2018 Offseason Brings Added Anticipation

Green Bay Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst enters his first offseason with the team and will be pulling the trigger on many of the important decisions that have fallen at the hands of his predecessor, Ted Thompson, for the past decade plus.

At the NFL Scouting Combine, Gutekunst said that he hopes that the Packers can be in many conversations as far as free agency goes.  Obviously, there are financial limitations and we have yet to see how quarterback Aaron Rodgers' new contract extension will look like over the next few seasons.

Last season, the Packers added five veteran free agents under Thompson's direction.  Will Gutekunst look to make bigger moves or even one really big move versus a few smaller?  We will see.  And that's part of the anticipation of this offseason.

Right now at the Combine, teams are looking at players, putting up smoke screens and trying to hold their cards close to the vest.  The draft becomes one of the biggest poker games in all of professional sports.  We see it manifest itself in the form of teams trading around because of panic or players drafted well before they should be.

It's hard to put a lot of stock into what we hear in the media right now, but with so many new faces running the Packers, there is still a lot of intrigue in Green Bay.

There have been reports that the Packers may jump into the mix for newly-released defensive lineman Muhammad Wilkerson, who was drafted to the New York Jets when Packers new Defensive Coordinator Mike Pettine was Jets Defensive Coordinator.  

There have also been numerous mock drafts that have the Packers both trading up and back in this year's first round.  They haven't picked this high since 2009 so they'll have an opportunity at many more highly-rated players than they have in recent years.

Around this time is when fans typically start developing their own wish lists for free agency and the draft.  What does yours look like?  Do you have more anticipation than usual this year with a new general leading the charge?

-------------------

Jason is a freelance writer on staff since 2012 and also co-hosts Cheesehead TV Live, Pulse of the Pack and Pack A Day podcasts.  You can follow him on Twitter here

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (52)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Royalty Free GM's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:26 am

We should keep all three; CM3, Cobb, Nelson.
Give ARod 35M deal.
Get one 5M FA. Whoa!

That’s it. What a change!

0 points
0
0
GB Jacker's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:34 am

I'd like to see what Wilkerson can do with Pettine again, but no more than a 2 year deal with an easy get out after year 1. If he's not too pricey he's the perfect kind of free agent gamble IMO. Biggest need on this team is defensive depth, so free agent vets are must.

I'd love to see GB go get Kap, he's a talented player and his political activism should be seen as admirable, not questionable. Could solve the back up QB issue.

Draft best defensive player available at 14 - or trade down a little as a ton of talent is likely to fall. (love to get the bills 2 1st rounders and get two studs)

Turn those 12 picks into 8-9 better value selections.

0 points
0
0
GB Jacker's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:42 am

I hope the dislikes are for Wilkerson and me, not the Kap mention

0 points
0
0
Fire_Gute's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:50 am

Mine was for kap. He sucks. Get over it. Michael Bennett lied about police and didn't lose a snap. Neither has Malcolm Jenkins, lynch, or any other player associated with the protests.

And the 1st round trade back suggestion. Time to draft the best play maker available at any position. There's plenty of needs. Enough with the value stuff. Need people who can make plays. Stay put or more up

0 points
0
0
GB Jacker's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:56 am

Is there that much difference between 14th and 20th/21st player?

Not sure what anything else you said makes too much sense but that's not a bad thing

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 05, 2018 at 12:25 pm

I agree: if you've got 3-4 players that you rate about equally at #14 and someone comes calling to move back to #18 or so? Why the heck not? If it means an extra 3rd (as the JJ value chart would indicate), that's not chump change.

0 points
0
0
HankScorpio's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:06 pm

I'm sort of hoping a run of QB leaves the Packers with one of the last of the top tier at 14, instead of their pick of the 2nd tier of players.

But if that doesn't work out, I'm all for adding a day 2 pick to drop a little bit in round 1.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:38 am

This is going to be a really interesting Draft and FA period. Assuming the Broncos and Jets don't sign Kurt Cousins there would probably be 4 QB's taken before the Packers pick at #14. IF that holds true like many expect and you throw in Barkley, a O-Linemen or two and maybe a WR all being drafted BEFORE the Packers pick at 14 they suddenly have a chance at a Top 5 Defensive player.

The Packers could almost guarantee themselves a chance at a players like Josh Jackson, Davenport, Roquan Smith, Trumaine Edmunds, Vita Vea, or Denzel Ward for example just to name a few. The Packers could take the best player available and probably have a 99% chance on hitting a pretty big need. Hell after last season I'm not opposed to taking one of the O-Linemen projected to go in the top 10 if they slipped. Rodgers NEEDS to stay upright and healthy for the Packers to have any success.

These next 7 days are when we'll see what the Packers plans are for Nelson and Cobb. If they plain on extending either of them or asking them to take a pay cut this is when it will happen. I'd also say if the Packers are really going to be players in FA, then those 2 contracts have to be redone IMO.

0 points
0
0
GB Jacker's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:39 am

What do you class being 'players in FA'? I think they will pursue a number of lower priced deals but can't see us being a 'player' on day 1

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 05, 2018 at 12:27 pm

It's all about what you define as "being aggressive". It could mean signing lots of guys....or a few high-priced guys...or kicking the tires on just about every viable player who fits the team mold. Just because you pursue doesn't mean you sign, but phone calls are cheap.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 05, 2018 at 12:32 pm

"Can you hear me now?"
I hope Gute has that unlimited calling plan.

0 points
0
0
Royalty Free GM's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:55 am

http://www.nfl.com/combine/participants
-> GRADE

Best player available, if we a lucky, will be Ridley. Grade 6.8.

Cut both Cobb and Nelson... then we have need for WR (Ridley)

Use that extra FA money to get two TOP class players; CB and Pass rusher.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

March 05, 2018 at 07:33 am

Rather have Sutton than Ridley. Edmunds is now a top 10 player. Smith probably goes before 14. Would the Pack take Lamar at #14?

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

March 05, 2018 at 07:36 am

I see a scenario where Sequon falls. He’s a better athlete than player.

0 points
0
0
Cubbygold's picture

March 05, 2018 at 02:47 pm

Only game I watched of his was OSU vs. PSU. 44 yards on 21 carries, and that included a 36 yard TD run. Obviously you can't just look at that game, but it should be rare that a 'game changing player' can be shut down like that. I think it happened to him multiple times last year

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 05, 2018 at 09:03 am

Edmunds is a top 10 player to draftniks at this point. Nobody knows what any credible GM thinks of him and won't find out until the draft.

I wouldn't take Lamar Jackson at #14, keeping in mind that I like him a lot and think he would be a really good understudy for #12. I think there are too many good players who will make it to #14 and that they'll push Jackson down the Packers board. I say this, but the primary issue teams had with him was whether or not he's an NFL QB...an interesting take here that show some scouts were very impressed with him and his interview.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2762461-lamar-jackson-doing-himself-f...

0 points
0
0
Hawg Hanner's picture

March 05, 2018 at 08:59 am

Its pretty clear we can't keep Cobb and Nelson under their current contracts after paying Adams and then go after anybody. Have to renegotiate both and don't forget they have to make the team. Can't see how Nelson can still be effective, he played like @$#& last season. Was he injured?

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

March 05, 2018 at 02:40 pm

Hawg Hanner, you were a disaster as a defensive coordinator.

0 points
0
0
Cubbygold's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:13 am

This plan would put alot of pressure on that rookie WR. If he doesn't turn into an instant starter, that plan can backfire quickly.

I like the creative thinking, but tend to fall on the side of restructuring cobb/jordy rather than cutting them

0 points
0
0
Royalty Free GM's picture

March 06, 2018 at 11:57 am

Ridley would be ready. He will be Marvin Harrison for ud and if we can him at #14 (or little sooner)... take him!

And actually I would cut Cobb, but keep Jordy (lots of TDs last year before ARod got hurt) if he restructures his deal.

But that would also mean less FA money to use on CB and Pass rush.

0 points
0
0
OnWisconsinGoPack's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:26 am

I need for Ridley where? Not in the 1st, no way he's worth that.

0 points
0
0
Royalty Free GM's picture

March 06, 2018 at 11:50 am

If you could draft Marvin Harrison at 14th, would you do that?

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

March 05, 2018 at 07:49 am

What No QB for the Packers? I think if Allen drops they'll take him. Nice names, but I believe they could trade down. Especially if they sign Wilkerson. I think you better include Landry.

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:01 am

Josh Allen??? He won’t drop... we’ll have to trade WAY UP for that QB pick and I’d love to see that happen!!! Just livin’ in my own dream world here...

0 points
0
0
EdsLaces's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:08 am

I would literally kill a man if we could draft Smith. He is the next Shazier pre injury....book it.

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:03 am

I watched Smith play every chance I could. This kid is the real deal as football players go. If he's there at 14 we gotta take him.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

March 06, 2018 at 02:49 pm

You’re thinking the same way I am Nick.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:49 am

The exciting part right now is that we have no idea what will happen this offseason. There is no track record to go off of with Gutekunst as a GM.

Under Thompson we pretty much knew what to expect. He avoided Free Agency like it was the plague most years even though he really did have success with it.

Also during the draft he became pretty predictable. He liked his Pac 12 players. He loved drafting OL in the 4th-5th rounds.

Right now we have no clue what Gutekunst will do. That is why this offseason is exciting. We might actually be players in free agency again. And as far as the draft goes, we have no clue what to expect making the draft more exciting then it already is.

0 points
0
0
Royalty Free GM's picture

March 05, 2018 at 06:57 am

You’re right. This is exciting. This used to be hibernating time for us (Packer fans) :D

0 points
0
0
Roadrunner23's picture

March 05, 2018 at 07:26 am

Being this is his first at bat, I believe Gute will play it safe on his first pick and take the best DB available, should be a strong pick as there is a lot of DB talent around #14
(he doesn't want to blow his first pick ever)

Then I'm sure he will settle in and use a bit of that draft capital to move up in the second or third rounds and take Best Players available after that.

After all, he learned under Thompson.

I also think they will keep Cobb, Nelson and Mathews with a bit of re-structuring.

Rodgers of course will get a ship-load of $$$

I expect one impact free-agent that can be a Defensive difference maker.

And a few minor cap casualty free-agents also a Ted Thompson strategy that has for the most part been a good model for the Packers and their compensatory choices.

Over-all not crazy exciting, however I believe the Packers will have a ship-load of cap room in the 2019 off-season and that is when Thompson most likely will depart for good and Gute can get his GM on.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 05, 2018 at 09:15 am

"I also think they will keep Cobb, Nelson and Mathews with a bit of re-structuring."

Usually when those talks are underway, it leaks out and the media knows it. As far as I know, the only things that have been said are that CMIII will NOT take a pay cut and that Nelson is amenable to restructuring his deal. But, as of yet, no other information as to whether talks with any of those players are active.

Leads me to think that the Packers will go into FA and make decisions on those guys one at a time...that they'll play the market and if they ink a capable WR, they'll then put pressure on Cobb or Nelson to restructure (or be cut). If they up and cut Cobb now, it puts stress on the roster and undercuts the Packers ability to negotiate as agents will know the Packers need players. I wouldn't be surprised if the changes to rostered player contracts are spread out over the spring.

0 points
0
0
Savage57's picture

March 05, 2018 at 07:38 am

The FA season tell what the Packers are going to do with Cobb, Nelson and Matthews. If the Packers make their usual week two forays, we'll know the $36M these guys are in line to make next season is a lock.

More important is coming out of this draft with something more than dribble singles followed up with double play outs.

The amount of early round draft capital the Packers have pissed away on the defensive side of the ball over the last several seasons has to be overcome, or this team is going to continue the steady bleeding we saw last season without The Great Band Aid covering the wound.

0 points
0
0
Fire_Gute's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:37 am

It's crazy to think the last 1st round offensive pick was Derrick Sherrod. Or that 5 of our last 8 1st and 2nd round picks have been for db's yet its still our second or 3rd biggest need probably. I really do not want GB to go secondary high once again, maybe some veteran leadership would be good. As of right now, that would have to come from Haha (no thanks). But at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter where the go. I just want to see someone picked who played the same position in college as they are projected to play in the NFL, and someone with speed.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

March 05, 2018 at 07:49 am

I think there will be three to four players signed during the FA period. Two on offense and two on defense. I think a back-up QB will be inked and I would pick RGII. The second offensive guy selected is a TE and my speculation is ASJ from the Jets. On the defense, Wilkerson and/or Trent Murphy , TJ Carrie would be logical.

Now I have no idea if any of this would happen. TE needs experienced bodies and a back-up QB that can throw a TD at home is a must as well. I could see another pass catcher like John Brown as long as he can play ST. A CB and either pass rusher/DE that can add disruption to the opponenet's passing game may be considered. Since you can't get too many starters from the draft that are reliable TEs or pass rushers, you may need some starters from FA.

As they say....we will see how Gutsey plays it.

0 points
0
0
JDK52's picture

March 05, 2018 at 09:58 am

Who's RGII?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:54 am

RGIII's old man?

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

March 05, 2018 at 08:28 am

The guys in charge are all Ted-trained. I’m not expecting any big change in the way they do business.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 05, 2018 at 09:07 am

Including all those Ted-trained guys around the league?...Schneider, McKenzie, Dorsey...?

Until he proves otherwise, I'll give Gutekunst the benefit of the doubt for having his own mind and his own plan. I also won't damn him if year 1 looks conservative if only because he's lashed to a tight cap (for now) with limited options to adjust it without potentially knee-capping his best asset (ARod). No GM operates in a vacuum...what every other team does in some way dictates what other teams can do. It all has to be viewed in whole and we won't have any real notion of how Gutekunst is doing this off-season for a while.

0 points
0
0
Fire_Gute's picture

March 05, 2018 at 01:47 pm

None of those other Ted trained guys have Ted over their shoulder or in the background at all. I still think that's a bad situation to put the new GM in. Whenever I read an article about fa or the draft and it mentions what kind of shape Ted left this team in, the first thing I think is that Ted didn't leave this team in any kind of shape because Ted didn't leave this team. I really don't think it's fair for gutekunst to be in this weird power structure situation and have Ted still lurking in the background

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

March 05, 2018 at 08:34 am

We know what the team needs. CB, Pass Rusher, TE, Speed WR, OL and DL depth, another starting caliber ILB and a backup QB who can play.

For me the question is will Gute make the moves required to fill these holes in 2018 or will he let some of them go on for years like TT did with TE, ILB and many other positions.

Our best chance for an SB is a healthy Aaron Rodgers and a complete team around him for once. How Gute handles filling the many holes in our roster will tell us if the new regime has a sense of urgency about winning and if we will see real change in how the roster is built going forward. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

March 05, 2018 at 08:48 am

I don't agree we are in full rebuild, o line is solid, need a RT, RB solid, WR are aging but productive, need one piece at WR in draft or FA, need to revamp TE with a pick and FA, defensive front is young and one of the strongest position groups, need an outside rusher, and another corner. The cubard is not bare. A player or 2 in FA a solid draft, year 2 jump from Biegel, Adams King, Jones, Jones, and Williams. Oh yeah and the QB isn't too bad either.

0 points
0
0
4thand10's picture

March 05, 2018 at 12:20 pm

That third round Richard Rodgers is still a head scratcher.

0 points
0
0
JDK52's picture

March 05, 2018 at 09:12 am

This is one of those years where sticking with true BPA is likely to give us great prospects at positions of need. As others have said, if there's a run on QB's at the top of Rd 1, which seems likely, then we could be looking at some serious Defensive talent available. Gotta think Gute will have 2-3 guys he loves at #14 that could come in and be immediate contributors.

Also, I'd love to see Lamar Jackson and Shaquem Griffin in Green Bay. Two great stories and players that have the chance to be something special given the right opportunity.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:41 am

Josh Jackson looks terrible in drills.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:15 am

No Long speed.

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

March 05, 2018 at 02:44 pm

I watched several Iowa games, Josh Jackson seems way overrated to me.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

March 05, 2018 at 10:57 am

Ridley, Sutton, Lamar, Landry, Payne, Vea, James, Davenport, Roquan...some of these might be available at 14.

0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:06 am

Vea pulled a hammy trying to run fast.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:13 am

I'd still draft him. DL premium. Line depth for years. Landry may be the next Mathews. Davenport is a DE. Take to long. And Jackson just dropped. Ward is the only other option that high.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

March 05, 2018 at 11:45 am

Still think Pack should stockpile 2021 1st rounders (if that’s allowed) by trading down this year.

0 points
0
0
John Kirk's picture

March 05, 2018 at 08:47 pm

I'm on Sutton as the best WR available. Would be ecstatic to get him...Quenton Nelson if he falls.

The defensive players in this draft are as meh as I've ever seen up high. Maybe, the AJ Hawk draft was lighter on top end talent. It's a shame.

Rumors of Vander Esch worry me. I can actually see this. FO thinking they've got an Urlacher clone.

Brian seems to like the measurables more than Ted. I just wonder if he'll pull the trigger on a 1st rounder with them, or will he go safe like Ted almost always did? Concerned we'll see the same old Packers when it comes to the draft. We really need to be different and fresh there. Is Brian really that different? Can't wait for us to be on the clock and see what is there. If we all can pretty much pick what we're going to do, then I fear we're the same as we ever were. I'm hoping this pick is a shock, not in the sense it's a reach, but it's just not typical.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

March 06, 2018 at 09:23 am

Quentin Nelson would be worth moving up for. I think he goes in the top ten. I would love to have that kind of mean on the OL. Think what practice would look like with Nelson and Daniels going head to head on a regular basis.

0 points
0
0