and this represents an excellent situation.
8. Falcons: Peter Skoronski: This is the biggest wild-card for me. I don't think it is likely they go edge or DL after all their free agent signings, but I could easily also see them going CB here. After the Okudah trade, though, IMO their biggest hole is at LG. Skoronski can easily fill that void, and perhaps give the Falcons the best offensive line in the league.
9. Jets (via Bears): OT Paris Johnson. The Bears have hinted that they may trade down again, and the Jets use pick 43 to move up and select arguably the best tackle in the draft class, as they see the tackle board is fading.
10. Lions: CB Devon Witherspoon, Illinois. The Lions trade back and are still able to get the guy they probably would have picked at 6. Witherspoon is an excellent fit with Dan Campbell. If the Falcons took Witherspoon, the Lions might select Van Ness, although given that they have several other options there and that they just traded Okudah I would probably think they would take Joey Porter Jr.
11. Titans: QB Will Levis. Levis and Mike Vrabel are too good of a fit to pass up. I think this will honestly be the steal of the draft if the Titans can get Levis without trading up for him.
12. Texans: Jaxon Smith-Njigba. The Texans are also candidates to select Van Ness, although given the abysmal state of their WR room and the fact they already have Jonathan Greenard and Jerry Hughes, I see them helping out their young QB Bryce Young with new weapons.
13. Bears (via Jets): OT Broderick Jones. I do not think the Bears have any other choice but to go OT in round one because Justin Fields will absolutely need all the protection he can get, and RT is a huge need for them. I know their GM Poles likes athletic o-linemen, and that is why I think Jones will actually be the #1 OT on their big board. I could also see them taking Darnell Wright, too (although they may trade back for him a bit too)
14. Patriots: OT Darnell Wright. The Pats are also candidates to take Van Ness, but OT is far and away their biggest need. Bellicheck showed last year that he won't hesitate to address the O-line and he will not hesitate to reach for the OL he likes best. Wright absolutely pulverized Will Anderson, and I think Belichick will take him here to be the RT of the future and move Trent Brown to LT.
15: Packers: Lukas Van Ness!

1 points
2
1
ImaPayne's picture

April 15, 2023 at 10:11 pm

Are we lowering our standards with old players now. I dont think you win with older just get by guys when you have the chance for youth and speed. He served his usefulness, its time the team moves on.

4 points
4
0
Since'75's picture

April 15, 2023 at 11:39 pm

Yea, maybe give him a raise also 😉
I don't think 4 million is enough for 6 catches and 66 yards.

Funny how they can pay this cat 4 million for 6 catches...but they insult Jordy Nelson telling him he can stay for the vet. minimum..or, tell him to kick rocks

Anyone ever hear the definition of ..insanity?

Lets sign more good locker room guys and watch the wins pile up.

Keep Mercedes Lewis?

Brilliant

Wouldn't the money be better spent hiring Gute a draft advisor and (maybe) hitting on some picks from rounds 3-7, and then were not having foolish discussions about keeping a non productive 39 year old on the roster for millions.

Sorry about the truth.....sometimes reality isn't all that pretty.

-4 points
2
6
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 12:32 pm

Romeo Doubs, Zach Tom, MVS, TJ Slaton, Isaiah McDuffie, Jon Runyan Jr, Samori Toure, Tariq Carpenter (a STs guy) and Kingsley Enagbare have all entered the chat...

1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

April 19, 2023 at 02:30 pm

So those are Gutes treasure picks after round 2 Sparky?

Ok..lol

So we have Doubs 6 drops, 2 fumbles, and needs to be more consistent.
We'll give him time to grow.

MVS...who cares? The Packers didn't think he was worth keeping.
And the Chiefs paid him 10 million for 2 TD's....what a bargain.

Toure?...You talking about his 5 catches for 82 yards?

I'm sorry, this is just getting silly...thanks for trying though 😏

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:58 am

Since75, you hit the main point right on the head. The #1 reason to not resign Lewis is WE HAVE NO MONEY! We haven't been able to do SQUAT in free agency because of that. Even if Lewis would resign for minimum I would look elsewhere for a TE. We don't need a mentor because we have actual TE coaches. Thats their job.

Surely, we can find another younger, minimum salary blocking TE that can also catch at least 25 passes to at the least keep the defense honest in covering him. Lewis caught 6 passes last year and fumbled in the biggest game of the year. Let someone else have that massive production. No to Lewis. Draft Kamari Averett and start over.
You have to pass the ball to be able to run successfully in this NFL. It's not the other way around anymore.

1 points
2
1
Since'75's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:26 am

Thanks GP1

Yea, i've been saying, find someone younger for less money. Chances are you will get more production for less money, and who knows, maybe you stumble on a Pro Bowl player, right?
Problem is we've drafted two tight ends in the 3rd round and....zilch.
For some reason Gute can't hit on a player after the 2nd round like Wolf and Thompson did.
I don't see one standout player from Gute after the 2nd round in his first 4 drafts.

Bottom line..... Lewis isn't worth the money, he gives you a terrible return on investment.
I mean...in 5 years he has 6 TD catches, in that same time he's moved the chains 30 times. (6 first downs a season).
He just doesn't move the needle at all.
I'm not sure why he is with us in the first place...maybe Rodgers wanted him around.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:24 am

"For some reason Gute can't hit on a player after the 2nd round like Wolf and Thompson did."

Khm, khm, Zack Tom, Enagbare, Doubs...

Ron Wolf: "Whenever we started the draft, I would always say, ‘Men, this is not my pick or your pick. It’s our pick. It’s the Green Bay Packers’ pick. We’re picking for the Packers.’ That’s what you have to remember."

To repeat great Ron Wolf - That’s what you have to remember!

2 points
2
0
Since'75's picture

April 19, 2023 at 02:20 pm

Ok Sport, i'll remember that 😏
.
I said... in Gutes 1st four drafts (like i wrote), it's a bit early to bring up the 2022 draft.

As far as Doubs...PFF has him graded at 61....that's the very bottom of average.

He only started 7 games, he had 6 drops , 1 behind the leader last season.
He fumbled twice in 42 receptions.
3 TD passes

Lets let the 2022 draft class get another season under their belts before we crown any of them.

They all have more to prove, like production and consistency, not just 5 or 6 good games out of a 17 game season.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 17, 2023 at 09:18 am

It's going to be really hard for teams to screw up drafting this year's TE class. Yeah there are some sort of red flags in Kinkaid's back, Musgraves knee to name 2. But there are so many good choices in multiple rounds this year.

My best scenario for GB after trading back from #15 for another 2nd and 4th is to pick Mayer, Kraft, or Washington later in the first round. In no particular order as I like all three and all three would start right away. Gamechanger is a word that gets thrown around and I think you should expect close to that with first round picks. Any of these three would fit that description because having strong TE play would impact our offense the most. Which would impact the defense too because of time of possession.

Picking Josh Whyle with our new 4th rounder and one of Averett, Strange, Durham, Sims, Allen in the 7th rebuilds our TE room and it becomes a strength. There are also going to be some good TEs not get picked this year and we should be in on them. Austin Allen is also a wildcard, he has great hands and at 6'8 he would be a red zone stud.

I hold out hope for GB trading for the Broncos TE, Albert Okwuegbunam and Jeremy Ruckert to come back to us in the Rodgers trade. Although I don't have as much positive vibes these days that the trade gets done at all. Either of them would currently be our best TE.

Hey, in my mocks I trade AR to the 49ers. Maybe two of their 2023 thirds and a 2023 6th, coupled with 2024 1st would get it done. That would essentially be a 2nd rounder because they will be the hands down favorite to win the Super Bowl with AR, maybe in 2025 too. A late 204 1st round pick is a prime spot to trade back and whatever compensation could be added to what we got for AR. Maybe we even get back a good young player to boot.

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

April 16, 2023 at 09:40 am

No matter what his age is Lewis "ragdolls" NFL defensive ends, in the NFC championship game vs the Bucs he put Jason Pierre Paul on his back several times and he played at an All Pro level for several years. Provided a reasonable salary as has been the case to date and continuing to give him an occasional day of not practicing he would still be a good veteran option and a role model for any drafted tight ends. They need to hit on a receiving tight end in the draft to develop, for years when the Packers were close to beating the Cowboys Jay Novacheck was the guy moving the chains for first downs that made the difference, then the Packers drafted Chumra and acquired Keith Jackson and that was reversed. Look at the 49ers and Chief's their tight ends make a huge difference as Ron Kramer did on the Lombardi teams.

2 points
4
2
greengold's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:04 am

Great piece, Gil.

What I find most intriguing is the possibility Mercedes Lewis chooses the Packers over the Jets.

If Lewis signs with GB, there’s no better endorsement available for Jordan Love.

The $$$ compensation will be the same between GB and NYJ. Is AR really that good of friends with ML??? Does NYJ’s Top 5 Defense make that decision for him?

If he returns to GB to play with Jordan Love instead of playing with AR and that D, it would make one helluva statement.

0 points
1
1
Since'75's picture

April 19, 2023 at 02:03 pm

"If Lewis signs with GB, there’s no better endorsement available for Jordan Love."

If that is the best endorsement available for Jordan Love, than Packer Nation should start worrying immediately.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:24 am

Frankly I thought it was a mistake to let Tonyon go to the Bears. That may come back to haunt us. As a result there is a lot of pressure to draft a TE; using our first pick which probably should be used to address Edge. Lewis is a great blocking TE but has lost a step and has a difficult time getting open. There is a chance we could get Darnell Washington who is the best blocking TE of the top three. He is also the biggest and the fastest of the top three tight ends. Moreover, he was observed making one handed catches at his pro day. His status dropped because he was not utilized much as a receiver. He could even drop to the second where he would be a steal. Finally the kid from Utah is said to be the most athletic but has had back issues. So, it is a tough call. We had a great draft last year so I have confidence in Gute. I hope we get something decent form the Jets. Hopefully at least a second round pick this year with a conditional 1st next year.Clearly the Jets are trying to fleece us.

0 points
1
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 16, 2023 at 10:52 am

Kraft at 259 Lbs ran a 4.49-4.54 40 at his Pro Day and elevated to 36-1/2 inches. Darnell @ 31"-0 Vertical. Same splits and broad jump as Darnell. 23 reps to Washington's 21. If Tillman is plucked in the higher numbers and these guys are still floating around, I would Select both in round two, just like Big Bad Bill taking Gronk and Hernandez for the two TE packages. Get Better.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 16, 2023 at 01:39 pm

Washington is 6’8, 265, to Kraft’s 6,5, 259. That’s going to make some difference.

Kraft is credited with a 4.69 40. He ran the same at his pro day the first time and then a run unofficially clocked at between 4.49-4.54. That range suggests one should take the accuracy with a pinch of salt. He’s possibly a low 4.6. Washington had a 3 cone of 7.03, Kraft’s was 7.08.

Effectively he runs the same speed to all intents and purposes as the bigger and slightly heavier Washington. He’s not as good an in line blocker as Washington by some way, at this point. Washington looks a much more natural catcher, but I’d back Kraft with ball in hand in space although Washington breaks tackles very effectively.

I’d be happy with either. Washington might be more helpful initially. Both will be red zone help and both have the potential to become broader offensive weapons. Of the two, I’d take Washington over Kraft, but the reality is that Kraft may be the better value in the real draft.

1 points
1
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:43 pm

If Washington is available in the second I would take him at 42 (or we could even package pick 78 in a trade up). I have Washington as my #1 TE in the draft. If he isn't, then let's take Kraft in the second. LaPorta would be my #3 TE.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 17, 2023 at 11:10 am

Then Draft a tackle. Washington doesn't have the bend or flex of Mayer, or Kraft, Kraft has the elevation and YAC. Kincaid is a big WR. Washington is a redundancy, a post-up guy ? Seems like he grows an Inch in every draftnik blog. Get a guy who can catch, run with the ball and block in space.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 17, 2023 at 09:22 am

I did too WD. And he was cheap too. He will catch 50 this year easy. What a change from a couple of years ago when we sign 2 edges, a LB, and a safety for crazy money. Now we can't afford to pay 2 or 3 million for anyone. Kicking the can down the road has real repercussions.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

April 16, 2023 at 11:25 am

To answer you simple and short: NO!

1 points
1
0
Bitternotsour's picture

April 16, 2023 at 12:26 pm

the desire to live in a past that no longer exists is strong among many in the fanbase.

the mantra again is "younger, faster, cheaper"

if the packers want an undersized tackle to play tight end, they can get one after the draft, and they can pay pennies on the dollar compared to lewis. this isn't hard. hell, they could probably get Bakhtiari 6 receptions and 60 yards if they need it.

younger
faster
cheaper

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

April 16, 2023 at 12:43 pm

If they want Lewis to mentor young TE, why not offer him Assistant TE coach job. More money, no cap issue. Same result!

2 points
2
0
PackyCheese500's picture

April 16, 2023 at 08:46 pm

My personal draft rankings for TE:

1. Darnell Washington
2. Tucker Kraft
3. Sam LaPorta
4. Michael Mayer
5. Luke Musgrave

The reason I have Mayer ranked at 4 is because I believe he has the second-highest floor of all the TEs (behind Washington) but also I think he has the lowest ceiling. If you are looking for a reliable but rather average TE, then Mayer should be #2. It depends on what you are looking for.

Not ranked: Dalton Kincaid (because he is NOT a true TE, but just a big WR)

0 points
1
1
golfpacker1's picture

April 17, 2023 at 09:29 am

I also think Kuntz is being overlooked. He was really highly rated when he committed to Penn State but never flashed while there. He sure did at OD and he is a great athlete as well. If he slipped to the 4th like they predict he will be a steal. Maybe for us. On a side note, while researching another player from Kraft's school, I read up on him and saw he didn't even have a rating out of high school. And he is a potential 1st round pick. WOW

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 17, 2023 at 11:18 am

Neither did Rodgers.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 19, 2023 at 03:15 pm

Reading through all of these comments, we seem to value what the TE can do with the ball in his hands more than what he does without it. Receptions, TDs, YAC, etc. That's what people are looking for. I'm just too Old School on this, I guess, because I think the TE is a blocker on most plays. He's a 6th offensive lineman who can stay in and block OR go into the pattern. There are always a few exceptional guys that become featured parts of the passing game, but for the most part, your TE isn't going to get targeted more than 5 times a game (that'd be 85 targets in a season. 9 TEs in the league got targeted more than 85 times last year. 4 of them got targeted over 100 times. Tonyan got targeted 67 times last year, or about 4 times/game.

We're going to replace a UDFA that we developed and was inexpensive with a high draft choice that makes more money? And that extra ONE target/game is going to improve our offense?

Here's my proposal: I would worry more about replacing the 177 targets that we lost with Lazard, Watkins, and Cobb, and use the higher picks to improve the WR unit, and then I'd come back and get Luke Schoonmaker later. He'll almost certainly be available on the start of Day 3, he has excellent RAS scores, he's possibly the best blocker in the class

IMO, the Packers should get a WR that can be a pitch-and-catch partner with Love, like Adams and Rodgers were. If you can't stop a team from making that completion, you can't get them off the field. We've already got Watson, who has to be watched carefully, because he can explode for 50 yards. So if you put another guy on the field with him that demands attention, it's putting a lot of stress on that defense.

Put me on board with us taking the best WR in the draft , JSN. We don't get a shot at that very often. He'd improve Love and create more opportunities for Watson. I think he makes the offense better than any other single player we could draft at #15.

1 points
1
0