Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Wait, We Get Our Free Agent Crush?

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

So, what shall we talk about today...

Was that or was that not the the most un-Packerish first day of free agency in their history? For our Green Bay Packers, who make it an annual habit of not being involved on the first day of free agency, to double down and actually go get a premium free agent player and the one we fans were all clamoring for? Our free agent crush?  This is not how the Green Bay Packers do business.

One way they do conduct business is being cold-blooded with veteran players and getting out from under their contracts a year before you want them too. But their track record is damn good with that approach.

 

 

Let's talk about Aaron Jones. As I tweeted on Monday, I could be a lot more rational about this move if Aaron Jones wasn't such a goddamn good human being. I've only ever bought one Packers jersey in my life, and it was as much for who the player was off the field as on - Bart Starr. Had Aaron Jones remained a Packer and retired a Packer, I think I might have purchased my second jersey. I'll miss you Aaron.

One of my favorite personalities on the Packers over the last few years was David Bakhtiari. He just has that blue collar "everyman" aura about him. The kind of guy you would love to throw a few beers down with at the local dive bar. He's always been very good to us here at CheeseheadTV and last night, he was kind enough to join our Patreon Happy Hour (only $5/mo.) and hang with our Patreon members for a bit. I'll miss you David.

I just saw that Jonathan Owens signed with Chicago. I'll miss you Simone.

Getting drafted by the Packers is like having a built-in golden parachute package - when your time with them ends, you'll have more money waiting for you in Chicago, Minnesota or Detroit.

Let's never forget that one hour where the Packers had a dynamic one-two punch of Aaron Jones and Josh Jacobs on the roster. 

If you're into PFF, you'll be thrilled to know Xavier McKinney was their top-rated coverage safety last year. The best part of the McKinney deal is that he's only 24 years old and just had a breakout season. He's an ascending player and unless he totally let's the money get to his head and decides to sit on the couch and eat bon bons, he is just approaching the prime years of his career. 

Who will be elected new Mayor of Door County now that AJ Dillon is gone? In my polluted mind, I have a sneaking suspicion the Packers didn't think he was committed enough to football. Too many outside interests like Kurt Benkert?

Ya think the "I'm not playing hurt anymore" tweet from De'Vondre Campbell sealed his one way ticket out of Green Bay? We'll always have 2021.

I ran a poll on twitter asking, " Are you more surprised Aaron Jones is gone or that the #Packers actually landed a Day 1 free agent all the fans were calling for?" Replies ran 60/40 McKinney/Jones, which seems about right.

I have to admit I was and wasn't surprised Jones ended up in Purple. It was a surprise because it happened so fast that it seemed like a move made out of spite. But certainly no surprise that a "left at the altar" Green Bay Packer ended up in Minny. 

Well, back to banging away at the Draft Guide. Our feature articles are all in the hands of the editors and I think you're going to love them.

Stay drafty my friends...

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

17 points
 

Comments (145)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Lphill's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:29 am

great guy Aaron Jones , great memories also unfortunately some big fumbles in big games, I think he chose the Vikings to stick it to the Packers but I wish him well, we got better at running back and safety.

7 points
10
3
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:57 am

He may have chosen the Vikings because they were the first team that made him an offer, and he knew he was not going to do any better. He's one of the great Packer players of our time, which is all the more reason to hope he fails in Minnesota. I don't want him to get hurt, but I hope he and the Vikings have an awful season.

10 points
10
0
murf7777's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:21 am

I won’t mind if Jones has a good season as long as the Vikings have a losing season and we kick their ass twice!

11 points
11
0
Cheezehead72's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:25 am

So Darnald will be their QB so it is very possible. I hope they change the SKOL chant to DARN Darnald.

2 points
2
0
Brewcity_BearsFan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:12 am

Darnold maybe on the roster, but I highly doubt he starts week 1. He is a solid back up.

Jimmy G is out there. I also strongly believe they will try and move up in the draft to get McCarthy.

3 points
3
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:37 am

Agreed. Everything points to them making a run at McCarthy. It will be one of the more interesting story lines of the draft.

3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:27 am

So, the Vikings will be starting a raw rookie this year? Just like the Bears?

You'd think they'd learn, but they don't.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:52 am

The Vikings got themselves in cap hell without ever really being good. They are worse off for dead cap than we are. Unfortunately for Jones, I think they’ve potentially mailed in this year already and will use it to work in a high QB pick for the future. Perhaps that is probably a rational approach long term except that it’s a course steered by those who dug the hole for no gain in the first place.

The Bears are baffling. They have cap galore, may have s brand new QB and yet have largely spent FA picking up second and third tier pieces. They signed a running back, Swift that seems less good than others then out there for more than seems the going rate. To say I’ve no idea what they are doing is an understatement.

Yes, they’ve got two high first round draft picks, but they only have 5 overall, no second rounder, a third and 2 4ths. If they spend one first on a QB, that’s one pick until #75 to give him new talent to help.

Of course they may go with Fields, since nobody else wants to, and trade down repeatedly. Given their FA activity, that might actually be the plan. If not, it looks like the perfect plan to ruin the next high pick QB.

Better to be a Packer …

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:35 am

From what I read Greg, the Cowboys had interest but didn't move fast enough. That would have been a way better team for Jones. Maybe he does have some get even in him. Either way I still really liked him as a Packer and a person.

2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:37 am

The Vikings overpaid. There were no competitors.

0 points
3
3
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:40 am

Interesting, I hadn't heard that, although it probably doesn't mean much. My translation of "didn't move fast enough" is "didn't make an offer." If that was the case, Jones would've risked having the Vikings sign someone else and retract their offer while he waited for the Cowboys.

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:50 pm

He took a 5 million dollars pay cut last year, and remained. Gute offered the same for next season. Aj told gutey, fuck all mate!! Do you blame him? He was a beloved player on the pitch and in the community. He could of left last year, but remained as a faithful packer. He should of left last year , better contract and money,no? Should of told fo,FUCK ALL !! Last Year.

0 points
1
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:17 am

I too think Jones picked Minny for a reason. He is a competitor just like Favre was and he will play GB twice a year....that is if he is healthy!

One thing I was appreciative about Jones was his unwavering support of Love. Campbell also provided early support for Jordan Love.

Gone but not forgotten!

4 points
4
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:03 pm

Can never forget #33. Especially after his blocking in pass pro! He flat out stonewalled some of the best in the business late last season, after returning from injury. That's playing with HEART.

3 points
3
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:20 am

First mention I have seen of the often criticized fumble history of Aaron Jones. He isn't dead so it's reasonable to approach his time in Green&Gold with an honest evaluation of his strengths and weaknesses. He was a great teammate and player, but he was most likely way over-valued by Packer faithful and his age and recent availability issues were not great guarantees that he could be relied upon in 2024. Also, look back at the game logs at the end of 2023. Yes AJ had his best run when he returned, but the Packers offense had already gotten straightened out when Jones was sidelined and his contributions were complimentary, not critical. Case in point the Dallas Game. Jones had 37 of his 118 yards while the Packers burst out to a 27-0 lead and effectively ended the Cowboys season. Were the 37 yards running critical for the 3 TD drives by the offense? Hard to objectively say they are critical. His contribution would have been missed, but a closer game means MLF doesn't put in the 5th string to close out the 4th quarter and give up 3 scores.

The other information that seems to be part of AJ's eulogy was his willingness to take a pay cut last year. He took a pay cut because the contract he had was way over what the market was paying and if the Packers released him then he would never have gotten close to similar money. AJ and his representation took what was going to get him the most money even if it was a cut from the Packers. This year he seems to have felt he wasn't getting a fair offer from the Packers, but a 1 year deal for about $2M more in guarantees ($1M more if he met the incentives) indicates the Packers pretty much nailed his true market value. Now he's with a team that may not be able to beat the Bears once next year. At least he won't have to worry about being available for a playoff game next year.

8 points
8
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:00 pm

I think he took the advice of his agent, and that's why he signed with the Viqueens.

It will be weird watching him play and rooting for the tackler ...

4 points
4
0
Cheezehead72's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:55 am

I like Aaron Jones and he is a good player and does a lot of things off the field that helps the community and is a good man but when it comes down to it the RB needs to be young and healthy which Jones is not or may not be anymore. The Vikings are banking that the Packers released him a year early and will get a good year out of him. I agree that Jones signed with the Packers West out of spite being as he received only about 1 mil more from the Vikings. Best wishes for Aaron but there are two games this coming season you do not do well.

Welcome to Green Bay Jacobs and McKinney. I look forward to seeing you play in Green and Gold. I was surprised we signed both of them.

Al I disagree with you. I am glad to see Simone go. She was another Taylor Swift when it came to football. How about we celebrate good family memebrs of players that are not already famous. I want to see the mothers and the fathers and the siblings of these players.

-9 points
5
14
JerseyAl's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:45 am

On Simone: It was a joke.

10 points
10
0
Cheezehead72's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:22 am

Glad to hear that. Nothing against her because she is good at her profession but let's see those less known people.

-1 points
2
3
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:09 pm

You have a great point here! Once in a while they broadcast an interview with a salt of the earth type parent etc, but not often enough. Those people are heroes that make the league possible, whereas celebrity wives and girlfriends? That's just a completely different thing.

-1 points
1
2
MainePackFan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:18 am

It's a shame that has to be explained.

3 points
5
2
x24's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:13 am

And Al nailed the jab.

Off the top of your head- what number did Jonathan Owens wear? I too will miss Simone

1 points
2
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:10 pm

Lemme guess - it's the same number of really important blown tackles?

-1 points
0
1
Cheezehead72's picture

March 14, 2024 at 06:00 am

Oh boy one of these touchy feely people. Oh poor Samone. Get real

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:45 pm

Al, were you channelling the sublime mini series "John Adams"?

Adams (Paul Giamatti) and Jefferson (Stephen Dillane), in Paris with Mrs Adams (Laura Linney) prior to Adams leaving Paris:

Adams: "I am certainly going to miss you, Thomas!"

Jefferson: "And I am certainly going to miss you too....Mrs. Adams!"

2 points
2
0
SpikeHyzer's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:38 am

And a good one!
For the dim bulbs who didn't get it: he was saying that Owens wasn't very good and was quite forgettable. Simone had far more memorable plays than Jonathan, even if they were on social media!

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:50 am

not even half the circus that followed Swift...not these ladies fault the networks choose to highlight them...

6 points
6
0
EnemyTerritory's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:05 pm

I don’t think jones went to the Vikings out of spite. He went where the money was better and he beat the rush to a RB needy club before some of the last dominoes fell. What has not been mentioned in evaluating his negligible higher contract in Minneapolis is that he will be the RB1 not a time share RBBC which will in his best estimate set him up for one more contract. Ty Chandler is not a RB1 for the Vikings. I wish him well and hope he has monster season in a losing cause for the Vikings.

1 points
1
0
Boneman's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:57 am

It's a testament to the Packers organization that so many players end up making emotional 'payback' FA decisions when pushed out the door of Green Bay. It's "part of the business of football" when players and their agents negotiate for the biggest contracts they can but it becomes personal when the downward trend inevitably happens. The Packers are among the best organizations at maintaining its standards and core philosophy, no matter the emotions that get involved. I'll root for A Jones to do well except against the Pack) and we will all welcome him back to GB in a few years when everything settles and he becomes a Packer HOF'er. He'll look good on the fast track in Minnesota but I very much doubt his body will survive the turf and the excess usage he will undoubtedly face.

17 points
17
0
BradHTX's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:05 am

So much this, Boneman. So much this. You nailed it.

3 points
3
0
Titisoussou's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:09 am

I really like what Gute is doing, the team is better than last week and he isn't forced to take the top dog safety in the draft (while I fully expect him to select one in the top 91 and double dip like 2019).

Losing 33 hurts, I hope he has a great year in MN because he deserves it, but I understand the move. GB get a cow bell RB, tackle breaker, great hands, 26 yo. Beside the classic "rather a year too soon than too late" take about performance, there's also the fan perception that suffers when it is too late. If GB trades Rodgers one year sooner, the bad perception about him is lessened. You just have to look discussions about 69 last year with people trashing him, when he is one of the best OT in team history and none of this injury problem was his fault.

The team is in a good position now, better than when the year ended, and the draft isn't even there with a plethora of picks ! Don't mourn yesterday, it was a good time and cherish tomorrow, GB is going on a hell of a run in the next few years ! Allow optimism in the offseason and enjoy the journey !

22 points
23
1
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:13 am

Clearly looks like the "rebuild" many were forecasting was a "reload" after all!

15 points
15
0
Untylu1968's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:30 am

And it all hinged on Loves success! This team is going to be young and hungry! When Gute nails this draft, look out!

7 points
7
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:03 pm

11 picks...cornucopia a plenty again!

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:15 pm

What do those 11 picks turn into? I'm almost willing to bet Gutey doesn't wind up making 11 picks. Does he trade back and winds up with more? Does he trade up and wind up with fewer? I guess it's even possible that he does both and collects 11, but not without wheeling and dealing.

1 points
1
0
SpikeHyzer's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:43 am

After adding something like 20 rookies in the last two exceptional drafts, and the FAs this year, I can't imagine that 11 can find a spot on this roster. Trading back makes absolutely no sense. There are probably another 15 players beyond those that are secure in their positions.
Trading up to assure getting blue chippers at our now smaller list of positional needs makes the most sense.
I'd rather get 8 contributors, than to get 6 contributors along with 5 bums.

I'd be trying to package up all the picks lower than 168 in order to improve the positions of all of the other picks.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:38 am

You are right about 69 and his injury not being his fault but he was asked to take a pay cut last year and he did not even though he was hurt all the previous year and then we saw what happened this last year.

He got paid well for not playing. I do not blame him because I would not want to take a pay cut either. I wish him the best on making his decision on if he is going to retire or continue playing.

6 points
6
0
packerbackerjim's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:14 am

Agreed this is a better Packer team than last week. What a refreshing change from previous years when waiting to shop the bargain bin in free agency was the MO. The draft changed to a BPA from one of need based approach.

3 points
3
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:40 am

We still have some big needs that need to be addressed in the draft before we go BPA. Maybe next year we can, but next years big need will be Clarks future replacement.

1 points
2
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:18 pm

Gutey still needs to add 3 O linemen, multiple safeties, ILB, CB, but RB is now a lower priority I think. Still need to draft at least one.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:09 am

I know Gutey learned from Ted who learned from The Wolfman.

Ted was mostly a wise owl, but at times...especially in pursuing outside talent...was a bit of a stuffed owl. He still got work done getting FAs like Sir Charles and Pickett. Ted liked to say "we want to sign our own Free Agents." Ted was however, very willing to part with a player a year early than a year late. IE: Sitton really shocked me.

Ron Wolf was more more assertive and urgent going after talent. Reggie, Shawn Jones, Santana Dotson, Bad Moon, Frank Winters, Gravedigger...and of course the Gunslinger. The Wolfman was quoted as saying to newly arriving players as saying: "Welcome to the Green Bay Packers. You will be here until I can find somebody to replace you" (or something similar). He left no doubt he was in charge.

After 6 six years and counting, Gutey has attributes of both men. He will part with popular players like Ted...from CMIII to Jones. However, I do see more Wolf than Owl in Gutey. He is an assertive hunter for talent that can make a quick impact.

Preston, Z, Amos, Turner, Douglas, Campbell, Reed, Jacobs and McKinney is a quite an accumulating list!

10 points
13
3
NickPerry's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:12 am

"One way they do conduct business is being cold-blooded with veteran players and getting out from under their contracts a year before you want them too. But their track record is damn good with that approach."

Personally I think Gutey is one hell of a GM. Since being named GM he's had to move on from some of the most beloved Packers players ever. Jordy Nelson and Aaron Jones have been two of my favorite Packers in the last say 20 years. He's had to make the HARD choice and move on from both. Getting rid of players THAT popular is tough. For two days now I've heard on various outlets how dirty Gutey did Aaron Jones.

IMO that's just WRONG. I'm glad the Packers have a GM who can make those choices, who doesn't keep a player longer than he should because he LIKES the player. There's NO room for that as an NFL GM. Gutey KNEW he was going to get hammered for moving on from Jones. But Gute had a plan and stuck to it. He made his offer and when the Jones camp said NO Gutey made his move...I'll miss Aaron Jones and look forward to the day he returns to retire a Green Bay Packer!

19 points
22
3
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:23 am

Gutey is only GM of Player Personnel.

After Acting GM MM retires after 2025, I expect Brian will finally be named GM of Football Operations. It is long past due.

In fact, MM should dissolve his "football committee" power sharing structure NOW and concentrate on recruiting his replacement. Let Gutey run the team, IMO. He's earned it.

7 points
13
6
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:32 am

OK......we made the playoffs with the youngest team ever. We have our QB of the future. Our salary cap allows us to get people in FA. Our HC has the highest lifetime winning percentage of any active coach. We have two extra picks on Day Two.

And we should change the structure that made all this possible.? I'm not so sure. It seems to be working pretty well.

The search for Murphy's successor is on. He doesn't need to recruit his replacement, and he certainly doesn't need to concentrate on that. He'll be gone, soon. Perhaps the new guy will have his own vision about how the management structure should be, or maybe he'll stick with something that is working well.

-5 points
1
6
dblbogey's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:22 am

Never understood the hate for Mark Murphy.

-3 points
1
4
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:24 pm

After all, he's not an idiot.

3 points
4
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:10 pm

Or he finally got light bulb in his head turned on and left football operation to be what Bob Harland did, but without any "official" changes in titles or job description.

I would say that we can thanks for that former Packers QB and his antics. Mark "WANI" Murphy thought he can control FPQB, and when he find out that he can't, he let go thing to others to made job.

I just want you to remember several "interesting" statements through the negotiating process with Jets about FPQB that just made Brian Gutekunst job much more complicated.

"Interestin opinion" - Hint: I borrowed from the British English a nicer term for stupidity!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:17 am

If, as is reported, Jones’ agent cut off discussions, the Packers were left either paying a contract both sides knew was unrealistic or running the risk of no proven starting running back. In that situation not putting a plan B in place would be indefensible.

It’s not like we could have traded Jones with his contract. He still took in essence a 45% pay cut and the speed suggests that he probably had one suitor.

I would have preferred to keep Jones on a reasonable deal and draft to replace—I have some doubts about Jacobs reverting to being a difference maker—but the contract is structured in a way that gives the team annual options and will be underpriced if he does. Not a bad plan B. Knowing LaFleur’s reluctance to play young backs till they are certain of their protection acumen, we had to have a bridge where other teams might not.

Now back to drafting to supplant as we would have had to do with Jones, but perhaps with more of a focus on a change of pace back who can get some snaps this year. We will have to address the IOL even more fundamentally Jones isn’t here to hide the woeful run blocking. That’s personnel in part, but their whole scheme needs a thorough review in my view. We should have been panning on that anyway, but now it’s even more obvious a need.

We got the consensus best safety available. I still gag at the size of contract, but he’s young enough that he’s something of an exception as a long term fixture to build around. Post safety in a Hafley style D is a premium position. It’s hard to fault the ambition.

Davis was a cheap, logical add for the 90. With the seeming certainty of kick off rule changes, Nixon was always going to get paid. I’m glad we aren’t going into another season with uncertainty over the returner. We still need to draft depth at the slot.

So for me, the FA leaves ILB as a greater priority perhaps, along with IOL and a SS. I could still see us adding a SS in FA, but the guard market is nuts and the ILB barrel now pretty empty. Overall though, we have helped ourselves thus far, but it’s going to be a very interesting draft.

5 points
6
1
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:39 am

To me, the fact that it fell apart between Jones and the Packers and then he quickly leaped to the Vikings makes me think there was other stuff going on. Jones may have some hard feelings, but he is the one who left. He could still be on the team if he wanted to, but he didn't.

Savag is $21M over 3 years, and the new guy is $64M over 4. That's a $43M difference, three times as much as staying with Savage. I hope he's three times the player. If he is, then the Packers should be much better on defense, right? Especially since Joe Barry is gone. We gave up 350 points last year, and Dallas was #5 with 315. SF gave up 298. We'll see what this year brings.

-3 points
1
4
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:01 pm

Thankfully, this year in Green Bay will not bring any Barry Ball onto the field.

Looking forward to what this mostly new D coaching staff will bring. Hafley got me very interested with his first presser explaining his defensive coaching philosophy. His assistants look to be just as interesting. Especially Campanile. Talk about a fire-breather.

5 points
5
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:34 pm

Moidalize da bums!

Yeah, I'm hoping our defensive players change drastically in this new system. The D as a whole being greater than the sum of its parts and playing ABOVE their talent level for a change ...

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:31 pm

Savage is 7 / year, McKinney 16. That's not 3x as much.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:34 pm

But $64M is three times as much as $21M

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:48 pm

technically it's 3.047, but there is a value correction based on years which then corrects the valuation to an annual of 16 v 7 which as we all know is only 2.285

that said, considering the overall cap structure and ROI's - well, I'm squarely in the I don't care one way or the other camp. Show me the team, and I'll cheer for them.

1 points
1
0
PeteK's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:04 pm

23 versus 12.5 guaranteed, that's what really counts. A leader with ability and durability could propel this D into another level.

0 points
0
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:48 am

" the speed suggests that he probably had one suitor."

It amazes me that people think Jones and his agent were just sitting around waiting for the Packers to offer more money. That's not how it works.

The Packers tell him to go get his best offer, and if they can match it they will. After the dust settled, Minnesota's offer was the benchmark. The Packers said pass. Jones took the offer from the Vikings.

There would be no need to wait. The legwork was already done. The number of suitors is unknown. and furthermore, it's irrelevant at the end of the day.

0 points
2
2
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:32 am

"It amazes me that people think Jones and his agent were just sitting around waiting for the Packers to offer more money. That's not how it works."

Jones was under contract. Yes that is how it works until the Packers tell him they are going to release him. Only then can his representation approach other teams.

There was about a 1 hour gap between when Jacobs signing was leaked/announced and the information that Jones would be released. I am sure there was plenty of discussion between the Packers and Rosenhaus during that time, but nothing worked out.

1 points
1
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:43 am

Not if the Packers agree to let him talk to other teams. It's quite common in situations like this. Lamar Jackson and Austin Eckler, just to name a couple examples.

1 points
1
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:06 pm

"It's quite common in situations like this. Lamar Jackson and Austin Eckler, just to name a couple examples."

Both Jackson and Eckler asked for trades because they were unhappy being franchised tagged (Jackson) or stalled extension negotiations (Eckler). Their teams gave them permission to shop a trade AFTER they requested a trade.

Teams renegotiate contracts with players all the time to get salary cap relief. Players can either agree or not (Bahk was notable in not reworking his deal last year) and the only negotiating leverage teams have is to give them extra money (not what was happening in AJ's case) or to release the player. I don't recall a player asking for a trade for any previous contract renegotiation.

0 points
0
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 14, 2024 at 05:38 am

CDH. We can agree to disagree on this topic.

0 points
0
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 14, 2024 at 11:27 am

no problem. Thanks for your reasonable responses!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:29 pm

CW,

Jacobs will go to waste unless Gutey prioritizes the IOL in this draft. He needs to draft 3, and the good ones are going early. He also needs someone in the Kyle Juscyk role.

MLF needs to use 1 RB; that requires a paradigm shift.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:24 pm

The O line is already better than what he has had in his career, and with at least a high draftee we'll be deeper.

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:22 am

and do you think it was Gutey who held on to Aaron Rodgers that extra year? I doubt it!

3 points
4
1
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:54 pm

No, that was MM's "Football Committee" where ML, Ball overruled Gutey and the Chairman agreed.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:23 pm

NP,

I won't be able to process this until I see Jacobs have a season that's at least good. A HUGE season would do much better, and I think Jacobs is very capable of that. He needs the team around him to be, too.

GPG!

2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:57 pm

Does good mean playing in more than 10 games? Cause if that's the standard I think you can take it to the bank - today.

Jacobs is going to be a great signing. Jones is going to play on carpet and turn to glass. As noted elsewhere, Jones born in the year of the Dog, and the Chinese Zodiac says 2024 is a bad year for those birth signs.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:20 am

Well, Since I have zero interest in pre-draft mocks and such, I don't get excited about Free Agency either. That was why yesterday morning was such an interesting experience for me when I turned on CHTV on my computer! Instantly, all of Monday's Packer moves were all on display. I didn't experience any of the drama of the previous day and kind of had a gestalt experience, taking it all in. For those who live and die by this time of year I'm glad you got to experience the day as it unfolded. For me it was better to get it all at once. I'm one of those fans who doesn't worry/hope about POSSIBLE trades/draft moves, etc. I love to go back AFTER the Packers have acquired/drafted a player to read about them. It's probably easier on my heart, lol.

12 points
12
0
PeteK's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:14 am

I thought Vulvans had no heart. LOL

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:09 pm

Vulvans? Can't wait to tell my wife that one.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:25 am

Gutey- Does Not Care about Sentimental Value.
Translation - Fits of anger and megalomania.

Aaron Jones- The packers “lost" more than a good human Being.
I wanted that old one two punch again. Jones will be missed.

Bahk- Losing so many good players sucks.

Owens- He played with heart. If Savage played better
He’d still be here.

X- I’m not into PFF. And I’m not into what this guy costs.
The draft could have brought us a S. And a healthier Cap.

Dillion - Never had the Punch we needed.

Campbell- From Soup to Nuts.

Surprised? - Wait till you see Gute's draft this year.
Driving a wedge between MLF and The Glory of Gute?

Since 2010- The revolving door keeps spinning.

-24 points
2
26
PeteK's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:21 am

You must be paying a fortune on your personal dominatrix. LOL

8 points
9
1
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:06 pm

Gutey wanted Jones gone.
The rumors for another RB never stopped.
Jonathan Taylor WI

-1 points
3
4
PeteK's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:06 pm

Stock, you are partially right, but I believe he thought he could have both. However, he made two correct decisions, Jacobs over Jones and Taylor.

1 points
1
0
dblbogey's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:24 am

Blah blah blah, everything sucks, blah blah blah.

3 points
6
3
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:01 pm

No- it just explains why Rodgers had Communication
problems with Gutey and wanted to be traded.

-5 points
2
7
croatpackfan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:27 pm

FPQB wanted to be recruiter on offensive side of the ball. As far as I understand, that was not in his contract. He might say some wishes about players, but acting like crying baby when Packers released his darling Kumerrow, who played only one or two seasons w/o any success shows who took himself the right to demand over what is said in the contract. If he wanted to be part of Personnel department, he should try to put that in contract, too. But, I know, it is easirier to criticize people if you have no responsibility and to glorify yourself when part of the proposal turns out to be good, but forgetting about all the other failures (like that m/f Bennett or Graham).

So, I believe, communication failure was much more in FPQB yard...

1 points
3
2
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:48 pm

In effective communication - listening is as important, if not more, - than talking. Unfortunately, the FPQB never embraced this maxim. Also, his recruitment record was inconsequential.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:53 pm

Add Campbell to the list.
I'm sure they all felt they were talking to Gute's hand.

1 points
2
1
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:01 pm

Rodgers was turning into an average QB before our eyes, but he was always a tool. Good riddance.

-1 points
1
2
4thand1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:28 am

Remember Joe Montana?Jerry Rice? Bahk like some other great o linemen had to go. Will miss AJ, but a younger running back is an upgrade. Especially JJ. Draft day just got a lot easier.

18 points
18
0
Razer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:31 am

I am not sure if it is the Packers who paint themselves in a corner with some of these players or it is the players and agents who are doing the painting. Aaron Jones was the difference for this team last year. When he came back he lifted the team and took us to the playoffs. Despite this and all the good Jones vibes there is no way the RB market and his age that the team is going to ante up the contract money. So you ask your star to take a cut to come down to market value. That isn't going to fly. It just doesn't show respect or appreciation. Drew Rosenhaus says we can get better money elsewhere and the Vikings see one year value or pay as you go. It is just business at this point.

Almost all these star Packer players leave the same way. They force the big contract and the team bails on the optional big money in the later years. I am sorry to see both Aaron Jones and David Bakhtiari go but, in the end, the numbers and injury became the overriding factor.

Still - going to the Vikings is a mortal sin. Bad form.

13 points
13
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:27 am

I remember Michael Irvin saying that Brett Favre would be making a big mistake by playing for the Vikings. Favre did it anyway, and I think most Packer fans forgave him for it. Not me, though.

I'm trying to withhold judgment on Jones, at least for now. Maybe that was the only offer he got.

4 points
6
2
murf7777's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:51 am

I loved watching Favre and is my favorite Packer I ever watched play the game. BUT, he is and was immature and makes bad life decisions.

6 points
6
0
Razer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:00 am

Yeah, I think that the breakdown between the Packers and Jones's agent forced the release. After that Aaron Jones was forced to look at offers (and the true market value of a 30 year old RB). You are probably on the right track with the Vikings being the only offer.

Unfortunately, the Packers would not have been given the luxury of a one year, pay as you go $7 million. This would have basically been the "pay cut" offer that was on the table with the Packers that Jones's agent nixed. No doubt the poker game of contract negotiation.

2 points
2
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:33 am

At first I was ticked off that Jones signed with the Vikings immediately, but then I realized it's what usually happens. When a player gets an offer, he almost always takes it, because the next offer is likely to be lower rather than higher. All of the teams have researched these guys ahead of time and know what they would be worth to them. Bidding wars, if they happen at all, are usually very short. It sounds like the Packers and Eagles were in a bidding war for Xavier McKinney for maybe a couple hours on Monday, and he was one of the most sought-after free agents on the market.

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:13 pm

Why would I forgive a guy who went out of his way to throw shit at something I've loved my entire life?

2 points
2
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 14, 2024 at 09:15 am

Because in life nothing is black & white. If we are driven just by logic in cold and calculated way, there might be the reason you feel now as you stated.

I understand AJ bitterness and his view of disrespect. I can accept he acted in "heat" of his feelings. I do not understand why you can not accept that AJ is still the same guy, same personality he was showing us during his tenure with Packers.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 03:58 pm

I am surprised that Jones went to the Vikings. Thinking he listened more to the slickster, Drew Rosenhaus, than his heart.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:33 am

I'll miss Mr. Jones like I missed Jammal Williams when they kept Jones instead of him. What a tough business, which none of the players would trade for my job and pay.

Someone above thought it was only for 1 mil that he left the Packers for the Viqueens. ONLY 1 MILION! I'm only working on my third million in my career, and that's because I gave up on the first two.

I didn't hear that Dillan actually went somewhere else. Where did he end up? Is he going to end up on Rodgers' staff?

7 points
8
1
Guam's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:51 am

Don't think Dillon has signed with anyone yet.

3 points
3
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:49 am

Cowboys are interested because the RB group is thin.

2 points
2
0
Guam's picture

March 13, 2024 at 07:49 am

With Bakh and Jones leaving, I think Preston Smith may be the only guy 30 or older when the season starts and that makes this is a very young team! This "rebuild" went far faster than I believed possible. Kudos to Gute for a quick turnaround.

11 points
12
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:04 pm

Perhaps Gutekunst's greatest feat was that he was able to rebuild, retool, renew etc. the team - in a matter of months - when it would have normally taken a few years.

2 points
2
0
LeotisHarris's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:29 am

"I just saw that Jonathan Owens signed with Chicago. I'll miss you Simone."

Perfect rhythm to this, Al. I laughed out loud.

12 points
12
0
JerseyAl's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:49 am

Hey, someone got the joke!

9 points
9
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:18 pm

Took awhile, but I got it!

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:30 am

The other part that hurts for Jones is after the season Gutey basically said they are keeping Jones. To go from that to all of a sudden he is being released, that was a bit of a gut punch. But him being such a good dude is what also kills. He was 100% a true Packer. He bled green and gold. I was hoping he would be able to retire a Packer. Then to add salt to the wound is that he signed with the Vikings. I don't want to hate Jones. I really don't.

The other moves are not surprising. I thought they would be in the market for a S. Clearly they listened to what Hafley wanted and got him a key member.

The players they let go is not surprising. Most were expected.

I think bringing back Nixon was a good move.

I don't think they are done bringing in FA's. I think they will be bringing in a few more players.

9 points
9
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:42 pm

Maybe they spent everything they had signing their own free agents?

0 points
0
0
NJMagic's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:50 am

With more info today, very clear Packers offered far less than Vikings. Packers offered 4MM with incentives, Vikings 6MM with 1MM likely incentive.

Drew R likely had that offer in hand when AJ said no to GB.

Can't fault a 30yo oft-injured RB taking an extra 3MM on what may be his last contract if he gets injured again.

But the Vikings.... Sigh. Going to hurt to root against the Sombrero.

8 points
9
1
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:13 am

From everything I read this week so far, the talks broke down with Aaron Jones last Friday. The legal tampering did not begin until Monday, so I seriously doubt they had the Vikings offer in hand during their last negotiation with the Packers.

3 points
3
0
mrtundra's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:24 am

I think the difference in money amounted to only $1 million between the vikings and Packers. Jones went with the money. At this point in his career, why wouldn't he?

3 points
3
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:49 am

$1M in total, but $2M in the guaranteed part. The Packers had more incentives in their proposal.

0 points
0
0
Dragon5's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:11 am

"Dragon5
February 29, 2024 at 11:40 pm
Gute should use a fine tooth comb when contemplating keeping DOGS in DRAGON year...
WILSON, ERIC
FORD, RUDY
JONES, AARON"

Props to Gute for doing his job!

Tyreek Hill, Jared Goff, Chris Jones, Derrick Henry, Calvin Ridley, Amari Cooper, Aaron Jones...all DOGS in a DRAGON year--their enemy year!  The odds of Aaron contributing to snuff (when healthy) are quite low this year.  From a business and forward looking perspective, Monday's move is welcomed.  Like Jones, Jacobs is grounded, having grown up often homeless living in/out of a car with his four siblings...some of you might recall Donald Driver's upbringing...it's hard not to appreciate overcoming adversity--non just on a professional level, but on a challenging, if not traumatizing, personal level; it's next man up to carry the G.  Even if Emmanuel Wilson showed promise last preseason, with BOTH Jones & Dillon gone, perhaps we can ramp up speculation for RAS stars Jaylen Wright & Isaac Guerendo, preferably from rd 4 on.

With McKinney signed, one of DeJean, Nubin, Bishop for the rook safety act please.  My draft M.O. is trade down, with 4  2nd round picks the optimal objective.

For all the annual WR hype at the top of the class, I don't think Xavier Legette gets enough.  6'1", 221, 4.39 40 and built like a brick shithouse.  If you watch his highlight tape he had to often wait / come back to underthrown balls...when hit in stride he's a Mack truck with a Lambo engine. Gamecocks have a history of producing these specimens: Sterling Sharpe, Deebo Samuel. Alshon Jeffrey, Sydney Rice.   FA acquisition Xavier McKinney is not enough...I got a fever and the only prescription is more Xavier please.  

OT NOTE:  Brewers ace reliever Devin Williams, also a DOG in his enemy year (DRAGON) is having issues with his spine this spring.  Arnold was a fool not to trade him (like Burnes--also in his enemy year) this offseason.

2 points
5
3
Bitternotsour's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:51 am

If front offices aren't using the Chinese Zodiac to help with their personnel decisions they are dropping the ball, big time. I'm so glad that you are highlighting the difficulties these year of the Dog players will face in 2024. The odds are so stacked against them.

Those in the know will be aware that we should be concentrating all of our free agent and draft decisions for 2024 on Rat, Monkey, Rooster. Sensible embrace of centuries old observations are just good business.

6 points
6
0
PeteK's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:31 am

Don't forget the squirrels, they're all over the place.

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:51 pm

Zodiac has no business being discussed with business - chinese or otherwise.

Phases of the moon have far more influence over human behavior, and NFL contracts aren't based on that.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 13, 2024 at 06:16 pm

There may be an opportunity for you to bring that consulting to the attention of the league. Opportunity abounds.

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:18 am

Had McKinney been 30 years old I would have been surprised. But Gutekunst knows this is a young ascending team and McKinney fits that , he went and got him.
The Jacobs move to me was a Godsend. Filled Jones and Dillons role with one star player, who could explode in GB.
Upgrade the LB position and have a good draft. They should be really good this year.

3 points
3
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:48 am

I like the idea that Jacobs could fill both the Jones and Dillon roles. I think that's closer to the truth than saying he is one or the other. He could be both the versatile RB and the power RB. Of course he can't get all the carries, though, so they will need to find another good RB. Maybe Jacobs gives them the option of using either type of RB as the #2 guy, instead of specifically wanting a power RB to complement Jones.

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:16 pm

That's how I see it too. JJ is not as quick as Jones, but his balance, like Jones' is sublime. He adds tremendous power in place of Jones' quickness to stay on his feet. He gets tremendous yards after contact. He is also adept as a receiver out of the backfield.

Jacobs won't get all the carries but he has demonstrated he can carry the load Jones that never did.

I believe the draft should be a pursuit of a back who can take over the feature role in a few years or when needed...not necessarily a smaller change of pace runner.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:57 pm

I'm really surprised at the Jacobs signing; I had resigned myself to the idea that the league sees drafting a rookie RB as the obvious choice, so draft and develop the long term replacement for #33, obviously.

Now? It seems to me that the pressure to draft a great RB is off, so Gutey can go there whenever it's BPA, freeing him up to fill needs elsewhere. We'll see ...

2 points
2
0
SinceLombardi's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:20 am

It’s a sad commentary on today’s athletes when a good person like Aaron Jones is the exception rather than the rule. How sad.

2 points
5
3
Bitternotsour's picture

March 13, 2024 at 09:56 am

You only know this about Aaron Jones because he is a star. Jamal Williams was a great guy, so too AJ Dillon. Bakhtiari by all appearances a great guy. So was Bulaga. I think by and large Green Bay drafts and develops good people, and that they're not the exception, but rather the rule. Your world view is pretty jaundiced.

1 points
3
2
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:16 am

What makes you think that most NFL players are so awful? I get the impression that on average they are decent guys. Lots of ego to be sure, but that's true of most high achievers.

4 points
4
0
ricky's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:01 am

Gutekunst is not afraid to make unpopular decisions, and the release of Aaron Jones is a prime example. A terrific player, the team was always at its best when he was on the field. Add in that he is an exemplary human being, and you have the definition of "Packers people". And now he's in Minnesota, which was almost to be expected. There is so much inter-team exchange of players through signing FA's that it seems as if all the NFC North is more a group of "kissing cousins" who try to grind each other into dust twice a season. Now, if Favre comes out of retirement to be the QB for the Vikings...

2 points
2
0
golfpacker1's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:02 am

Al, I got a couple questions:

What did we save by cutting Jones and how much is still owed?

Why didn't GB attempt to trade Jones? Even a 6th or 7th round pick would have been better than nothing. A comp pick is also gone.

Do you think a RB will be drafted by GBs #91? Irving, Lloyd, Davis, Guerendo should all still be there. Any you like better?

FA LB still a need but most are gone. How do you feel about second chance for Devin White? He is still young and talented. And how about Bobby Wagner for 2 years? Both would be cheap.

Lastly, all I know about dead cap is it is not good. Patrick Mahomes 2024 dead cap hit is $113.6 million. His 2025 dead cap hit is $78 million. How do they manage that and stay under the cap?

1 points
1
0
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:21 am

Not Al but I can help a bit.

Jones - dead money was around $12.3MM. Expected cap hits were $17MM and change this year and then another dead money hit next year due to void years. They basically cleared 8 million from the cap by releasing him and used about 5 million of it this year for Jacobs (1/4 of signing bonus + yr 1 salary). If Jacobs only plays this year It ends up being $3 million cheaper than letting Jones run out his contract. If he plays two years, it works out to be about 3.5 million more in total than one year of Aaron Jones.

We don't know that the Packers didn't attempt to trade Jones. It's also possible he had a no trade clause on his contract. The Packers still would have had to eat the dead money on his deal traded, and likely would have had to pay part of his salary to facilitate the trade as any team acquiring him probably wouldn't want to pay $12 million for a 30-year-old running back who is starting to develop nagging injuries, especially when that running backs agent was talking to the media about how contract negotiations broke down and he would probably be hitting the open market since he didn't want to take another pay cut.

I haven't looked at scouting profiles of any of the running backs out there but I think it's likely they will take at least one between rounds four and six and probably bring in a couple UDFAs.

Devin White profiles extremely similar to Quay Walker, including the negative traits. If they go for a linebacker and free agency I think they're going to want somebody more consistent, even if that means they are not a spectacular athlete. Wagner seems to go against what the team is trying to do in getting younger and building for the future but I don't hate it for the right price.

Dead cap is the money that would hit the team salary cap that year if the player was released. In a nutshell, you look at the future year contracts and all the amortized amounts, add in future guaranteed salary, and then add that to the current years amortizations and guaranteed salary to get your dead cap number. If a player's dead cap number is higher than their cap hit number, it basically means they're guaranteed a roster spot that year unless the team has the cap space to absorb the difference between the projected cap hit and the dead cap number. This is pretty rare with quarterbacks, but the falcons did decide to do that with Matt Ryan and eat a pretty significant cap charge in order to get their books clean for future years. In your example, if mahomes suddenly decided he was going to retire this year or KC traded him, KC would eat all future bonus amortization. If they released him, they'd be eating that + all future guaranteed salary, which would be catastrophic and would trigger a series of releases and restructures in order to get the team back under the cap. If a team can't get under the cap the NFL can penalize the team by forfeiting future draft picks and will start voiding contracts starting at the largest until the team is in compliance.

4 points
4
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:04 am

Great title this week. Talk about a whirlwind day. Strange, still on a cloud over the McKinney signing yet depressed about losing a great Packer in Jones. I'm with Al on the jersey. Was thinking about finally picking up one . My first was Bart. Although as a kid I had to have a Nitschke, when the time came and I was able to go to Lambeau , it was Bart all the way. Since then I bought a Hornung , also a must and I guess for what he was on and off the field!
Last but not least I have a 1929 Throwback, the Lewellen one. It's great but I should have just bought the Jordy one, sigh.

GPG

3 points
3
0
BruceC1960's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:18 am

Kenny Clark….don’t answer your phone.

4 points
4
0
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:11 pm

I think he's safe at least until after the draft. Green Bay would only save about 3 million cutting him, so I don't see that personally happening unless they know they have a day one starter that could absorb most of those snaps. If they don't find a future DL starter they really like in the draft, I don't think a two-year extension is out of the picture unless he is looking for Chris Jones money - Even if he is worth it, I don't see a way of Green Bay could make that happen while also accounting for all of the void year dead money already on his deal.

OTC shows GB with about $32MM in cap space right now. I don't believe that includes the McKinney or Jacobs contracts or the Nixon/Davis/Ballentine resignings, but they'll also get another $8MM or so from Campbell's release on June 1.

3 points
3
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:17 pm

Agree - Clark's safe - for at least this year. He's still playing to the level of his contract and remains the team's best interior D-lineman (as usual). However I would not to be too surprised if a Kris Jenkins or a Braden Fiske was selected by Gutekunst - as this is Clark's last contract year in which he is approaching 30.

1 points
2
1
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:27 am

I would have no problem with a big guy at number one or number two.

1 points
1
0
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:25 am

Damn, this was an emotional week.

Campbell and Bahk were inevitable due to age/injury and their large price tags.

If Jones had a clean contract, I could have seen a scenario where Green Bay would have been fine with him playing out his last year on that higher price tag, especially since his cap hit with the pay cut we may wanted him to take would have been effectively the same as the Jacobs cap hit if he only plays one year. He was a victim to all of the back loading and restructuring that had to be done to facilitate the Rogers extension and subsequent restructure to make him tradable.

I'm really curious to see what happens with Kenny Clark. His pay this year is probably close to market rate for player of his stature, but his cap hit is horrendous and he has another big dead money sandwich GB needs to eat next year if they can't work out an extension. If the Packers have a stud DT that can play week one fall into their lap in the draft, I could see a world where the Packers decide to take their medicine and make a surprise cut so they are finally out from under that deal and can go into 2025 with as little dead money as possible so they have more room to start extending out their 2026 free agent class.

3 points
3
0
PackfanNY's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:29 am

We can agree/disagree with Gute’s approach. However, I always think we leave one position thin. I get we will address during the Draft ( we don’t play until September) but right now LB is paper thin. Kind of hoping we get a reasonably priced veteran at LB so we don’t need to reach at the Draft. Oh, well I trust Gute better than myself.

1 points
2
1
TKWorldWide's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:06 am

Agreed. But it’s awfully rare to be “totally loaded” at every position. And even if we THINK we are, things happen.

2 points
2
0
BruceC1960's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:50 am

Wonder how close we were on Josey Jewel?

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:06 pm

"Missed it by that much, Chief"

0 points
0
0
BruceC1960's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:28 pm

Just as I thought.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

March 13, 2024 at 10:42 am

I'm a bit amazed at the Jones-Jacobs hubbub. I'm firmly in the camp that sentimentality gets you beaten.

Lets say the Packers met Jones' $7 million demand(they offered 6 million), he would be back likely one year. Jacobs would have signed elsewhere. Dillon leaves, then Jones gets hurt again and you have Wilson and Taylor in the backfield. Super Bowl here we come!

One other factor is the lack of high-powered running backs coming into the draft this year. The best ones are second rounders.

There reaches a point where you have to fish or cut bait and the Packers correctly identified that Jones, as great a guy as he is, wasn't the long-term answer. Jacobs could get hurt admittedly , but he will be back. His yardage totals for the Raiders were impressive(last year down a bit) and he provides all the good things Jones does and he's years younger. Jones signing with the Vikings is a kick in the arse. We've had before but the Vikings now can hope he stays healthy.

In Packers history the team made a sentimental choice to hire Bart Starr as its coach in the 70's. It was a popular choice. The hot rumor was Don Shula wanted to come to Green Bay. Starr's teams were mostly mediocre to poor. While he didn't have a lot of help in the personnel department, as great of a quarterback as he was, it didn't translate to coaching.

I have the same view of Christian Watson as Jones. Potentially one of the best receivers in the league but has spent too much time on the sidelines.

9 points
9
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:04 am

Yes, definite lack of surefire first round stud running backs this year, but every year there are impact guys who get drafted later. Legend has it GB once found a super diamond in the rough in round five. 😉

3 points
3
0
GregC's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:41 am

There is one big difference between Aaron Jones and Christian Watson: their age. Also, Watson is still on his rookie contract. Let's see if he can stay healthy this year.

6 points
6
0
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 13, 2024 at 12:16 pm

Right on that. There is effectively nothing to lose by letting Watson play out his rookie deal. If he plays lights out this year and stays healthy, Green Bay would likely have some suitors for a trade if they didn't want to pay premium veteran wide receiver money on an extension.

I think Doubs will get an extension before the end of this season, but I don't see Green Bay engaging in any meaningful conversations with Watson's agent until they see if he can both stay productive and stay available.

5 points
5
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:16 pm

HH,

wasn't Patrick Taylor cut already?

Jacobs is risky only if GB doesn't have a dominant O line all the way across this season; they also need someone good in the Kyle Juscyk role. As true as it is that Dillon would benefit from that, he is NOT the ball carrier Jacobs is, he's a BEAST! He also has a history of playing through injury.

Hopefully this proves to be a good move.

1 points
1
0
Matt Gonzales's picture

March 14, 2024 at 10:25 am

Taylor was an ERFA and was not tendered, so I believe he is just a regular free agent now.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:01 am

1. You don’t sign a 29 year old running back to a multi-year, big money contract. It’s bad business.
2. GB offered 6, MN signed him for 7. Does that make GB’s offer seem reasonable?
3. Nothing wrong with mixed feelings. Great player, greater person, business decision.
4. I was too young to witness firsthand the glory of the 1960’s Packers. More than once, though, I’ve heard their downfall came from hanging onto too many players too long, and too many of them declined all at once. I seriously doubt that’ll happen in the modern era.

13 points
13
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:35 am

I guess I differ from many of you in that while I can appreciate a player and their contributions to the GBP's over the years without a lot of emotion I am more concerned whether the Packers improved with the moves being made. My focus tends to be almost solely on Gutey with his methods and maneuvering to improve the team. Occasionally there is that one player whom the Packers should have kept who left and it might sting a bit but in these rare cases, I know it was the player's decision and not the Packers. This week's moves were handled perfectly by Gutey and the Packers are a better team for it. Not just for 2024 but for the next 3-4 years.

8 points
8
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:53 am

Quote of Al: "Let's talk about Aaron Jones. As I tweeted on Monday, I could be a lot more rational about this move if Aaron Jones wasn't such a goddamn good human being. I've only ever bought one Packers jersey in my life, and it was as much for who the player was off the field as on - Bart Starr."

Al, it's as if you took the words right out of my mind. I was so fortunate to meet Bart (with my dad) when I was a kid and he was so kind and treated me as if I was someone important. Right there he had a fan for life. I bought his jersey and to this day I wear his jersey at home when the Packers play and at the games at Lambeau and away games that I attend without fail.

5 points
5
0
Packerpasty's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:55 am

good work so far Gute's, now go get a LB, a f/a or draft, and another running back later in the draft,,,good draft for RB's.

2 points
3
1
Starrbrite's picture

March 13, 2024 at 01:25 pm

Right Al—you have to be Branch Ricky in these situations. We ALL love and will miss Jones, but Gutey made a critical decision to set the clock forward—I applaud him for his resolve.

4 points
4
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 13, 2024 at 02:35 pm

Well, 2 really great players and really great personalities was let go this off season. I like both. For different reasons.

It is understandible that David was in better position to overcome bitterness towards Packers, because of his fight to even play another snap. And he really posted very balanced and loving farewell post on twiter (sorry - X). He knew what is coming and he has time to digest it and understand it.

Aaron Jones is in different situation. And I'm sure that he will, by time, comes to same position as David is in. It is really question of age, and need. He will understand quickly, just let him some time.

I hope that his season in purple will not affect his Packers HOF introduction. As I hope that David will be introduced in both Packers and NFL HOF - both deserved that. High quality persons.

2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 04:39 pm

I know that is not the habit for the Packers to be annually involved in Day 1 free agency. However, it seems to becoming a habit, on or about, every Leap Year (with the previous Day 1 free agency splurge being the 2019/20 season). So circling 2028 for the Packers next free agent shopping spree.

4 points
4
0
Swisch's picture

March 13, 2024 at 08:49 pm

I really like the long-time approach of the Packers of draft-and-develop, but I like them adapting to the free agent market, as well.
They're not exclusive to each other.
To go for a couple of free agents in any given year, if they are the right players at the right price, does not, and should not, negate draft-and-develop.
Draft-and-develop is the meat-and-potatoes of putting together a top roster in the NFL; free agent signings are the gravy to fill positions that continue to be of need in order to put the team over the top for a run at a Super Bowl title.
It's not a matter of signing free agents just to sign free agents, but rather signing them if they're the likes of McKinney and Jacobs.
***
I really like keeping our Packers players as long as possible.
I want to get to know them a little, to like them, to root for them as people as well as players.
Also, it's good for team continuity and team morale, which is good for team success.
The difficult thing is that as they age and are less able, they want more money than the guys on rookie contracts.
The rule of thumb to me is to sign guys to second contracts in their mid-20s but not third contracts at about age 30.
We have to look out for entire roster getting paid, and for the team having enough talent to be not just good, but great.
As for Aaron Jones, one of my favorite Packers of all time, he did get a second contract with the Packers, maybe even a third.
He had a good long run with the Packers, so to speak, and it was probably time to move on for the price he wanted.
It's been a great stretch for him, for the team, and for us as fans. Win-win-win.

3 points
3
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 13, 2024 at 11:09 pm

The average playing career of an NFL running back is 2.57 years - which is the lowest all position groups. In comparison - the league average for all players is 3.3 years.

Aaron Jones will be entering his 8th NFL season - with career earnings of over 40M. So it's truly "been a great stretch for him." However, it's goodbye for now - with the wish that he will return for his induction into the GBP Hall of Fame.

2 points
2
0
BoHunter's picture

March 15, 2024 at 10:48 am

Great article Al
Please refrain from using the Lord’s name in vain as it doesn’t embellish your article and offends many people along with being wrong.

Go Pack Go !

☮️ Bo Hunter

0 points
0
0